NASA space station automation: AI-based technology review

Research and Development projects in automation for the Space Station are discussed. Artificial Intelligence (AI) based automation technologies are planned to enhance crew safety through reduced need for EVA, increase crew productivity through the reduction of routine operations, increase space station autonomy, and augment space station capability through the use of teleoperation and robotics. AI technology will also be developed for the servicing of satellites at the Space Station, system monitoring and diagnosis, space manufacturing, and the assembly of large space structures

An intelligent, free-flying robot

The ground based demonstration of the extensive extravehicular activity (EVA) Retriever, a voice-supervised, intelligent, free flying robot, is designed to evaluate the capability to retrieve objects (astronauts, equipment, and tools) which have accidentally separated from the Space Station. The major objective of the EVA Retriever Project is to design, develop, and evaluate an integrated robotic hardware and on-board software system which autonomously: (1) performs system activation and check-out; (2) searches for and acquires the target; (3) plans and executes a rendezvous while continuously tracking the target; (4) avoids stationary and moving obstacles; (5) reaches for and grapples the target; (6) returns to transfer the object; and (7) returns to base

The NASA SBIR product catalog

The purpose of this catalog is to assist small business firms in making the community aware of products emerging from their efforts in the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) program. It contains descriptions of some products that have advanced into Phase 3 and others that are identified as prospective products. Both lists of products in this catalog are based on information supplied by NASA SBIR contractors in responding to an invitation to be represented in this document. Generally, all products suggested by the small firms were included in order to meet the goals of information exchange for SBIR results. Of the 444 SBIR contractors NASA queried, 137 provided information on 219 products. The catalog presents the product information in the technology areas listed in the table of contents. Within each area, the products are listed in alphabetical order by product name and are given identifying numbers. Also included is an alphabetical listing of the companies that have products described. This listing cross-references the product list and provides information on the business activity of each firm. In addition, there are three indexes: one a list of firms by states, one that lists the products according to NASA Centers that managed the SBIR projects, and one that lists the products by the relevant Technical Topics utilized in NASA's annual program solicitation under which each SBIR project was selected

Collision-free path planning for robots using B-splines and simulated annealing

This thesis describes a technique to obtain an optimal collision-free path for an automated guided vehicle (AGV) and/or robot in two and three dimensions by synthesizing a B-spline curve under geometric and intrinsic constraints. The problem is formulated as a combinatorial optimization problem and solved by using simulated annealing. A two-link planar manipulator is included to show that the B-spline curve can also be synthesized by adding kinematic characteristics of the robot. A cost function, which includes obstacle proximity, excessive arc length, uneven parametric distribution and, possibly, link proximity costs, is developed for the simulated annealing algorithm. Three possible cases for the orientation of the moving object are explored: (a) fixed orientation, (b) orientation as another independent variable, and (c) orientation given by the slope of the curve. To demonstrate the robustness of the technique, several examples are presented. Objects are modeled as ellipsoid type shapes. The procedure to obtain the describing parameters of the ellipsoid is also presented

Study of robotics systems applications to the space station program

Applications of robotics systems to potential uses of the Space Station as an assembly facility, and secondarily as a servicing facility, are considered. A typical robotics system mission is described along with the pertinent application guidelines and Space Station environmental assumptions utilized in developing the robotic task scenarios. A functional description of a supervised dual-robot space structure construction system is given, and four key areas of robotic technology are defined, described, and assessed. Alternate technologies for implementing the more routine space technology support subsystems that will be required to support the Space Station robotic systems in assembly and servicing tasks are briefly discussed. The environmental conditions impacting on the robotic configuration design and operation are reviewed

Sensors: A Key to Successful Robot-Based Assembly

Computer controlled robots offer a number of significant advantages in manufacturing and assembly tasks. These include consistent product reliability and the ability to work in harsh environments. The programmable nature of robotic automation allows the possibility of applying them to a number of tasks. In particular, significant savings can be expected in batch production, if robots can be applied to produce numbers of products successfully without plant re-tooling. Unfortunately, despite considerable progress made in robot programming [Lozano-Perez 83] [Paul 81] ;Ahmad 84] [Graver et al. 84] [Bonner & Shin 82] and in sensing [Gonzalez & Safabakhsh 82] [Fu 82] [Hall et al. 82], [Goto et al. 80], [Hirzinger & Dietrich 86], [Harmon 84], kinematics and control strategies [Whitney 85] [Luh S3] [Lee 82], a number of problems still remain unsolved before en-mass applications take place. In fact, in current applications, the specialized tooling for manufacturing a particular product may make up as much as 80% of the production line cost. In such a production line the robot is often used only as a programmable parts transfer device. Improving robots ability to sense and adapt to different products or environments so as to handle a larger variety of products without retooling is essential. It is just as important to be able to program them easily and quickly, without requiring the user to have a detailed understanding of complex robot programming languages and control schemes such as RCCL [Hayward & Paul 84], VAL-II [Shimano et al., 84], AML [Taylor et al., 83], SR3L-90 [Ahmad 84] or AL [Mujtaba & Goldman 79]. Currently there are a number of Computer Aided Design (CAD) packages available which simplify the robot programming problem. Such packages allow the automation system designer to simulate the assembly workcell which may consist of various machines and robots. The designer can then pick the motion sequences the robot has to execute in order to achieve the desired assembly task. This is done by viewing the motions on a graphical screen from different viewing angles to check for collisions and to ensure the relative positioning is correct, much the same way1 as it is done in on-line teach playback methods (see Figure 1). Off-line robot programming on CAD stations does not always lead to successful results due to two reasons: (i) The robot mechanism is inherently inaccurate due to incorrect kinematic models programmed in their control system [Wu 83] [Hayati 83] [Ahmad 87] [Whitney et ■ al. 84]. (ii) The assembly workcell model represented in the controller is not accurate. As a result parts and tools are not exactly located and their exact position may vary. This causes a predefined kinematic motion sequence program to fail, as it cannot deal with positional uncertainties. Sensors to detect real-time errors in the part and tool positions are obviously required with tailored sensor-based motion strategies to ensure assembly accomplishment. In this chapter we deal with how sensors are used to successfully ensure assembly task accomplishment. We illustrate the use of various sensors by going through an actual assembly of an oil pump. Additionally we illustrate a number of motion strategies which have been developed to deal with assembly errors. Initially, we discuss a number of sensors found in typical robotic assembly systems in Section 1. In Section 2 we discuss how and when sensors are to be used during an assembly operation. Issues relating to sensing and robust assembly systems are discussed very briefly in Section 3. Section 4 details a sensor-based robot assembly to illustrate practical applications

NASA SBIR product catalog, 1991

This catalog is a partial list of products of NASA SBIR (Small Business Innovation Research) projects that have advanced to some degree into Phase 3. While most of the products evolved from work conducted during SBIR Phase 1 and 2, a few advanced to commercial status solely from Phase 1 activities. The catalog presents information provided to NASA by SBIR contractors who wished to have their products exhibited at Technology 2001, a NASA-sponsored technology transfer conference held in San Jose, California, on December 4, 5, and 6, 1991. The catalog presents the product information in the following technology areas: computer and communication systems; information processing and AI; robotics and automation; signal and image processing; microelectronics; electronic devices and equipment; microwave electronic devices; optical devices and lasers; advanced materials; materials processing; materials testing and NDE; materials instrumentation; aerodynamics and aircraft; fluid mechanics and measurement; heat transfer devices; refrigeration and cryogenics; energy conversion devices; oceanographic instruments; atmosphere monitoring devices; water management; life science instruments; and spacecraft electromechanical systems

Proceedings of the NASA Conference on Space Telerobotics, volume 1

The theme of the Conference was man-machine collaboration in space. Topics addressed include: redundant manipulators; man-machine systems; telerobot architecture; remote sensing and planning; navigation; neural networks; fundamental AI research; and reasoning under uncertainty