730 research outputs found

    Effectiveness of Lateral Auditory Collision Warnings: Should Warnings Be Toward Danger or Toward Safety?

    Get PDF
    Objective. The present study investigated the design of spatially oriented auditory collision warning signals to facilitate driversโ€™ responses to potential collisions. Background. Prior studies on collision warnings have mostly focused on manual driving. It is necessary to examine the design of collision warnings for safe take-over actions in semi-autonomous driving. Method. In a video-based semi-autonomous driving scenario, participants responded to pedestrians walking across the road, with a warning tone presented in either the avoidance direction or the collision direction. The time interval between the warning tone and the potential collision was also manipulated. In Experiment 1, pedestrians always started walking from one side of the road to the other side. In Experiment 2, pedestrians appeared in the middle of the road and walked toward either side of the road. Results. In Experiment 1, drivers reacted to the pedestrian faster with collision-direction warnings than with avoidance-direction warnings. In Experiment 2, the difference between the two warning directions became non-significant. In both experiments, shorter time intervals to potential collisions resulted in faster reactions but did not influence the effect of warning direction. Conclusion. The collision-direction warnings were advantageous over the avoidance-direction warnings only when they occurred at the same lateral location as the pedestrian, indicating that this advantage was due to the capture of attention by the auditory warning signals. Application. The present results indicate that drivers would benefit most when warnings occur at the side of potential collision objects rather than the direction of a desirable action during semi-autonomous driving

    A systematic literature review on the relationship between autonomous vehicle technology and traffic-related mortality.

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(์„์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ํ–‰์ •๋Œ€ํ•™์› ๊ธ€๋กœ๋ฒŒํ–‰์ •์ „๊ณต, 2023. 2. ์ตœํƒœํ˜„.The society is anticipated to gain a lot from Autonomous Vehicles (AV), such as improved traffic flow and a decrease in accidents. They heavily rely on improvements in various Artificial Intelligence (AI) processes and strategies. Though some researchers in this field believe AV is the key to enhancing safety, others believe AV creates new challenges when it comes to ensuring the security of these new technology/systems and applications. The article conducts a systematic literature review on the relationship between autonomous vehicle technology and traffic-related mortality. According to inclusion and exclusion criteria, articles from EBSCO, ProQuest, IEEE Explorer, Web of Science were chosen, and they were then sorted. The findings reveal that the most of these publications have been published in advanced transport-related journals. Future improvements in the automobile industry and the development of intelligent transportation systems could help reduce the number of fatal traffic accidents. Technologies for autonomous cars provide effective ways to enhance the driving experience and reduce the number of traffic accidents. A multitude of driving-related problems, such as crashes, traffic, energy usage, and environmental pollution, will be helped by autonomous driving technology. More research is needed for the significant majority of the studies that were assessed. They need to be expanded so that they can be tested in real-world or computer-simulated scenarios, in better and more realistic scenarios, with better and more data, and in experimental designs where the results of the proposed strategy are compared to those of industry standards and competing strategies. Therefore, additional study with improved methods is needed. Another major area that requires additional research is the moral and ethical choices made by AVs. Government, policy makers, manufacturers, and designers all need to do many actions in order to deploy autonomous vehicles on the road effectively. The government should develop laws, rules, and an action plan in particular. It is important to create more effective programs that might encourage the adoption of emerging technology in transportation systems, such as driverless vehicles. In this regard, user perception becomes essential since it may inform designers about current issues and observations made by people. The perceptions of autonomous car users in developing countries like Azerbaijan haven't been thoroughly studied up to this point. The manufacturer has to fix the system flaw and needs a good data set for efficient operation. In the not-too-distant future, the widespread use of highly automated vehicles (AVs) may open up intriguing new possibilities for resolving persistent issues in current safety-related research. Further research is required to better understand and quantify the significant policy implications of Avs, taking into consideration factors like penetration rate, public adoption, technological advancements, traffic patterns, and business models. It only needs to take into account peer-reviewed, full-text journal papers for the investigation, but it's clear that a larger database and more documents would provide more results and a more thorough analysis.์ž์œจ์ฃผํ–‰์ฐจ(AV)๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ตํ†ต ํ๋ฆ„์ด ๊ฐœ์„ ๋˜๊ณ  ์‚ฌ๊ณ ๊ฐ€ ์ค„์–ด๋“œ๋Š” ๋“ฑ ์‚ฌํšŒ๊ฐ€ ์–ป๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ๋งŽ์„ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์˜ˆ์ƒ๋œ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋“ค์€ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ(AI) ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค์™€ ์ „๋žต์˜ ๊ฐœ์„ ์— ํฌ๊ฒŒ ์˜์กดํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋ถ„์•ผ์˜ ์ผ๋ถ€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์ž๋“ค์€ AV๊ฐ€ ์•ˆ์ „์„ฑ์„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ์—ด์‡ ๋ผ๊ณ  ๋ฏฟ์ง€๋งŒ, ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์ž๋“ค์€ AV๊ฐ€ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๊ธฐ์ˆ /์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ๋ฐ ์• ํ”Œ๋ฆฌ์ผ€์ด์…˜์˜ ๋ณด์•ˆ์„ ๋ณด์žฅํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จํ•˜์—ฌ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ์•ผ๊ธฐํ•œ๋‹ค๊ณ  ๋ฏฟ๋Š”๋‹ค. ์ด ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ์ž์œจ์ฃผํ–‰์ฐจ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ๊ณผ ๊ตํ†ต ๊ด€๋ จ ์‚ฌ๋ง๋ฅ  ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ฒด๊ณ„์ ์ธ ๋ฌธํ—Œ ๊ฒ€ํ† ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•œ๋‹ค. ํฌํ•จ ๋ฐ ์ œ์™ธ ๊ธฐ์ค€์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ EBSCO, ProQuest, IEEE Explorer ๋ฐ Web of Science์˜ ๊ธฐ์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ์„ ํƒํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜ํ–ˆ๋‹ค.์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์ถœํŒ๋ฌผ์˜ ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์ด ๊ณ ๊ธ‰ ์šด์†ก ๊ด€๋ จ ์ €๋„์— ๊ฒŒ์žฌ๋˜์—ˆ์Œ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค€๋‹ค. ๋ฏธ๋ž˜์˜ ์ž๋™์ฐจ ์‚ฐ์—…์˜ ๊ฐœ์„ ๊ณผ ์ง€๋Šฅํ˜• ๊ตํ†ต ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์€ ์น˜๋ช…์ ์ธ ๊ตํ†ต ์‚ฌ๊ณ ์˜ ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ค„์ด๋Š” ๋ฐ ๋„์›€์ด ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ž์œจ์ฃผํ–‰ ์ž๋™์ฐจ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์€ ์šด์ „ ๊ฒฝํ—˜์„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ค๊ณ  ๊ตํ†ต ์‚ฌ๊ณ ์˜ ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ค„์ผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ธ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ถฉ๋Œ, ๊ตํ†ต, ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์‚ฌ์šฉ, ํ™˜๊ฒฝ ์˜ค์—ผ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ์ˆ˜๋งŽ์€ ์šด์ „ ๊ด€๋ จ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋“ค์€ ์ž์œจ ์ฃผํ–‰ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์— ์˜ํ•ด ๋„์›€์„ ๋ฐ›์„ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ํ‰๊ฐ€๋œ ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๋” ๋งŽ์€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ์‹ค์ œ ๋˜๋Š” ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค, ๋” ์ข‹๊ณ  ํ˜„์‹ค์ ์ธ ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค, ๋” ์ข‹๊ณ  ๋” ๋งŽ์€ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ์ „๋žต ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ์‚ฐ์—… ํ‘œ์ค€ ๋ฐ ๊ฒฝ์Ÿ ์ „๋žต์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์™€ ๋น„๊ต๋˜๋Š” ์‹คํ—˜ ์„ค๊ณ„์—์„œ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ํ™•์žฅ๋˜์–ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๊ฐœ์„ ๋œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ถ”๊ฐ€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ์ถ”๊ฐ€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ๋˜ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์ฃผ์š” ๋ถ„์•ผ๋Š” AV์˜ ๋„๋•์ , ์œค๋ฆฌ์  ์„ ํƒ์ด๋‹ค. ์ •๋ถ€, ์ •์ฑ… ์ž…์•ˆ์ž, ์ œ์กฐ์—…์ฒด ๋ฐ ์„ค๊ณ„์ž๋Š” ๋ชจ๋‘ ์ž์œจ ์ฃผํ–‰ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰์„ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋„๋กœ์— ๋ฐฐ์น˜ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋งŽ์€ ์กฐ์น˜๋ฅผ ์ทจํ•ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ •๋ถ€๋Š” ํŠนํžˆ ๋ฒ•, ๊ทœ์น™, ์‹คํ–‰ ๊ณ„ํš์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์šด์ „์ž ์—†๋Š” ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ์šด์†ก ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์—์„œ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์˜ ์ฑ„ํƒ์„ ์žฅ๋ คํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ณด๋‹ค ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ธ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์„ ๋งŒ๋“œ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ์ด์™€ ๊ด€๋ จํ•˜์—ฌ, ์„ค๊ณ„์ž์—๊ฒŒ ํ˜„์žฌ ์ด์Šˆ์™€ ์‚ฌ๋žŒ์— ์˜ํ•œ ๊ด€์ฐฐ์„ ์•Œ๋ ค์ค„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž ์ธ์‹์ด ํ•„์ˆ˜์ ์ด ๋œ๋‹ค.์ œ์กฐ์—…์ฒด๋Š” ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ๊ฒฐํ•จ์„ ์ˆ˜์ •ํ•ด์•ผ ํ•˜๋ฉฐ ํšจ์œจ์ ์ธ ์ž‘๋™์„ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ข‹์€ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์„ธํŠธ๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ๋ฉ€์ง€ ์•Š์€ ๋ฏธ๋ž˜์—, ๊ณ ๋„๋กœ ์ž๋™ํ™”๋œ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰(AV)์˜ ๊ด‘๋ฒ”์œ„ํ•œ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์€ ํ˜„์žฌ์˜ ์•ˆ์ „ ๊ด€๋ จ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ์ง€์†์ ์ธ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ํฅ๋ฏธ๋กœ์šด ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์„ ์—ด์–ด์ค„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณด๊ธ‰๋ฅ , ๊ณต๊ณต ์ฑ„ํƒ, ๊ธฐ์ˆ  ๋ฐœ์ „, ๊ตํ†ต ํŒจํ„ด ๋ฐ ๋น„์ฆˆ๋‹ˆ์Šค ๋ชจ๋ธ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ์š”์†Œ๋ฅผ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์—ฌ Avs์˜ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์ •์ฑ… ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋” ์ž˜ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๊ณ  ์ •๋Ÿ‰ํ™”ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ถ”๊ฐ€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ์กฐ์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋™๋ฃŒ ๊ฒ€ํ† ๋ฅผ ๊ฑฐ์นœ ์ „๋ฌธ ์ €๋„ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ๋งŒ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜๋ฉด ๋˜์ง€๋งŒ, ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฒ ์ด์Šค๊ฐ€ ์ปค์ง€๊ณ  ๋ฌธ์„œ๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ์•„์ง€๋ฉด ๋” ๋งŽ์€ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์™€ ๋” ์ฒ ์ €ํ•œ ๋ถ„์„์ด ์ œ๊ณต๋  ๊ฒƒ์ด ๋ถ„๋ช…ํ•˜๋‹ค.Abstract 3 Table of Contents 6 List of Tables 7 List of Figures 7 List of Appendix 7 CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 8 1.1. Background 8 1.2. Purpose of Research 13 CHAPTER 2: AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES 21 2.1. Intelligent Traffic Systems 21 2.2. System Architecture for Autonomous Vehicles 22 2.3. Key components in AV classification 27 CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY AND DATA COLLECTION PROCEDURE 35 CHAPTER 4: FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION 39 4.1. RQ1: Do autonomous vehicles reduce traffic-related deaths 40 4.2. RQ2: Are there any challenges to using autonomous vehicles 63 4.3. RQ3: As a developing country, how effective is the use of autonomous vehicles for reducing traffic mortality 72 CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSION 76 5.1. Summary 76 5.2. Implications and Recommendations 80 5.3. Limitation of the study 91 Bibliography 93 List of Tables Table 1: The 6 Levels of Autonomous Vehicles Table 2: Search strings Table 3: Inclusion and exclusion criteria List of Figures Figure 1: Traffic Death Comparison with Europe Figure 2: Research strategy and study selection process List of Appendix Appendix 1: List of selected articles์„

    Eine mikrosimulationsbasierte Methode zur Beurteilung der Leistungsfรคhigkeit von Shared Space

    Get PDF
    Shared space is a concept of urban street design which implies the creation of a level surface within the whole road reserve and is aimed at encouraging different road users to interact spontaneously and to negotiate priority with each other. To build successful shared spaces, traffic engineers can rely at present on specific guidelines as well as technical reports. Nevertheless, there is no method available to compute the performance of shared spaces in terms of Level Of Service (LOS). In order to address this gap, a new indicator of traffic quality for pedestrians is being developed. This measure of performance considers aspects of comfort related to the crossing, which pedestrians use to go from one side of the roadway to the other. During this movement, discomfort is generated by the necessity to solve the conflicts with vehicles. Therefore, factors which potentially influence comfort are mathematically formulated. Later, the performance indicator can be calibrated on the basis of the opinion of a group of respondents, who evaluated real-world crossing movements in video sequences. The effectiveness and usability of the developed indicator is demonstrated in an exemplary case study. A shared street in the district of Bergedorf, Hamburg (D) is selected and filmed. To reproduce the interaction of road users and the mechanism of space negotiation, an innovative modeling approach based on social force model (SFM) is proposed. The model is calibrated and implemented in a Java-based simulation tool. Alternative shared space scenarios, as well as conventional ones with space segregation, are simulated. The goal of this dissertation is to establish a method to evaluate the performances of shared spaces through traffic microsimulation. This method includes the data survey and acquisition, the definition of performance indicators, the development of a microsimulation approach, the calibration of the motion model on the basis of real-world data and finally the execution of simulations to collect the results. In addition, this work shows the necessity to employ a comfort-based indicator for pedestrian traffic quality in shared spaces. The benefits of this approach, with respect to conventional efficiency-based indicators as time delay, is properly shown in real-world situations and successively demonstrated by help of statistical methods.Shared Space ist ein Konzept der urbanen StraรŸengestaltung, das die Schaffung von niveaugleichen Zonen im gesamten StraรŸenquerschnitt beinhaltet, und darauf abzielt, die verschiedenen Verkehrsteilnehmer zu ermutigen, spontan zu interagieren und den Vorrang untereinander auszuhandeln. Um erfolgreiche Shared Spaces zu gestalten, kรถnnen sich Ingenieure derzeit auf spezifische Richtlinien, sowie auf technische Berichte stรผtzen. Dennoch gibt es keine Methode, um die Qualitรคt des Shared Space im Hinblick auf den Level of Service (LOS) zu kalkulieren. Daher wird ein neuer Verkehrsqualitรคtsindikator fรผr FuรŸgรคnger entwickelt. Diese ErfolgsmessgrรถรŸe berรผcksichtigt Komfortaspekte hinsichtlich der von FuรŸgรคngern zur Querung der StraรŸen benutzten รœbergรคnge. Wรคhrend der รœberquerung wird durch das Aushandeln des Vorrangs mit den Fahrzeugen ein Unbehagen erzeugt. Daher werden potentiell komfortbeeinflussende Faktoren mathematisch formuliert. Spรคter kann der Leistungsindikator auf Basis der Ansicht einer Umfragegruppe, die reale StraรŸenรผberquerungen in Videosequenzen auswertet, kalibriert werden. Die Effektivitรคt und Tauglichkeit des entwickelten Indikators wird in einer exemplarischen Fallstudie im Hamburger Bezirk Bergedorf demonstriert. Hierzu wird der dortige Shared Space gefilmt. Um die Interaktion von Verkehrsteilnehmern und die Wirkungsweise der Verkehrsraumaushandlung nachzustellen, wird ein innovativer Modellierungsansatz, der auf dem sozialen Krรคftemodell basiert, empfohlen. Das Modell wird in einem Java-basierten Simulationstool kalibriert und implementiert. Verschiedene Shared Space Arten und konventionelle Szenarien mit Raumtrennung werden simuliert. Das Ziel dieser Dissertation ist es, ein Verfahren zur Auswertung der Performances von Shared Spaces durch Verkehrsmikrosimulation zu entwickeln. Dieses Verfahren beinhaltet die Datenerhebung und โ€“erfassung, die Definition der Leistungsindikatoren, die Entwicklung eines Mikrosimulationsansatzes und die Kalibrierung des Bewegungsmodells auf Basis realer Daten. Zudem werden Simulationen durchgefรผhrt, um Ergebnisse zu sammeln. Des Weiteren zeigt diese Arbeit die Notwendigkeit, einen komfortbasierten Indikator fรผr die Verkehrsqualitรคt der FuรŸgรคnger in Shared Spaces zu verwenden. Die Vorteile dieses Ansatzes, gegenรผber konventionellen, effizienzbasierten Indikatoren wie z.B. Zeitverzรถgerungen, werden entsprechend in praxistauglichen Situationen dargestellt und sukzessiv mittels statistischer Verfahren veranschaulicht

    ๋„์‹ฌ ๊ต์ฐจ๋กœ์—์„œ์˜ ์ž์œจ์ฃผํ–‰์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ฃผ๋ณ€ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰ ๊ฒฝ๋กœ ์˜ˆ์ธก ๋ฐ ๊ฑฐ๋™ ๊ณ„ํš ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(๋ฐ•์‚ฌ)--์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› :๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„ํ•ญ๊ณต๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€,2020. 2. ์ด๊ฒฝ์ˆ˜.์ฐจ๋ž‘์šฉ ์„ผ์‹ฑ ๋ฐ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์ด ๋ฐœ๋‹ฌํ•จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ž๋™์ฐจ ๊ธฐ์ˆ  ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ์ˆ˜๋™ ์•ˆ์ „ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์—์„œ ๋Šฅ๋™ ์•ˆ์ „ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ๋กœ ์ดˆ์ ์ด ํ™•์žฅ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ตœ๊ทผ, ์ฃผ์š” ์ž๋™์ฐจ ์ œ์ž‘์‚ฌ๋“ค์€ ๋Šฅ๋™ํ˜• ์ฐจ๊ฐ„๊ฑฐ๋ฆฌ ์ œ์–ด, ์ฐจ์„  ์œ ์ง€ ๋ณด์กฐ, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ๊ธด๊ธ‰ ์ž๋™ ์ œ๋™๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋Šฅ๋™ ์•ˆ์ „ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์ด ์ด๋ฏธ ์ƒ์—…ํ™”ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์  ์ง„๋ณด๋Š” ์‚ฌ์ƒ๋ฅ  ์ œ๋กœ๋ฅผ ๋‹ฌ์„ฑํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ธฐ์ˆ  ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ถ„์•ผ๋ฅผ ๋Šฅ๋™ ์•ˆ์ „ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์„ ๋„˜์–ด์„œ ์ž์œจ์ฃผํ–‰ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์œผ๋กœ ํ™•์žฅ์‹œํ‚ค๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ, ๋„์‹ฌ ๋„๋กœ๋Š” ์ธ๋„, ์‚ฌ๊ฐ์ง€๋Œ€, ์ฃผ์ฐจ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰, ์ด๋ฅœ์ฐจ, ๋ณดํ–‰์ž ๋“ฑ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๊ตํ†ต ์œ„ํ—˜ ์š”์†Œ๋ฅผ ๋งŽ์ด ๊ฐ–๊ณ  ์žˆ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๊ณ ์†๋„๋กœ๋ณด๋‹ค ์‚ฌ๊ณ  ๋ฐœ์ƒ๋ฅ ๊ณผ ์‚ฌ์ƒ๋ฅ ์ด ๋†’์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ๋„์‹ฌ ๋„๋กœ์—์„œ์˜ ์ž์œจ์ฃผํ–‰์€ ํ•ต์‹ฌ ์ด์Šˆ๊ฐ€ ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋งŽ์€ ํ”„๋กœ์ ํŠธ๋“ค์ด ์ž์œจ์ฃผํ–‰์˜ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์ , ์ธ๊ตฌํ•™์ , ์‚ฌํšŒ์ , ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ๊ฒฝ์ œ์  ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ์˜ ์ž์œจ์ฃผํ–‰์˜ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋˜์—ˆ๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ ์ค‘์— ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์˜ˆ๋ฅผ ๋“ค์–ด, ์œ ๋Ÿฝ์˜ AdaptIVE๋Š” ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ž์œจ์ฃผํ–‰ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ตฌ์ฒด์ ์ธ ํ‰๊ฐ€ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, CityMobil2๋Š” ์œ ๋Ÿฝ ์ „์—ญ์˜ 9๊ฐœ์˜ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์—์„œ ๋ฌด์ธ ์ง€๋Šฅํ˜• ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰์„ ์„ฑ๊ณต์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ†ตํ•ฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ผ๋ณธ์—์„œ๋Š” 2014๋…„ 5์›”์— ์‹œ์ž‘๋œ Automated Driving System Research Project๋Š” ์ž์œจ์ฃผํ–‰ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ๊ณผ ์ฐจ์„ธ๋Œ€ ๋„์‹ฌ ๊ตํ†ต ์ˆ˜๋‹จ์˜ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ ๋ฐ ๊ฒ€์ฆ์— ์ดˆ์ ์„ ๋งž์ถ”์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋“ค์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์กฐ์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ž์œจ์ฃผํ–‰ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์€ ๊ตํ†ต ์ฐธ์—ฌ์ž๋“ค์˜ ์•ˆ์ „๋„๋ฅผ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ค๊ณ , ๊ตํ†ต ํ˜ผ์žก์„ ๊ฐ์†Œ์‹œํ‚ค๋ฉฐ, ์šด์ „์ž ํŽธ์˜์„ฑ์„ ์ฆ์ง„์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์ฆ๋ช…๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ๋“ค์ด ์ธ์ง€, ๊ฑฐ๋™ ๊ณ„ํš, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์ œ์–ด์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋„์‹ฌ ๋„๋กœ ์ž์œจ์ฃผํ–‰์ฐจ์˜ ํ•ต์‹ฌ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ๋“ค์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ๋งŽ์€ ์ตœ์‹ ์˜ ์ž์œจ์ฃผํ–‰ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋“ค์€ ๊ฐ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์˜ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์„ ๋ณ„๊ฐœ๋กœ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์—ฌ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•ด์™”๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ†ตํ•ฉ์ ์ธ ๊ด€์ ์—์„œ์˜ ์ž์œจ์ฃผํ–‰ ๊ธฐ์ˆ  ์„ค๊ณ„๋Š” ์•„์ง ์ถฉ๋ถ„ํžˆ ๊ณ ๋ ค๋˜์–ด ์•Š์•˜๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ, ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ๋„์‹ฌ ๋„๋กœ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์—์„œ ๋ผ์ด๋‹ค, ์นด๋ฉ”๋ผ, GPS, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ๊ฐ„๋‹จํ•œ ๊ฒฝ๋กœ ๋งต์— ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ํ•œ ์™„์ „ ์ž์œจ์ฃผํ–‰ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋กœ ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ์ž์œจ์ฃผํ–‰ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์€ ๋น„ํ†ต์ œ ๊ต์ฐจ๋กœ๋ฅผ ํฌํ•จํ•œ ๋„์‹ฌ ๋„๋กœ ์ƒํ™ฉ์„ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰ ๊ฑฐ๋™ ์˜ˆ์ธก๊ธฐ์™€ ๋ชจ๋ธ ์˜ˆ์ธก ์ œ์–ด ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์— ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ์„ค๊ณ„๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ๋™์ , ์ •์  ํ™˜๊ฒฝ ํ‘œํ˜„ ๋ฐ ์ข…ํšก๋ฐฉํ–ฅ ๊ฑฐ๋™ ๊ณ„ํš์„ ์ค‘์ ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋‹ค๋ฃจ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ๋„์‹ฌ ๋„๋กœ ์ž์œจ์ฃผํ–‰์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ฑฐ๋™ ๊ณ„ํš ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์˜ ๊ฐœ์š”๋ฅผ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์‹ค์ œ ๊ตํ†ต ์ƒํ™ฉ์—์„œ์˜ ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์˜ ํšจ๊ณผ์„ฑ๊ณผ ์šด์ „์ž ๊ฑฐ๋™๊ณผ์˜ ์œ ์‚ฌ์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์‹ค์ฐจ ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ๋น„ํ†ต์ œ ๊ต์ฐจ๋กœ๋ฅผ ํฌํ•จํ•œ ๋„์‹ฌ ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค์—์„œ์˜ ๊ฐ•๊ฑดํ•œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ์—ˆ๋‹ค.The foci of automotive researches have been expanding from passive safety systems to active safety systems with advances in sensing and processing technologies. Recently, the majority of automotive makers have already commercialized active safety systems, such as adaptive cruise control (ACC), lane keeping assistance (LKA), and autonomous emergency braking (AEB). Such advances have extended the research field beyond active safety systems to automated driving systems to achieve zero fatalities. Especially, automated driving on urban roads has become a key issue because urban roads possess numerous risk factors for traffic accidents, such as sidewalks, blind spots, on-street parking, motorcycles, and pedestrians, which cause higher accident rates and fatalities than motorways. Several projects have been conducted, and many others are still underway to evaluate the effects of automated driving in environmental, demographic, social, and economic aspects. For example, the European project AdaptIVe, develops various automated driving functions and defines specific evaluation methodologies. In addition, CityMobil2 successfully integrates driverless intelligent vehicles in nine other environments throughout Europe. In Japan, the Automated Driving System Research Project began on May 2014, which focuses on the development and verification of automated driving systems and next-generation urban transportation. From a careful review of a considerable amount of literature, automated driving systems have been proven to increase the safety of traffic users, reduce traffic congestion, and improve driver convenience. Various methodologies have been employed to develop the core technology of automated vehicles on urban roads, such as perception, motion planning, and control. However, the current state-of-the-art automated driving algorithms focus on the development of each technology separately. Consequently, designing automated driving systems from an integrated perspective is not yet sufficiently considered. Therefore, this dissertation focused on developing a fully autonomous driving algorithm in urban complex scenarios using LiDAR, vision, GPS, and a simple path map. The proposed autonomous driving algorithm covered the urban road scenarios with uncontrolled intersections based on vehicle motion prediction and model predictive control approach. Mainly, four research issues are considered: dynamic/static environment representation, and longitudinal/lateral motion planning. In the remainder of this thesis, we will provide an overview of the proposed motion planning algorithm for urban autonomous driving and the experimental results in real traffic, which showed the effectiveness and human-like behaviors of the proposed algorithm. The proposed algorithm has been tested and evaluated using both simulation and vehicle tests. The test results show the robust performance of urban scenarios, including uncontrolled intersections.Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1. Background and Motivation 1 1.2. Previous Researches 4 1.3. Thesis Objectives 9 1.4. Thesis Outline 10 Chapter 2 Overview of Motion Planning for Automated Driving System 11 Chapter 3 Dynamic Environment Representation with Motion Prediction 15 3.1. Moving Object Classification 17 3.2. Vehicle State based Direct Motion Prediction 20 3.2.1. Data Collection Vehicle 22 3.2.2. Target Roads 23 3.2.3. Dataset Selection 24 3.2.4. Network Architecture 25 3.2.5. Input and Output Features 33 3.2.6. Encoder and Decoder 33 3.2.7. Sequence Length 34 3.3. Road Structure based Interactive Motion Prediction 36 3.3.1. Maneuver Definition 38 3.3.2. Network Architecture 39 3.3.3. Path Following Model based State Predictor 47 3.3.4. Estimation of predictor uncertainty 50 3.3.5. Motion Parameter Estimation 53 3.3.6. Interactive Maneuver Prediction 56 3.4. Intersection Approaching Vehicle Motion Prediction 59 3.4.1. Driver Behavior Model at Intersections 59 3.4.2. Intention Inference based State Prediction 63 Chapter 4 Static Environment Representation 67 4.1. Static Obstacle Map Construction 69 4.2. Free Space Boundary Decision 74 4.3. Drivable Corridor Decision 76 Chapter 5 Longitudinal Motion Planning 81 5.1. In-Lane Target Following 82 5.2. Proactive Motion Planning for Narrow Road Driving 85 5.2.1. Motivation for Collision Preventive Velocity Planning 85 5.2.2. Desired Acceleration Decision 86 5.3. Uncontrolled Intersection 90 5.3.1. Driving Phase and Mode Definition 91 5.3.2. State Machine for Driving Mode Decision 92 5.3.3. Motion Planner for Approach Mode 95 5.3.4. Motion Planner for Risk Management Phase 98 Chapter 6 Lateral Motion Planning 105 6.1. Vehicle Model 107 6.2. Cost Function and Constraints 109 Chapter 7 Performance Evaluation 115 7.1. Motion Prediction 115 7.1.1. Prediction Accuracy Analysis of Vehicle State based Direct Motion Predictor 115 7.1.2. Prediction Accuracy and Effect Analysis of Road Structure based Interactive Motion Predictor 122 7.2. Prediction based Distance Control at Urban Roads 132 7.2.1. Driving Data Analysis of Direct Motion Predictor Application at Urban Roads 133 7.2.2. Case Study of Vehicle Test at Urban Roads 138 7.2.3. Analysis of Vehicle Test Results on Urban Roads 147 7.3. Complex Urban Roads 153 7.3.1. Case Study of Vehicle Test at Complex Urban Roads 154 7.3.2. Closed-loop Simulation based Safety Analysis 162 7.4. Uncontrolled Intersections 164 7.4.1. Simulation based Algorithm Comparison of Motion Planner 164 7.4.2. Monte-Carlo Simulation based Safety Analysis 166 7.4.3. Vehicle Tests Results in Real Traffic Conditions 172 7.4.4. Similarity Analysis between Human and Automated Vehicle 194 7.5. Multi-Lane Turn Intersections 197 7.5.1. Case Study of a Multi-Lane Left Turn Scenario 197 7.5.2. Analysis of Motion Planning Application Results 203 Chapter 8 Conclusion & Future Works 207 8.1. Conclusion 207 8.2. Future Works 209 Bibliography 210 Abstract in Korean 219Docto

    Real-time motion planning methods for autonomous on-road driving: state-of-the-art and future research directions

    Get PDF
    Currently autonomous or self-driving vehicles are at the heart of academia and industry research because of its multi-faceted advantages that includes improved safety, reduced congestion, lower emissions and greater mobility. Software is the key driving factor underpinning autonomy within which planning algorithms that are responsible for mission-critical decision making hold a significant position. While transporting passengers or goods from a given origin to a given destination, motion planning methods incorporate searching for a path to follow, avoiding obstacles and generating the best trajectory that ensures safety, comfort and efficiency. A range of different planning approaches have been proposed in the literature. The purpose of this paper is to review existing approaches and then compare and contrast different methods employed for the motion planning of autonomous on-road driving that consists of (1) finding a path, (2) searching for the safest manoeuvre and (3) determining the most feasible trajectory. Methods developed by researchers in each of these three levels exhibit varying levels of complexity and performance accuracy. This paper presents a critical evaluation of each of these methods, in terms of their advantages/disadvantages, inherent limitations, feasibility, optimality, handling of obstacles and testing operational environments. Based on a critical review of existing methods, research challenges to address current limitations are identified and future research directions are suggested so as to enhance the performance of planning algorithms at all three levels. Some promising areas of future focus have been identified as the use of vehicular communications (V2V and V2I) and the incorporation of transport engineering aspects in order to improve the look-ahead horizon of current sensing technologies that are essential for planning with the aim of reducing the total cost of driverless vehicles. This critical review on planning techniques presented in this paper, along with the associated discussions on their constraints and limitations, seek to assist researchers in accelerating development in the emerging field of autonomous vehicle research

    Potential safety applications of advanced technology. Final Report

    Full text link
    Notes: Report covers the period Sept 1990 - June 1993. Originally dated June 1993Federal Highway Administration, Office of Safety and Traffic Operations Research and Development, McLean, Va.http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/1045/2/85136.0001.001.pd

    Real-time motion planning methods for autonomous on-road driving: State-of-the-art and future research directions

    Get PDF
    Open access articleCurrently autonomous or self-driving vehicles are at the heart of academia and industry research because of its multi-faceted advantages that includes improved safety, reduced congestion,lower emissions and greater mobility. Software is the key driving factor underpinning autonomy within which planning algorithms that are responsible for mission-critical decision making hold a significant position. While transporting passengers or goods from a given origin to a given destination, motion planning methods incorporate searching for a path to follow, avoiding obstacles and generating the best trajectory that ensures safety, comfort and efficiency. A range of different planning approaches have been proposed in the literature. The purpose of this paper is to review existing approaches and then compare and contrast different methods employed for the motion planning of autonomous on-road driving that consists of (1) finding a path, (2) searching for the safest manoeuvre and (3) determining the most feasible trajectory. Methods developed by researchers in each of these three levels exhibit varying levels of complexity and performance accuracy. This paper presents a critical evaluation of each of these methods, in terms of their advantages/disadvantages, inherent limitations, feasibility, optimality, handling of obstacles and testing operational environments. Based on a critical review of existing methods, research challenges to address current limitations are identified and future research directions are suggested so as to enhance the performance of planning algorithms at all three levels. Some promising areas of future focus have been identified as the use of vehicular communications (V2V and V2I) and the incorporation of transport engineering aspects in order to improve the look-ahead horizon of current sensing technologies that are essential for planning with the aim of reducing the total cost of driverless vehicles. This critical review on planning techniques presented in this paper, along with the associated discussions on their constraints and limitations, seek to assist researchers in accelerating development in the emerging field of autonomous vehicle research
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore