69,611 research outputs found
Model-based dependability analysis : state-of-the-art, challenges and future outlook
Abstract: Over the past two decades, the study of model-based dependability analysis has gathered significant research interest. Different approaches have been developed to automate and address various limitations of classical dependability techniques to contend with the increasing complexity and challenges of modern safety-critical system. Two leading paradigms have emerged, one which constructs predictive system failure models from component failure models compositionally using the topology of the system. The other utilizes design models - typically state automata - to explore system behaviour through fault injection. This paper reviews a number of prominent techniques under these two paradigms, and provides an insight into their working mechanism, applicability, strengths and challenges, as well as recent developments within these fields. We also discuss the emerging trends on integrated approaches and advanced analysis capabilities. Lastly, we outline the future outlook for model-based dependability analysis
Computer-aided verification in mechanism design
In mechanism design, the gold standard solution concepts are dominant
strategy incentive compatibility and Bayesian incentive compatibility. These
solution concepts relieve the (possibly unsophisticated) bidders from the need
to engage in complicated strategizing. While incentive properties are simple to
state, their proofs are specific to the mechanism and can be quite complex.
This raises two concerns. From a practical perspective, checking a complex
proof can be a tedious process, often requiring experts knowledgeable in
mechanism design. Furthermore, from a modeling perspective, if unsophisticated
agents are unconvinced of incentive properties, they may strategize in
unpredictable ways.
To address both concerns, we explore techniques from computer-aided
verification to construct formal proofs of incentive properties. Because formal
proofs can be automatically checked, agents do not need to manually check the
properties, or even understand the proof. To demonstrate, we present the
verification of a sophisticated mechanism: the generic reduction from Bayesian
incentive compatible mechanism design to algorithm design given by Hartline,
Kleinberg, and Malekian. This mechanism presents new challenges for formal
verification, including essential use of randomness from both the execution of
the mechanism and from the prior type distributions. As an immediate
consequence, our work also formalizes Bayesian incentive compatibility for the
entire family of mechanisms derived via this reduction. Finally, as an
intermediate step in our formalization, we provide the first formal
verification of incentive compatibility for the celebrated
Vickrey-Clarke-Groves mechanism
Trusting Computations: a Mechanized Proof from Partial Differential Equations to Actual Program
Computer programs may go wrong due to exceptional behaviors, out-of-bound
array accesses, or simply coding errors. Thus, they cannot be blindly trusted.
Scientific computing programs make no exception in that respect, and even bring
specific accuracy issues due to their massive use of floating-point
computations. Yet, it is uncommon to guarantee their correctness. Indeed, we
had to extend existing methods and tools for proving the correct behavior of
programs to verify an existing numerical analysis program. This C program
implements the second-order centered finite difference explicit scheme for
solving the 1D wave equation. In fact, we have gone much further as we have
mechanically verified the convergence of the numerical scheme in order to get a
complete formal proof covering all aspects from partial differential equations
to actual numerical results. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first
time such a comprehensive proof is achieved.Comment: N° RR-8197 (2012). arXiv admin note: text overlap with
arXiv:1112.179
Platform Dependent Verification: On Engineering Verification Tools for 21st Century
The paper overviews recent developments in platform-dependent explicit-state
LTL model checking.Comment: In Proceedings PDMC 2011, arXiv:1111.006
Accurate Verification of Five-Axis Numerically Controlled Machining
Current automated machining systems are composed of a number of components to aid in bringing a surface from design to physical completion. Numerically controlled (NC) milling machines are used to cut parts out of stock. Programming these machines to cut a desired surface is still largely a matter of experienced human participation. Therefore, the need exists to verify that tool programs produce the desired part.
We present recent developments in the verification of NC tool programs. Many of these methods rely on approximating the stock material as vectors whose lengths reflect the amount of uncut material at any point. This allows simulation of 3-axis machining to be carried out efficiently, because the intersection process is simple to compute. Some machines are capable of 5-axis tool movements which are more versatile, but verification of these programs is difficult due to the complexity of the tool motion.
We show several techniques by which it is possible to determine the intersection of 5-axis tool movements and guarantee the accuracy of the results. These techniques can be integrated into current NC machining verification systems to allow checking of 5-axis programs. We then evaluate the relative performance of implementations on test data and real world data
SPEEDY: An Eclipse-based IDE for invariant inference
SPEEDY is an Eclipse-based IDE for exploring techniques that assist users in
generating correct specifications, particularly including invariant inference
algorithms and tools. It integrates with several back-end tools that propose
invariants and will incorporate published algorithms for inferring object and
loop invariants. Though the architecture is language-neutral, current SPEEDY
targets C programs. Building and using SPEEDY has confirmed earlier experience
demonstrating the importance of showing and editing specifications in the IDEs
that developers customarily use, automating as much of the production and
checking of specifications as possible, and showing counterexample information
directly in the source code editing environment. As in previous work,
automation of specification checking is provided by back-end SMT solvers.
However, reducing the effort demanded of software developers using formal
methods also requires a GUI design that guides users in writing, reviewing, and
correcting specifications and automates specification inference.Comment: In Proceedings F-IDE 2014, arXiv:1404.578
- …