3,805 research outputs found
On the Equivalence of Youla, System-level and Input-output Parameterizations
A convex parameterization of internally stabilizing controllers is
fundamental for many controller synthesis procedures. The celebrated Youla
parameterization relies on a doubly-coprime factorization of the system, while
the recent system-level and input-output characterizations require no
doubly-coprime factorization but a set of equality constraints for achievable
closed-loop responses. In this paper, we present explicit affine mappings among
Youla, system-level and input-output parameterizations. Two direct implications
of the affine mappings are 1) any convex problem in Youla, system level, or
input-output parameters can be equivalently and convexly formulated in any
other one of these frameworks, including the convex system-level synthesis
(SLS); 2) the condition of quadratic invariance (QI) is sufficient and
necessary for the classical distributed control problem to admit an equivalent
convex reformulation in terms of Youla, system-level, or input-output
parameters.Comment: 8 pages, 3 figure
System Level Synthesis
This article surveys the System Level Synthesis framework, which presents a
novel perspective on constrained robust and optimal controller synthesis for
linear systems. We show how SLS shifts the controller synthesis task from the
design of a controller to the design of the entire closed loop system, and
highlight the benefits of this approach in terms of scalability and
transparency. We emphasize two particular applications of SLS, namely
large-scale distributed optimal control and robust control. In the case of
distributed control, we show how SLS allows for localized controllers to be
computed, extending robust and optimal control methods to large-scale systems
under practical and realistic assumptions. In the case of robust control, we
show how SLS allows for novel design methodologies that, for the first time,
quantify the degradation in performance of a robust controller due to model
uncertainty -- such transparency is key in allowing robust control methods to
interact, in a principled way, with modern techniques from machine learning and
statistical inference. Throughout, we emphasize practical and efficient
computational solutions, and demonstrate our methods on easy to understand case
studies.Comment: To appear in Annual Reviews in Contro
System-level, Input-output and New Parameterizations of Stabilizing Controllers, and Their Numerical Computation
It is known that the set of internally stabilizing controller
is non-convex, but it admits convex
characterizations using certain closed-loop maps: a classical result is the
{Youla parameterization}, and two recent notions are the {system-level
parameterization} (SLP) and the {input-output parameterization} (IOP). In this
paper, we address the existence of new convex parameterizations and discuss
potential tradeoffs of each parametrization in different scenarios. Our main
contributions are: 1) We first reveal that only four groups of stable
closed-loop transfer matrices are equivalent to internal stability: one of them
is used in the SLP, another one is used in the IOP, and the other two are new,
leading to two new convex parameterizations of . 2)
We then investigate the properties of these parameterizations after imposing
the finite impulse response (FIR) approximation, revealing that the IOP has the
best ability of approximating given FIR
constraints. 3) These four parameterizations require no \emph{a priori}
doubly-coprime factorization of the plant, but impose a set of equality
constraints. However, these equality constraints will never be satisfied
exactly in numerical computation. We prove that the IOP is numerically robust
for open-loop stable plants, in the sense that small mismatches in the equality
constraints do not compromise the closed-loop stability. The SLP is known to
enjoy numerical robustness in the state feedback case; here, we show that
numerical robustness of the four-block SLP controller requires case-by-case
analysis in the general output feedback case.Comment: 20 pages; 5 figures. Added extensions on numerial computation and
robustness of closed-loop parameterization
Plane geometry and convexity of polynomial stability regions
The set of controllers stabilizing a linear system is generally non-convex in
the parameter space. In the case of two-parameter controller design (e.g. PI
control or static output feedback with one input and two outputs), we observe
however that quite often for benchmark problem instances, the set of
stabilizing controllers seems to be convex. In this note we use elementary
techniques from real algebraic geometry (resultants and Bezoutian matrices) to
explain this phenomenon. As a byproduct, we derive a convex linear matrix
inequality (LMI) formulation of two-parameter fixed-order controller design
problem, when possible
- …