Digital manipulatives as scaffolds for preschoolers’ language development

The study reported here aims at contributing to a deeper understanding of the educational possibilities offered by digital manipulatives in preschool contexts. It presents a study carried with a digital manipulative to enhance the development of lexical knowledge and language awareness, which are relevant language abilities for formal literacy learning. The study took place in a Portuguese preschool, with a class of 20 five-year-olds in collaboration with the teacher. The digital manipulative supported the construction of multiple fictional worlds, motivating children's verbal interactions, and the playing of words and sound games, thus contextualizing the learning of an extensive collection of vocabulary and language awareness abilities. The degree of engagement and involvement that the manipulative provided in supporting children’s imaginative play as well as the imitation, in their own play, of the playful pedagogical interventions that the teacher had designed, shows the importance of well- designed materials that support a child-centered learning model. As such, it sustains a discussion on the potential of digital manipulatives to enhance fundamental language development in the preschool years. Further, the study highlights the importance of multidisciplinary teams in the creation of innovative pedagogical materials.This work was supported by the Portuguese Foundation for the Science and the Technology within the Post-Doctoral Grant SFRH/BPD/111891/2015

Young children learning with mobile devices: Research on design and implementation

The increasing growth and usage of mobile devices, such as tablets and iPads, by young children has not yet been accompanied by systematic research about the effects they have on children's learning and the conditions that facilitate or hinder learning and engagement. As a result, only few empirically-based guidelines exist to guide parents, educators, and application (app) designers when choosing or designing apps for young children, often leading to non-evidence-based decisions, or the design of apps with little educational value. This symposium aims to bring together researchers from Australia, the UK and USA to discuss what evidence exist about the learning potential of mobile devices and apps for young children and how it could be used to inform relevant stakeholders

The Impact of Technology Selection on Student Literacy Achievement

The purpose of this action research project was to determine if prekindergarten students could increase literacy achievement and motivation when the educator selects the technology based on learning goals and the Iowa Early Learning Standards. High quality technology applications were provided during whole group, small group, and learning centers. Data was collected through quantitative means using Teaching Strategies GOLD and the Individual Growth and Development Indicators (IGDI) test scores. Analysis of the data collected suggests that the prekindergarten student’s GOLD and IGDI scores increased as specific technology integration was implemented in the classroom

Technology Use in Early Childhood

This literature review examines the influence of technology on early childhood development. It uses scholarly journals and articles to show the benefits and risks of technology use and how it can be used to compliment growth, development, and learning of young children. It also examines how technology can impact the early childhood developmental domains of: (a) social emotional, (b) cognitive, (c) physical motor, (d) language and literacy, and (e) mathematics. The influence of technology use on teaching and the family are also addressed. Furthermore, this literature review includes implications for the future, continuing research, and recommendations from the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), The United States Department of Education (DoEd), and The National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC) & The Fred Rogers Center for Early Learning and Children\u27s Media

Teaching and Learning Spatial Thinking with Young Students: the Use and Influence of External Representations

Previous research suggests spatial thinking is fundamental to mathematics learning (Bronowski, 1947; Clements & Sarama, 2007, 2011), and acts as a predictor for future mathematical achievement levels (Battista, 1990; Gunderson et al., 2012). However, research with regard to spatial thinking is almost non-existent in early years mathematics classrooms (Bruce, Moss, & Ross, 2012; Clements & Sarama, 2011; Newcombe & Frick, 2010; Sarama & Clements, 2009, 2011; Stipek, 2013), and how to teach it in these contexts has received little attention. Fewer studies again have focused on the use of virtual manipulatives in influencing young students’ spatial thinking (Highfield & Mulligan, 2007; Ng & Sinclair, 2015). Despite a recent surge in studies exploring the influence of virtual manipulatives in mathematics classrooms, little is known about how these manipulatives compare to physical manipulatives, especially in regard to the changes that occur in the social interactions between teacher and students during the learning process. To date, there has been no comparative study conducted that explores the influence of different external representations (e.g., physical manipulatives and virtual manipulatives) on both the teaching and the learning aspects within mathematics classrooms. The purpose of this research is to explore the use of external representations (i.e., physical manipulatives as compared to virtual manipulatives) in the mathematics classroom and how these representations support young, disadvantaged students’ spatial thinking. The use of manipulatives is a common starting point for the teaching and learning of spatial thinking. Previous research on manipulative use (both physical and virtual) in mathematics education has yielded positive results with regard to student learning (Clements, 1999; Heddens, 1997; Highfield & Mulligan, 2007; Riconscente, 2013; Siemon et al., 2011; Warren, 2006; Warren & Miller, 2013). Recent studies indicate that these newer digital technologies promote interactions between visual and kinaesthetic learning, which have been shown to support the teaching and learning of spatial thinking (Battista, 2008; Bruce, McPherson, Sabeti, & Flynn, 2011; Clements & Sarama, 2011; Highfield & Mulligan, 2007; Jorgensen & Lowrie, 2012; Sinclair, de Freitas, & Ferrara, 2013; Sinclair & Moss, 2012). However, results from comparative studies between physical manipulatives and virtual manipulatives have been varied (e.g., Brown, 2007; Olkum, 2003; Suh, 2005). It is proposed that different types of manipulatives influence the teaching and learning of spatial thinking in different ways. By viewing the learning of spatial thinking through a sociocultural perspective, aspects of the teaching and learning of spatial learning in mathematics classrooms can be scrutinised. A review of the literature generated two research questions that informed the research design of this study. These were: 1. What influence do different external representations (e.g., physical manipulatives and virtual manipulatives) have on young students’ learning of spatial thinking? 2. What changes occur in the teaching and learning of spatial thinking when using different external representations (e.g., physical manipulatives and virtual manipulatives)? Given that the study focused on exploring students’ spatial thinking as they construct their knowledge from the interactions they experience with external representations, an interpretive paradigm was an appropriate epistemological, ontological and methodological stance adopted for the research. Vygotsky’s (1978) sociocultural theory provided a lens to interpret the interaction between teacher and students. Practical application of this theory permitted a narrowing lens to pinpoint particular aspects of the teaching of spatial thinking and students’ learning of spatial thinking. Within this study, these practical applications included the use of Anghileri’s “hierarchy of scaffolding practices” (2006) and Sfard’s “commognitive approach” (2008). The methodology for the study included teaching experiments. Data collection methods incorporated the use of pre-test, post-test and post post-testing using spatial testing material and observations of lessons from a teaching experiment (n = 68) comprising six lessons (three based on spatial orientation concepts and three based on spatial visualisation concepts). Findings from this study provide further insights into the teaching and learning of spatial thinking. First, the use of manipulatives (either physical or virtual) appears to be important to students’ learning of spatial thinking. Furthermore, the use of virtual manipulatives increases the communicative functions used by students, thus benefiting their spatial thinking. Second, teachers need to be able to instantaneously access deep content and pedagogical knowledge in order to maintain their role as “more knowledgeable other” and continually contribute to the teaching and learning of spatial thinking. Finally, teaching and learning appears to be positively influenced when both the teacher and students are major contributors to the classroom discourse. This study contributes to the understanding of how different external representations influence the teaching and learning of spatial thinking. Theoretical contributions to new knowledge include a hypothesised theory on the interaction between teacher, student and manipulatives type. Implications for future classroom practice include placing importance on the use of manipulatives and communication in mathematics classrooms. Furthermore, teachers need to be aware that their ability to instantaneously access deep levels of content and pedagogical knowledge to further develop students’ spatial thinking is essential and that for optimum learning to occur, both the teacher and students need to be major contributors to the teaching and learning process

Improving Read-Aloud Instruction in an Autism Preschool Classroom

The purpose of this study was to look at what literacy strategies can be implemented to engage autistic preschool students during read-aloud instruction. Through this qualitative case study, I conducted research to find strategies that would engage my students in a way that is purposeful, effective, and create instruction where students take something meaningful away from the lesson. The research was conducted in a self-contained preschool classroom with a focus on Autism. A teacher\u27s journal, family questionnaire, observational and anecdotal notes were used and collected to analyze data from read-aloud instruction. The data that was collected was analyzed through the use of triangulation and coding of student participation patterns and engagement in order to determine themes that emerged from the study. Based on the data analysis it was evident that instruction was more effective in a large group setting when implementing a variety of fiction and nonfiction texts based on student interest. Other factors such as seating arrangements, rereading of texts, incorporation of technology also resulted in an increase in student engagement and students demonstrated greater comprehension of the text. Another key component of effective read-aloud instruction was setting up a read-aloud routine that is predictable and consistent. At the conclusion of the study of implementing these strategies it was evident that student engagement and comprehension of the text increased

A Case Study Exploring the Nature of How Prekindergarten Teachers’ Mathematics Instruction Decisions Relate to Their Mathematics Pedagogical Content Knowledge

The mathematics knowledge students develop in prekindergarten is key to their ability to make sense of more complex mathematics in the future (C. T. Cross, Woods, & Schweingruber, 2009; Ginsburg, Lee, & Boyd, 2008). Research continues to present evidence that there is a mathematics achievement gap between minoritized students living in lower socioeconomic communities compared to their peers before entering kindergarten (Arnold, Fisher, Doctroff, & Dobbs, 2002; Duncan et al., 2007; Sonnenschein & Galindo, 2015; Wang, 2010). The joint position statement issued by the National Association for the Education of Young Children and the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2010) states that all prekindergarten teachers working in public and private settings should utilize age and developmentally appropriate instruction to promote mathematics readiness. Yet there is limited research that provides data that captures non-licensed pre-K teachers’ beliefs towards preschool mathematics or the mathematics instruction these teachers deliver as it relates to age and developmentally appropriate instruction. In order to explore this topic, an exploratory qualitative study was conducted with two non-licensed prekindergarten teachers, framed by McCray’s (2008) mathematical pedagogical content knowledge framework. Data were collected using one structured and two semi-structured interviews, observations, questionnaire, and surveys. The qualitative analysis of these data yielded four themes that shed light on mathematics instruction provided by the two non-licensed pre-K teachers, and they were used to organize the results. Mathematics instruction is related to Theme 1: teacher beliefs and Theme 2: access to available resources. Mathematics in pre-kindergarten Theme 3: is primarily number sense; and Theme 4: mathematics instruction occurs in free-play during center time

A phonological awareness intervention for at-risk preschoolers: the effects of supplemental, intensive small-group instruction

Results from phonological awareness research on assessment and intervention support two major suppositions. First, findings from correlational studies revealing that young children\u27s phonological sensitivity is related to the future development of reading skills (Lonigan et al., 1998) validate early screening of phonological awareness to identify children who may be at risk for encountering reading difficulties. Second, experimental studies examining the effectiveness of phonological awareness instruction demonstrate that young children\u27s phonological sensitivity can be promoted, thereby altering patterns of initial weaknesses (Bentin & Leshem, 1993; O\u27Connor et al., 1995b; Torgesen & Davis, 1996; Warrick et al., 1993) The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of small-group instruction designed to enhance whole-class phonological awareness instruction delivered to preschoolers. Intensive small-group instruction, which supplemented phonological awareness activities conducted with large classroom groups 3 times each week, was provided biweekly to students who demonstrated waeknesses in phonological awareness on pre-treatment measures. The contrast group of low-performing students participated in the whole-class phonological awareness instruction, but received no additional small-group instruction. All students enrolled in 4 different preschool classes participated in phonological awareness instruction delivered to intact classes of 17 to 20 students. Data collected on students participating in the low-skilled treatment and contrast groups and on a sample of average- to high-skilled students, serving as an additional contrast group, were analyzed to examine the effects of supplemental, intensive, small-group phonological awareness instruction delivered to low-skilled preschoolers. The effectiveness of supplemental, intensive, small-group phonological awareness instruction for preschoolers with little awareness of the phonological structure of language was not supported by the results of this study. Analyses of post-intervention scores revealed that the experimental treatment did not promote subjects\u27 phonological awareness to levels significantly higher than those of the low-skilled contrast students, who participated only in phonological awareness instruction delivered to the whole class. The supplemental small-group instruction also did not promote subjects\u27 phonological awareness to levels similar to those of the average- to high-skilled contrast students

Can Maths Apps Add Value to Young Children's Learning? A Systematic Review and Content Analysis

Educational maths applications (apps) are an emerging trend in children’s learning environments aiming to raise their mathematical attainment. However, with over 200,000 educational apps available within the App Store (Apple, 2014), deciding which apps to use poses a significant challenge to teachers, parents, and policy makers. The current study aimed to advance our understandings of whether and how educational maths apps can support children’s learning, as well as outline gaps in current research evidence and practice. In doing so, the current study included: / • A systematic review (Part 1) to synthesise the current evidence on educational maths apps for young children in the first three years of compulsory school (e.g., ages 4-7 years in England; ages 5-8 years in the USA). / • A content analysis (Part 2) to examine the content and design features of different educational maths apps and how they may support children’s learning