Dynamic load balancing on heterogeneous clusters for parallel ant colony optimization

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York Ant colony optimisation (ACO) is a nature-inspired, population-based metaheuristic that has been used to solve a wide variety of computationally hard problems. In order to take full advantage of the inherently stochastic and distributed nature of the method, we describe a parallelization strategy that leverages these features on heterogeneous and large-scale, massively-parallel hardware systems. Our approach balances workload effectively, by dynamically assigning jobs to heterogeneous resources which then run ACO implementations using different search strategies. Our experimental results confirm that we can obtain significant improvements in terms of both solution quality and energy expenditure, thus opening up new possibilities for the development of metaheuristic-based solutions to “real world” problems on high-performance, energy-efficient contemporary heterogeneous computing platforms

Re-engineering the ant colony optimization for CMP architectures

[EN] The ant colony optimization (ACO) is inspired by the behavior of real ants, and as a bioinspired method, its underlying computation is massively parallel by definition. This paper shows re-engineering strategies to migrate the ACO algorithm applied to the Traveling Salesman Problem to modern Intel-based multi- and many-core architectures in a step-by-step methodology. The paper provides detailed guidelines on how to optimize the algorithm for the intra-node (thread and vector) parallelization, showing the performance scalability along with the number of cores on different Intel architectures, reporting up to 5.5x speedup factor between the Intel Xeon Phi Knights Landing and Intel Xeon v2. Moreover, parallel efficiency is provided for all targeted architectures, finding that core load imbalance, memory bandwidth limitations, and NUMA effects on data placement are some of the key factors limiting performance. Finally, a distributed implementation is also presented, reaching up to 2.96x speedup factor when running the code on 3 nodes over the single-node counterpart version. In the latter case, the parallel efficiency is affected by the synchronization frequency, which also affects the quality of the solution found by the distributed implementation.This work was partially supported by the Fundación Séneca, Agencia de Ciencia y Tecnología de la Región de Murcia under Project 20813/PI/18, and by Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities as well as European Commission FEDER funds under Grants TIN2015-66972-C5-3-R, RTI2018-098156-B-C53, TIN2016-78799-P (AEI/FEDER, UE), and RTC-2017-6389-5. We acknowledge the excellent work done by Victor Montesinos while he was doing a research internship supported by the University of Murcia.Cecilia-Canales, JM.; García Carrasco, JM. (2020). Re-engineering the ant colony optimization for CMP architectures. The Journal of Supercomputing (Online). 76(6):4581-4602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-019-02869-8S45814602766Yang XS (2010) Nature-inspired metaheuristic algorithms. Luniver Press, LebanonAkila M, Anusha P, Sindhu M, Selvan Krishnasamy T (2017) Examination of PSO, GA-PSO and ACO algorithms for the design optimization of printed antennas. In: IEEE Applied Electromagnetics Conference (AEMC)Dorigo M, Stützle T (2004) Ant colony optimization. A bradford book. The MIT Press, CambridgeCecilia JM, García JM, Nisbet A, Amos M, Ujaldón M (2013) Enhancing data parallelism for ant colony optimization on GPUs. J Parallel Distrib Comput 73(1):42–51Dawson L, Stewart I (2013) Improving ant colony optimization performance on the GPU using CUDA. In: IEEE Conference on Evolutionary Computation, pp 1901–1908Llanes A, Cecilia JM, Sánchez A, García JM, Amos M, Ujaldón M (2016) Dynamic load balancing on heterogeneous clusters for parallel ant colony optimization. Cluster Comput 19(1):1–11Cecilia JM, Llanes A, Abellán JL, Gómez-Luna J, Chang L, Hwu WW (2018) High-throughput ant colony optimization on graphics processing units. J Parallel Distrib Comput 113:261–274Lloyd H, Amos M (2016) A Highly Parallelized and Vectorized Implementation of Max–Min Ant System on Intel Xeon Phi. In: IEEE computational intelligenceTirado F, Barrientos RJ, González P, Mora M (2017) Efficient exploitation of the Xeon Phi architecture for the ant colony optimization (ACO) metaheuristic. J Supercomput 73(11):5053–5070Montesinos V, García JM (2018) Vectorization strategies for ant colony optimization on intel architectures. Parallel Computing is Everywhere. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 400–409Lawler E, Lenstra J, Kan A, Shmoys D (1987) The Traveling salesman problem. Wiley, New YorkMontesinos V (June 2018) Performance analysis of ant colony optimization on intel architectures. Master’s Thesis, University of Murcia (Spain)Lloyd H, Amos M (2017) Analysis of independent roulette selection in parallel ant colony optimization. In: Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, ACM, pp 19–26Dorigo M (1992) Optimization, learning and natural algorithms. Ph.D. Thesis, Politecnico di Milano, ItalyDuran A, Klemm M (2012) The intel many integrated core architecture. In: Internal Conference on High Performance Computing and Simulation (HPCS), pp 365–366The OpenMP API specification for parallel programming. URL: https://www.openmp.org . [Last accessed 14 June 2018]The Message Passing Interface (MPI) standard. URL: http://www.mcs.anl.gov/research/projects/mpi/ . [Last accessed 15 June 2018]Vladimirov A, Asai R (2016) Clustering modes in Knights landing processors: developer’s guide. Colfax international. URL: https://colfaxresearch.com/knl-numa/ . [Last accessed: 16 June 2018]Intel Developer Zone. URL: https://software.intel.com/en-us/modern-code . [Last accessed 02 Oct 2018]Pearce M (2018) What is code modernization? Intel developer zone. URL: http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/what-is-code-modernization . [Last accessed 15 Feb 2018]Stützle T ACOTSP v1.03. Last accessed 15 Feb 2018. URL: http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~mdorigo/ACO/downloads/ACOTSP-1.03.tgzReinelt G (1991) TSPLIB—a traveling salesman problem library. ORSA J Comput 3:376–384Crainic TG, Toulouse M (2003) Parallel strategies for meta-heuristics. State-of-the-art handbook in metaheuristics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 475–513Delévacq A, Delisle P, Gravel M, Krajecki M (2013) Parallel ant colony optimization on graphics processing units. J Parallel Distrib Comput 73(1):52–61Skinderowicz R (2016) The GPU-based parallel ant colony system. J Parallel Distrib Comput 98:48–60Zhou Y, He F, Hou N, Qiu Y (2018) Parallel ant colony optimization on multi-core SIMD CPUs. Future Gener Comput Syst 79:473–487Peake J, Amos M, Yiapanis P, Lloyd H (2018) Vectorized candidate set selection for parallel ant colony optimization. In: Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, ACM, pp 1300–1306Stützle T (1998) Parallelization strategies for ant colony optimization. In: Eiben AE, Bäck T, Schoenauer M, Schwefel HP (eds) Parallel problem solving from nature—PPSN V. PPSN. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1498. Springer, Berlin, HeidelbergAbdelkafi O, Lepagnot J, Idoumghar L (2014) Multi-level parallelization for hybrid ACO. In: Siarry P, Idoumghar L, Lepagnot J (eds) Swarm Intelligence Based Optimization. ICSIBO 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8472. Springer, ChamMichel R, Middendorf M (1998) An island model based ant system with lookahead for the shortest super sequence problem. In: Eiben AE, Bäck T, Schoenauer M, Schwefel HP (eds) Parallel problem solving from nature— PPSN V. PPSN. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1498. Springer, Berlin, HeidelbergChen L, Sun H, Wang S (2008) Parallel implementation of ant colony optimization on MPP. In: International Conference on Machine Learning and CyberneticsLin Y, Cai H, Xiao J, Zhang J (2007) Pseudo parallel ant colony optimization for continuous functions. In: International Conference on Natural Computatio

A Three-Level Parallelisation Scheme and Application to the Nelder-Mead Algorithm

We consider a three-level parallelisation scheme. The second and third levels define a classical two-level parallelisation scheme and some load balancing algorithm is used to distribute tasks among processes. It is well-known that for many applications the efficiency of parallel algorithms of the second and third level starts to drop down after some critical parallelisation degree is reached. This weakness of the two-level template is addressed by introduction of one additional parallelisation level. As an alternative to the basic solver some new or modified algorithms are considered on this level. The idea of the proposed methodology is to increase the parallelisation degree by using less efficient algorithms in comparison with the basic solver. As an example we investigate two modified Nelder-Mead methods. For the selected application, a few partial differential equations are solved numerically on the second level, and on the third level the parallel Wang's algorithm is used to solve systems of linear equations with tridiagonal matrices. A greedy workload balancing heuristic is proposed, which is oriented to the case of a large number of available processors. The complexity estimates of the computational tasks are model-based, i.e. they use empirical computational data

Parallel Asynchronous Particle Swarm Optimization For Job Scheduling In Grid Environment

Grid computing is a new, large and powerful self managing virtual computer out of large collection of connected heterogeneous systems sharing various combination of resources and it is the combination of computer resources from multiple administrative domains applied to achieve a goal, it is used to solve scientific, technical or business problem that requires a great number of processing cycles and needs large amounts of data. One primary issue associated with the efficient utilization of heterogeneous resources in a grid environment is task scheduling. Task Scheduling is an important issue of current implementation of grid computing. The demand for scheduling is to achieve high performance computing. If large number of tasks is computed on the geographically distributed resources, a reasonable scheduling algorithm must be adopted in order to get the minimum completion time. Typically, it is difficult to find an optimal resource allocation for specific job that minimizes the schedule length of jobs. So the scheduling problem is defined as NP-complete problem and it is not trivial. Heuristic algorithms are used to solve the task scheduling problem in the grid environment and may provide high performance or high throughput computing or both. In this paper, a parallel asynchronous particle swarm optimization algorithm is proposed for job scheduling. The proposed scheduler allocates the best suitable resources to each task with minimal makespan and execution time. The experimental results are compared which shows that the algorithm produces better results when compared with the existing ant colony algorithm

Classification and Performance Study of Task Scheduling Algorithms in Cloud Computing Environment

Cloud computing is becoming very common in recent years and is growing rapidly due to its attractive benefits and features such as resource pooling, accessibility, availability, scalability, reliability, cost saving, security, flexibility, on-demand services, pay-per-use services, use from anywhere, quality of service, resilience, etc. With this rapid growth of cloud computing, there may exist too many users that require services or need to execute their tasks simultaneously by resources provided by service providers. To get these services with the best performance, and minimum cost, response time, makespan, effective use of resources, etc. an intelligent and efficient task scheduling technique is required and considered as one of the main and essential issues in the cloud computing environment. It is necessary for allocating tasks to the proper cloud resources and optimizing the overall system performance. To this end, researchers put huge efforts to develop several classes of scheduling algorithms to be suitable for the various computing environments and to satisfy the needs of the various types of individuals and organizations. This research article provides a classification of proposed scheduling strategies and developed algorithms in cloud computing environment along with the evaluation of their performance. A comparison of the performance of these algorithms with existing ones is also given. Additionally, the future research work in the reviewed articles (if available) is also pointed out. This research work includes a review of 88 task scheduling algorithms in cloud computing environment distributed over the seven scheduling classes suggested in this study. Each article deals with a novel scheduling technique and the performance improvement it introduces compared with previously existing task scheduling algorithms. Keywords: Cloud computing, Task scheduling, Load balancing, Makespan, Energy-aware, Turnaround time, Response time, Cost of task, QoS, Multi-objective. DOI: 10.7176/IKM/12-5-03 Publication date:September 30th 2022

Adaptive Dispatching of Tasks in the Cloud

The increasingly wide application of Cloud Computing enables the consolidation of tens of thousands of applications in shared infrastructures. Thus, meeting the quality of service requirements of so many diverse applications in such shared resource environments has become a real challenge, especially since the characteristics and workload of applications differ widely and may change over time. This paper presents an experimental system that can exploit a variety of online quality of service aware adaptive task allocation schemes, and three such schemes are designed and compared. These are a measurement driven algorithm that uses reinforcement learning, secondly a "sensible" allocation algorithm that assigns jobs to sub-systems that are observed to provide a lower response time, and then an algorithm that splits the job arrival stream into sub-streams at rates computed from the hosts' processing capabilities. All of these schemes are compared via measurements among themselves and with a simple round-robin scheduler, on two experimental test-beds with homogeneous and heterogeneous hosts having different processing capacities.Comment: 10 pages, 9 figure

Load Balancing in Heterogeneous Cloud Environments by Using PROMETHEE Method

Abstract: Efficient Scheduling of tasks in a cloud environment improves resources utilization thereby meeting users' requirements. One of the most important objectives of a scheduling algorithm in cloud environment is a balanced load distribution over various resources for enhancing the overall performance of the cloud. Such a scheduling is complex in nature due to the dynamicity of resources and incoming application specifications. In this paper, we employ PROMETHEE decision making model to design a scheduling algorithm, called PROMETHEE Load Balancing (PLB).This paper formulates the load balancing issue as a multi-criteria decision making problem and aims to achieve well-balanced load across virtual machines for maximizing the overall throughput of the cloud. Extensive simulation results in CloudSim environment show that the proposed algorithm outperforms existing algorithms in terms of load balancing index (LBI), VM load variation, makespan, average execution time and waiting time