18,411 research outputs found

    Improving the benefits of multicast prioritization algorithms

    Full text link
    The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11227-014-1087-zPrioritized atomic multicast consists in delivering messages in total order while ensuring that the priorities of the messages are considered; i.e., messages with higher priorities are delivered first. That service can be used in multiple applications. An example is the usage of prioritization algorithms for reducing the transaction abort rates in applications that use a replicated database system. To this end, transaction messages get priorities according to their probability of violating the existing integrity constraints. This paper evaluates how that abort reduction may be improved varying the message sending rate and the bounds set on the length of the priority reordering queue being used by those multicast algorithms.This work has been partially supported by EU FEDER and Spanish MICINN under research Grants TIN2009-14460-C03-01 and TIN2010-17193.Miedes De Elías, EP.; Muñoz Escoí, FD. (2014). Improving the benefits of multicast prioritization algorithms. Journal of Supercomputing. 68(3):1280-1301. doi:10.1007/s11227-014-1087-zS12801301683Amir Y, Danilov C, Stanton JR (2000) A low latency, loss tolerant architecture and protocol for wide area group communication. In: International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN), IEEE-CS, Washington, DC, USA, pp 327–336Chockler G, Keidar I, Vitenberg R (2001) Group communication specifications: a comprehensive study. ACM Comput Surv 33(4):427–469CiA (2001) About CAN in Automation (CiA). http://www.can-cia.org/index.php?id=aboutciaDéfago X, Schiper A, Urbán P (2004) Total order broadcast and multicast algorithms: taxonomy and survey. ACM Comput Surv 36(4):372–421Dolev D, Dwork C, Stockmeyer L (1987) On the minimal synchronism needed for distributed consensus. J ACM 34(1):77–97International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (1993) Road vehicles—interchange of digital information—controller area network (CAN) for high-speed communication. Revised by ISO 11898-1:2003JBoss (2011) The Netty project 3.2 user guide. http://docs.jboss.org/netty/3.2/guide/html/Kaashoek MF, Tanenbaum AS (1996) An evaluation of the Amoeba group communication system. In: International conference on distributed computing system (ICDCS), IEEE-CS, Washington, DC, USA, pp 436–448Miedes E, Muñoz-Escoí FD (2008) Managing priorities in atomic multicast protocols. In: International conference on availability, reliability and security (ARES), Barcelona, Spain, pp 514–519Miedes E, Muñoz-Escoí FD (2010) Dynamic switching of total-order broadcast protocols. In: International conference on parallel and distributed processing techniques and applications (PDPTA), CSREA Press, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, pp 457–463Miedes E, Muñoz-Escoí FD, Decker H (2008) Reducing transaction abort rates with prioritized atomic multicast protocols. In: International European conference on parallel and distributed computing (Euro-Par), Springer, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain, Lecture notes in computer science, vol 5168, pp 394–403Mocito J, Rodrigues L (2006) Run-time switching between total order algorithms. In: International European conference on parallel and distributed computing (Euro-Par), Springer, Dresden, Germany, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4128, pp 582–591Moser LE, Melliar-Smith PM, Agarwal DA, Budhia R, Lingley-Papadopoulos C (1996) Totem: a fault-tolerant multicast group communication system. Commun ACM 39(4):54–63Nakamura A, Takizawa M (1992) Priority-based total and semi-total ordering broadcast protocols. In: International conference on distributed computing systems (ICDCS), Yokohama, Japan, pp 178–185Nakamura A, Takizawa M (1993) Starvation-prevented priority based total ordering broadcast protocol on high-speed single channel network. In: 2nd International symposium on high performance distributed computing (HPDC), pp 281–288Rodrigues L, Veríssimo P, Casimiro A (1995) Priority-based totally ordered multicast. In: Workshop on algorithms and architectures for real-time control (AARTC), Ostend, BelgiumRütti O, Wojciechowski P, Schiper A (2006) Structural and algorithmic issues of dynamic protocol update. In: 20th International parallel and distributed processing symposium (IPDPS), IEEE-CS Press, Rhodes Island, GreeceTindell K, Clark J (1994) Holistic schedulability analysis for distributed hard real-time systems. Microprocess Microprogr 40(2–3):117–134Tully A, Shrivastava SK (1990) Preventing state divergence in replicated distributed programs. In: International symposium on reliable distributed systems (SRDS), Huntsville, Alabama, USA, pp 104–113Wiesmann M, Schiper A (2005) Comparison of database replication techniques based on total order broadcast. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 17(4):551–56

    Low Cost Quality of Service Multicast Routing in High Speed Networks

    Get PDF
    Many of the services envisaged for high speed networks, such as B-ISDN/ATM, will support real-time applications with large numbers of users. Examples of these types of application range from those used by closed groups, such as private video meetings or conferences, where all participants must be known to the sender, to applications used by open groups, such as video lectures, where partcipants need not be known by the sender. These types of application will require high volumes of network resources in addition to the real-time delay constraints on data delivery. For these reasons, several multicast routing heuristics have been proposed to support both interactive and distribution multimedia services, in high speed networks. The objective of such heuristics is to minimise the multicast tree cost while maintaining a real-time bound on delay. Previous evaluation work has compared the relative average performance of some of these heuristics and concludes that they are generally efficient, although some perform better for small multicast groups and others perform better for larger groups. Firstly, we present a detailed analysis and evaluation of some of these heuristics which illustrates that in some situations their average performance is reversed; a heuristic that in general produces efficient solutions for small multicasts may sometimes produce a more efficient solution for a particular large multicast, in a specific network. Also, in a limited number of cases using Dijkstra's algorithm produces the best result. We conclude that the efficiency of a heuristic solution depends on the topology of both the network and the multicast, and that it is difficult to predict. Because of this unpredictability we propose the integration of two heuristics with Dijkstra's shortest path tree algorithm to produce a hybrid that consistently generates efficient multicast solutions for all possible multicast groups in any network. These heuristics are based on Dijkstra's algorithm which maintains acceptable time complexity for the hybrid, and they rarely produce inefficient solutions for the same network/multicast. The resulting performance attained is generally good and in the rare worst cases is that of the shortest path tree. The performance of our hybrid is supported by our evaluation results. Secondly, we examine the stability of multicast trees where multicast group membership is dynamic. We conclude that, in general, the more efficient the solution of a heuristic is, the less stable the multicast tree will be as multicast group membership changes. For this reason, while the hybrid solution we propose might be suitable for use with closed user group multicasts, which are likely to be stable, we need a different approach for open user group multicasting, where group membership may be highly volatile. We propose an extension to an existing heuristic that ensures multicast tree stability where multicast group membership is dynamic. Although this extension decreases the efficiency of the heuristics solutions, its performance is significantly better than that of the worst case, a shortest path tree. Finally, we consider how we might apply the hybrid and the extended heuristic in current and future multicast routing protocols for the Internet and for ATM Networks.

    PluralisMAC: a generic multi-MAC framework for heterogeneous, multiservice wireless networks, applied to smart containers

    Get PDF
    Developing energy-efficient MAC protocols for lightweight wireless systems has been a challenging task for decades because of the specific requirements of various applications and the varying environments in which wireless systems are deployed. Many MAC protocols for wireless networks have been proposed, often custom-made for a specific application. It is clear that one MAC does not fit all the requirements. So, how should a MAC layer deal with an application that has several modes (each with different requirements) or with the deployment of another application during the lifetime of the system? Especially in a mobile wireless system, like Smart Monitoring of Containers, we cannot know in advance the application state (empty container versus stuffed container). Dynamic switching between different energy-efficient MAC strategies is needed. Our architecture, called PluralisMAC, contains a generic multi-MAC framework and a generic neighbour monitoring and filtering framework. To validate the real-world feasibility of our architecture, we have implemented it in TinyOS and have done experiments on the TMote Sky nodes in the w-iLab.t testbed. Experimental results show that dynamic switching between MAC strategies is possible with minimal receive chain overhead, while meeting the various application requirements (reliability and low-energy consumption)

    Measurement-Adaptive Cellular Random Access Protocols

    Get PDF
    This work considers a single-cell random access channel (RACH) in cellular wireless networks. Communications over RACH take place when users try to connect to a base station during a handover or when establishing a new connection. Within the framework of Self-Organizing Networks (SONs), the system should self- adapt to dynamically changing environments (channel fading, mobility, etc.) without human intervention. For the performance improvement of the RACH procedure, we aim here at maximizing throughput or alternatively minimizing the user dropping rate. In the context of SON, we propose protocols which exploit information from measurements and user reports in order to estimate current values of the system unknowns and broadcast global action-related values to all users. The protocols suggest an optimal pair of user actions (transmission power and back-off probability) found by minimizing the drift of a certain function. Numerical results illustrate considerable benefits of the dropping rate, at a very low or even zero cost in power expenditure and delay, as well as the fast adaptability of the protocols to environment changes. Although the proposed protocol is designed to minimize primarily the amount of discarded users per cell, our framework allows for other variations (power or delay minimization) as well.Comment: 31 pages, 13 figures, 3 tables. Springer Wireless Networks 201

    Energy-Optimal Scheduling in Low Duty Cycle Sensor Networks

    Get PDF
    Energy consumption of a wireless sensor node mainly depends on the amount of time the node spends in each of the high power active (e.g., transmit, receive) and low power sleep modes. It has been well established that in order to prolong node's lifetime the duty-cycle of the node should be low. However, low power sleep modes usually have low current draw but high energy cost while switching to the active mode with a higher current draw. In this work, we investigate a MaxWeightlike opportunistic sleep-active scheduling algorithm that takes into account time- varying channel and traffic conditions. We show that our algorithm is energy optimal in the sense that the proposed ESS algorithm can achieve an energy consumption which is arbitrarily close to the global minimum solution. Simulation studies are provided to confirm the theoretical results

    A Survey of Green Networking Research

    Full text link
    Reduction of unnecessary energy consumption is becoming a major concern in wired networking, because of the potential economical benefits and of its expected environmental impact. These issues, usually referred to as "green networking", relate to embedding energy-awareness in the design, in the devices and in the protocols of networks. In this work, we first formulate a more precise definition of the "green" attribute. We furthermore identify a few paradigms that are the key enablers of energy-aware networking research. We then overview the current state of the art and provide a taxonomy of the relevant work, with a special focus on wired networking. At a high level, we identify four branches of green networking research that stem from different observations on the root causes of energy waste, namely (i) Adaptive Link Rate, (ii) Interface proxying, (iii) Energy-aware infrastructures and (iv) Energy-aware applications. In this work, we do not only explore specific proposals pertaining to each of the above branches, but also offer a perspective for research.Comment: Index Terms: Green Networking; Wired Networks; Adaptive Link Rate; Interface Proxying; Energy-aware Infrastructures; Energy-aware Applications. 18 pages, 6 figures, 2 table
    • …
    corecore