2,391 research outputs found

    Usability testing for improving interactive geovisualization techniques

    Get PDF
    Usability describes a productโ€™s fitness for use according to a set of predefined criteria. Whatever the aim of the product, it should facilitate usersโ€™ tasks or enhance their performance by providing appropriate analysis tools. In both cases, the main interest is to satisfy users in terms of providing relevant functionality which they find fit for purpose. โ€œTesting usability means making sure that people can find and work with [a productโ€™s] functions to meet their needsโ€ (Dumas and Redish, 1999: 4). It is therefore concerned with establishing whether people can use a product to complete their tasks with ease and at the same time help them complete their jobs more effectively. This document describes the findings of a usability study carried out on DecisionSite Map Interaction Services (Map IS). DecisionSite, a product of Spotfire, Inc.,1 is an interactive system for the visual and dynamic exploration of data designed for supporting decisionmaking. The system was coupled to ArcExplorer (forming DecisionSite Map IS) to provide limited GIS functionality (simple user interface, basic tools, and data management) and support users of spatial data. Hence, this study set out to test the suitability of the coupling between the two software components (DecisionSite and ArcExplorer) for the purpose of exploring spatial data. The first section briefly discusses DecisionSiteโ€™s visualization functionality. The second section describes the test goals, its design, the participants and data used. The following section concentrates on the analysis of results, while the final section discusses future areas of research and possible development

    Dashboard Confessional: Co-Designing a decision-making support tool to support Resident's test ordering

    Full text link
    Master of DesignArt and DesignUniversity of Michiganhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/156122/1/DeepBlue_Jesko_2020_MDes_Thesis.pd

    COUNTING ON: Humanizing self-tracked data in a connected world

    Get PDF
    This thesis explores the evolving role of the Quantified Self and self-tracking culture within personalized healthcare. Health and fitness wearables are proliferating globally. However, wearable device abandonment rates are also surging. Wearables can sometimes be authoritative or punitive when presenting wearers with their biological data. In the past, some devices have even triggered adverse health-related conditions. This thesis proposes an approach to visualizing biological data from wearables, in ways that are coherent, contextual, and humane. It critiques normative data visualizations in commercial wearables and speculates alternate futures for self-tracking to empower individuals to manage their health and well-being autonomously. Through an iterative development process to prototype creation, the author gathers biological data using a consumer wearable device and uses it to propose an information architecture that categorizes the data coherently. The architecture is applied in hand-drawn, domestic, embedded visualization prototypes that present the authorโ€™s biological data. Lastly, user interviews are conducted to acquire responses to the prototypes and plan possibilities for future iterations. The purpose of this research is to advocate empathy and compassion in the emerging culture of living with data while considering the intricacies of everyday life, the imperfections of being human, and the need for autonomy in personal data management

    Visualizing risk: How information design can facilitate shared decision making in medicine

    Get PDF
    This masterโ€™s thesis explores the use of information design and information visualizations in the context of shared decision making in medicine. More specifically, this thesis focuses on the visualization of risk through its case study, Oravizio. Oravizio is a risk assessment tool for joint replacement surgery that is used prior to surgery when the medical professional and the patient discuss treatment alternatives and how safe a surgical operation would be for that particular patient. The tool has a risk calculating algorithm that takes into account patient-specific data and a graphical user interface that shows the results visualized. The wider communicative context in which Oravizio is used is called shared decision making. Shared decision making is a practice where the medical professional and the patient discuss options related to a medical decision together. Shared decision making is considered a modern way of communicating at the doctorโ€™s office and is used particularly in situations where different treatment options have differing pros and cons. This thesis assesses how well Oravizio and its information visualizations facilitate shared decision making at the moment and how the tool and its features could be improved in the future. A theoretical background is formed by drawing from various literary sources in information design, risk visualization and shared decision making. To enrich the findings from literature, professionals with experience using Oravizio in a clinical setting are interviewed to gain understanding of how, when and why they use the tool. This thesis concludes that although the current visualizations of Oravizio already work quite well according to the professionals, improvements can be made. To be able to compare the risk information to the potential gains of the surgery, a possibility of adding other data sources such as patient reported outcome measures to the tool are speculated. Before implementing any changes to the tool and its visualizations, this thesis calls for additional research and insights gathered from the other user group: the patients

    ํ—ฌ์Šค์ผ€์–ด ์„œ๋น„์Šค์—์„œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ปค๋ฎค๋‹ˆ์ผ€์ด์…˜์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋””์ž์ธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(๋ฐ•์‚ฌ)--์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› :์œตํ•ฉ๊ณผํ•™๊ธฐ์ˆ ๋Œ€ํ•™์› ์œตํ•ฉ๊ณผํ•™๋ถ€(๋””์ง€ํ„ธ์ •๋ณด์œตํ•ฉ์ „๊ณต),2020. 2. ์ด์ค‘์‹.์Šค๋งˆํŠธํฐ๊ณผ ์›จ์–ด๋Ÿฌ๋ธ” ๊ธฐ๊ธฐ์˜ ๋ณด๊ธ‰์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ํ™˜์ž ์ƒ์„ฑ ๊ฑด๊ฐ• ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ(Patient-Generated Health Data; PGHD)๊ฐ€ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ์ด๋Š” ์˜์‚ฌ-ํ™˜์ž ์˜์‚ฌ ์†Œํ†ต์„ ๊ฐœ์„ ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐœ์ „ ํ•  ์ˆ˜์žˆ๋Š” ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๊ธฐํšŒ๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ–ˆ๋‹ค. PGHD๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์ค‘์‹ฌ ์ปค๋ฎค๋‹ˆ์ผ€์ด์…˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ํ™˜์ž์™€ ์˜์‚ฌ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด ์ž„์ƒ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์™„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ดํ•ด์˜ ์ฐจ์ด๋ฅผ ๋ฉ”์šธ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ํ™˜์ž ๊ฑด๊ฐ•์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํฌ๊ด„์ ์ธ ๊ด€์ ๋„ ํš๋“ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜, ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์œ ํ˜•์˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์™€ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์„ ๊ธฐ์กด ์˜๋ฃŒ ์ปค๋ฎค๋‹ˆ์ผ€์ด์…˜์— ํ†ตํ•ฉํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ์—๋Š” ์—ฌ์ „ํžˆ ์–ด๋ ค์›€์ด ๋‚จ์•„ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ํ™˜์ž๋Š” ์ข…์ข… ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์ˆ˜์ง‘์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ฐธ์—ฌ์™€ ๋™๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ์žƒ์–ด๋ฒ„๋ฆฌ๋ฉฐ, ์ด์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ˆ˜์ง‘ํ•œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋Š” ๋ถˆ์™„์ „ํ•ด์ง€๋Š” ๋ฌธ์ œ๊ฐ€ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ PGHD๊ฐ€ ์˜จ์ „ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ˆ˜์ง‘ ๋˜๋”๋ผ๋„ ์˜์‚ฌ์™€ ํ™˜์ž๋Š” ์˜๋ฃŒ ๊ด€ํ–‰์—์„œ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์–ด๋ ค์›€์„ ๊ฒช๊ฒŒ ๋œ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ์‹œ๊ฐ„๊ณผ ์ •๋ณด์˜ ๋ถ€์กฑ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ํ˜„์žฌ ์›Œํฌ ํ”Œ๋กœ์šฐ์—์„œ ํ™˜์ž์™€ ์˜์‚ฌ ๋ชจ๋‘๊ฐ€ PGHD๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ํ˜‘์—…ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ๋งค์šฐ ์–ด๋ ค์šด ์ผ๋กœ ์•Œ๋ ค์ ธ ์žˆ๋‹ค. HCI ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ด€์ ์—์„œ, PGHD๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉ ํ•œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์ค‘์‹ฌ ํ†ต์‹ ์„ ์ง€์›ํ•˜๋Š” ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ์„ค๊ณ„ํ•˜๋ฉด ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ณผ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ž ์žฌ๋ ฅ์ด ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์ˆ˜์ง‘(collection), ํ‘œํ˜„(representation), ํ•ด์„(interpretation) ๋ฐ ํ˜‘์—…(collaboration)์˜ ๋„ค ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์„ค๊ณ„ ๊ณต๊ฐ„(design space)์—์„œ ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์ธ ํƒ์ƒ‰์„ ์š”๊ตฌํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ, ์ด ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ์„ค๊ณ„ ๋ฐ ํ˜„์žฅ ๋ฐฐํฌ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์—ฌ, ๊ฐ ์„ค๊ณ„ ๊ณต๊ฐ„์—์„œ ํ•ด๊ฒฐ๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์€ ์งˆ๋ฌธ์„ ํƒ์ƒ‰ํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ฒฝํ—˜์  ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๋ฐ ์„ค๊ณ„ ์ง€์นจ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋กœ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋จผ์ €, ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์ˆ˜์ง‘์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์„ค๊ณ„ ๊ณต๊ฐ„์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋กœ์„œ, ์ ‘๊ทผ์„ฑ ๋†’์€ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์ถ”์  ๋„๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ํ™˜์ž๊ฐ€ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์œ ํ˜•์˜ PGHD, ํŠนํžˆ ์‹์‚ฌ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜์ง‘ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์–ด๋–ค ๋„์›€์„ ์ค„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š”์ง€์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด, ์ ‘๊ทผ์„ฑ ๋†’์€ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์ถ”์  ๋„๊ตฌ์ธ mFood Logger์„ ๋””์ž์ธํ•œ ํ›„, 20 ๋ช…์˜ ํ™˜์ž์™€ 6 ๋ช…์˜ ์ž„์ƒ์˜๋ฅผ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ์‹ค์ฆ์  ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ํ™˜์ž์™€ ์ž„์ƒ์˜๊ฐ€ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ปค๋ฎค๋‹ˆ์ผ€์ด์…˜์„ ์œ„ํ•ด ์›ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์œ ํ˜•์ด ๋ฌด์—‡์ธ์ง€ ํŒŒ์•…ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๊ณ , ์ž„์ƒ์  ๋งฅ๋ฝ์—์„œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜์ง‘ ํ•  ๋•Œ์˜ ๋‚œ์ ๊ณผ ๊ธฐํšŒ๋ฅผ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‘˜์งธ, ์ž„์ƒ์˜๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ํ‘œํ˜„์„ ํŒŒ์•…ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด, 18๋ช…์˜ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ดํ•ด ๊ด€๊ณ„์ž(e.g., ์ž„์ƒ์˜, EMR ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์ž)์™€ ์ฐธ์—ฌ์  ๋””์ž์ธ(participatory design) ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด PGHD๋ฅผ ํ‘œ์‹œํ•˜๋Š” DataMD๋ฅผ ์„ค๊ณ„ํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ตฌํ˜„ํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฐธ์—ฌ์  ๋””์ž์ธ ์›Œํฌ์ƒต์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์•Œ์•„๋‚ธ ๊ฒƒ์€, ์˜๋ฃŒ์  ์ƒํ™ฉ์˜ ์ œ์•ฝ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์ž„์ƒ์˜๊ฐ€ ์›ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ํ‘œํ˜„ ๋ฐฉ์‹์ด ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ๊ณผ ์นœ์ˆ™ํ•จ์œผ๋กœ ์ˆ˜๋ ด๋œ๋‹ค๋Š” ์ ์ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ž„์ƒ์˜๋Š” ํ•™์Šต์— ๊ฑธ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์‹œ๊ฐํ™” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์•˜๊ณ , ํ•œ ๋ฒˆ์— ๋งŽ์€ ์–‘์˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ๋ณด๊ณ  ์‹ถ์–ดํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์š”๊ตฌ ์‚ฌํ•ญ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์—ฌ, ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์œ ํ˜•์˜ PGHD๊ฐ€ ํ•œ ๋ˆˆ์— ๋ณด์—ฌ์ง€๋ฉฐ, ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ž„์ƒ ์ƒํ™ฉ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•œ, DataMD๋ฅผ ์„ค๊ณ„ํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ตฌํ˜„ํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์…‹์งธ, ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ปค๋ฎค๋‹ˆ์ผ€์ด์…˜์˜ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์ธก๋ฉด์œผ๋กœ์„œ, ํ™˜์ž๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ํ•ด์„ ์ „๋žต์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜์—ฌ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ธ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ํ•ด์„์„ ๋•๋Š” ์„ค๊ณ„ ์ง€์นจ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 20๋ช…์˜ ๋งŒ์„ฑ ์งˆํ™˜ ํ™˜์ž์™€์˜ ์ธํ„ฐ๋ทฐ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด, ํ™˜์ž๋“ค์ด PGHD๋ฅผ ํ•ด์„ํ•  ๋•Œ, ๋…ผ๋ฆฌ์  ์ฆ๊ฑฐ๊ฐ€ ์•„๋‹Œ ์ž์‹ ์˜ ๊ณผ๊ฑฐ ๊ฒฝํ—˜์— ๊ฐ•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์˜์กดํ•œ๋‹ค๋Š” ์ ์„ ๋ฐํ˜€๋ƒˆ๋‹ค. ํ™˜์ž๋“ค์€ ์ž์‹ ์˜ ์‹ ๋…๊ณผ ๊ฒฝํ—˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ •ํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋„ค ๊ฐ€์ง€์˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ํ•ด์„ ์ „๋žต์„ ๊ตฌ์‚ฌํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์ดํ•ด๋Š” ์„ค๊ณ„์ž์™€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์›์ด ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ํ•ด์„์„ ์ง€์›ํ•˜๋Š” ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ์„ค๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋ฐœ์ „์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ๋ฐ ๋„์›€์ด ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰์œผ๋กœ, ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•œ ํ˜‘์—…์„ ์ง€์›ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์•ž์„  ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ๋””์ž์ธํ•œ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ PGHD๋ฅผ ๊ณต์œ ํ•˜๊ณ  ํ™œ์šฉํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ, ์ž„์ƒ์˜์™€ ํ™˜์ž๊ฐ€ ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ํ˜‘์—…ํ•˜๋Š”์ง€๋ฅผ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ํ™˜์ž์˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์ˆ˜์ง‘ ๋ฐ ํ•ด์„์„ ๋•๋Š” ์•ฑ์ธ MyHealthKeeper์™€ ์ž„์ƒ์˜๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ธํ„ฐํŽ˜์ด์Šค์ธ DataMD๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋œ ํ†ตํ•ฉ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ์ž„์ƒ ํ˜„์žฅ์— ๋ฐฐํฌํ–ˆ๋‹ค. 80๋ช…์˜ ์™ธ๋ž˜ํ™˜์ž์™€์˜ ์ž„์ƒ์‹œํ—˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋ฉด PGHD๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•œ ํ˜‘๋ ฅ์œผ๋กœ ํ™˜์ž๊ฐ€ ํ–‰๋™ ๋ณ€ํ™”์— ์„ฑ๊ณตํ•  ์ˆ˜์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ์•ฑ ์‚ฌ์šฉ ๋กœ๊ทธ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋ฉด ํ™˜์ž๋Š” ์ง์ ‘์ ์ธ ์ƒํ˜ธ ์ž‘์šฉ ์—†์ด๋„ ์ž„์ƒ์˜์™€ ์›๊ฒฉ์œผ๋กœ ํ˜‘์—… ํ•  ์ˆ˜๋„ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ, ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ž„์ƒ์˜์™€ ํ™˜์ž ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ํ˜‘๋ ฅ์„ ์ง€์›ํ•  ์ˆ˜์žˆ๋Š” ์ฃผ์š” ๊ธฐํšŒ๊ฐ€ ๊ธฐ์กด ์ž„์ƒ ์›Œํฌํ”Œ๋กœ์šฐ์— PGHD ์‚ฌ์šฉ์„ ํ†ตํ•ฉํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์— ์žˆ์Œ์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•œ๋‹ค. ์•ž์„  ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋“ค์„ ํ†ตํ•ด, ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ปค๋ฎค๋‹ˆ์ผ€์ด์…˜์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋””์ž์ธ์ด ํ™˜์ž์™€ ์˜์‚ฌ๊ฐ€ PGHD๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ํ˜‘์—…ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ๋„์›€์ด ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌํ–ˆ๋‹ค. PGHD๊ฐ€ ๋„ค ๊ฐœ์˜ ์„ค๊ณ„ ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ๋‚ด์—์„œ ๊ธฐ์กด ์˜์‚ฌ-ํ™˜์ž ํ†ต์‹ ์„ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์ค‘์‹ฌ ํ†ต์‹ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐœ์„  ํ•  ์ˆ˜์žˆ๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ๊ฐœ๋…ํ™”ํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ, ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ํ™˜์ž์™€ ์˜์‚ฌ ๊ฐ„์˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ปค๋ฎค๋‹ˆ์ผ€์ด์…˜์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋””์ž์ธ์ด ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ๋„์ถœ๋˜์–ด์•ผ ํ•˜๋Š”์ง€์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์‹œ๊ฐ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•  ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๊ธฐ๋Œ€ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด ์ž‘์—…์€ HCI, CSCW๊ณผ ๊ฑด๊ฐ• ์ •๋ณดํ•™ ์ปค๋ฎค๋‹ˆํ‹ฐ์˜ ๊ฒฝํ—˜์  ์ดํ•ด๋ฅผ ๋†’์ด๊ณ , ์‹ค์šฉ์ ์ธ ์„ค๊ณ„ ์ง€์นจ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋ก ์  ํ™•์žฅ์— ๊ธฐ์—ฌํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ํ–ฅํ›„ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๋ถ„์•ผ์—์„œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ปค๋ฎค๋‹ˆ์ผ€์ด์…˜์„ ์ง€์›ํ•˜๋Š” ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ์„ค๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ์ด๋ค„์ ธ์•ผ ํ•˜๋Š”์ง€์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ธฐ์ดˆ๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•œ๋‹ค.The prevalence of smartphones and wearable devices has led to a dramatic increase in patient-generated health data (PGHD). The growing interest in PGHD has offered new opportunities to improve doctor-patient communication to become more data-driven. Data-driven communication using PGHD enables patients and physicians to fill in gaps between understandings by supplementing existing clinical data, as well as providing a more comprehensive picture of ongoing patient health. However, challenges in integrating such new types of data and technologies into existing healthcare communications remain. Patients often lose their engagement and motivation in data collection, resulting in incomplete data. Even if PGHD is wholly collected, physicians and patients encounter challenges in utilizing such data--representation and interpretation--in healthcare practices. Furthermore, it is challenging for both patients and physicians to collaborate through PGHD in the current workflow due to the lack of time and information overload. From the HCI research perspective, designing a system supporting data-driven communication utilizing PGHD has the potential to address such challenges, which calls for further exploration in four design spaces: data collection, representation, interpretation, and collaboration. Therefore, in this dissertation work, I aim to explore unsolved questions in each design space by conducting a series of design and deployment studies and provide empirical findings and design guidelines. In the design space of data collection, I investigated how the semi-automated tracking tool can support patients to track various types of PGHD, especially food journaling. With the design of mFood Logger, a semi-automated data tracking tool, I conducted an empirical study with 20 patients and 6 clinicians. I identified desired data types for data-driven communication from the patients' and clinicians' sides and uncovered the challenges and opportunities in collecting data within clinical contexts. I was able to understand the feasibility and acceptability of PGHD in clinical practices, as well as clinicians' presence--either remotely or in-person--as an enabler that encourages patients to keep tracking PGHD in the longer-term. Incorporating critical topics regarding data collection from the literature and findings from my work, I discuss the applicability of PGHD and data tracking modes. To support data representation for clinicians, I designed and implemented DataMD that displays PGHD, considering situational constraints through a participatory design process with 18 various stakeholders (e.g., clinicians, EMR developers). Through the participatory design workshop, I found that the ways of data representation that clinicians desired converged to efficiency and familiarity due to the situational constraints. Clinicians wanted to see a large amount of data at once, avoiding using novel visualization methods due to the issue of learnability. Considering those requirements, I designed and implemented DataMD, in which various types of PGHD are represented with considerations of clinical contexts. I discussed the role of data representation in data-driven communication. As the critical aspect of data-driven communication, I present different data-interpretation strategies from patients, providing design guidelines to help effective data-interpretation. By conducting interviews with 20 chronic disease patients, I found that they shaped their interests and assumptions by incorporating prior experiences rather than logical evidence. I also identified four data-interpretation strategies: finding evidence to confirm assumptions, discrediting data to preserve initial assumptions, discovering new insights, and deferring drawing hasty conclusions from data. These understandings help designers and researchers advance the design of systems to support data-interpretation. Lastly, to support collaboration via data, I demonstrate how clinicians and patients collaborate by sharing and utilizing PGHD based on the system I designed. I deployed the integrated system consisting of a patient app, MyHealthKeeper, and a clinician interface, DataMD. I investigated how the system could support collaboration via data. Clinical outcomes revealed that collaboration via PGHD led patients to succeed in behavior change. App usage log also showed that patients could even remotely collaborate with clinicians without direct interactions. Findings from these studies indicate that the key opportunities to facilitate collaboration between clinicians and patients are the integration of data prescriptions into the clinician's workflow and intervention based on natural language feedback generated within clinical contexts. Across these studies, I found that the design for data-driven communication can support patients and physicians to collaborate through PGHD. By conceptualizing how PGHD could improve the existing doctor-patient communication to data-driven communication within four design spaces, I expect that this work will shed new light on how the design should be derived for data-driven communication between patients and physicians in the real world. Taken together, I believe this work contributes to empirical understandings, design guidelines, theoretical extensions, and artifacts in human-computer interaction, computer-supported cooperative work, and health informatics communities. This work also provides a foundation for future researchers to study how the design of the system supporting data-driven communication can empower various users situated in different contexts to communicate through data in other domains, such as learning, beyond the context of healthcare services.1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Motivation 4 1.3 Topics of Interest 5 1.3.1 Design Spaces 5 1.3.2 Research Scope 11 1.4 Thesis Statements and Research Questions 13 1.5 Thesis Overview 15 1.6 Contribution 18 1.6.1 Empirical research contributions 18 1.6.2 Artifacts contributions 18 1.6.3 Theoretical contributions 19 2 Conceptual Background & Related Work 20 2.1 Data-driven Communication in Healthcare Services 20 2.1.1 Concept of Doctor-Patient Communication 21 2.1.2 Brief History of Patient-Centered Approach 25 2.1.3 Emergence of Patient-Generated Health Data 27 2.2 Four Design Spaces for Data-Driven Communication 30 2.2.1 Data collection 34 2.2.2 Data Representation 41 2.2.3 Data Interpretation 47 2.2.4 Collaboration via Data 50 3 Data Collection: Study of mFood Logger 54 3.1 Motivation 55 3.2 Preliminary Work & Tool Design 57 3.2.1 Clinical Requirements for Data Collection 57 3.2.2 Design of Data Collection Tool: mFood Logger 60 3.3 Study Design 63 3.3.1 Participants 63 3.3.2 StudyProcedure 64 3.4 Results 69 3.4.1 PatientSide 69 3.4.2 ClinicianSide 76 3.5 Limitations & Conclusion 80 3.6 Chapter 3 Summary 81 4 Data Representation: Design of DataMD 83 4.1 Motivation 84 4.2 Preliminary Work 86 4.2.1 Workflow Journey Maps 87 4.2.2 DesignGoals 89 4.3 Study Design 90 4.3.1 Participants 91 4.3.2 ParticipatoryDesignworkshop 91 4.4 Results 92 4.4.1 DesignRequirements 92 4.4.2 Implementation: DataMD 98 4.5 Limitations & Conclusion 102 4.6 Summary of Chapter4 102 5 Data Interpretation: Data-Interpretation Strategies 103 5.1 Motivation 103 5.2 Study Design 106 5.2.1 Participants 106 5.2.2 Study Procedure 108 5.2.3 Data Analysis 110 5.3 Results 111 5.3.1 Change of Interest in Data 111 5.3.2 Assumptions on Relationships between Data Types 113 5.3.3 Data-InterpretationStrategy 117 5.4 Limitations & Conclusion 124 5.5 Summary of Chapter5 125 6 Collaboration via Data: Deployment Study 126 6.1 Motivation 127 6.2 System Design 128 6.2.1 MyHealthKeeper: Patient App 128 6.2.2 DataMD: Clinician Interface 132 6.3 Study Design 133 6.3.1 Participants 134 6.3.2 Procedure 135 6.4 Data Analysis 138 6.4.1 Statistical Analysis of Clinical Outcomes 139 6.4.2 App Usage Log 139 6.4.3 Observation Data Analysis 139 6.5 Results 140 6.5.1 Behavior Change 140 6.5.2 Data-Collection & Journaling Rate 144 6.5.3 Workflow Integration & Communication Support 146 6.6 Limitations & Conclusion 150 6.7 Summary of Chapter6 151 7 Discussion 152 7.1 Towards a Design for Data-Driven Communication 152 7.1.1 Improve Data Quality for Clinical Applicability 153 7.1.2 Support Accessibility of Data Collection 154 7.1.3 Understand Clinicians Preference for Familiar Data Representation. 157 7.1.4 Embrace Lived Experience for Rich Data Interpretation 158 7.1.5 Prioritize Workflow Integration for Successful Data-Driven Communication 163 7.1.6 Consider Risks of Using Patient-Generated Health Data in Clinical Settings 165 7.2 Opportunities for Future Work 166 7.2.1 Leverage Ubiquitous Technology to Design Data CollectionTools 166 7.2.2 Provide Data-Interpretation Guidelines for People with Different Levels of Literacy and Goals 169 7.2.3 Consider Cultural Differences in Data-Driven Communication 170 8 Conclusion 173 8.1 Summary of Contributions 173 8.2 Future Directions 175 8.3 Final Remarks 176Docto

    A Survey of Multimodal Information Fusion for Smart Healthcare: Mapping the Journey from Data to Wisdom

    Full text link
    Multimodal medical data fusion has emerged as a transformative approach in smart healthcare, enabling a comprehensive understanding of patient health and personalized treatment plans. In this paper, a journey from data to information to knowledge to wisdom (DIKW) is explored through multimodal fusion for smart healthcare. We present a comprehensive review of multimodal medical data fusion focused on the integration of various data modalities. The review explores different approaches such as feature selection, rule-based systems, machine learning, deep learning, and natural language processing, for fusing and analyzing multimodal data. This paper also highlights the challenges associated with multimodal fusion in healthcare. By synthesizing the reviewed frameworks and theories, it proposes a generic framework for multimodal medical data fusion that aligns with the DIKW model. Moreover, it discusses future directions related to the four pillars of healthcare: Predictive, Preventive, Personalized, and Participatory approaches. The components of the comprehensive survey presented in this paper form the foundation for more successful implementation of multimodal fusion in smart healthcare. Our findings can guide researchers and practitioners in leveraging the power of multimodal fusion with the state-of-the-art approaches to revolutionize healthcare and improve patient outcomes.Comment: This work has been submitted to the ELSEVIER for possible publication. Copyright may be transferred without notice, after which this version may no longer be accessibl

    Informatics innovation in clinical care: A visionary scenario for dentistry

    Get PDF
    Health information technology (HIT) is one of the most significant developments in health care in recent years. However, there is still a large gap between how HIT could support clinical work versus how it does. In this project, we developed a visionary scenario to identify opportunities for improving patient care in dentistry. In the scenario, patients and care providers are supported by a ubiquitous, embedded computing infrastructure that captures and processes data streams from multiple sources. Practical decision support, as well as automated background data processing (e.g., to screen for common conditions), helps clinicians provide quality care. A holistic view of clinical information technology (IT) focuses on supporting clinicians and patients in a user-centered manner. While clinical IT is still in very much a work in progress, scenarios such as the one presented may be helpful to keep us focused on the possibilities of tomorrow, not on the limitations of today

    Software Usability

    Get PDF
    This volume delivers a collection of high-quality contributions to help broaden developersโ€™ and non-developersโ€™ minds alike when it comes to considering software usability. It presents novel research and experiences and disseminates new ideas accessible to people who might not be software makers but who are undoubtedly software users
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore