Sublinear Algorithms for (1.5+ϵ)(1.5+\epsilon)-Approximate Matching

We study sublinear time algorithms for estimating the size of maximum matching. After a long line of research, the problem was finally settled by Behnezhad [FOCS'22], in the regime where one is willing to pay an approximation factor of $2$. Very recently, Behnezhad et al.[SODA'23] improved the approximation factor to $(2-\frac{1}{2^{O(1/\gamma)}})$ using $n^{1+\gamma}$ time. This improvement over the factor $2$ is, however, minuscule and they asked if even $1.99$-approximation is possible in $n^{2-\Omega(1)}$ time. We give a strong affirmative answer to this open problem by showing $(1.5+\epsilon)$-approximation algorithms that run in $n^{2-\Theta(\epsilon^{2})}$ time. Our approach is conceptually simple and diverges from all previous sublinear-time matching algorithms: we show a sublinear time algorithm for computing a variant of the edge-degree constrained subgraph (EDCS), a concept that has previously been exploited in dynamic [Bernstein Stein ICALP'15, SODA'16], distributed [Assadi et al. SODA'19] and streaming [Bernstein ICALP'20] settings, but never before in the sublinear setting. Independent work: Behnezhad, Roghani and Rubinstein [BRR'23] independently showed sublinear algorithms similar to our Theorem 1.2 in both adjacency list and matrix models. Furthermore, in [BRR'23], they show additional results on strictly better-than-1.5 approximate matching algorithms in both upper and lower bound sides

Minimizing Flow Time in the Wireless Gathering Problem

We address the problem of efficient data gathering in a wireless network through multi-hop communication. We focus on the objective of minimizing the maximum flow time of a data packet. We prove that no polynomial time algorithm for this problem can have approximation ratio less than \Omega(m^{1/3) when $m$ packets have to be transmitted, unless $P = NP$. We then use resource augmentation to assess the performance of a FIFO-like strategy. We prove that this strategy is 5-speed optimal, i.e., its cost remains within the optimal cost if we allow the algorithm to transmit data at a speed 5 times higher than that of the optimal solution we compare to