LBS: A Beacon Synchronization Scheme With Higher Schedulability for IEEE 802.15. 4 Cluster-Tree-Based IoT Applications

[EN] The IEEE 802.15.4 standard is one of the most widely used link layer technology for building Internet of Things (IoT). It specifies several physical layer options and MAC layer for meeting low-power and low-rate requirements of devices deployed in a network of IoT. The standard also specifies a synchronization scheme for devices connected in a star topology, operating in beacon-enabled (BE) mode using periodic beacons. The BE mode facilitates synchronization among devices for data transmission and is suitable for large networks to establish low duty-cycles. Absence of a such a scheme for a cluster-tree network has confined its application only to nonbeacon mode. The challenge here is to schedule beacon frame transmissions of multiple devices in a nonoverlapping manner to avoid beacon collisions. This paper tackles the problem of synchronization by proposing localized beacon synchronization (LBS) scheme, a distributed technique for beacon scheduling in cluster-tree network topologies. LBS uses 2-hop information and association order to compute beacon transmission offsets that better utilize the available time slots, incur fewer transmissions, and is highly scalable. Further, we analytically show that the schedulability of the proposed scheme is higher compared to other related schemes. In addition, we also address the important issue of resynchronization that has been ignored in all of the prior works. The proposed resynchronization mechanisms consider the interdependencies between synchronization and duty-cycling schemes and are shown to significantly lower the synchronization overhead when synchronization among devices is lost.This work was supported by the Science and Engineering Research Board, Department of Science and Technology, Govt. of India, under Grant ECR/2016/001651.Choudhury, N.; Matam, R.; Mukherjee, M.; Lloret, J. (2019). LBS: A Beacon Synchronization Scheme With Higher Schedulability for IEEE 802.15. 4 Cluster-Tree-Based IoT Applications. IEEE Internet of Things. 6(5):8883-8896. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2019.2924317888388966

Zigbee over tinyos: Implementation and experimental challenges

The IEEE 802.15.4/Zigbee protocols are a promising technology for Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs). This paper shares our experience on the implementation and use of these protocols and related technologies in WSNs. We present problems and challenges we have been facing in implementing an IEEE 802.15.4/ZigBee stack for TinyOS in a two-folded perspective: IEEE 802.15.4/ZigBee protocol standards limitations (ambiguities and open issues) and technological limitations (hardware and software). Concerning the former, we address challenges for building scalable and synchronized multi-cluster ZigBee networks, providing a trade-off between timeliness and energy-efficiency. On the latter issue, we highlight implementation problems in terms of hardware, timer handling and operating system limitations. We also report on our experience from experimental test-beds, namely on physical layer aspects such as coexistence problems between IEEE 802.15.4 and 802.11 radio channels

Wireless industrial monitoring and control networks: the journey so far and the road ahead

While traditional wired communication technologies have played a crucial role in industrial monitoring and control networks over the past few decades, they are increasingly proving to be inadequate to meet the highly dynamic and stringent demands of today’s industrial applications, primarily due to the very rigid nature of wired infrastructures. Wireless technology, however, through its increased pervasiveness, has the potential to revolutionize the industry, not only by mitigating the problems faced by wired solutions, but also by introducing a completely new class of applications. While present day wireless technologies made some preliminary inroads in the monitoring domain, they still have severe limitations especially when real-time, reliable distributed control operations are concerned. This article provides the reader with an overview of existing wireless technologies commonly used in the monitoring and control industry. It highlights the pros and cons of each technology and assesses the degree to which each technology is able to meet the stringent demands of industrial monitoring and control networks. Additionally, it summarizes mechanisms proposed by academia, especially serving critical applications by addressing the real-time and reliability requirements of industrial process automation. The article also describes certain key research problems from the physical layer communication for sensor networks and the wireless networking perspective that have yet to be addressed to allow the successful use of wireless technologies in industrial monitoring and control networks

On the use of the ZigBee protocol for wireless sensor networks

This project was developed within the ART-WiSe framework of the IPP-HURRAY group (http://www.hurray.isep.ipp.pt), at the Polytechnic Institute of Porto (http://www.ipp.pt). The ART-WiSe – Architecture for Real-Time communications in Wireless Sensor networks – framework (http://www.hurray.isep.ipp.pt/art-wise) aims at providing new communication architectures and mechanisms to improve the timing performance of Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs). The architecture is based on a two-tiered protocol structure, relying on existing standard communication protocols, namely IEEE 802.15.4 (Physical and Data Link Layers) and ZigBee (Network and Application Layers) for Tier 1 and IEEE 802.11 for Tier 2, which serves as a high-speed backbone for Tier 1 without energy consumption restrictions. Within this trend, an application test-bed is being developed with the objectives of implementing, assessing and validating the ART-WiSe architecture. Particularly for the ZigBee protocol case; even though there is a strong commercial lobby from the ZigBee Alliance (http://www.zigbee.org), there is neither an open source available to the community for this moment nor publications on its adequateness for larger-scale WSN applications. This project aims at fulfilling these gaps by providing: a deep analysis of the ZigBee Specification, mainly addressing the Network Layer and particularly its routing mechanisms; an identification of the ambiguities and open issues existent in the ZigBee protocol standard; the proposal of solutions to the previously referred problems; an implementation of a subset of the ZigBee Network Layer, namely the association procedure and the tree routing on our technological platform (MICAz motes, TinyOS operating system and nesC programming language) and an experimental evaluation of that routing mechanism for WSNs

Beacon scheduling in cluster-tree IEEE 802.15.4/ZigBee wireless sensor networks

The recently standardized IEEE 802.15.4/Zigbee protocol stack offers great potentials for ubiquitous and pervasive computing, namely for Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs). However, there are still some open and ambiguous issues that turn its practical use a challenging task. One of those issues is how to build a synchronized multi-hop cluster-tree network, which is quite suitable for QoS support in WSNs. In fact, the current IEEE 802.15.4/Zigbee specifications restrict the synchronization in the beacon-enabled mode (by the generation of periodic beacon frames) to star-based networks, while it supports multi-hop networking using the peer-to-peer mesh topology, but with no synchronization. Even though both specifications mention the possible use of cluster-tree topologies, which combine multi-hop and synchronization features, the description on how to effectively construct such a network topology is missing. This report tackles this problem, unveils the ambiguities regarding the use of the cluster-tree topology and proposes two collisionfree beacon frame scheduling schemes

A Beacon and GTS Scheduling Scheme for IEEE 802.15.4 DSME Networks

[EN] The IEEE 802.15.4 standard is one of the widely adopted networking specification for realizing different applications of Internet of Things (IoT). It defines several physical layer options and medium access control (MAC) sublayer protocols for low-power devices supporting low-data rates. One such MAC protocol is the deterministic and synchronous multichannel extension (DSME), which addresses the limitation on the maximum number of guaranteed time slots (GTSs) in 802.15.4-2011 MAC, and provides channel diversity to increase network robustness. However, beacon scheduling in peer-to-peer networks suffers from beacon slot collisions when two or more coordinators simultaneously compete for the same vacant beacon slot. In addition, the standard does not explore DSME-GTS scheduling (DGS) across multiple channels. This article addresses the beacon slot collision problem by proposing a nonconflicting beacon scheduling mechanism using association order (AO). Furthermore, a distributed multichannel DSME-GTS schedule is proposed that optimally assigns DSME-GTSs across different channels. The objective is to minimize the number of times-lots used while maximizing the usage of available channels. Through simulations, the proposed mechanisms' performance is analyzed in terms of energy efficiency, transmission overhead, scheduling efficiency, throughput, and latency and is shown to outperform the other existing schemes.Choudhury, N.; Matam, R.; Mukherjee, M.; Lloret, J. (2022). A Beacon and GTS Scheduling Scheme for IEEE 802.15.4 DSME Networks. IEEE Internet of Things. 9(7):5162-5172. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2021.3110866516251729

Beacon Synchronization for GTS Collision Avoidance in an IEEE 802.15.4 Meshed Network

International audienceIndustrial process control architectures are generally composed of nodes organized in a cluster-tree. Today, wired communications between nodes enable guaranteeing the constraint respect attached to determinism. Innovations in wireless technology allow using these new technologies instead of wired systems. IEEE 802.15.4 standard meet industrial local network needs, but it does not propose any mechanisms to avoid beacon and GTS (Guaranteed Time Slot ) collisions in meshed network. This communication proposes a new synchronization method for beacons and GTSs in meshed networks using IEEE 802.15.4

Collision-free beacon scheduling mechanisms for IEEE 802.15.4/Zigbee cluster-tree wireless sensor networks

The recently standardized IEEE 802.15.4/Zigbee protocol stack offers great potentials for ubiquitous and pervasive computing, namely for Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs). However, there are still some open and ambiguous issues that turn its practical use a challenging task. One of those issues is how to build a synchronized multi-hop cluster-tree network, which is quite suitable for QoS support in WSNs. In fact, the current IEEE 802.15.4/Zigbee specifications restrict the synchronization in the beacon-enabled mode (by the generation of periodic beacon frames) to star-based networks, while it supports multi-hop networking using the peer-to-peer mesh topology, but with no synchronization. Even though both specifications mention the possible use of cluster-tree topologies, which combine multi-hop and synchronization features, the description on how to effectively construct such a network topology is missing. This paper tackles this problem, unveils the ambiguities regarding the use of the cluster-tree topology and proposes two collision-free beacon frame scheduling schemes. We strongly believe that the results provided in this paper trigger a significant step towards the practical and efficient use of IEEE 802.15.4/Zigbee cluster-tree networks

A Study of Medium Access Control Protocols for Wireless Body Area Networks

The seamless integration of low-power, miniaturised, invasive/non-invasive lightweight sensor nodes have contributed to the development of a proactive and unobtrusive Wireless Body Area Network (WBAN). A WBAN provides long-term health monitoring of a patient without any constraint on his/her normal dailylife activities. This monitoring requires low-power operation of invasive/non-invasive sensor nodes. In other words, a power-efficient Medium Access Control (MAC) protocol is required to satisfy the stringent WBAN requirements including low-power consumption. In this paper, we first outline the WBAN requirements that are important for the design of a low-power MAC protocol. Then we study low-power MAC protocols proposed/investigated for WBAN with emphasis on their strengths and weaknesses. We also review different power-efficient mechanisms for WBAN. In addition, useful suggestions are given to help the MAC designers to develop a low-power MAC protocol that will satisfy the stringent WBAN requirements.Comment: 13 pages, 8 figures, 7 table

On the use of IEEE 802.15.4/ZigBee as federating communication protocols for Wireless Sensor Networks

Tese de mestrado. Redes e Serviços de Comunicação. Faculdade de Engenharia. Universidade do Porto, Instituto Superior de Engenharia. 200