36 research outputs found

    On the lengths of divisible codes

    Get PDF
    In this article, the effective lengths of all qrq^r-divisible linear codes over Fq\mathbb{F}_q with a non-negative integer rr are determined. For that purpose, the Sq(r)S_q(r)-adic expansion of an integer nn is introduced. It is shown that there exists a qrq^r-divisible Fq\mathbb{F}_q-linear code of effective length nn if and only if the leading coefficient of the Sq(r)S_q(r)-adic expansion of nn is non-negative. Furthermore, the maximum weight of a qrq^r-divisible code of effective length nn is at most σqr\sigma q^r, where σ\sigma denotes the cross-sum of the Sq(r)S_q(r)-adic expansion of nn. This result has applications in Galois geometries. A recent theorem of N{\u{a}}stase and Sissokho on the maximum size of a partial spread follows as a corollary. Furthermore, we get an improvement of the Johnson bound for constant dimension subspace codes.Comment: 17 pages, typos corrected; the paper was originally named "An improvement of the Johnson bound for subspace codes

    A study of (x(q+1),x;2,q)-minihypers

    Get PDF
    In this paper, we study the weighted (x(q + 1), x; 2, q)-minihypers. These are weighted sets of x(q + 1) points in PG(2, q) intersecting every line in at least x points. We investigate the decomposability of these minihypers, and define a switching construction which associates to an (x(q + 1), x; 2, q)-minihyper, with x <= q(2) - q, not decomposable in the sum of another minihyper and a line, a (j (q + 1), j; 2, q)-minihyper, where j = q(2) - q-x, again not decomposable into the sum of another minihyper and a line. We also characterize particular (x(q + 1), x; 2, q)-minihypers, and give new examples. Additionally, we show that (x(q + 1), x; 2, q)-minihypers can be described as rational sums of lines. In this way, this work continues the research on (x(q + 1), x; 2, q)-minihypers by Hill and Ward (Des Codes Cryptogr 44: 169-196, 2007), giving further results on these minihypers

    Lengths of divisible codes - the missing cases

    Get PDF

    The Nonexistence of [132, 6, 86]3 Codes and [135, 6, 88]3 Codes

    Get PDF
    We prove the nonexistence of [g3(6, d), 6, d]3 codes for d = 86, 87, 88, where g3(k, d) = ∑⌈d/3i⌉ and i=0 ... k−1. This determines n3(6, d) for d = 86, 87, 88, where nq(k, d) is the minimum length n for which an [n, k, d]q code exists

    The Nonexistence of some Griesmer Arcs in PG(4, 5)

    Get PDF
    In this paper, we prove the nonexistence of arcs with parameters (232, 48) and (233, 48) in PG(4,5). This rules out the existence of linear codes with parameters [232,5,184] and [233,5,185] over the field with five elements and improves two instances in the recent tables by Maruta, Shinohara and Kikui of optimal codes of dimension 5 over F5

    Binary self-orthogonal codes which meet the Griesmer bound or have optimal minimum distances

    Full text link
    The purpose of this paper is two-fold. First, we characterize the existence of binary self-orthogonal codes meeting the Griesmer bound by employing Solomon-Stiffler codes and some related residual codes. Second, using such a characterization, we determine the exact value of dso(n,7)d_{so}(n,7) except for five special cases and the exact value of dso(n,8)d_{so}(n,8) except for 41 special cases, where dso(n,k)d_{so}(n,k) denotes the largest minimum distance among all binary self-orthogonal [n,k][n, k] codes. Currently, the exact value of dso(n,k)d_{so}(n,k) (k≤6)(k \le 6) was determined by Shi et al. (2022). In addition, we develop a general method to prove the nonexistence of some binary self-orthogonal codes by considering the residual code of a binary self-orthogonal code.Comment: Submitted 20 January, 202

    On the non-existence of a projective (75, 4,12, 5) set in PG(3, 7)

    Get PDF
    We show by a combination of theoretical argument and computer search that if a projective (75, 4, 12, 5) set in PG(3, 7) exists then its automorphism group must be trivial. This corresponds to the smallest open case of a coding problem posed by H. Ward in 1998, concerning the possible existence of an infinite family of projective two-weight codes meeting the Griesmer bound
    corecore