1,246 research outputs found
Detecting single-trial EEG evoked potential using a wavelet domain linear mixed model: application to error potentials classification
Objective. The main goal of this work is to develop a model for multi-sensor
signals such as MEG or EEG signals, that accounts for the inter-trial
variability, suitable for corresponding binary classification problems. An
important constraint is that the model be simple enough to handle small size
and unbalanced datasets, as often encountered in BCI type experiments.
Approach. The method involves linear mixed effects statistical model, wavelet
transform and spatial filtering, and aims at the characterization of localized
discriminant features in multi-sensor signals. After discrete wavelet transform
and spatial filtering, a projection onto the relevant wavelet and spatial
channels subspaces is used for dimension reduction. The projected signals are
then decomposed as the sum of a signal of interest (i.e. discriminant) and
background noise, using a very simple Gaussian linear mixed model. Main
results. Thanks to the simplicity of the model, the corresponding parameter
estimation problem is simplified. Robust estimates of class-covariance matrices
are obtained from small sample sizes and an effective Bayes plug-in classifier
is derived. The approach is applied to the detection of error potentials in
multichannel EEG data, in a very unbalanced situation (detection of rare
events). Classification results prove the relevance of the proposed approach in
such a context. Significance. The combination of linear mixed model, wavelet
transform and spatial filtering for EEG classification is, to the best of our
knowledge, an original approach, which is proven to be effective. This paper
improves on earlier results on similar problems, and the three main ingredients
all play an important role
Target Contrastive Pessimistic Discriminant Analysis
Domain-adaptive classifiers learn from a source domain and aim to generalize
to a target domain. If the classifier's assumptions on the relationship between
domains (e.g. covariate shift) are valid, then it will usually outperform a
non-adaptive source classifier. Unfortunately, it can perform substantially
worse when its assumptions are invalid. Validating these assumptions requires
labeled target samples, which are usually not available. We argue that, in
order to make domain-adaptive classifiers more practical, it is necessary to
focus on robust methods; robust in the sense that the model still achieves a
particular level of performance without making strong assumptions on the
relationship between domains. With this objective in mind, we formulate a
conservative parameter estimator that only deviates from the source classifier
when a lower or equal risk is guaranteed for all possible labellings of the
given target samples. We derive the corresponding estimator for a discriminant
analysis model, and show that its risk is actually strictly smaller than that
of the source classifier. Experiments indicate that our classifier outperforms
state-of-the-art classifiers for geographically biased samples.Comment: 9 pages, no figures, 2 tables. arXiv admin note: substantial text
overlap with arXiv:1706.0808
Classification of Epileptic EEG Signals by Wavelet based CFC
Electroencephalogram, an influential equipment for analyzing humans
activities and recognition of seizure attacks can play a crucial role in
designing accurate systems which can distinguish ictal seizures from regular
brain alertness, since it is the first step towards accomplishing a high
accuracy computer aided diagnosis system (CAD). In this article a novel
approach for classification of ictal signals with wavelet based cross frequency
coupling (CFC) is suggested. After extracting features by wavelet based CFC,
optimal features have been selected by t-test and quadratic discriminant
analysis (QDA) have completed the Classification.Comment: Electroencephalogram; Wavelet Decomposition; Cross Frequency
Coupling;Quadratic Discriminant Analysis; T-test Feature Selectio
Prediction of delayed graft function after kidney transplantation : comparison between logistic regression and machine learning methods
Background: Predictive models for delayed graft function (DGF) after kidney transplantation are usually developed using logistic regression. We want to evaluate the value of machine learning methods in the prediction of DGF.
Methods: 497 kidney transplantations from deceased donors at the Ghent University Hospital between 2005 and 2011 are included. A feature elimination procedure is applied to determine the optimal number of features, resulting in 20 selected parameters (24 parameters after conversion to indicator parameters) out of 55 retrospectively collected parameters. Subsequently, 9 distinct types of predictive models are fitted using the reduced data set: logistic regression (LR), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA), support vector machines (SVMs; using linear, radial basis function and polynomial kernels), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), and stochastic gradient boosting (SGB). Performance of the models is assessed by computing sensitivity, positive predictive values and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) after 10-fold stratified cross-validation. AUROCs of the models are pairwise compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
Results: The observed incidence of DGF is 12.5 %. DT is not able to discriminate between recipients with and without DGF (AUROC of 52.5 %) and is inferior to the other methods. SGB, RF and polynomial SVM are mainly able to identify recipients without DGF (AUROC of 77.2, 73.9 and 79.8 %, respectively) and only outperform DT. LDA, QDA, radial SVM and LR also have the ability to identify recipients with DGF, resulting in higher discriminative capacity (AUROC of 82.2, 79.6, 83.3 and 81.7 %, respectively), which outperforms DT and RF. Linear SVM has the highest discriminative capacity (AUROC of 84.3 %), outperforming each method, except for radial SVM, polynomial SVM and LDA. However, it is the only method superior to LR.
Conclusions: The discriminative capacities of LDA, linear SVM, radial SVM and LR are the only ones above 80 %. None of the pairwise AUROC comparisons between these models is statistically significant, except linear SVM outperforming LR. Additionally, the sensitivity of linear SVM to identify recipients with DGF is amongst the three highest of all models. Due to both reasons, the authors believe that linear SVM is most appropriate to predict DGF
Fast DD-classification of functional data
A fast nonparametric procedure for classifying functional data is introduced.
It consists of a two-step transformation of the original data plus a classifier
operating on a low-dimensional hypercube. The functional data are first mapped
into a finite-dimensional location-slope space and then transformed by a
multivariate depth function into the -plot, which is a subset of the unit
hypercube. This transformation yields a new notion of depth for functional
data. Three alternative depth functions are employed for this, as well as two
rules for the final classification on . The resulting classifier has
to be cross-validated over a small range of parameters only, which is
restricted by a Vapnik-Cervonenkis bound. The entire methodology does not
involve smoothing techniques, is completely nonparametric and allows to achieve
Bayes optimality under standard distributional settings. It is robust,
efficiently computable, and has been implemented in an R environment.
Applicability of the new approach is demonstrated by simulations as well as a
benchmark study
- …