1,508 research outputs found
De Morgan Dual Nominal Quantifiers Modelling Private Names in Non-Commutative Logic
This paper explores the proof theory necessary for recommending an expressive
but decidable first-order system, named MAV1, featuring a de Morgan dual pair
of nominal quantifiers. These nominal quantifiers called `new' and `wen' are
distinct from the self-dual Gabbay-Pitts and Miller-Tiu nominal quantifiers.
The novelty of these nominal quantifiers is they are polarised in the sense
that `new' distributes over positive operators while `wen' distributes over
negative operators. This greater control of bookkeeping enables private names
to be modelled in processes embedded as formulae in MAV1. The technical
challenge is to establish a cut elimination result, from which essential
properties including the transitivity of implication follow. Since the system
is defined using the calculus of structures, a generalisation of the sequent
calculus, novel techniques are employed. The proof relies on an intricately
designed multiset-based measure of the size of a proof, which is used to guide
a normalisation technique called splitting. The presence of equivariance, which
swaps successive quantifiers, induces complex inter-dependencies between
nominal quantifiers, additive conjunction and multiplicative operators in the
proof of splitting. Every rule is justified by an example demonstrating why the
rule is necessary for soundly embedding processes and ensuring that cut
elimination holds.Comment: Submitted for review 18/2/2016; accepted CONCUR 2016; extended
version submitted to journal 27/11/201
From Proof Nets to the Free *-Autonomous Category
In the first part of this paper we present a theory of proof nets for full
multiplicative linear logic, including the two units. It naturally extends the
well-known theory of unit-free multiplicative proof nets. A linking is no
longer a set of axiom links but a tree in which the axiom links are subtrees.
These trees will be identified according to an equivalence relation based on a
simple form of graph rewriting. We show the standard results of
sequentialization and strong normalization of cut elimination. In the second
part of the paper we show that the identifications enforced on proofs are such
that the class of two-conclusion proof nets defines the free *-autonomous
category.Comment: LaTeX, 44 pages, final version for LMCS; v2: updated bibliograph
Reasoning about Knowledge in Linear Logic: Modalities and Complexity
In a recent paper, Jean-Yves Girard commented that âit has been a long time since philosophy has stopped intereacting with logicâ[17]. Actually, it has no
Relevant Logics Obeying Component Homogeneity
This paper discusses three relevant logics that obey Component Homogeneity - a principle that Goddard and Routley introduce in their project of a logic of significance. The paper establishes two main results. First, it establishes a general characterization result for two families of logic that obey Component Homogeneity - that is, we provide a set of necessary and sufficient conditions for their consequence relations. From this, we derive characterization results for S*fde, dS*fde, crossS*fde. Second, the paper establishes complete sequent calculi for S*fde, dS*fde, crossS*fde. Among the other accomplishments of the paper, we generalize the semantics from Bochvar, Hallden, Deutsch and Daniels, we provide a general recipe to define containment logics, we explore the single-premise/single-conclusion fragment of S*fde, dS*fde, crossS*fdeand the connections between crossS*fde and the logic Eq of equality by Epstein. Also, we present S*fde as a relevant logic of meaninglessness that follows the main philosophical tenets of Goddard and Routley, and we briefly examine three further systems that are closely related to our main logics. Finally, we discuss Routley's criticism to containment logic in light of our results, and overview some open issues
Proof search and counter-model construction for bi-intuitionistic propositional logic with labelled sequents
Bi-intuitionistic logic is a conservative extension of
intuitionistic logic with a connective dual to implication, called
exclusion. We present a sound and complete cut-free labelled sequent
calculus for bi-intuitionistic propositional logic, BiInt,
following S. Negri's general method for devising sequent calculi
for normal modal logics. Although it arises as a natural
formalization of the Kripke semantics, it is does not directly
support proof search. To describe a proof search procedure, we
develop a more algorithmic version that also allows for
counter-model extraction from a failed proof attempt.Estonian Science Foundation - grants no. 5567; 6940Fundação para a CiĂȘncia e a Tecnologia (FCT)RESCUE - no. PTDC/EIA/65862/2006TYPES - FP6 ISTCentro de matemĂĄtica da Universidade do Minh
Basic Logic and Quantum Entanglement
As it is well known, quantum entanglement is one of the most important
features of quantum computing, as it leads to massive quantum parallelism,
hence to exponential computational speed-up. In a sense, quantum entanglement
is considered as an implicit property of quantum computation itself. But...can
it be made explicit? In other words, is it possible to find the connective
"entanglement" in a logical sequent calculus for the machine language? And
also, is it possible to "teach" the quantum computer to "mimic" the EPR
"paradox"? The answer is in the affirmative, if the logical sequent calculus is
that of the weakest possible logic, namely Basic logic. A weak logic has few
structural rules. But in logic, a weak structure leaves more room for
connectives (for example the connective "entanglement"). Furthermore, the
absence in Basic logic of the two structural rules of contraction and weakening
corresponds to the validity of the no-cloning and no-erase theorems,
respectively, in quantum computing.Comment: 10 pages, 1 figure,LaTeX. Shorter version for proceedings
requirements. Contributed paper at DICE2006, Piombino, Ital
- âŠ