Desirable properties for XML update mechanisms

The adoption of XML as the default data interchange format and the standardisation of the XPath and XQuery languages has resulted in significant research in the development and implementation of XML databases capable of processing queries efficiently. The ever-increasing deployment of XML in industry and the real-world requirement to support efficient updates to XML documents has more recently prompted research in dynamic XML labelling schemes. In this paper, we provide an overview of the recent research in dynamic XML labelling schemes. Our motivation is to define a set of properties that represent a more holistic dynamic labelling scheme and present our findings through an evaluation matrix for most of the existing schemes that provide update functionality

Pentagonal scheme for dynamic XML prefix labelling

In XML databases, the indexing process is based on a labelling or numbering scheme and generally used to label an XML document to perform an XML query using the path node information. Moreover, a labelling scheme helps to capture the structural relationships during the processing of queries without the need to access the physical document. Two of the main problems for labelling XML schemes are duplicated labels and the cost efficiency of labelling time and size. This research presents a novel dynamic XML labelling scheme, called the Pentagonal labelling scheme, in which data are represented as ordered XML nodes with relationships between them. The update of these nodes from large scale XML documents has been widely investigated and represents a challenging research problem as it means relabelling a whole tree. Our algorithms provide an efficient dynamic XML labelling scheme that supports data updates without duplicating labels or relabelling old nodes. Our work evaluates the labelling process in terms of size and time, and evaluates the labelling scheme’s ability to handle several insertions in XML documents. The findings indicate that the Pentagonal scheme shows a better initial labelling time performance than the compared schemes, particularly when using large XML datasets. Moreover, it efficiently supports random skewed updates, has fast calculations and uncomplicated implementations so efficiently handles updates. Also, it proved its capability in terms of the query performance and in determining the relationships.Libyan governmen

Labeling Workflow Views with Fine-Grained Dependencies

This paper considers the problem of efficiently answering reachability queries over views of provenance graphs, derived from executions of workflows that may include recursion. Such views include composite modules and model fine-grained dependencies between module inputs and outputs. A novel view-adaptive dynamic labeling scheme is developed for efficient query evaluation, in which view specifications are labeled statically (i.e. as they are created) and data items are labeled dynamically as they are produced during a workflow execution. Although the combination of fine-grained dependencies and recursive workflows entail, in general, long (linear-size) data labels, we show that for a large natural class of workflows and views, labels are compact (logarithmic-size) and reachability queries can be evaluated in constant time. Experimental results demonstrate the benefit of this approach over the state-of-the-art technique when applied for labeling multiple views.Comment: VLDB201

A relevance comparison between interval and prefix labelling schemes

Improving XML database management system has attracted researchers to consider whether the indexing system is equivalent to a relational database management system. The indexing system is based on labelling the nodes of the XML tree. Different types of labelling scheme have been proposed to label the document quickly and without consuming too much storage space. However, most the studies focused on evaluating the performance of new labelling schemes. The appropriateness of various existing schemes to the particular structure an XML document has not been addressed sufficiently. To investigate this aspect two common XML labelling schemes were employed: Prefix (Dewey Encoding) and Interval (Containment) to label three different examples of XML documents with very different structures. The time and storage space requirements were investigated to compare the relevance of each scheme to the structures of the documents. A number of experiments were conducted and it was found that Dewey Encoding and Containment techniques are relatively fast when labelling shallow tree structures. Dewey required little storage space to save labels of wide tree structures, however, Containment used less storage space when storing the labels of short trees