2,844 research outputs found
Efficient Identity-Based Encryption Without Random Oracles
We present the first efficient Identity-Based Encryption
(IBE) scheme that is fully secure without random
oracles. We first present our IBE construction and reduce the
security of our scheme to the decisional Bilinear Diffie-Hellman
(BDH) problem. Additionally, we show that our techniques can be used
to build a new signature scheme that is secure under the
computational Diffie-Hellman assumption without random oracles
Pairing-based identification schemes
We propose four different identification schemes that make use of bilinear
pairings, and prove their security under certain computational assumptions.
Each of the schemes is more efficient and/or more secure than any known
pairing-based identification scheme
On the Relations Between Diffie-Hellman and ID-Based Key Agreement from Pairings
This paper studies the relationships between the traditional Diffie-Hellman
key agreement protocol and the identity-based (ID-based) key agreement protocol
from pairings.
For the Sakai-Ohgishi-Kasahara (SOK) ID-based key construction, we show that
identical to the Diffie-Hellman protocol, the SOK key agreement protocol also
has three variants, namely \emph{ephemeral}, \emph{semi-static} and
\emph{static} versions. Upon this, we build solid relations between
authenticated Diffie-Hellman (Auth-DH) protocols and ID-based authenticated key
agreement (IB-AK) protocols, whereby we present two \emph{substitution rules}
for this two types of protocols. The rules enable a conversion between the two
types of protocols. In particular, we obtain the \emph{real} ID-based version
of the well-known MQV (and HMQV) protocol.
Similarly, for the Sakai-Kasahara (SK) key construction, we show that the key
transport protocol underlining the SK ID-based encryption scheme (which we call
the "SK protocol") has its non-ID counterpart, namely the Hughes protocol.
Based on this observation, we establish relations between corresponding
ID-based and non-ID-based protocols. In particular, we propose a highly
enhanced version of the McCullagh-Barreto protocol
A New Cryptosystem Based On Hidden Order Groups
Let be a cyclic multiplicative group of order . It is known that the
Diffie-Hellman problem is random self-reducible in with respect to a
fixed generator if is known. That is, given and
having oracle access to a `Diffie-Hellman Problem' solver with fixed generator
, it is possible to compute in polynomial time (see
theorem 3.2). On the other hand, it is not known if such a reduction exists
when is unknown (see conjuncture 3.1). We exploit this ``gap'' to
construct a cryptosystem based on hidden order groups and present a practical
implementation of a novel cryptographic primitive called an \emph{Oracle Strong
Associative One-Way Function} (O-SAOWF). O-SAOWFs have applications in
multiparty protocols. We demonstrate this by presenting a key agreement
protocol for dynamic ad-hoc groups.Comment: removed examples for multiparty key agreement and join protocols,
since they are redundan
Finding Significant Fourier Coefficients: Clarifications, Simplifications, Applications and Limitations
Ideas from Fourier analysis have been used in cryptography for the last three
decades. Akavia, Goldwasser and Safra unified some of these ideas to give a
complete algorithm that finds significant Fourier coefficients of functions on
any finite abelian group. Their algorithm stimulated a lot of interest in the
cryptography community, especially in the context of `bit security'. This
manuscript attempts to be a friendly and comprehensive guide to the tools and
results in this field. The intended readership is cryptographers who have heard
about these tools and seek an understanding of their mechanics and their
usefulness and limitations. A compact overview of the algorithm is presented
with emphasis on the ideas behind it. We show how these ideas can be extended
to a `modulus-switching' variant of the algorithm. We survey some applications
of this algorithm, and explain that several results should be taken in the
right context. In particular, we point out that some of the most important bit
security problems are still open. Our original contributions include: a
discussion of the limitations on the usefulness of these tools; an answer to an
open question about the modular inversion hidden number problem
Signcryption schemes with threshold unsigncryption, and applications
The final publication is available at link.springer.comThe goal of a signcryption scheme is to achieve the same functionalities as encryption and signature together, but in a more efficient way than encrypting and signing separately. To increase security and reliability in some applications, the unsigncryption phase can be distributed among a group of users, through a (t, n)-threshold process. In this work we consider this task of threshold unsigncryption, which has received very few attention from the cryptographic literature up to now (maybe surprisingly, due to its potential applications). First we describe in detail the security requirements that a scheme for such a task should satisfy: existential unforgeability and indistinguishability, under insider chosen message/ciphertext attacks, in a multi-user setting. Then we show that generic constructions of signcryption schemes (by combining encryption and signature schemes) do not offer this level of security in the scenario of threshold unsigncryption. For this reason, we propose two new protocols for threshold unsigncryption, which we prove to be secure, one in the random oracle model and one in the standard model. The two proposed schemes enjoy an additional property that can be very useful. Namely, the unsigncryption protocol can be divided in two phases: a first one where the authenticity of the ciphertext is verified, maybe by a single party; and a second one where the ciphertext is decrypted by a subset of t receivers, without using the identity of the sender. As a consequence, the schemes can be used in applications requiring some level of anonymity, such as electronic auctions.Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft
Still Wrong Use of Pairings in Cryptography
Several pairing-based cryptographic protocols are recently proposed with a
wide variety of new novel applications including the ones in emerging
technologies like cloud computing, internet of things (IoT), e-health systems
and wearable technologies. There have been however a wide range of incorrect
use of these primitives. The paper of Galbraith, Paterson, and Smart (2006)
pointed out most of the issues related to the incorrect use of pairing-based
cryptography. However, we noticed that some recently proposed applications
still do not use these primitives correctly. This leads to unrealizable,
insecure or too inefficient designs of pairing-based protocols. We observed
that one reason is not being aware of the recent advancements on solving the
discrete logarithm problems in some groups. The main purpose of this article is
to give an understandable, informative, and the most up-to-date criteria for
the correct use of pairing-based cryptography. We thereby deliberately avoid
most of the technical details and rather give special emphasis on the
importance of the correct use of bilinear maps by realizing secure
cryptographic protocols. We list a collection of some recent papers having
wrong security assumptions or realizability/efficiency issues. Finally, we give
a compact and an up-to-date recipe of the correct use of pairings.Comment: 25 page
- …