Toward An Uncertainty Principle For Weighted Graphs

International audienceThe uncertainty principle states that a signal cannot be localized both in time and frequency. With the aim of extending this result to signals on graphs, Agaskar & Lu introduce notions of graph and spectral spreads. They show that a graph uncertainty principle holds for some families of unweighted graphs. This principle states that a signal cannot be simultaneously localized both in graph and spectral domains. In this paper, we aim to extend their work to weighted graphs. We show that a naive extension of their definitions leads to inconsistent results such as discontinuity of the graph spread when regarded as a function of the graph structure. To circumvent this problem, we propose another definition of graph spread that relies on an inverse similarity matrix. We also discuss the choice of the distance function that appears in this definition. Finally, we compute and plot uncertainty curves for families of weighted graphs

New bounds for the signless Laplacian spread

Let $G$ be an undirected simple graph. The signless Laplacian spread of $G$ is defined as the maximum distance of pairs of its signless Laplacian eigenvalues. This paper establishes some new bounds, both lower and upper, for the signless Laplacian spread. Several of these bounds depend on invariant parameters of the graph. We also use a minmax principle to find several lower bounds for this spectral invariant.publishe

New lower bounds for the Randić spread

Let $G=\left( \mathcal{V}\left( G\right) ,\mathcal{E}\left( G\right) \right)$ be an $\left( n,m\right)$-graph. The Randi\'{c} spread of $G$, $s_{R}(G)$, is defined as the maximum distance of its Randi\'{c} eigenvalues, disregarding the Randi\'{c} spectral radius of $G$. In this work, we use numerical inequalities and bounds for the matricial spread to obtain relations between this spectral parameter and some structural and algebraic parameters of the underlying graph such as, the sequence of vertex degrees, the nullity, Randi\'{c} index, generalized Randi\'{c} indices and its independence number. In the last section a comparison is presented for regular graphs

On the Sum and Spread of Reciprocal Distance Laplacian Eigenvalues of Graphs in Terms of Harary Index

The reciprocal distance Laplacian matrix of a connected graph G is defined as RDL(G)=RT(G)−RD(G), where RT(G) is the diagonal matrix of reciprocal distance degrees and RD(G) is the Harary matrix. Clearly, RDL(G) is a real symmetric matrix, and we denote its eigenvalues as λ1(RDL(G))≥λ2(RDL(G))≥…≥λn(RDL(G)). The largest eigenvalue λ1(RDL(G)) of RDL(G), denoted by λ(G), is called the reciprocal distance Laplacian spectral radius. In this paper, we obtain several upper bounds for the sum of k largest reciprocal distance Laplacian eigenvalues of G in terms of various graph parameters, such as order n, maximum reciprocal distance degree RTmax, minimum reciprocal distance degree RTmin, and Harary index H(G) of G. We determine the extremal cases corresponding to these bounds. As a consequence, we obtain the upper bounds for reciprocal distance Laplacian spectral radius λ(G) in terms of the parameters as mentioned above and characterize the extremal cases. Moreover, we attain several upper and lower bounds for reciprocal distance Laplacian spread RDLS(G)=λ1(RDL(G))−λn−1(RDL(G)) in terms of various graph parameters. We determine the extremal graphs in many cases

A Spectral Graph Uncertainty Principle

The spectral theory of graphs provides a bridge between classical signal processing and the nascent field of graph signal processing. In this paper, a spectral graph analogy to Heisenberg's celebrated uncertainty principle is developed. Just as the classical result provides a tradeoff between signal localization in time and frequency, this result provides a fundamental tradeoff between a signal's localization on a graph and in its spectral domain. Using the eigenvectors of the graph Laplacian as a surrogate Fourier basis, quantitative definitions of graph and spectral "spreads" are given, and a complete characterization of the feasibility region of these two quantities is developed. In particular, the lower boundary of the region, referred to as the uncertainty curve, is shown to be achieved by eigenvectors associated with the smallest eigenvalues of an affine family of matrices. The convexity of the uncertainty curve allows it to be found to within $\varepsilon$ by a fast approximation algorithm requiring $O(\varepsilon^{-1/2})$ typically sparse eigenvalue evaluations. Closed-form expressions for the uncertainty curves for some special classes of graphs are derived, and an accurate analytical approximation for the expected uncertainty curve of Erd\H{o}s-R\'enyi random graphs is developed. These theoretical results are validated by numerical experiments, which also reveal an intriguing connection between diffusion processes on graphs and the uncertainty bounds.Comment: 40 pages, 8 figure

Signals on Graphs: Uncertainty Principle and Sampling

In many applications, the observations can be represented as a signal defined over the vertices of a graph. The analysis of such signals requires the extension of standard signal processing tools. In this work, first, we provide a class of graph signals that are maximally concentrated on the graph domain and on its dual. Then, building on this framework, we derive an uncertainty principle for graph signals and illustrate the conditions for the recovery of band-limited signals from a subset of samples. We show an interesting link between uncertainty principle and sampling and propose alternative signal recovery algorithms, including a generalization to frame-based reconstruction methods. After showing that the performance of signal recovery algorithms is significantly affected by the location of samples, we suggest and compare a few alternative sampling strategies. Finally, we provide the conditions for perfect recovery of a useful signal corrupted by sparse noise, showing that this problem is also intrinsically related to vertex-frequency localization properties.Comment: This article is the revised version submitted to the IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing on May, 2016; first revision was submitted on January, 2016; original manuscript was submitted on July, 2015. The work includes 16 pages, 8 figure