A distributional investigation of German verbs

Diese Dissertation bietet eine empirische Untersuchung deutscher Verben auf der Grundlage statistischer Beschreibungen, die aus einem großen deutschen Textkorpus gewonnen wurden. In einem kurzen Überblick über linguistische Theorien zur lexikalischen Semantik von Verben skizziere ich die Idee, dass die Verbbedeutung wesentlich von seiner Argumentstruktur (der Anzahl und Art der Argumente, die zusammen mit dem Verb auftreten) und seiner Aspektstruktur (Eigenschaften, die den zeitlichen Ablauf des vom Verb denotierten Ereignisses bestimmen) abhängt. Anschließend erstelle ich statistische Beschreibungen von Verben, die auf diesen beiden unterschiedlichen Bedeutungsfacetten basieren. Insbesondere untersuche ich verbale Subkategorisierung, Selektionspräferenzen und Aspekt. Alle diese Modellierungsstrategien werden anhand einer gemeinsamen Aufgabe, der Verbklassifikation, bewertet. Ich zeige, dass im Rahmen von maschinellem Lernen erworbene Merkmale, die verbale lexikalische Aspekte erfassen, für eine Anwendung von Vorteil sind, die Argumentstrukturen betrifft, nämlich semantische Rollenkennzeichnung. Darüber hinaus zeige ich, dass Merkmale, die die verbale Argumentstruktur erfassen, bei der Aufgabe, ein Verb nach seiner Aspektklasse zu klassifizieren, gut funktionieren. Diese Ergebnisse bestätigen, dass diese beiden Facetten der Verbbedeutung auf grundsätzliche Weise zusammenhängen.This dissertation provides an empirical investigation of German verbs conducted on the basis of statistical descriptions acquired from a large corpus of German text. In a brief overview of the linguistic theory pertaining to the lexical semantics of verbs, I outline the idea that verb meaning is composed of argument structure (the number and types of arguments that co-occur with a verb) and aspectual structure (properties describing the temporal progression of an event referenced by the verb). I then produce statistical descriptions of verbs according to these two distinct facets of meaning: In particular, I examine verbal subcategorisation, selectional preferences, and aspectual type. All three of these modelling strategies are evaluated on a common task, automatic verb classification. I demonstrate that automatically acquired features capturing verbal lexical aspect are beneficial for an application that concerns argument structure, namely semantic role labelling. Furthermore, I demonstrate that features capturing verbal argument structure perform well on the task of classifying a verb for its aspectual type. These findings suggest that these two facets of verb meaning are related in an underlying way

An interdisciplinary, cross-lingual perspective

Multiword expressions (MWEs), such as noun compounds (e.g. nickname in English, and Ohrwurm in German), complex verbs (e.g. give up in English, and aufgeben in German) and idioms (e.g. break the ice in English, and das Eis brechen in German), may be interpreted literally but often undergo meaning shifts with respect to their constituents. Theoretical, psycholinguistic as well as computational linguistic research remain puzzled by when and how MWEs receive literal vs. meaning-shifted interpretations, what the contributions of the MWE constituents are to the degree of semantic transparency (i.e., meaning compositionality) of the MWE, and how literal vs. meaning-shifted MWEs are processed and computed. This edited volume presents an interdisciplinary selection of seven papers on recent findings across linguistic, psycholinguistic, corpus-based and computational research fields and perspectives, discussing the interaction of constituent properties and MWE meanings, and how MWE constituents contribute to the processing and representation of MWEs. The collection is based on a workshop at the 2017 annual conference of the German Linguistic Society (DGfS) that took place at Saarland University in Saarbrücken, German

The role of constituents in multiword expressions

Multiword expressions (MWEs), such as noun compounds (e.g. nickname in English, and Ohrwurm in German), complex verbs (e.g. give up in English, and aufgeben in German) and idioms (e.g. break the ice in English, and das Eis brechen in German), may be interpreted literally but often undergo meaning shifts with respect to their constituents. Theoretical, psycholinguistic as well as computational linguistic research remain puzzled by when and how MWEs receive literal vs. meaning-shifted interpretations, what the contributions of the MWE constituents are to the degree of semantic transparency (i.e., meaning compositionality) of the MWE, and how literal vs. meaning-shifted MWEs are processed and computed. This edited volume presents an interdisciplinary selection of seven papers on recent findings across linguistic, psycholinguistic, corpus-based and computational research fields and perspectives, discussing the interaction of constituent properties and MWE meanings, and how MWE constituents contribute to the processing and representation of MWEs. The collection is based on a workshop at the 2017 annual conference of the German Linguistic Society (DGfS) that took place at Saarland University in Saarbrücken, Germany

The role of constituents in multiword expressions

Multiword expressions (MWEs), such as noun compounds (e.g. nickname in English, and Ohrwurm in German), complex verbs (e.g. give up in English, and aufgeben in German) and idioms (e.g. break the ice in English, and das Eis brechen in German), may be interpreted literally but often undergo meaning shifts with respect to their constituents. Theoretical, psycholinguistic as well as computational linguistic research remain puzzled by when and how MWEs receive literal vs. meaning-shifted interpretations, what the contributions of the MWE constituents are to the degree of semantic transparency (i.e., meaning compositionality) of the MWE, and how literal vs. meaning-shifted MWEs are processed and computed. This edited volume presents an interdisciplinary selection of seven papers on recent findings across linguistic, psycholinguistic, corpus-based and computational research fields and perspectives, discussing the interaction of constituent properties and MWE meanings, and how MWE constituents contribute to the processing and representation of MWEs. The collection is based on a workshop at the 2017 annual conference of the German Linguistic Society (DGfS) that took place at Saarland University in Saarbrücken, Germany

Bridging Formal and Conceptual Semantics

The articles in this volume are the outcome of the successful BRIDGE Workshop held in Düsseldorf in 2014. The workshop gathered a number of distinguished researchers from formal semantics and conceptual semantics and aimed to initiate a deeper conversation and collaboration instead of separating the two sides as competing views. The workshop provided a platform to further discuss parallelisms on specific semantic issues on the one hand and on the other hand to confront opposed claims from the two different perspectives. This volume represents a selected number of high-quality papers presented at the workshop featuring various approaches to meaning from linguistics, logic and philosophy of language. This series explores issues of mental representation, linguistic structure and representation, and their interplay. The research presented in this series is grounded in the idea explored in the Collaborative Research Center ‘The structure of representations in language, cognition and science’ (SFB 991) that there is a universal format for the representation of linguistic and cognitive concepts

Bridging Formal and Conceptual Semantics

The articles in this volume are the outcome of the successful BRIDGE Workshop held in Düsseldorf in 2014. The workshop gathered a number of distinguished researchers from formal semantics and conceptual semantics and aimed to initiate a deeper conversation and collaboration instead of separating the two sides as competing views. The workshop provided a platform to further discuss parallelisms on specific semantic issues on the one hand and on the other hand to confront opposed claims from the two different perspectives. This volume represents a selected number of high-quality papers presented at the workshop featuring various approaches to meaning from linguistics, logic and philosophy of language. This series explores issues of mental representation, linguistic structure and representation, and their interplay. The research presented in this series is grounded in the idea explored in the Collaborative Research Center ‘The structure of representations in language, cognition and science’ (SFB 991) that there is a universal format for the representation of linguistic and cognitive concepts

Incremental Coreference Resolution for German

The main contributions of this thesis are as follows: 1. We introduce a general model for coreference and explore its application to German. • The model features an incremental discourse processing algorithm which allows it to coherently address issues caused by underspecification of mentions, which is an especially pressing problem regarding certain German pronouns. • We introduce novel features relevant for the resolution of German pronouns. A subset of these features are made accessible through the incremental architecture of the discourse processing model. • In evaluation, we show that the coreference model combined with our features provides new state-of-the-art results for coreference and pronoun resolution for German. 2. We elaborate on the evaluation of coreference and pronoun resolution. • We discuss evaluation from the view of prospective downstream applications that benefit from coreference resolution as a preprocessing component. Addressing the shortcomings of the general evaluation framework in this regard, we introduce an alternative framework, the Application Related Coreference Scores (ARCS). • The ARCS framework enables a thorough comparison of different system outputs and the quantification of their similarities and differences beyond the common coreference evaluation. We demonstrate how the framework is applied to state-of-the-art coreference systems. This provides a method to track specific differences in system outputs, which assists researchers in comparing their approaches to related work in detail. 3. We explore semantics for pronoun resolution. • Within the introduced coreference model, we explore distributional approaches to estimate the compatibility of an antecedent candidate and the occurrence context of a pronoun. We compare a state-of-the-art approach for word embeddings to syntactic co-occurrence profiles to this end. • In comparison to related work, we extend the notion of context and thereby increase the applicability of our approach. We find that a combination of both compatibility models, coupled with the coreference model, provides a large potential for improving pronoun resolution performance. We make available all our resources, including a web demo of the system, at: http://pub.cl.uzh.ch/purl/coreference-resolutio

Cross-lingual question answering

Question Answering has become an intensively researched area in the last decade, being seen as the next step beyond Information Retrieval in the attempt to provide more concise and better access to large volumes of available information. Question Answering builds on Information Retrieval technology for a first touch of possible relevant data and uses further natural language processing techniques to search for candidate answers and to look for clues that accept or invalidate the candidates as right answers to the question. Though most of the research has been carried out in monolingual settings, where the question and the answer-bearing documents share the same natural language, current approaches concentrate on cross-language scenarios, where the question and the documents are in different languages. Known in this context and common with the Information Retrieval research are three methods of crossing the language barrier: by translating the question, by translating the documents or by aligning both the question and the documents to a common inter-lingual representation. We present a cross-lingual English to German Question Answering system, for both factoid and definition questions, using a German monolingual system and translating the questions from English to German. Two different techniques of translation are evaluated: • direct translation of the English input question into German and • transfer-based translation, by using an intermediate representation that captures the “meaning” of the original question and is translated into the target language. For both translation techniques two types of translation tools are used: bilingual dictionaries and machine translation. The intermediate representation captures the semantic meaning of the question in terms of Question Type (QType), Expected Answer Type (EAType) and Focus, information that steers the workflow of the question answering process. The German monolingual Question Answering system can answer both factoid and definition questions and is based on several premises: • facts and definitions are usually expressed locally at the level of a sentence and its surroundings; • proximity of concepts within a sentence can be related to their semantic dependency; • for factoid questions, redundancy of candidate answers is a good indicator of their suitability; • definitions of concepts are expressed using fixed linguistic structures such as appositions, modifiers, and abbreviation extensions. Extensive evaluations of the monolingual system have shown that the above mentioned hypothesis holds true in most of the cases when dealing with a fairly large collection of documents, like the one used in the CLEF evaluation forum.Innerhalb der letzten zehn Jahre hat sich Question Answering zu einem intensiv erforschten Themengebiet gewandelt, es stellt den nächsten Schritt des Information Retrieval dar, mit dem Bestreben einen präziseren Zugang zu großen Datenbeständen von verfügbaren Informationen bereitzustellen. Das Question Answering setzt auf die Information Retrieval-Technologie, um mögliche relevante Daten zu suchen, kombiniert mit weiteren Techniken zur Verarbeitung von natürlicher Sprache, um mögliche Antwortkandidaten zu identifizieren und diese anhand von Hinweisen oder Anhaltspunkten entsprechend der Frage als richtige Antwort zu akzeptieren oder als unpassend zu erklären. Während ein Großteil der Forschung den einsprachigen Kontext voraussetzt, wobei Frage- und Antwortdokumente ein und dieselbe Sprache teilen, konzentrieren sich aktuellere Ansätze auf sprachübergreifende Szenarien, in denen die Frage- und Antwortdokumente in unterschiedlichen Sprachen vorliegen. Im Kontext des Information Retrieval existieren drei bekannte Ansätze, die versuchen auf unterschiedliche Art und Weise die Sprachbarriere zu überwinden: durch die Übersetzung der Frage, durch die Übersetzung der Dokumente oder durch eine Angleichung von sowohl der Frage als auch der Dokumente zu einer gemeinsamen interlingualen Darstellung. Wir präsentieren ein sprachübergreifendes Question Answering System vom Englischen ins Deutsche, das sowohl für Faktoid- als auch für Definitionsfragen funktioniert. Dazu verwenden wir ein einsprachiges deutsches System und übersetzen die Fragen vom Englischen ins Deutsche. Zwei unterschiedliche Techniken der Übersetzung werden untersucht: • die direkte Übersetzung der englischen Fragestellung ins Deutsche und • die Abbildungs-basierte Übersetzung, die eine Zwischendarstellung verwendet, um die „Semantik“ der ursprünglichen Frage zu erfassen und in die Zielsprache zu übersetzen. Für beide aufgelisteten Übersetzungstechniken werden zwei Übersetzungsquellen verwendet: zweisprachige Wörterbücher und maschinelle Übersetzung. Die Zwischendarstellung erfasst die Semantik der Frage in Bezug auf die Art der Frage (QType), den erwarteten Antworttyp (EAType) und Fokus, sowie die Informationen, die den Ablauf des Frage-Antwort-Prozesses steuern. Das deutschsprachige Question Answering System kann sowohl Faktoid- als auch Definitionsfragen beantworten und basiert auf mehreren Prämissen: • Fakten und Definitionen werden in der Regel lokal auf Satzebene ausgedrückt; • Die Nähe von Konzepten innerhalb eines Satzes kann auf eine semantische Verbindung hinweisen; • Bei Faktoidfragen ist die Redundanz der Antwortkandidaten ein guter Indikator für deren Eignung; • Definitionen von Begriffen werden mit festen sprachlichen Strukturen ausgedrückt, wie Appositionen, Modifikatoren, Abkürzungen und Erweiterungen. Umfangreiche Auswertungen des einsprachigen Systems haben gezeigt, dass die oben genannten Hypothesen in den meisten Fällen wahr sind, wenn es um eine ziemlich große Sammlung von Dokumenten geht, wie bei der im CLEF Evaluationsforum verwendeten Version

Proceedings

Proceedings of the Ninth International Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories. Editors: Markus Dickinson, Kaili Müürisep and Marco Passarotti. NEALT Proceedings Series, Vol. 9 (2010), 268 pages. © 2010 The editors and contributors. Published by Northern European Association for Language Technology (NEALT) http://omilia.uio.no/nealt . Electronically published at Tartu University Library (Estonia) http://hdl.handle.net/10062/15891

Bridging Formal and Conceptual Semantics Selected papers of BRIDGE-14

The articles in this volume are the outcome of the successful BRIDGE Workshop held in Düsseldorf in 2014. The workshop gathered a number of distinguished researchers from formal semantics and conceptual semantics and aimed to initiate a deeper conversation and collaboration instead of separating the two sides as competing views. The workshop provided a platform to further discuss parallelisms on specific semantic issues on the one hand and on the other hand to confront opposed claims from the two different perspectives. This volume represents a selected number of high-quality papers presented at the workshop featuring various approaches to meaning from linguistics, logic and philosophy of language. The series 'Studies in Language and Cognition' explores issues of mental representation, linguistic structure and representation, and their interplay. The research presented in this series is grounded in the idea explored in the Collaborative Research Center 'The structure of representations in language, cognition and science' (SFB 991) that there is a universal format for the representation of linguistic and cognitive concepts