7 research outputs found
Indestructibility of Vopenka's Principle
We show that Vopenka's Principle and Vopenka cardinals are indestructible
under reverse Easton forcing iterations of increasingly directed-closed partial
orders, without the need for any preparatory forcing. As a consequence, we are
able to prove the relative consistency of these large cardinal axioms with a
variety of statements known to be independent of ZFC, such as the generalised
continuum hypothesis, the existence of a definable well-order of the universe,
and the existence of morasses at many cardinals.Comment: 15 pages, submitted to Israel Journal of Mathematic
Notes in Pure Mathematics & Mathematical Structures in Physics
These Notes deal with various areas of mathematics, and seek reciprocal
combinations, explore mutual relations, ranging from abstract objects to
problems in physics.Comment: Small improvements and addition
Criteria of Empirical Significance: Foundations, Relations, Applications
This dissertation consists of three parts. Part I is a defense of an artificial language methodology in philosophy and a historical and systematic defense of the logical empiricists' application of an artificial language methodology to scientific theories. These defenses provide a justification for the presumptions of a host of criteria of empirical significance, which I analyze, compare, and develop in part II. On the basis of this analysis, in part III I use a variety of criteria to evaluate the scientific status of intelligent design, and further discuss confirmation, reduction, and concept formation
Criteria of Empirical Significance: Foundations, Relations, Applications
This dissertation consists of three parts. Part I is a defense of an artificial language methodology in philosophy and a historical and systematic defense of the logical empiricists' application of an artificial language methodology to scientific theories. These defenses provide a justification for the presumptions of a host of criteria of empirical significance, which I analyze, compare, and develop in part II. On the basis of this analysis, in part III I use a variety of criteria to evaluate the scientific status of intelligent design, and further discuss confirmation, reduction, and concept formation