Stochastic DES Fault Diagnosis with Coloured Interpreted Petri Nets

[EN] This proposal presents an online method to detect and isolate faults in stochastic discrete event systems without previous model. A coloured timed interpreted Petri Net generates the normal behavior language after an identification stage.The next step is fault detection that is carried out by comparing the observed event sequences with the expected event sequences. Once a new fault is detected, a learning algorithm changes the structure of the diagnoser, so it is able to learn new fault languages. Moreover, the diagnoser includes timed events to represent and diagnose stochastic languages. Finally, this paper proposes a detectability condition for stochastic DES and the sufficient and necessary conditions are proved.This work was supported by a grant from the Universidad del Cauca, Reference 2.3-31.2/05 2011.Muñoz-Añasco, DM.; Correcher Salvador, A.; García Moreno, E.; Morant Anglada, FJ. (2015). Stochastic DES Fault Diagnosis with Coloured Interpreted Petri Nets. Mathematical Problems in Engineering. 2015:1-13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/303107S1132015Jiang, S., & Kumar, R. (2004). Failure Diagnosis of Discrete-Event Systems With Linear-Time Temporal Logic Specifications. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 49(6), 934-945. doi:10.1109/tac.2004.829616Zaytoon, J., & Lafortune, S. (2013). Overview of fault diagnosis methods for Discrete Event Systems. Annual Reviews in Control, 37(2), 308-320. doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2013.09.009Sampath, M., Sengupta, R., Lafortune, S., Sinnamohideen, K., & Teneketzis, D. (1995). Diagnosability of discrete-event systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 40(9), 1555-1575. doi:10.1109/9.412626Sampath, M., Sengupta, R., Lafortune, S., Sinnamohideen, K., & Teneketzis, D. C. (1996). Failure diagnosis using discrete-event models. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 4(2), 105-124. doi:10.1109/87.486338Estrada-Vargas, A. P., López-Mellado, E., & Lesage, J.-J. (2010). A Comparative Analysis of Recent Identification Approaches for Discrete-Event Systems. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2010, 1-21. doi:10.1155/2010/453254Cabasino, M. P., Giua, A., & Seatzu, C. (2010). Fault detection for discrete event systems using Petri nets with unobservable transitions. Automatica, 46(9), 1531-1539. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2010.06.013Prock, J. (1991). A new technique for fault detection using Petri nets. Automatica, 27(2), 239-245. doi:10.1016/0005-1098(91)90074-cAghasaryan, A., Fabre, E., Benveniste, A., Boubour, R., & Jard, C. (1998). Discrete Event Dynamic Systems, 8(2), 203-231. doi:10.1023/a:1008241818642Hadjicostis, C. N., & Verghese, G. C. (1999). Monitoring Discrete Event Systems Using Petri Net Embeddings. Application and Theory of Petri Nets 1999, 188-207. doi:10.1007/3-540-48745-x_12Benveniste, A., Fabre, E., Haar, S., & Jard, C. (2003). Diagnosis of asynchronous discrete-event systems: a net unfolding approach. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 48(5), 714-727. doi:10.1109/tac.2003.811249Genc, S., & Lafortune, S. (2003). Distributed Diagnosis of Discrete-Event Systems Using Petri Nets. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 316-336. doi:10.1007/3-540-44919-1_21Genc, S., & Lafortune, S. (2007). Distributed Diagnosis of Place-Bordered Petri Nets. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 4(2), 206-219. doi:10.1109/tase.2006.879916Ramirez-Trevino, A., Ruiz-Beltran, E., Rivera-Rangel, I., & Lopez-Mellado, E. (2007). Online Fault Diagnosis of Discrete Event Systems. A Petri Net-Based Approach. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 4(1), 31-39. doi:10.1109/tase.2006.872120Dotoli, M., Fanti, M. P., Mangini, A. M., & Ukovich, W. (2009). On-line fault detection in discrete event systems by Petri nets and integer linear programming. Automatica, 45(11), 2665-2672. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2009.07.021Fanti, M. P., Mangini, A. M., & Ukovich, W. (2013). Fault Detection by Labeled Petri Nets in Centralized and Distributed Approaches. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 10(2), 392-404. doi:10.1109/tase.2012.2203596Basile, F., Chiacchio, P., & De Tommasi, G. (2009). An Efficient Approach for Online Diagnosis of Discrete Event Systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 54(4), 748-759. doi:10.1109/tac.2009.2014932Roth, M., Lesage, J.-J., & Litz, L. (2011). The concept of residuals for fault localization in discrete event systems. Control Engineering Practice, 19(9), 978-988. doi:10.1016/j.conengprac.2011.02.008Roth, M., Schneider, S., Lesage, J.-J., & Litz, L. (2012). Fault detection and isolation in manufacturing systems with an identified discrete event model. International Journal of Systems Science, 43(10), 1826-1841. doi:10.1080/00207721.2011.649369Chung-Hsien Kuo, & Han-Pang Huang. (2000). Failure modeling and process monitoring for flexible manufacturing systems using colored timed Petri nets. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 16(3), 301-312. doi:10.1109/70.850648Ramirez-Trevino, A., Ruiz-Beltran, E., Aramburo-Lizarraga, J., & Lopez-Mellado, E. (2012). Structural Diagnosability of DES and Design of Reduced Petri Net Diagnosers. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans, 42(2), 416-429. doi:10.1109/tsmca.2011.2169950Cabasino, M. P., Giua, A., & Seatzu, C. (2014). Diagnosability of Discrete-Event Systems Using Labeled Petri Nets. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 11(1), 144-153. doi:10.1109/tase.2013.2289360Yao, L., Feng, L., & Jiang, B. (2014). Fault Diagnosis and Fault Tolerant Control for Non-Gaussian Singular Time-Delayed Stochastic Distribution Systems. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2014, 1-9. doi:10.1155/2014/937583Murata, T. (1989). Petri nets: Properties, analysis and applications. Proceedings of the IEEE, 77(4), 541-580. doi:10.1109/5.24143Dotoli, M., Fanti, M. P., & Mangini, A. M. (2008). Real time identification of discrete event systems using Petri nets. Automatica, 44(5), 1209-1219. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2007.10.014Muñoz, D. M., Correcher, A., García, E., & Morant, F. (2014). Identification of Stochastic Timed Discrete Event Systems with st-IPN. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2014, 1-21. doi:10.1155/2014/835312Latorre-Biel, J.-I., Jiménez-Macías, E., Pérez de la Parte, M., Blanco-Fernández, J., & Martínez-Cámara, E. (2014). Control of Discrete Event Systems by Means of Discrete Optimization and Disjunctive Colored PNs: Application to Manufacturing Facilities. Abstract and Applied Analysis, 2014, 1-16. doi:10.1155/2014/821707Cabasino, M. P., Giua, A., Lafortune, S., & Seatzu, C. (2012). A New Approach for Diagnosability Analysis of Petri Nets Using Verifier Nets. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 57(12), 3104-3117. doi:10.1109/tac.2012.2200372Abdelwahed, S., Karsai, G., Mahadevan, N., & Ofsthun, S. C. (2009). Practical Implementation of Diagnosis Systems Using Timed Failure Propagation Graph Models. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 58(2), 240-247. doi:10.1109/tim.2008.200595

On Fault Diagnosis of random Free-choice Petri Nets

This paper presents an on-line diagnosis algorithm for Petri nets where a priori probabilistic knowledge about the plant operation is available. We follow the method developed by Benveniste, Fabre, and Haar to assign probabilities to configurations in a net unfolding thus avoiding the need for randomizing all concurrent interleavings of transitions. We consider different settings of the diagnosis problem, including estimating the likelihood that a fault may have happened prior to the most recent observed event, the likelihood that a fault will have happened prior to the next observed event. A novel problem formulation treated in this paper considers deterministic diagnosis of faults that occurred prior to the most recent observed event, and simultaneous calculation of the likelihood that a fault will occur prior to the next observed event

Minimal Diagnosis and Diagnosability of Discrete-Event Systems Modeled by Automata

In the last several decades, the model-based diagnosis of discrete-event systems (DESs) has increasingly become an active research topic in both control engineering and artificial intelligence. However, in contrast with the widely applied minimal diagnosis of static systems, in most approaches to the diagnosis of DESs, all possible candidate diagnoses are computed, including nonminimal candidates, which may cause intractable complexity when the number of nonminimal diagnoses is very large. According to the principle of parsimony and the principle of joint-probability distribution, generally, the minimal diagnosis of DESs is preferable to a nonminimal diagnosis. To generate more likely diagnoses, the notion of the minimal diagnosis of DESs is presented, which is supported by a minimal diagnoser for the generation of minimal diagnoses. Moreover, to either strongly or weakly decide whether a minimal set of faulty events has definitely occurred or not, two notions of minimal diagnosability are proposed. Necessary and sufficient conditions for determining the minimal diagnosability of DESs are proven. The relationships between the two types of minimal diagnosability and the classical diagnosability are analysed in depth

Probabilistic Analysis of Predictability in Discrete Event Systems

International audiencePredictability is a key property allowing one to expect in advance the occurrence of a fault in a system based on its observed events. Existing works give a binary answer to the question of knowing whether a system is predictable or not. In this paper, we consider discrete event systems where probabilities of the transitions are available. We show how to take advantage of this information to perform a Markov chain based analysis and extract a variety of probability values that give a finer appreciation of the degree of predictability. This analysis is particularly important in case of non predictable systems. We consider a "light" analysis that focuses only on predictability as well as a "deep" analysis that handles in a uniform framework both predictability and diagnosability