A New Transmitted Reference Pulse Cluster Based Ultra-Wideband Transmitter Design

An energy efficient ultra-wideband (UWB) transmitter based on the novel transmitted reference pulse cluster (TRPC) modulation scheme is presented. The TRPC-UWB transmitter integrates, namely, wideband active baluns, wideband I-Q modulator based up-conversion mixer, and differential to single-ended converter. The integrated circuits of TRPC-UWB front end is designed and implemented in the 130-nm CMOS process technology. the measured worst-case carrier leakage suppression is 22.4 dBc, while the single sideband suppression is higher than 31.6 dBc, operating at the frequency from 3.1 GHz to 8.2 GHz. With adjustable data rate of 10 to 300 Mbps, the transmitter achieves a high energy efficiency of 38.4 pJ/pulse.Comment: 4 page, 8 figure

Microwave and Millimeter-wave Concurrent Multiband Low-Noise Amplifiers and Receiver Front-end in SiGe BiCMOS Technology

A fully integrated SiGe BiCMOS concurrent multiband receiver front-end and its building blocks including multiband low-noise amplifiers (LNAs), single-to-differential amplifiers and mixer are presented for various Ku-/K-/Ka-band applications. The proposed concurrent multiband receiver building blocks and receiver front-end achieve the best stopband rejection performances as compared to the existing multiband LNAs and receivers. First, a novel feedback tri-band load composed of two inductor feedback notch filters is proposed to overcome the low Q-factor of integrated passive inductors, and hence it provides superior stopband rejection ratio (SRR). A new 13.5/24/35-GHz concurrent tri-band LNA implementing the feedback tri-band load is presented. The developed tri-band LNA is the first concurrent tri-band LNA operating up to millimeter-wave region. By expanding the operating principle of the feedback tri-band load, a 21.5/36.5-GHz concurrent dual-band LNA with an inductor feedback dual-band load and another 23/36-GHz concurrent dual-band LNA with a new transformer feedback dual-band load are also presented. The latter provides more degrees of freedom for the creation of the stopband and passbands as compared to the former. A 22/36-GHz concurrent dual-band single-to-differential LNA employing a novel single-to-differential transformer feedback dual-band load is presented. The developed LNA is the first true concurrent dual-band single-to-differential amplifier. A novel 24.5/36.5 GHz concurrent dual-band merged single-to-differential LNA and mixer implementing the proposed single-to-differential transformer feedback dual-band load is also presented. With a 21-GHz LO signal, the down-converted dual IF bands are located at 3.5/15.5 GHz for two passband signals at 24.5/36.5 GHz, respectively. The proposed merged LNA and mixer is the first fully integrated concurrent dual-band mixer operating up to millimeter-wave frequencies without using any switching mechanism. Finally, a 24.5/36.5-GHz concurrent dual-band receiver front-end is proposed. It consists of the developed concurrent dual-band LNA using the single-to-single transformer feedback dual-band load and the developed concurrent dual-band merged LNA and mixer employing the single-to-differential transformer feedback dual-band load. The developed concurrent dual-band receiver front-end achieves the highest gain and the best NF performances with the largest SRRs, while operating at highest frequencies up to millimeter-wave region, among the concurrent dual-band receivers reported to date

Microwave and Millimeter-wave Concurrent Multiband Low-Noise Amplifiers and Receiver Front-end in SiGe BiCMOS Technology

A fully integrated SiGe BiCMOS concurrent multiband receiver front-end and its building blocks including multiband low-noise amplifiers (LNAs), single-to-differential amplifiers and mixer are presented for various Ku-/K-/Ka-band applications. The proposed concurrent multiband receiver building blocks and receiver front-end achieve the best stopband rejection performances as compared to the existing multiband LNAs and receivers. First, a novel feedback tri-band load composed of two inductor feedback notch filters is proposed to overcome the low Q-factor of integrated passive inductors, and hence it provides superior stopband rejection ratio (SRR). A new 13.5/24/35-GHz concurrent tri-band LNA implementing the feedback tri-band load is presented. The developed tri-band LNA is the first concurrent tri-band LNA operating up to millimeter-wave region. By expanding the operating principle of the feedback tri-band load, a 21.5/36.5-GHz concurrent dual-band LNA with an inductor feedback dual-band load and another 23/36-GHz concurrent dual-band LNA with a new transformer feedback dual-band load are also presented. The latter provides more degrees of freedom for the creation of the stopband and passbands as compared to the former. A 22/36-GHz concurrent dual-band single-to-differential LNA employing a novel single-to-differential transformer feedback dual-band load is presented. The developed LNA is the first true concurrent dual-band single-to-differential amplifier. A novel 24.5/36.5 GHz concurrent dual-band merged single-to-differential LNA and mixer implementing the proposed single-to-differential transformer feedback dual-band load is also presented. With a 21-GHz LO signal, the down-converted dual IF bands are located at 3.5/15.5 GHz for two passband signals at 24.5/36.5 GHz, respectively. The proposed merged LNA and mixer is the first fully integrated concurrent dual-band mixer operating up to millimeter-wave frequencies without using any switching mechanism. Finally, a 24.5/36.5-GHz concurrent dual-band receiver front-end is proposed. It consists of the developed concurrent dual-band LNA using the single-to-single transformer feedback dual-band load and the developed concurrent dual-band merged LNA and mixer employing the single-to-differential transformer feedback dual-band load. The developed concurrent dual-band receiver front-end achieves the highest gain and the best NF performances with the largest SRRs, while operating at highest frequencies up to millimeter-wave region, among the concurrent dual-band receivers reported to date

Designing of Low Power RF-Receiver Front-end with CMOS Technology

This thesis studies how to design ultra low power radio-receiver front-end circuit consisting of a low-noise CMOS amplifier and mixer for low power Bluetooth applications. This system is designed in 65-nm CMOS technology with the voltage source of 1.2 V, and it operates at 2.4 GHz. This research project includes the design of radio frequency integrated circuit with CMOS technology using CAD software for circuit design, layout design, pre and post-layout simulations. Firstly, brief study about both Low noise amplifier (LNA) and mixer has been done, and then the design structure such as, input matching network of LNA, noise of system, gain and linearity have been discussed. Later, next section reports simulation results of LNA, mixer and eventually their combination. Furthermore, the effect of packaging and non-ideal on-chip circuit performance has been considered and shown in comparison tables for more clarity. Finally, after the layout design, the obtained results of both post-layout and pre-layout simulations are compared and shown the stability of the design with parasitics consideration

A New Application of Current Conveyors: The Design of Wideband Controllable Low-Noise Amplifiers

The aim of this paper is three-fold. First, it reviews the low-noise amplifier and its relevance in wireless communications receivers. Then it presents an exhaustive review of the existing topologies. Finally, it introduces a new class of LNAs, based on current conveyors, describing the founding principle and the performances of a new single-ended LNA. The new LNAs offer the following notable advantages: total absence of passive elements (and the smallest LNAs in their respective classes); wideband performance, with stable frequency responses from 0 to 3 GHz; easy gain control over wide ranges (0 to 20 dB). Comparisons with other topologies prove that the new class of LNA greatly advances the state of the art

Design and Analysis of Low-power Millimeter-Wave SiGe BiCMOS Circuits with Application to Network Measurement Systems

Interest in millimeter (mm-) wave frequencies covering the spectrum of 30-300 GHz has been steadily increasing. Advantages such as larger absolute bandwidth and smaller form-factor have made this frequency region attractive for numerous applications, including high-speed wireless communication, sensing, material science, health, automotive radar, and space exploration. Continuous development of silicon-germanium heterojunction bipolar transistor (SiGe HBT) and associated BiCMOS technology has achieved transistors with fT/fmax of 505/720 GHz and integration with 55 nm CMOS. Such accomplishment and predictions of beyond THz performance have made SiGe BiCMOS technology the most competitive candidate for addressing the aforementioned applications. Especially for mobile applications, a critical demand for future mm-wave applications will be low DC power consumption (Pdc), which requires a substantial reduction of supply voltage and current. Conventionally, reducing the supply voltage will lead to HBTs operating close to or in the saturation region, which is typically avoided in mm-wave circuits due to expectated performance degradation and often inaccurate models. However, due to only moderate speed reduction at the forward-biased base-collector voltage (VBC) up to 0.5 V and the accuracy of the compact model HICUM/L2 also in saturation, low-power mm-wave circuits with SiGe HBTs operating in saturation offer intriguing benefits, which have been explored in this thesis based on 130 nm SiGe BiCMOS technologies: • Different low-power mm-wave circuit blocks are discussed in detail, including low-noise amplifiers (LNAs), down-conversion mixers, and various frequency multipliers covering a wide frequency range from V-band (50-75 GHz) to G-band (140-220 GHz). • Aiming at realizing a better trade-off between Pdc and RF performance, a drastic decrease in supply voltage is realized with forward-biased VBC, forcing transistors of the circuits to operate in saturation. • Discussions contain the theoretical analysis of the key figure of merits (FoMs), topology and bias selection, device sizing, and performance enhancement techniques. • A 173-207 GHz low-power amplifier with 23 dB gain and 3.2 mW Pdc, and a 72-108 GHz low-power tunable amplifier with 10-23 dB gain and 4-21 mW Pdc were designed. • A 97 GHz low-power down-conversion mixer was presented with 9.6 dB conversion gain (CG) and 12 mW Pdc. • For multipliers, a 56-66 GHz low-power frequency quadrupler with -3.6 dB peak CG and 12 mW Pdc, and a 172-201 GHz low-power frequency tripler with -4 dB peak CG and 10.5 mW Pdc were realized. By cascading these two circuits, also a 176-193 GHz low-power ×12 multiplier was designed, achieving -11 dBm output power with only 26 mW Pdc. • An integrated 190 GHz low-power receiver was designed as one receiving channel of a G-band frequency extender specifically for a VNA-based measurement system. Another goal of this receiver is to explore the lowest possible Pdc while keeping its highly competitive RF performance for general applications requiring a wide LO tuning range. Apart from the low-power design method of circuit blocks, the careful analysis and distribution of the receiver FoMs are also applied for further reduction of the overall Pdc. Along this line, this receiver achieved a peak CG of 49 dB with a 14 dB tunning range, consuming only 29 mW static Pdc for the core part and 171 mW overall Pdc, including the LO chain. • All designs presented in this thesis were fabricated and characterized on-wafer. Thanks to the accurate compact model HICUM/L2, first-pass access was achieved for all circuits, and simulation results show excellent agreement with measurements. • Compared with recently published work, most of the designs in this thesis show extremely low Pdc with highly competitive key FoMs regarding gain, bandwidth, and noise figure. • The observed excellent measurement-simulation agreement enables the sensitivity analysis of each design for obtaining a deeper insight into the impact of transistor-related physical effects on critical circuit performance parameters. Such studies provide meaningful feedback for process improvement and modeling development.:Table of Contents Kurzfassung . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii Abstract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iv Table of Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vii 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Motivation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.2 Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 List of symbols and acronyms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2 Technology 7 2.1 Fabrication Technologies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 2.1.1 SiGe HBT performance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 2.1.2 B11HFC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 2.1.3 SG13G2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 2.1.4 SG13D7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 2.2 Commonly Used Components . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 2.2.1 Grounded-sidewall-shielded microstrip line . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 2.2.2 Zero-impedance Transmission Line . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 2.2.3 Balun . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 2.2.3.1 Active Balun . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 2.2.3.2 Passive Balun . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 2.3 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 3 Low-power Low-noise Amplifiers 25 3.1 173-207 GHz Ultra-low-power Amplifier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 3.1.1 Topology Selection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 3.1.2 Bias Dependency of the Small-signal Performance . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 3.1.2.1 Bias . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 3.1.2.2 Bias vs Gain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 3.1.2.3 Bias vs Noise . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 3.1.2.4 Bias vs Stability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 3.1.3 Bias selection and Device sizing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 3.1.3.1 Bias Selection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 3.1.3.2 Device Sizing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 3.1.4 Performance Enhancement Technologies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 3.1.4.1 Gm-boosting Inductors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 3.1.4.2 Stability Enhancement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 3.1.4.3 Noise Improvement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 3.1.5 Circuit Realization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 3.1.5.1 Layout Scheme . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 3.1.5.2 Inductors Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 3.1.5.3 Dual-band Matching Network . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 3.1.5.4 Circuit Implementation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 3.1.6 Results and Discussions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 3.1.6.1 Measurement Setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 3.1.6.2 Measurement Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 3.1.6.3 Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 3.2 72-108 GHz Low-Power Tunable Amplifier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 3.2.1 Configuration, Sizing, and Bias Tuning Range . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 3.2.2 Regional Matching Network . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 3.2.2.1 Impedance Variation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 3.2.2.2 Regional Matching Network Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 3.2.3 Circuit Implementation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 3.2.4 Results and Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 3.2.4.1 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 3.2.4.2 Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 3.3 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 4 Low-power Down-conversion Mixers 73 4.1 97 GHz Low-power Down-conversion Mixer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 4.1.1 Mixer Design and Implementation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 4.1.1.1 Mixer Topology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 4.1.1.2 Bias Selection and Device Sizing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 4.1.1.3 Mixer Implementation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 4.1.2 Results and Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 4.1.2.1 Measurement Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 4.1.2.2 Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 4.2 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 5 Low-power Multipliers 87 5.1 General Design Flow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88 5.2 56-66 GHz Low-power Frequency Quadrupler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89 5.3 172-201 GHz Low-power Frequency Tripler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93 5.4 176-193 GHz Low-power ×12 Frequency Multiplier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 5.5 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 6 Low-power Receivers 101 6.1 Receiver Performance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101 6.2 LO Chain (×12) Integrated 190 GHz Low-Power Receiver . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 6.2.1 Receiver Architecture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 6.2.2 Low-power Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 6.2.3 Building Blocks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 6.2.3.1 LNA and LO DA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 6.2.3.2 Tunable Mixer and IF BA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111 6.2.3.3 65 GHz (V-band) Quadrupler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116 6.2.3.4 G-band Tripler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120 6.2.4 Receiver Results and Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123 6.2.5 Measurement Setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124 6.2.6 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124 6.3 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131 7 Conclusions 133 7.1 Summaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133 7.2 Outlook . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134 Bibliography 135 List of Figures 149 List of Tables 157 A Derivation of the Gm 159 A.1 Gm of standard cascode stage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159 A.2 Gm of cascode stage with Lcas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 160 A.3 Gm of cascode stage with Lb . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161 B Derivation of Yin in the stability analysis 163 C Derivation of Zin and Zout 165 C.1 Zin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 165 C.2 Zout . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 167 D Derivation of the cascaded oP1dB 169 E Table of element values for the designed circuits 17

Dual-Band Transmitter and Receiver with Bowtie-Antenna in 0.13 μm SiGe BiCMOS for Gas Spectroscopy at 222 - 270 GHz

This paper presents a transmitter (TX) and a receiver (RX) with bowtie-antenna and silicon lens for gas spectroscopy at 222-270 GHz, which are fabricated in IHP’s 0.13 μm SiGe BiCMOS technology. The TX and RX use two integrated local oscillators for 222 – 256 GHz and 250 – 270 GHz, which are switched for dual-band operation. Due to its directivity of about 27 dBi, the single integrated bowtie-antenna with silicon lens enables an EIRP of about 25 dBm for the TX, and therefore a considerably higher EIRP for the 2-band TX compared to previously reported systems. The double sideband noise temperature of the RX is 20,000 K (18.5 dB noise figure) as measured by the Y-factor method. Absorption spectroscopy of gaseous methanol is used as a measure for the performance of the gas spectroscopy system with TX- and RX-modules

A robust 2.4 GHz time-of-arrival based ranging system with sub-meter accuracy: feasibility study and realization of low power CMOS receiver

Draadloze sensornetwerken worden meer en meer aangewend om verschillende soorten informatie te verzamelen. De locatie, waar deze informatie verzameld is, is een belangerijke eigenschap en voor sommige toepassingen, zoals het volgen van personen of goederen, zelfs de meest belangrijke en mogelijkmakende factor. Om de positie van een sensor te bepalen, is een technologie nodig die de afstand tot een gekend referentiepunt schat. Door verschillende afstandsmetingen te combineren, is het mogelijk de absolute locatie van de node te berekenen