10,852 research outputs found

    Creation of a Single National ID: Challenges & Opportunities for India

    Get PDF
    A National ID for all citizens and residents of India has long being considered a critical necessity, albeit the related projects have been in pilot mode for the past several years and no distinct road ahead seems to be coming out. The government has been focusing on inclusive growth and has launched several schemes at different levels to facilitate the same. However, monitoring the execution of these schemes and understanding clearly if the targeted citizens actually have got benefited, would demand for substantial granularity of information and doing away with information bottlenecks. Interestingly, proper execution of the National ID project by the government can prove to be useful for execution of various schemes and projects as well as in accessing multiple government and private sector services. This paper focuses on the need for a single national identity system in India and its proposed execution which may actually be linked to citizen life cycle. The other aspects covered and analyzed include current Indian scenario, challenges, existing identification systems and loopholes in the existing systems. Major challenges seem to be coming from enrolments, technology platform choice and strategic design, corresponding policy and legal frameworks. The paper also discusses about international scenario of single national id projects undertaken in 27 countries across the globe to understand current status, adoption and usage. To reinforce the need for national ID, the existing IDs were analysed based on a scoring model considering various dimensions. Primary research was conducted, based on which it was found none of the existing IDs was able to satisfy as a National ID based on the scoring model. The proposed road map has been discussed in length i.e technology platform, smart card technology, legal and administrative framework, business model based on Private-Public Partnership (PPP) considering the mammoth and diverse population. A ranking matrix may be created to come up with a composite score for all districts based on various dimensions. The execution may be planned to be executed without asking Indians to stand in queue for one more ID and accelerating towards a more secured society and more importantly ensuring better delivery of Government services to citizens.

    A Blockchain-Based Approach Towards Overcoming Financial Fraud in Public Sector Services

    Get PDF
    In financial markets it is common for companies and individuals to invest into foreign companies. To avoid the double taxation of investors on dividend payment - both in the country where the profit is generated as well as the country of residence - most governments have entered into bilateral double taxation treaties, whereby investors can claim a tax refund in the country where the profit is generated. Due to easily forgeable documents and insufficient international exchange of information between tax authorities, investors illegitimately apply for these tax returns causing an estimated damage of 1.8 billion USD, for example, in Denmark alone. This paper assesses the potential of a blockchain database to provide a feasible solution for overcoming this problem against the backdrop of recent advances in the public sector and the unique set of blockchain capacities. Towards this end, we develop and evaluate a blockchain-based prototype system aimed at eliminating this type of tax fraud and increasing transparency regarding the flow of dividends. While the prototype is based on the specific context of the Danish tax authority, we discuss how it can be generalized for tracking international and interorganizational transactions

    Blockchain implications for auditing: a systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis

    Get PDF
    Blockchain technology, smart contracts, and asset tokenization have relevant implications for the auditing environment. This paper evaluates the current stage of blockchain application in auditing, analyzing scientific publications and identifying the impact of what is already a reality and the potential effects of its improvements in audit professionalsโ€™ activities performance. The article considers the proposals and suggestions on the leading research indexed by the Scopus and Web of Science databases. We analyzed 374 papers on the topic of blockchain and provide a summary and analysis of the current state of auditing research. The bibliometric analysis was performed using the Bibliometrix R Package and the VOSviewer software. After a systematic study of abstracts and a general review of the papers to only include those directly related to our workโ€™s objectives, we found 78 papers. The work results in a framework of potential and effective implications of blockchain technology for auditing, pointing out several new challenges in terms of skills and knowledge needed in this new reality of audit professionals

    The current limitations of blockchain traceability: challenges from industry

    Get PDF
    Blockchain technology is a chain of cryptographically linked blocks. It was designed to be immutable, so that the identity and traceability of the information entered would be guaranteed. After analyzing several traceability solutions, in the context of a Spanish company project, it was found that in order for a traceability solution to be efficient and agile, an additional layer is necessary in the blockchain. Since this need originated in the industrial sector, the subject has awakened considerable interest in the research community. This paper explains why the extra layer is essential and why it should ideally be totally independent of the information that is recorded on the blockchain network. Although data in a blockchain network is immutable, the paper also outlines the need for additional verification mechanisms capable of determining whether the raw data was correct. Finally, it includes planned future work.Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovaciรณn y Universidades PID2019-105455GB-C31Junta de Andalucรญa CEI-12-TIC02

    The New International Architecture

    Get PDF
    In 1998 Rรผdiger Dornbusch gave the Munich Lectures in Economics entitled โ€œInternational Financial Crisesโ€. The CES Academic Council awarded him the prize and title โ€œDistinguished CES Fellowโ€ for his outstanding work on the monetary theory of foreign trade.Rรผdiger Dornbusch passed away on July 25, 2002, before he was able to finalize the manuscript of his most stimulating and thought-provoking lectures. The manuscript was scheduled to appear in the CESifo book series with MIT Press. This working paper contains the introduction which was distributed at the lectures. CES would like to make this document available to the scientific community. There is a video presentation of the lectures on the CES website (www.CESifo.de), and a leaflet is also available with the introductory speech by Stanley Fisher.International Finance, Financial Crises, IMF

    ๋””์ง€ํ„ธ ๋ฌด์—ญ ๊ฑฐ๋ž˜์—์„œ์˜ ์ „์ž๊ณ„์•ฝ์„œ์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ๋ฒ•์  ๊ณ ์ฐฐ

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(์„์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ตญ์ œ๋Œ€ํ•™์› ๊ตญ์ œํ•™๊ณผ(๊ตญ์ œ์ง€์—ญํ•™์ „๊ณต), 2023. 2. ์•ˆ๋•๊ทผ.The fourth industrial revolution and technological development have accelerated the digital transformation. With this advancement, cross-border trade is becoming simpler and faster. Electronic purchase, documentation, data storage, exchanges of data from customers to traders push forward the implementation of e-contracts. Especially since 2010, the digitalized trade ecosystem is being processed more widely. Perhaps, the unprecedented global pandemic and the environmental-friendly movement have brought the digital transformation faster in diverse fields including trade. Countries are concluding bilateral and multilateral digital partnership agreements to promote economic activities while ensuring the national economic security. Unfortunately, the regulatory gaps exist because legislation procedure has not kept up with the speed of the progress in technology. The adaptation of digitalization seems systematical and prompt as people and industries follow the trend. However, it has certainly brought vagueness and asked for a pioneering leader to set standards to the modification in industrial movement be legally valid to execute. The world is closer to one another more than ever. The global trade scale has increased drastically. According to the WTO survey, 4300% growth has been reached in international trade from 1950 to 2021. In order to facilitate the trade ecosystem, digital transformation is unavoidable. One of the changes would be implementing e-contracts that is better known as smart contracts. Considering beneficiaries that e-contracts have: cost and time reduction, simple documentation and customs clearance, and guaranteeing privity and security, it is more favourable to utilize them. With their advantageous features notwithstanding, the absence of typical protocol disturbs more widespread usage of e-contracts. In fact, there is no concrete norm to define e-contract worldwide. Perhaps it is because e-contracts contain not only technical concepts but various related legal issues such as contractual relationship practice and e-identity. As a result, e-contracts lift many concerns not only in contract law but also in multiple legal fields like financial law, electronic transaction law and data protection law. This is why it is worth reviewing legal concerns of e-contracts and profits from using them on behalf of existing contracts. This research will provide a general preview of the concept, legal conditions and effects of e-contracts. How e-contracts are used in a real trade ecosystem will also be introduced to show the validity of the study goal. Then, the review of blockchain technology on e-contracts will follow to explain the technical conditions and the structure of e-contracts. Finally, already existing domestic laws and partnership agreements will be reviewed to be able to make suggestions for policymakers and trade negotiators to update the current legal framework for e-contracts. Therefore, it is important to review from the current status of e-contracts from the definition and the cornerstone technology to the legal framework to suggest comprehensive digital partnership agreements in the digital trade era.4์ฐจ ์‚ฐ์—…ํ˜๋ช…์˜ ๋ฐœ์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ๋””์ง€ํ„ธ๊ธฐ์ˆ ๋ฐœ์ „์€ ์‚ฌํšŒ์˜ ๋งŽ์€ ์˜์—ญ์—์˜ ๋””์ง€ํ„ธ ์ „ํ™˜์„ ๊ฐ€์†ํ™”ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๊ธฐ์ˆ  ๋ฐœ์ „์œผ๋กœ ์„ธ์ƒ์€ ๊ทธ ์–ด๋Š๋•Œ๋ณด๋‹ค ๊ธด๋ฐ€ํžˆ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ธ€๋กœ๋ฒŒ ๊ฐ€์น˜ ์‚ฌ์Šฌ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์„ธ๊ณ„ ๋ฌด์—ญ ๊ทœ๋ชจ ์—ญ์‹œ ๊ธ‰๊ฒฉํžˆ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ–ˆ๋‹ค. WTO ์กฐ์‚ฌ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋ฉด, 1950๋…„๋ถ€ํ„ฐ 2021๋…„๊นŒ์ง€ ๊ตญ์ œ ๋ฌด์—ญ์€ 4300%์˜ ์„ฑ์žฅ์„ ์ด๋ฃจ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ ์ „๋ก€ ์—†๋Š” ์ฝ”๋กœ๋‚˜19๋ฅผ ๊ฒช์œผ๋ฉฐ ์ „์ž์ƒ๊ฑฐ๋ž˜๋ฅผ ๋น„๋กฏํ•œ ๊ตญ๊ฒฝ์„ ๋„˜๋‚˜๋“œ๋Š” ๋ฌด์—ญ(Cross-border trade)์˜ ๋””์ง€ํ„ธ ์ „ํ™˜์„ ๋”์šฑ ์•ž๋‹น๊ฒผ๋‹ค. ๋ฌด์—ญ์—…๋ฌด๊ณผ์ •์— ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ๋ชจ๋“  ๋‹จ๊ณ„๋“ค(๊ตฌ๋งค, ์„œ๋ฅ˜์˜ ๋ฌธ์„œํ™”, ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์ €์žฅ, ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ๊ตํ™˜ ๋“ฑ)์€ '์ „์ž ๊ณ„์•ฝ(e-contract)'์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋”์šฑ ์šฉ์ดํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ดํ–‰๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ฆ‰, ๋ฌด์—ญ ์ƒํƒœ๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์›ํ™œํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ๋””์ง€ํ„ธ ์ „ํ™˜์ด ๋ถˆ๊ฐ€ํ”ผํ•˜๋‹ค. ์‹ค์ œ๋กœ ๋งŽ์€ ๊ตญ๊ฐ€๋“ค์€ ๊ฐ๊ตญ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์ œ ํ™œ๋™์„ ์ด‰์ง„ํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ตญ๊ฐ€ ๊ฒฝ์ œ ์•ˆ๋ณด๋ฅผ ๋ณด์žฅํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์–‘์ž ๋ฐ ๋‹ค์ž๊ฐ„ ๋””์ง€ํ„ธ ํŒŒํŠธ๋„ˆ์‹ญ ํ˜‘์ •์„ ์ฒด๊ฒฐํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ์‹ค์ •์ด๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ๊ธฐ์ˆ  ๋ฐœ์ „์˜ ์†๋„๊ฐ€ ๋„ˆ๋ฌด ๋น ๋ฅด๋ฉด ๋ฒ• ์ œ์ • ์ ˆ์ฐจ๊ฐ€ ์ด๋ฅผ ๋”ฐ๋ผ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋ชปํ•ด, ๊ธฐ์ˆ  ๋ฐœ์ „๊ณผ ๊ทœ์ œ ์‚ฌ์ด์— ๊ฒฉ์ฐจ๊ฐ€ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•œ๋‹ค. ์‚ฐ์—…์ด๋‚˜ ์ผ์ƒ์„ ์ƒ๊ฐํ•ด๋ณด๋ฉด ๋””์ง€ํ„ธ์ „ํ™˜์ด ๊ฝค๋‚˜ ์ž์—ฐ์Šค๋ ˆ ์ด๋ฃจ์–ด์ง€๋Š” ๊ฒƒ ๊ฐ™์ง€๋งŒ, ์•„์ง ์ง„ํ–‰ ์ค‘์ธ ๊ณผ์ •์—์„œ์˜ ๋ฒ•์  ๊ตฌ์†๋ ฅ์„ ๊ฒฐ์ •์ง“๊ธฐ์—” ๊ณ ๋ คํ•ด์•ผํ•  ์–ด๋ ค์›€์ด ๋’ค๋”ฐ๋ฅด๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋น„์šฉ๊ณผ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์˜ ์ ˆ๊ฐ, ํ†ต๊ด€์ ˆ์ฐจ ๊ฐ„์†Œํ™”, ํ”„๋ผ์ด๋ฒ„์‹œ์™€ ๋ณด์•ˆ ๋ณด์žฅ ๋“ฑ ์ „์ž๊ณ„์•ฝ์ด ๊ฐ€์ง„ ์ด์ ๋“ค์€ ๊ฒฐ์ฝ” ๋ฌด์‹œํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์—†๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์žฅ์ ์—๋„ ๋ถˆ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ , ์ •ํ˜•ํ™”๋œ ๊ธฐ์ค€ ๋ฐ ๊ทœ์ œ์˜ ๋ถ€์žฌ๋Š” ๋” ๊ด‘๋ฒ”์œ„ํ•œ ์ „์ž ๊ณ„์•ฝ์˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์„ ๋ฐฉํ•ดํ•œ๋‹ค. ์‚ฌ์‹ค ์ „ ์„ธ๊ณ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ •ํ•ด์ง„ ์ „์ž ๊ณ„์•ฝ'์˜ ์ •์˜๋Š” ์—†๋‹ค. ์•„๋งˆ๋„ ์ „์ž๊ณ„์•ฝ์—๋Š” ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์  ๊ฐœ๋… ๋ฟ๋งŒ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ ๊ณ„์•ฝ๊ด€๊ณ„ ๊ด€ํ–‰, ์ „์ž์ •์ฒด์„ฑ ๋“ฑ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๊ด€๋ จ ๋ฒ•์  ๋ฌธ์ œ๊ฐ€ ํฌํ•จ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ผ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ์ด์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ „์ž๊ณ„์•ฝ์€ ๊ณ„์•ฝ๋ฒ•์€ ๋ฌผ๋ก , ๊ธˆ์œต๋ฒ•, ์ „์ž๊ฑฐ๋ž˜๋ฒ•, ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ณดํ˜ธ๋ฒ• ๋“ฑ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๋ฒ•๋ฅ  ๋ถ„์•ผ์—์„œ ๊ฒ€ํ† ๋˜์–ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ „์ž๊ณ„์•ฝ์˜ ๊ฐœ๋…, ๋ฒ•์  ์กฐ๊ฑด ๋ฐ ํšจ๊ณผ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ์‹œ์‚ฌ์ ์„ ์†Œ๊ฐœํ•˜๋ฉด์„œ ์ „์ž๊ณ„์•ฝ์ด ์‹ค์ œ ๋ฌด์—ญ ์ƒํƒœ๊ณ„์—์„œ ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ํ™œ์šฉ๋˜๋Š”์ง€๋ฅผ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด์–ด ๋ธ”๋ก์ฒด์ธ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ๊ณผ ์ด๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ํ•œ ์ „์ž๊ณ„์•ฝ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฒ€ํ† ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ „์ž๊ณ„์•ฝ์˜ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์  ์กฐ๊ฑด๊ณผ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰์œผ๋กœ ๊ด€๋ จ ํ•ญ๋ชฉ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง„ ํ•œ๊ตญ, ๋ฏธ๊ตญ, ์œ ๋Ÿฝ ์—ฐํ•ฉ์˜ ๊ตญ๋‚ด๋ฒ•๊ณผ ํŒŒํŠธ๋„ˆ์‹ญ ํ˜‘์ •์˜ ๊ฒ€ํ† ๋ฅผ ํ•„์š”๋กœ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ •์ฑ… ์ž…์•ˆ์ž๋‚˜ ๋ฌด์—ญ ์ „๋ฌธ๊ฐ€๋“ค์ด ์ „์ž๊ณ„์•ฝ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํ˜„ํ–‰๋ฒ• ๊ฐœ์ • ๋˜๋Š” ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๋””์ง€ํ„ธ ํŒŒํŠธ๋„ˆ์‹ญ ๊ณ„์•ฝ์„ ์ฒด๊ฒฐํ•  ๋•Œ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•ด๋ณด ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋ผ ํŒ๋‹จ๋œ๋‹ค.Chapter I. Introduction 1 1. Study Background 1 2. Purpose of Research 3 Chapter II. What is an E-contract 6 1. Definition of E-Contracts 6 2. Legal Characteristics of E-Contracts 8 3. Effects of Using E-Contracts 11 Chapter III. E-Contract issues and trends in trade 14 1. Current Status of E-Contracts in South Korea 14 2. E-Contract Usage in International Trade 19 Chapter IV. Blockchain and E-contracts 22 1. What is Blockchain Technology 22 2. Blockchain Application in Digital Trade 23 3. E-Contracts in Digital Trade 26 Chapter V. Legal Agreement Analysis 32 1. Comparisons of Bilateral Agreements 32 2. United States Legislation Status and Prospect 36 3. Europes Legislation Status and Prospect 38 4. South Koreas Legislation Status and Prospect 41 Chapter VI. Conclusion 43 Bibliography 47 Abstract in Korean (๊ตญ๋ฌธ ์ดˆ๋ก) 51์„

    REGULATORY SANDBOXES ENABLE PRAGMATIC BLOCKCHAIN REGULATION

    Get PDF
    Since blockchain technology supports digitally-native money, the centralized chokepoints that governments have traditionally targeted to regulate commerce no longer apply to our (digital) property. However, competent regulation furthers basic public policy goals and should enable responsible innovation of this promising technology. This Article discusses pragmatic policies that enable responsible innovation by cultivating regulatory expertise required to write enforceable rules. Responsible innovation is necessary because unlike the early internet, where programmers could manipulate simple colors and text on webpages, these same individuals can now create financial services applications that manipulate actual moneyโ€”we are faced with an inescapable reality that more is at stake
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore