254 research outputs found
Domination in graphs of minimum degree at least two and large girth
We prove that for graphs of order n, minimum degree 2 and girth g 5 the domination number satisfies 1 3 + 2 3gn. As a corollary this implies that for cubic graphs of order n and girth g 5 the domination number satisfies 44 135 + 82 135gn which improves recent results due to Kostochka and Stodolsky (An upper bound on the domination number of n-vertex connected cubic graphs, manuscript (2005)) and Kawarabayashi, Plummer and Saito (Domination in a graph with a 2-factor, J. Graph Theory 52 (2006), 1-6) for large enough girth. Furthermore, it confirms a conjecture due to Reed about connected cubic graphs (Paths, stars and the number three, Combin. Prob. Comput. 5 (1996), 267-276) for girth at least 83
Locating-dominating sets and identifying codes in graphs of girth at least 5
Locating-dominating sets and identifying codes are two closely related
notions in the area of separating systems. Roughly speaking, they consist in a
dominating set of a graph such that every vertex is uniquely identified by its
neighbourhood within the dominating set. In this paper, we study the size of a
smallest locating-dominating set or identifying code for graphs of girth at
least 5 and of given minimum degree. We use the technique of vertex-disjoint
paths to provide upper bounds on the minimum size of such sets, and construct
graphs who come close to meet these bounds.Comment: 20 pages, 9 figure
Domination number of graphs with minimum degree five
We prove that for every graph on vertices and with minimum degree
five, the domination number cannot exceed . The proof combines
an algorithmic approach and the discharging method. Using the same technique,
we provide a shorter proof for the known upper bound on the domination
number of graphs of minimum degree four.Comment: 17 page
Locating-total dominating sets in twin-free graphs: a conjecture
A total dominating set of a graph is a set of vertices of such
that every vertex of has a neighbor in . A locating-total dominating set
of is a total dominating set of with the additional property that
every two distinct vertices outside have distinct neighbors in ; that
is, for distinct vertices and outside , where denotes the open neighborhood of . A graph is twin-free if
every two distinct vertices have distinct open and closed neighborhoods. The
location-total domination number of , denoted , is the minimum
cardinality of a locating-total dominating set in . It is well-known that
every connected graph of order has a total dominating set of size at
most . We conjecture that if is a twin-free graph of order
with no isolated vertex, then . We prove the
conjecture for graphs without -cycles as a subgraph. We also prove that if
is a twin-free graph of order , then .Comment: 18 pages, 1 figur
Edge Roman domination on graphs
An edge Roman dominating function of a graph is a function satisfying the condition that every edge with
is adjacent to some edge with . The edge Roman
domination number of , denoted by , is the minimum weight
of an edge Roman dominating function of .
This paper disproves a conjecture of Akbari, Ehsani, Ghajar, Jalaly Khalilabadi
and Sadeghian Sadeghabad stating that if is a graph of maximum degree
on vertices, then . While the counterexamples having the edge Roman domination numbers
, we prove that is an upper bound for connected graphs. Furthermore, we
provide an upper bound for the edge Roman domination number of -degenerate
graphs, which generalizes results of Akbari, Ehsani, Ghajar, Jalaly Khalilabadi
and Sadeghian Sadeghabad. We also prove a sharp upper bound for subcubic
graphs.
In addition, we prove that the edge Roman domination numbers of planar graphs
on vertices is at most , which confirms a conjecture of
Akbari and Qajar. We also show an upper bound for graphs of girth at least five
that is 2-cell embeddable in surfaces of small genus. Finally, we prove an
upper bound for graphs that do not contain as a subdivision, which
generalizes a result of Akbari and Qajar on outerplanar graphs
- …