1,156 research outputs found

    Computer- and robot-assisted Medical Intervention

    Full text link
    Medical robotics includes assistive devices used by the physician in order to make his/her diagnostic or therapeutic practices easier and more efficient. This chapter focuses on such systems. It introduces the general field of Computer-Assisted Medical Interventions, its aims, its different components and describes the place of robots in that context. The evolutions in terms of general design and control paradigms in the development of medical robots are presented and issues specific to that application domain are discussed. A view of existing systems, on-going developments and future trends is given. A case-study is detailed. Other types of robotic help in the medical environment (such as for assisting a handicapped person, for rehabilitation of a patient or for replacement of some damaged/suppressed limbs or organs) are out of the scope of this chapter.Comment: Handbook of Automation, Shimon Nof (Ed.) (2009) 000-00

    Robotic-assisted internal fixation of femoral fractures

    Get PDF
    Closed surgical techniques for the internal fixation of femoral fractures require orthopaedic surgeons to work in close proximity to X-rays. In addition to the occupational health risk this imposes, inexperienced surgeons often encounter great difficulty in achieving optimal positioning of fracture repair fixtures. A vision-guided robotic system has been proposed as a possible solution to these problems and an initial investigation involving two exemplar orthopaedic procedures has been undertaken. Robotic surgery assistance imposes rigorous safety-related design constraints, since the orthopaedic robot must operate in close proximity to the patient and operating staff. The design and implementation of a purpose-built robotic system for orthopaedic surgery assistance is described in this paper

    Robots and tools for remodeling bone

    Get PDF
    The field of robotic surgery has progressed from small teams of researchers repurposing industrial robots, to a competitive and highly innovative subsection of the medical device industry. Surgical robots allow surgeons to perform tasks with greater ease, accuracy, or safety, and fall under one of four levels of autonomy; active, semi-active, passive, and remote manipulator. The increased accuracy afforded by surgical robots has allowed for cementless hip arthroplasty, improved postoperative alignment following knee arthroplasty, and reduced duration of intraoperative fluoroscopy among other benefits. Cutting of bone has historically used tools such as hand saws and drills, with other elaborate cutting tools now used routinely to remodel bone. Improvements in cutting accuracy and additional options for safety and monitoring during surgery give robotic surgeries some advantages over conventional techniques. This article aims to provide an overview of current robots and tools with a common target tissue of bone, proposes a new process for defining the level of autonomy for a surgical robot, and examines future directions in robotic surgery

    Image-Guided Robotic Dental Implantation With Natural-Root-Formed Implants

    Get PDF
    Dental implantation is now recognized as the standard of the care for tooth replacement. Although many studies show high short term survival rates greater than 95%, long term studies (\u3e 5 years) have shown success rates as low as 41.9%. Reasons affecting the long term success rates might include surgical factors such as limited accuracy of implant placement, lack of spacing controls, and overheating during the placement. In this dissertation, a comprehensive solution for improving the outcome of current dental implantation is presented, which includes computer-aided preoperative planning for better visualization of patient-specific information and automated robotic site-preparation for superior placement and orientation accuracy. Surgical planning is generated using patient-specific three-dimensional (3D) models which are reconstructed from Cone-beam CT images. An innovative image-guided robotic site-preparation system for implants insertion is designed and implemented. The preoperative plan of the implant insertion is transferred into intra-operative operations of the robot using a two-step registration procedure with the help of a Coordinate Measurement Machine (CMM). The natural-root implants mimic the root structure of natural teeth and were proved by Finite Element Method (FEM) to provide superior stress distribution than current cylinder-shape implants. However, due to their complicated geometry, manual site-preparation for these implants cannot be accomplished. Our innovative image-guided robotic implantation system provides the possibility of using this advanced type of implant. Phantom experiments with patient-specific jaw models were performed to evaluate the accuracy of positioning and orientation. Fiducial Registration Error (FRE) values less than 0.20 mm and final Target Registration Error (TRE) values after the two-step registration of 0.36ยฑ0.13 mm (N=5) were achieved. Orientation error was 1.99ยฑ1.27ยฐ (N=14). Robotic milling of the natural-root implant shape with single- and double-root was also tested, and the results proved that their complicated volumes can be removed as designed by the robot. The milling time for single- and double-root shape was 177 s and 1522 s, respectively

    Review of robotic technology for keyhole transcranial stereotactic neurosurgery

    Get PDF
    The research of stereotactic apparatus to guide surgical devices began in 1908, yet a major part of today's stereotactic neurosurgeries still rely on stereotactic frames developed almost half a century ago. Robots excel at handling spatial information, and are, thus, obvious candidates in the guidance of instrumentation along precisely planned trajectories. In this review, we introduce the concept of stereotaxy and describe a standard stereotactic neurosurgery. Neurosurgeons' expectations and demands regarding the role of robots as assistive tools are also addressed. We list the most successful robotic systems developed specifically for or capable of executing stereotactic neurosurgery. A critical review is presented for each robotic system, emphasizing the differences between them and detailing positive features and drawbacks. An analysis of the listed robotic system features is also undertaken, in the context of robotic application in stereotactic neurosurgery. Finally, we discuss the current perspective, and future directions of a robotic technology in this field. All robotic systems follow a very similar and structured workflow despite the technical differences that set them apart. No system unequivocally stands out as an absolute best. The trend of technological progress is pointing toward the development of miniaturized cost-effective solutions with more intuitive interfaces.This work has been partially financed by the NETT Project (FP7-PEOPLE-2011-ITN-289146), ACTIVE Project (FP7-ICT-2009-6-270460), and FCT PhD grant (ref. SFRH/BD/86499/2012)

    Image-guided surgery and medical robotics in the cranial area

    Get PDF
    Surgery in the cranial area includes complex anatomic situations with high-risk structures and high demands for functional and aesthetic results. Conventional surgery requires that the surgeon transfers complex anatomic and surgical planning information, using spatial sense and experience. The surgical procedure depends entirely on the manual skills of the operator. The development of image-guided surgery provides new revolutionary opportunities by integrating presurgical 3D imaging and intraoperative manipulation. Augmented reality, mechatronic surgical tools, and medical robotics may continue to progress in surgical instrumentation, and ultimately, surgical care. The aim of this article is to review and discuss state-of-the-art surgical navigation and medical robotics, image-to-patient registration, aspects of accuracy, and clinical applications for surgery in the cranial area

    Recent trends, technical concepts and components of computer-assisted orthopedic surgery systems: A comprehensive review

    Get PDF
    Computer-assisted orthopedic surgery (CAOS) systems have become one of the most important and challenging types of system in clinical orthopedics, as they enable precise treatment of musculoskeletal diseases, employing modern clinical navigation systems and surgical tools. This paper brings a comprehensive review of recent trends and possibilities of CAOS systems. There are three types of the surgical planning systems, including: systems based on the volumetric images (computer tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or ultrasound images), further systems utilize either 2D or 3D fluoroscopic images, and the last one utilizes the kinetic information about the joints and morphological information about the target bones. This complex review is focused on three fundamental aspects of CAOS systems: their essential components, types of CAOS systems, and mechanical tools used in CAOS systems. In this review, we also outline the possibilities for using ultrasound computer-assisted orthopedic surgery (UCAOS) systems as an alternative to conventionally used CAOS systems.Web of Science1923art. no. 519

    Evaluation of Autonomous Robotic Milling Methodology for Natural Tooth-Shaped Implants Based on SKO Optimization

    Get PDF
    Robotic surgery is one of the most demanding and challenging applications in the field of automatic control. One of the conventional surgeries, the dental implantation, is the standard methodology to place the artificial tooth root composed of titanium material into the upper or lower jawbone. During the dental implant surgery, mechanical removal of the bone material is the most critical procedure because it may affect the patient\u27s safety including damage to the mandibular canal nerve and/or piercing the maxillary sinus. With this problem, even though short term survival rates are greater than 95%, long term success rate of the surgery is as low as 41.9% in 5 years. Since criteria of bone loss should be less than 0.2 mm per year, a high degree of anatomical accuracy is required. Considering the above issues leads to the employment of more precise surgery using computer assisted medical robots. In this dissertation, a computer-aided open-loop intra-operative robotic system with pre-operative planning is presented to improve the success rate of the dental implantation using different types of milling algorithms that also incorporate natural root-shaped implants. This dissertation also presents the refinement and optimization of three-dimensional (3D) dental implants with the complex root shapes of natural teeth. These root shapes are too complex to be drilled manually like current commercial implants and are designed to be conducive to robotic drilling utilizing milling algorithms. Due to the existence of sharp curvatures and undercuts, anatomically correct models must be refined for 3D robotic milling, and these refined shapes must be shown to be optimized for load bearing. Refinement of the anatomically correct natural tooth-shaped models for robotic milling was accomplished using Computer-Aided-Design (CAD) tools for smoothing the sham curvatures and undercuts. The load bearing optimization algorithm is based on the Soft-Kill Option (SKO) method, and the geometries are represented using non-uniform rational B-spline (NURBS) curves and surfaces. Based on these methods, we present optimized single and double root-shaped dental implants for use with robotic site preparation. Evaluation of phantom experiment has led us to investigate how the position, orientation, and depth of the robotic drilling defined with the dental tool exhibit accuracy and efficiency

    ๋กœ๋ด‡์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ์ž์œจ์  ํ•˜์•…๊ณจ์ฑ„์ทจ ๊ณจ์ ˆ๋‹จ์ˆ ์˜ ๊ธฐ์ดˆ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ• ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๊ณผ ๊ทธ ์ •ํ™•๋„ ํ‰๊ฐ€

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ)-- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ์น˜์˜ํ•™๋Œ€ํ•™์› ์น˜์˜๊ณผํ•™๊ณผ, 2019. 2. ๊น€์„ฑ๋ฏผ.Objectives: An autonomous robot osteotomy system using direct coordinate determination was developed in our study. The registration accuracy was evaluated by measuring the fiducial localization error (FLE) and target registration error (TRE) and the accuracy of the designed osteotomy method along a preprogrammed plan was evaluated. Furthermore, the accuracy of the robotic osteotomy and a manual osteotomy was compared in regard to cut position, length, angle and depth. Methods: A light-weight-robot was used in this study, with an electric gripper. A direct coordinate determination method, using three points on the teeth, was developed for registration and determination of FLE and TRE, as measured on a mandible model. Sixteen landmarks on the mandible were prepared with holes and zirconia beads and the TRE was computed in ten repeated measurements using the robot. A direct coordinate determination via three points was used for registering and a twenty stone model (7 cm x 7 cm x 3 cm). The osteotomy line was designed similar to the ramal bone graft (2 cm x 1 cm x 0.5 cm). To evaluate accuracy, we measured a position (how accurate the robot arm is located), length (how accurate the robot arm is moving while cutting), angle (the angle at which the robot arm is located), and depth (the depth of the disc cutting) error. Sixteen mandible phantoms were used to simulate the osteotomy for the ramus bone graft. An image of the phantom was obtained by three-dimensional camera scanning and a virtual ramal bone graft was designed with computer software. To evaluate an accuracy and precision, the mandible phantoms were scanned with cone beam computer tomography (CBCT). Cut position, length, angle and depth errors were measured and the results of the robotic surgery were compared with that of manual surgery. Results: The mean value of the FLE was 0.84 ยฑ 0.38 mm and the third reference point which detected the lingual fossa of the right second molar had a larger error than the other reference points. The mean value of the TRE was 1.69 ยฑ 0.82 mm and there were significant differences between the anterior body, posterior body, and coronoid/condyle groups. Landmarks at the anterior body had the lowest TRE (0.96 ยฑ 0.47 mm) and landmarks on the coronoid and condyle had the highest TRE (2.12 ยฑ 0.99 mm). An autonomous robot osteotomy with a direct coordinate determination using three points was successfully achieved. On the model RBG osteotomy, the posterior cut had 0.77ยฑ0.32 absolute mean value, the anterior cut had 0.82ยฑ0.43, the inferior cut had 0.76 ยฑ 0.38 and the superior cut had 1.37 ยฑ 0.83, respectively. The absolute mean values for osteotomy errors for position, length, angle, and depth were 0.93 ยฑ 0.45 mm, 0.81 ยฑ 0.34 mm, 1.26 ยฑ 1.35ยฐ, and 1.19 ยฑ 0.73 mm, respectively. The position and length errors were significantly lower than angle and depth errors. In the comparison between robotic surgery and manual surgery, there were significant differences of absolute mean value and variance in all categories. For the robotic surgery, the cut position, length, angle and depth errors were 0.70 ยฑ 0.34 mm, 0.35 ยฑ 0.19 mm, 1.32 ยฑ 0.96ยฐ and 0.59 ยฑ 0.46 mm, respectively. For the manual surgery, the cut position, length, angle and depth errors were 1.83 ยฑ 0.65 mm, 0.62 ยฑ 0.37 mm, 5.96 ยฑ 3.47ยฐ and 0.40 ยฑ 0.31 mm, respectively. The robotic surgery had significantly higher accuracy and lower variance for cut position, length and angle errors. On the other hand, the depth error had a significantly higher absolute mean value and variance than the robotic surgery. Conclusions: An autonomous robot osteotomy scheme was developed, using the direct coordinate determination by three points on the teeth, and proved an accurate method for registration. The incisal edge or buccal pit of the teeth were more proper reference points than the fossa of the teeth. The measured RMS of the TRE increased when the target moved away from the reference points. Robotic surgery showed high accuracy and precision in positioning and reduced accuracy in controlling the depth of disc sawing. The robotic surgery showed high accuracy and precision in positioning and somewhat low accuracy in controlling the depth of the disc sawing. Comparing robotic and manual surgeries, the robotic surgery was superior in accuracy and precision in position, length and angle. However, the manual surgery had higher accuracy and precision in depth.1. ๋ชฉ ์  ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์„ธ ์  ์ ‘์ด‰์„ ํ†ตํ•œ ์ขŒํ‘œ ๊ฒฐ์ • ๋ฐฉ์‹์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์‹ค์ œ ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ์ขŒํ‘œ์™€ ๋กœ๋ด‡์ด ๊ฐ€์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ์ขŒํ‘œ๋ฅผ ์ •ํ•ฉํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ์‹์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ž์œจ ๋กœ๋ด‡์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ํ•˜์•…๊ณจ์ฑ„์ทจ ๊ณจ์ ˆ๋‹จ์ˆ ์˜ ๊ธฐ์ดˆ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋œ ์ •ํ•ฉ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์˜ ์œ„์น˜ ์ถ”์  ์˜ค๋ฅ˜ (fiducial localization error)์™€ ๋ชฉํ‘œ ์ •ํ•ฉ ์˜ค๋ฅ˜ (target registration error)๋ฅผ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ •ํ•ฉ์˜ ์ •ํ™•์„ฑ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์‚ฌ์ „์— ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋ž˜๋ฐ๋œ ๊ณจ์ ˆ๋‹จ์„ ์ง์œก๋ฉด์ฒด ๋ชจ๋ธ์— ์‹œํ–‰ํ•˜๊ณ  ์œ„์น˜, ๊ธธ์ด, ๊ฐ๋„, ๊นŠ์ด์˜ ์˜ค๋ฅ˜๋ฅผ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ •ํ™•์„ฑ์„ ์•Œ์•„๋ณด๊ณ ์ž ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์œผ๋กœ 3์ฐจ์› ๊ฐ€์ƒ์ˆ˜์ˆ ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ํ•˜์•… ์ƒํ–‰์ง€ ๊ณจ์ด์‹์ˆ (ramal bone graft)์„ ์„ค๊ณ„ํ•˜๊ณ  ํ•˜์•… ํŒฌํ…€ ๋ชจํ˜•์—์„œ ์ด์— ๋งž๊ฒŒ ์ž์œจ ๋กœ๋ด‡์ด ๊ณจ์ ˆ๋‹จ์ˆ ์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์—ฌ ์•…๊ณจ์—์„œ ์žˆ์–ด์„œ ๋กœ๋ด‡์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ๊ณจ์ ˆ๋‹จ์ˆ ์˜ ์ •ํ™•์„ฑ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•ด ๋ณด๊ณ  ๋ฐ˜๋Œ€์ธก์€ ๋Œ€์กฐ๊ตฐ์œผ๋กœ ์™ธ๊ณผ์˜๊ฐ€ ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ์ „ํ†ต์ ์ธ ๋ฐฉ์‹์œผ๋กœ ๊ณจ์ ˆ๋‹จ์ˆ ์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ์–‘์ธก์„ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•œ๋‹ค. 2. ๋ฐฉ ๋ฒ• ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ฒฝ๋Ÿ‰ ๋กœ๋ด‡์˜ ์ตœ์ข… ์ž‘์šฉ์ฒด(end effector)์— ์ „์ž ๊ทธ๋ฆฌํผ(gripper)๋ฅผ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐํ•˜๊ณ  ์ด ๊ทธ๋ฆฌํผ๊ฐ€ ์ˆ˜์ˆ ์šฉ ์ ˆ์‚ญ๊ธฐ๊ตฌ๋‚˜ ๋””์Šคํฌ๊ฐ€ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ๋œ ์น˜๊ณผ์šฉ ํ•ธ๋“œํ”ผ์Šค๋ฅผ ์žก๊ณ  ๊ณจ์ ˆ๋‹จ์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๋„๋ก ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์‹ค์ œ ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ์ขŒํ‘œ์™€ ๋กœ๋ด‡์ด ๊ฐ€์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ์ขŒํ‘œ๋ฅผ ์ค‘์ฒฉํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์„ธ ์ ์„ ์ฐ์–ด ์ฒซ๋ฒˆ์งธ ์ ์„ ์›์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ•˜๊ณ , ๋‘๋ฒˆ์งธ ์ ์˜ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์„ x์ถ•์œผ๋กœ, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์„ธ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ์ ์ด ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ํ‰๋ฉด์„ xy ํ‰๋ฉด์œผ๋กœ ์ธ์‹ํ•˜๋„๋ก ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ฒซ๋ฒˆ์งธ ์‹คํ—˜์—์„œ๋Š” ์œ„์น˜ ์ถ”์  ์˜ค๋ฅ˜์™€ ๋ชฉํ‘œ ์ •ํ•ฉ ์˜ค๋ฅ˜์˜ ํ‰๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ํ•˜์•…๊ณจ ๋ชจ๋ธ์— ์น˜์•„์˜ ๊ธฐ์ค€ ์„ธ ์ ๊ณผ ํ•˜์•…๊ณจ์˜ ์ด 16๊ฐœ์˜ ๋ชฉํ‘œ ์œ„์น˜์— 1mm ๊ตฌ๋ฉ์„ ๋šซ๊ณ  1mm ์ง€๋ฆ„์˜ ์ง€๋ฅด์ฝ”๋‹ˆ์•„ ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์ ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ CBCT ์ƒ์—์„œ ์ž˜ ๋ณด์ผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ฐ ๋ชฉํ‘œ ์œ„์น˜์— 10๋ฒˆ์”ฉ ๋ฐ˜๋ณตํ•˜์—ฌ ์œ„์น˜๋ฅผ ์ธ์‹ํ•˜์—ฌ ์˜ค๋ฅ˜๋ฅผ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ชฉํ‘œ ์ •ํ•ฉ ์˜ค๋ฅ˜์˜ ์œ„์น˜๋ณ„ ์ฐจ์ด๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋‘๋ฒˆ์งธ ์‹คํ—˜์—์„œ๋Š” ์ด 20 ๊ฐœ์˜ ์ง์œก๋ฉด์ฒด ์„๊ณ  ๋ชจ๋ธ (7cm x 7cm x 3cm)์„ ์ œ์ž‘ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ  ์„๊ณ ์˜ ์ ˆ๋‹จ ํฌ๊ธฐ๋Š” ํ•˜์•… ์ƒํ–‰์ง€ ๊ณจ์ฑ„์ทจ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ณจ์ ˆ๋‹จ ํฌ๊ธฐ (2cm x 1cm x 0.5cm)์™€ ๋™์ผํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์„ค๊ณ„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋กœ๋ด‡ํŒ”์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ 3์  ์ ‘์ด‰์„ ํ•˜๋ฉด ์ขŒํ‘œ๊ฐ’์„ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฏธ๋ฆฌ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋ž˜๋ฐ๋œ ์œ„์น˜์—์„œ ๊ณจ์ ˆ๋‹จ์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋กœ๋ด‡์— ์˜ํ•ด ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋œ ์„๊ณ  ์ ˆ๋‹จ์„ ์€ ์œ„์น˜, ๊ธธ์ด ๊ฐ๋„ ๋ฐ ๊นŠ์ด๋กœ ๋‚˜๋ˆ„์–ด ์˜ค๋ฅ˜๋ฅผ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์„ธ๋ฒˆ์งธ ์‹คํ—˜์—์„œ๋Š” ํ•˜์•… ์ƒํ–‰์ง€ ๊ณจ์ฑ„์ทจ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ณจ์ ˆ๋‹จ ์‹คํ—˜์„ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ด 16๊ฐœ์˜ ํ•˜์•… ํŒฌํ…€ ๋ชจํ˜•์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํŒฌํ…€ ๋ชจํ˜•์„ ์‚ผ์ฐจ์› ์Šค์บ๋‹์œผ๋กœ ์‚ผ์ฐจ์› ์˜์ƒ์„ ์–ป๊ณ  ๊ฐ€์ƒ ์ˆ˜์ˆ ์„ ์‹œํ–‰ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ณจ์ ˆ๋‹จ ํฌ๊ธฐ์™€ ํ˜•ํƒœ ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ๊ทธ ์œ„์น˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ณ„ํš์„ ์„ธ์› ๋‹ค. ์ด ๊ฐ€์ƒ ์ˆ˜์ˆ  ๊ณ„ํš์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋กœ๋ด‡์ด ํŒฌํ…€ ๋ชจ๋ธ์— ๊ณจ์ ˆ๋‹จ ์ˆ˜์ˆ ์„ ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ฐ˜๋Œ€ ์ธก์€ ๋Œ€์กฐ๊ตฐ์œผ๋กœ ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ์ „ํ†ต์ ์ธ ๋ฐฉ์‹์œผ๋กœ ์™ธ๊ณผ์˜๊ฐ€ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์—ฌ ์–‘์ธก์˜ ์˜ค์ฐจ๋ฅผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ ˆ๋‹จ์„ ์˜ ์œ„์น˜, ๊ธธ์ด, ๊ฐ๋„ ๋ฐ ๊นŠ์ด๋ฅผ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฐ๊ฐ์˜ ์ •ํ™•๋„๋ฅผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์œ„์น˜ ์˜ค๋ฅ˜๋Š” x์ถ•์œผ๋กœ๋Š” ๋กœ๋ด‡์ด ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์ ‘์ด‰์„ ์ธ์‹ํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ณจ์ ˆ๋‹จ์„ ์‹œํ–‰ํ•˜๊ธฐ์— 0์˜ ๊ฐ’์œผ๋กœ ์ธก์ •๋˜์—ˆ๊ณ  y ์ถ•๊ณผ z ์ถ•์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜๋ˆ„์–ด ์ธก์ •๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ํ‰๊ท ๊ฐ’๊ณผ ์ œ๊ณฑํ‰๊ท ์ œ๊ณฑ๊ทผ๋ฅผ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. 3. ๊ฒฐ ๊ณผ ์œ„์น˜ ์ถ”์  ์˜ค๋ฅ˜์™€ ๋ชฉํ‘œ ์ •ํ•ฉ ์˜ค๋ฅ˜๋Š” ๊ฐ๊ฐ 0.49ยฑ0.22 mm ์™€ 0.98ยฑ0.47 mm๋กœ ์ธก์ •๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ๊ธฐ์ค€์ ‘์—์„œ ๋ฉ€์–ด์งˆ์ˆ˜๋ก ๋ชฉํ‘œ ์ •ํ•ฉ ์˜ค๋ฅ˜๋Š” ๋” ํฐ ๊ฐ’์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ์„๊ณ  ๋ชจ๋ธ ์‹คํ—˜์—์„œ ์ ˆ๋‹จ์„ ์˜ ์œ„์น˜, ๊ธธ์ด, ๊ฐ๋„ ๋ฐ ๊นŠ์ด์˜ ํ‰๊ท ๊ณผ ํ‘œ์ค€์˜ค์ฐจ๋Š” ๊ฐ๊ฐ 0.93 ยฑ 0.45 mm, 0.81 ยฑ 0.34 mm, 1.26 ยฑ 1.35ยฐ, 1.19 ยฑ 0.73 mm ์ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์œ„์น˜๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ๊ฐ’์„ ๋ณด์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ๊ธธ์ด ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ๊นŠ์ด ์ˆœ์œผ๋กœ ์˜ค์ฐจ๊ฐ€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ฐ๋„์™€ ์ ˆ๋‹จ ๊นŠ์ด ์ œ์–ด๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์˜ค์ฐจ๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ์€ ์ˆ ์‹์ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. ํ•˜์•… ํŒฌํ…€ ์ˆ˜์ˆ ์—์„œ ๋กœ๋ด‡์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ๊ณจ์ ˆ๋‹จ์˜ ์œ„์น˜, ๊ธธ์ด, ๊ฐ๋„ ๋ฐ ๊นŠ์ด ์˜ค์ฐจ ๊ฐ’์€ ๊ฐ๊ฐ 0.70 ยฑ 0.34 mm, 0.35 ยฑ 0.19 mm, 1.32 ยฑ 0.96ยฐ, 0.59 ยฑ 0.46 mm ์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ์™ธ๊ณผ์˜์˜ ๊ณจ์ ˆ๋‹จ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ฐ’์ด ๊ฐ๊ฐ 1.83 ยฑ 0.65 mm, 0.62 ยฑ 0.37 mm, 5.96 ยฑ 3.47ยฐ, 0.40 ยฑ 0.31 mm ์˜€๋‹ค. ์œ„์น˜, ๊ธธ์ด, ๊ฐ๋„ ์˜ค์ฐจ๋Š” ๋กœ๋ด‡์ด ๋” ์ž‘์€ ๊ฐ’์„ ๋ณด์˜€๊ณ  ๊นŠ์ด ์˜ค์ฐจ๋Š” ์™ธ๊ณผ์˜์˜ ์ˆ˜์ˆ ์—์„œ ๋” ์ž‘์€ ๊ฐ’์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. 4. ๊ฒฐ ๋ก  ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ํ•˜์•… ์ƒํ–‰์ง€ ๊ณจ์ฑ„์ทจ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ž์œจ ๋กœ๋ด‡์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ๊ณจ์ ˆ๋‹จ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜์˜€๊ณ  ์œ„์น˜์ถ”์ ์˜ค๋ฅ˜์™€ ๋ชฉํ‘œ์ •ํ•ฉ์˜ค๋ฅ˜ ๋ชจ๋‘ ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•œ ๊ฐ’์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ์„๊ณ  ๋ชจํ˜•๊ณผ ํ•˜์•… ํŒฌํ…€ ๋ชจํ–ฅ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ๋‘๊ฐ€์ง€ ์‹คํ—˜ ๋ชจ๋‘์—์„œ ์œ ์šฉ์„ฑ๊ณผ ํ–ฅ์ƒ๋œ ์ •ํ™•์„ฑ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์„ธ์  ์ ‘์ด‰ ์ขŒํ‘œ ๊ฒฐ์ • ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์€ ์‹ค์ œ ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ์ขŒํ‘œ๋ฅผ ๋กœ๋ด‡์˜ ์ขŒํ‘œ๋กœ ๋“ฑ๋กํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์œ ์šฉํ•œ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์ด์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ํ•˜์•… ์ƒํ–‰์ง€ ๊ณจ์ ˆ๋‹จ์ˆ ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ž์œจ๋กœ๋ด‡ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ์ •ํ™•๋„๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ์™ธ๊ณผ์˜๊ฐ€ ์ง์ ‘ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ์‹๋ณด๋‹ค ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.Abstract (in English) 1. Introduction 1 2. Materials and Methods. 12 3. Results 26 4. Discussion 32 5. Conclusions 40 6. References 41 Tables and Figures 48 Abstract (in Korean) 74Docto

    Robotic-assisted internal fixation of hip fractures: a fluoroscopy-based intraoperative registration technique

    Get PDF
    The internal fixation of proximal femoral (hip) fractures is the most frequently performed orthopaedic surgery procedure. When using a sliding compression hip screw, a commonly used fixation device, accurate positioning of the device within the femoral neck-head is achieved by initially drilling a pilot hole. A cannulated component of the hip screw is then inserted over the guide wire (surgical drill bit), which is used to drill the pilot hole. However, in practice, this fluoroscopically controlled drilling process is severely complicated by a depth perception problem and, as such, a surgeon can require several attempts to achieve a satisfactory guide wire placement. A prototype robotic-assisted orthopaedic surgery system has therefore been developed, with a view to achieving accurate right-first-time guide wire insertions. This paper describes the non-invasive digital X-ray photogrammetry-based registration technique which supports the proposed robotic-assisted drilling scenario. Results from preliminary laboratory (in vitro) trials employing this registration technique indicate that the cumulative error associated with the entire X-ray guided robotic system is within acceptable limits for the guide wire insertion process
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore