15,803 research outputs found

    Sample Complexity Bounds on Differentially Private Learning via Communication Complexity

    Full text link
    In this work we analyze the sample complexity of classification by differentially private algorithms. Differential privacy is a strong and well-studied notion of privacy introduced by Dwork et al. (2006) that ensures that the output of an algorithm leaks little information about the data point provided by any of the participating individuals. Sample complexity of private PAC and agnostic learning was studied in a number of prior works starting with (Kasiviswanathan et al., 2008) but a number of basic questions still remain open, most notably whether learning with privacy requires more samples than learning without privacy. We show that the sample complexity of learning with (pure) differential privacy can be arbitrarily higher than the sample complexity of learning without the privacy constraint or the sample complexity of learning with approximate differential privacy. Our second contribution and the main tool is an equivalence between the sample complexity of (pure) differentially private learning of a concept class CC (or SCDP(C)SCDP(C)) and the randomized one-way communication complexity of the evaluation problem for concepts from CC. Using this equivalence we prove the following bounds: 1. SCDP(C)=Ω(LDim(C))SCDP(C) = \Omega(LDim(C)), where LDim(C)LDim(C) is the Littlestone's (1987) dimension characterizing the number of mistakes in the online-mistake-bound learning model. Known bounds on LDim(C)LDim(C) then imply that SCDP(C)SCDP(C) can be much higher than the VC-dimension of CC. 2. For any tt, there exists a class CC such that LDim(C)=2LDim(C)=2 but SCDP(C)tSCDP(C) \geq t. 3. For any tt, there exists a class CC such that the sample complexity of (pure) α\alpha-differentially private PAC learning is Ω(t/α)\Omega(t/\alpha) but the sample complexity of the relaxed (α,β)(\alpha,\beta)-differentially private PAC learning is O(log(1/β)/α)O(\log(1/\beta)/\alpha). This resolves an open problem of Beimel et al. (2013b).Comment: Extended abstract appears in Conference on Learning Theory (COLT) 201

    Locally Differentially Private Gradient Tracking for Distributed Online Learning over Directed Graphs

    Full text link
    Distributed online learning has been proven extremely effective in solving large-scale machine learning problems over streaming data. However, information sharing between learners in distributed learning also raises concerns about the potential leakage of individual learners' sensitive data. To mitigate this risk, differential privacy, which is widely regarded as the "gold standard" for privacy protection, has been widely employed in many existing results on distributed online learning. However, these results often face a fundamental tradeoff between learning accuracy and privacy. In this paper, we propose a locally differentially private gradient tracking based distributed online learning algorithm that successfully circumvents this tradeoff. We prove that the proposed algorithm converges in mean square to the exact optimal solution while ensuring rigorous local differential privacy, with the cumulative privacy budget guaranteed to be finite even when the number of iterations tends to infinity. The algorithm is applicable even when the communication graph among learners is directed. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first result that simultaneously ensures learning accuracy and rigorous local differential privacy in distributed online learning over directed graphs. We evaluate our algorithm's performance by using multiple benchmark machine-learning applications, including logistic regression of the "Mushrooms" dataset and CNN-based image classification of the "MNIST" and "CIFAR-10" datasets, respectively. The experimental results confirm that the proposed algorithm outperforms existing counterparts in both training and testing accuracies.Comment: 21 pages, 4 figure
    corecore