An ankle rehabilitation robot based on 3-RRS spherical parallel mechanism

This article presents the design modeling of a novel 3-RRS spherical parallel mechanism for ankle rehabilitation applications. The kinematics of the 3-RRS spherical parallel mechanism is established. The degree of freedom of 3-RRS spherical parallel mechanism is calculated using screw theory. The inverse kinematics of 3-RRS spherical parallel mechanism is solved. Eight groups of inverse solutions of 3-RRS spherical parallel mechanism are obtained. A method for forward position analysis is developed with variation and iteration approaches, which is suitable for motor position control. The ankle rehabilitation robot can be widely used in clinical treatment and can also be used at home, hotels, and fitness centers for ankle muscle relaxation.</p

Development of lower-limb rehabilitation exercises using 3-PRS Parallel Robot and Dynamic Movement Primitives

[EN] The design of rehabilitation exercises applied to sprained ankles requires extreme caution, regarding the trajectories and the speed of the movements that will affect the patient. This paper presents a technique that allows a 3-PRS parallel robot to control such exercises, consisting of dorsi/plantar flexion and inversion/eversion ankle movements. The work includes a position control scheme for the parallel robot in order to follow a reference trajectory for each limb with the possibility of stopping the exercise in mid-execution without control loss. This stop may be motivated by the forces that the robot applies to the patient, acting like an alarm mechanism. The procedure introduced here is based on Dynamic Movement Primitives (DMPs).This work has been partially funded by FEDER-CICYT project with reference DPI2017-84201-R financed by Ministerio de Economía, Industria e Innovación (Spain).Escarabajal Sánchez, RJ.; Abu Dakka, FJM.; Pulloquinga Zapata, J.; Mata Amela, V.; Vallés Miquel, M.; Valera Fernández, Á. (2020). Development of lower-limb rehabilitation exercises using 3-PRS Parallel Robot and Dynamic Movement Primitives. Multidisciplinary Journal for Education, Social and Technological Sciences. 7(2):30-44. https://doi.org/10.4995/muse.2020.13907OJS304472Abu-Dakka, F. J., Valera, A., Escalera, J. A., Vallés, M., Mata, V., & Abderrahim, M. (2015). Trajectory adaptation and learning for ankle rehabilitation using a 3-PRS parallel robot. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 9245, 483-494. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22876-1_41Atkeson, C. G., Moore, A. W., & Schaal, S. (1997). Locally Weighted Learning. Artificial Intelligence Review, 11(1-5), 11-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2053-3_2Brockett, C. L., & Chapman, G. J. (2016). Biomechanics of the ankle. Orthopaedics and Trauma, 30(3), 232-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mporth.2016.04.015Dai, J. S., Zhao, T., & Nester, C. (2004). Sprained Ankle Physiotherapy Based Mechanism Synthesis and Stiffness Analysis of a Robotic Rehabilitation Device. Autonomous Robots, 16(2), 207-218. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:AURO.0000016866.80026.d7Díaz-Rodríguez, M., Mata, V., Valera, Á., & Page, Á. (2010). A methodology for dynamic parameters identification of 3-DOF parallel robots in terms of relevant parameters. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 45(9), 1337-1356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2010.04.007Díaz, I., Gil, J. J., & Sánchez, E. (2011). Lower-Limb Robotic Rehabilitation: Literature Review and Challenges. Journal of Robotics, 2011(i), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/759764Fanger, Y., Umlauft, J., & Hirche, S. (2016). Gaussian Processes for Dynamic Movement Primitives with application in knowledge-based cooperation. IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2016-Novem, 3913-3919. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2016.7759576Gosselin, C., & Angeles, J. (1990). Singularity Analysis of Closed-Loop Kinematic Chains. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 6(3), 281-290. https://doi.org/10.1109/70.56660Hesse, S., & Uhlenbrock, D. (2000). A mechanized gait trainer for restoration of gait. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 37(6), 701-708.Ijspeert, A. J., Nakanishi, J., Hoffmann, H., Pastor, P., & Schaal, S. (2013). Dynamical movement primitives: Learning attractor models formotor behaviors. Neural Computation, 25(2), 328-373. https://doi.org/10.1162/NECO_a_00393Ijspeert, A. J., Nakanishi, J., & Schaal, S. (2002). Movement imitation with nonlinear dynamical systems in humanoid robots. Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2, 1398-1403. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOT.2002.1014739Liu, G., Gao, J., Yue, H., Zhang, X., & Lu, G. (2006). Design and kinematics simulation of parallel robots for ankle rehabilitation. 2006 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation, ICMA 2006, 2006, 1109-1113. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMA.2006.257780Nakanishi, J., Morimoto, J., Endo, G., Cheng, G., Schaal, S., & Kawato, M. (2004). Learning from demonstration and adaptation of biped locomotion. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 47(2-3), 79-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2004.03.003Nemec, B., & Ude, A. (2012). Action sequencing using dynamic movement primitives. Robotica, 30(5), 837-846. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0263574711001056Patel, Y. D., & George, P. M. (2012). Parallel Manipulators Applications-A Survey. Modern Mechanical Engineering, 02(03), 57-64. https://doi.org/10.4236/mme.2012.23008Paul, R. P. (1981). Robot Manipulators: Mathematics, Programming, and Control : the Computer Control of Robot Manipulators (p. 279).Reinkensmeyer, D. J., Aoyagi, D., Emken, J. L., Galvez, J. A., Ichinose, W., Kerdanyan, G., Maneekobkunwong, S., Minakata, K., Nessler, J. A., Weber, R., Roy, R. R., De Leon, R., Bobrow, J. E., Harkema, S. J., & Reggie Edgerton, V. (2006). Tools for understanding and optimizing robotic gait training. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 43(5), 657-670. https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2005.04.0073Safran, M. R., Benedetti, R. S., Bartolozzi, A. R., & Mandelbaum, B. R. (1999). Lateral ankle sprains: A comprehensive review part 1: Etiology, pathoanatomy, histopathogenesis, and diagnosis. In Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise (Vol. 31, Issue 7 SUPPL., pp. S429-S437).https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-199907001-00004Saglia, J. A., Tsagarakis, N. G., Dai, J. S., & Caldwell, D. G. (2013). Control strategies for patient-assisted training using the ankle rehabilitation robot (ARBOT). IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 18(6), 1799-1808. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2012.2214228Schaal, S. (2006). Dynamic Movement Primitives -A Framework for Motor Control in Humans and Humanoid Robotics. In Adaptive Motion of Animals and Machines (pp. 261-280). https://doi.org/10.1007/4-431-31381-8_23Sui, P., Yao, L., Lin, Z., Yan, H., & Dai, J. S. (2009). Analysis and synthesis of ankle motion and rehabilitation robots. 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, ROBIO 2009, 3, 2533-2538. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBIO.2009.5420487Tsoi, Y. H., Xie, S. Q., & Graham, A. E. (2009). Design, modeling and control of an ankle rehabilitation robot. Studies in Computational Intelligence, 177, 377-399. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89933-4_18Vallés, M., Díaz-Rodrguez, M., Valera, Á., Mata, V., & Page, Á. (2012). Mechatronic development and dynamic control of a 3-dof parallel manipulator. Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines, 40(4), 434-452. https://doi.org/10.1080/15397734.2012.687292Xie, S. (2016). Advanced robotics for medical rehabilitation: current state of the art and recent advances. In Springer tracts in advanced robotics (Issue 108). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19896-5Yoon, J., Ryu, J., & Lim, K. B. (2006). Reconfigurable ankle rehabilitation robot for various exercises. Journal of Robotic Systems, 22(SUPPL.), 15-33. https://doi.org/10.1002/rob.2015

Passive exercise adaptation for ankle rehabilitation based on learning control framework

This article belongs to the Special Issue Human-Robot Interaction.Ankle injuries are among the most common injuries in sport and daily life. However, for their recovery, it is important for patients to perform rehabilitation exercises. These exercises are usually done with a therapist's guidance to help strengthen the patient's ankle joint and restore its range of motion. However, in order to share the load with therapists so that they can offer assistance to more patients, and to provide an efficient and safe way for patients to perform ankle rehabilitation exercises, we propose a framework that integrates learning techniques with a 3-PRS parallel robot, acting together as an ankle rehabilitation device. In this paper, we propose to use passive rehabilitation exercises for dorsiflexion/plantar flexion and inversion/eversion ankle movements. The therapist is needed in the first stage to design the exercise with the patient by teaching the robot intuitively through learning from demonstration. We then propose a learning control scheme based on dynamic movement primitives and iterative learning control, which takes the designed exercise trajectory as a demonstration (an input) together with the recorded forces in order to reproduce the exercise with the patient for a number of repetitions defined by the therapist. During the execution, our approach monitors the sensed forces and adapts the trajectory by adding the necessary offsets to the original trajectory to reduce its range without modifying the original trajectory and subsequently reducing the measured forces. After a predefined number of repetitions, the algorithm restores the range gradually, until the patient is able to perform the originally designed exercise. We validate the proposed framework with both real experiments and simulation using a Simulink model of the rehabilitation parallel robot that has been developed in our lab

Passive Exercise Adaptation for Ankle Rehabilitation Based on Learning Control Framework

[EN] Ankle injuries are among the most common injuries in sport and daily life. However, for their recovery, it is important for patients to perform rehabilitation exercises. These exercises are usually done with a therapist's guidance to help strengthen the patient's ankle joint and restore its range of motion. However, in order to share the load with therapists so that they can offer assistance to more patients, and to provide an efficient and safe way for patients to perform ankle rehabilitation exercises, we propose a framework that integrates learning techniques with a 3-PRS parallel robot, acting together as an ankle rehabilitation device. In this paper, we propose to use passive rehabilitation exercises for dorsiflexion/plantar flexion and inversion/eversion ankle movements. The therapist is needed in the first stage to design the exercise with the patient by teaching the robot intuitively through learning from demonstration. We then propose a learning control scheme based on dynamic movement primitives and iterative learning control, which takes the designed exercise trajectory as a demonstration (an input) together with the recorded forces in order to reproduce the exercise with the patient for a number of repetitions defined by the therapist. During the execution, our approach monitors the sensed forces and adapts the trajectory by adding the necessary offsets to the original trajectory to reduce its range without modifying the original trajectory and subsequently reducing the measured forces. After a predefined number of repetitions, the algorithm restores the range gradually, until the patient is able to perform the originally designed exercise. We validate the proposed framework with both real experiments and simulation using a Simulink model of the rehabilitation parallel robot that has been developed in our lab.This work has been partially funded by the FEDER-CICYT project with reference DPI2017-84201-R (Integracion de modelos biomecanicos en el desarrollo y operacion de robots rehabilitadores reconfigurables) financed by Ministerio de Economia, Industria e Innovacion (Spain).Abu-Dakka, FJ.; Valera Fernández, Á.; Escalera, JA.; Abderrahim, M.; Page Del Pozo, AF.; Mata Amela, V. (2020). Passive Exercise Adaptation for Ankle Rehabilitation Based on Learning Control Framework. Sensors. 20(21):1-23. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20216215S123202

Controller-observer design and dynamic parameter identification for model-based control of an electromechanical lower-limb rehabilitation system

[EN] Rehabilitation is a hazardous task for a mechanical system, since the device has to interact with the human extremities without the hands-on experience the physiotherapist acquires over time. A gap needs to be filled in terms of designing effective controllers for this type of devices. In this respect, the paper describes the design of a model-based control for an electromechanical lower-limb rehabilitation system based on a parallel kinematic mechanism. A controller-observer was designed for estimating joint velocities, which are then used in a hybrid position/force control scheme. The model parameters are identified by customising an approach based on identifying only the relevant system dynamics parameters. Findings obtained through simulations show evidence of improvement in tracking performance compared with those where the velocity was estimated by numerical differentiation. The controller is also implemented in an actual electromechanical system for lower-limb rehabilitation tasks. Findings based on rehabilitation tasks confirm the findings from simulations.This work was partially financed by the Plan Nacional de I+D, Comision Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnologia (FEDERCICYT) under the project DPI2013-44227-R and by the Instituto U. de Automatica e Informatica Industrial (ai2) of the Universitat Politecnica de Valencia.Valera Fernández, Á.; Díaz-Rodríguez, M.; Vallés Miquel, M.; Oliver, E.; Mata Amela, V.; Page Del Pozo, AF. (2017). Controller-observer design and dynamic parameter identification for model-based control of an electromechanical lower-limb rehabilitation system. International Journal of Control. 90(4):702-714. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207179.2016.1215529S702714904Åström, K. J., & Murray, R. M. (2010). Feedback Systems. doi:10.2307/j.ctvcm4gdkAtkeson, C. G., An, C. H., & Hollerbach, J. M. (1986). Estimation of Inertial Parameters of Manipulator Loads and Links. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 5(3), 101-119. doi:10.1177/027836498600500306Chia Bejarano, N., Maggioni, S., De Rijcke, L., Cifuentes, C. A., & Reinkensmeyer, D. J. (2015). Robot-Assisted Rehabilitation Therapy: Recovery Mechanisms and Their Implications for Machine Design. Emerging Therapies in Neurorehabilitation II, 197-223. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24901-8_8Berghuis, H., & Nijmeijer, H. (1993). A passivity approach to controller-observer design for robots. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 9(6), 740-754. doi:10.1109/70.265918Briot, S., & Gautier, M. (2013). Global identification of joint drive gains and dynamic parameters of parallel robots. Multibody System Dynamics, 33(1), 3-26. doi:10.1007/s11044-013-9403-6Canudas de Wit, C., & Fixot, N. (1991). Robot control via robust estimated state feedback. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 36(12), 1497-1501. doi:10.1109/9.106170Canudas de Wit, C., & Slotine, J.-J. E. (1991). Sliding observers for robot manipulators. Automatica, 27(5), 859-864. doi:10.1016/0005-1098(91)90041-yCao, J., Xie, S. Q., Das, R., & Zhu, G. L. (2014). Control strategies for effective robot assisted gait rehabilitation: The state of art and future prospects. Medical Engineering & Physics, 36(12), 1555-1566. doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2014.08.005Carretero, J. A., Podhorodeski, R. P., Nahon, M. A., & Gosselin, C. M. (1999). Kinematic Analysis and Optimization of a New Three Degree-of-Freedom Spatial Parallel Manipulator. Journal of Mechanical Design, 122(1), 17-24. doi:10.1115/1.533542Cazalilla, J., Vallés, M., Mata, V., Díaz-Rodríguez, M., & Valera, A. (2014). Adaptive control of a 3-DOF parallel manipulator considering payload handling and relevant parameter models. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 30(5), 468-477. doi:10.1016/j.rcim.2014.02.003De Jalon, J.G. & Bayo, E. (1994). Kinematic and dynamic simulation of multibody systems: the real-time challenge. New York: Springer Verlag.Díaz, I., Gil, J. J., & Sánchez, E. (2011). Lower-Limb Robotic Rehabilitation: Literature Review and Challenges. Journal of Robotics, 2011, 1-11. doi:10.1155/2011/759764Díaz-Rodríguez, M., Iriarte, X., Mata, V., & Ros, J. (2009). On the Experiment Design for Direct Dynamic Parameter Identification of Parallel Robots. Advanced Robotics, 23(3), 329-348. doi:10.1163/156855308x397550Díaz-Rodríguez, M., Mata, V., Valera, Á., & Page, Á. (2010). A methodology for dynamic parameters identification of 3-DOF parallel robots in terms of relevant parameters. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 45(9), 1337-1356. doi:10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2010.04.007Gautier, M. (1991). Numerical calculation of the base inertial parameters of robots. Journal of Robotic Systems, 8(4), 485-506. doi:10.1002/rob.4620080405Gautier, M., & Khalil, W. (s. f.). On the identification of the inertial parameters of robots. Proceedings of the 27th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control. doi:10.1109/cdc.1988.194738Jamwal, P. K., Hussain, S., & Xie, S. Q. (2013). Review on design and control aspects of ankle rehabilitation robots. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 10(2), 93-101. doi:10.3109/17483107.2013.866986Janabi-Sharifi, F., Hayward, V., & Chen, C.-S. J. (2000). Discrete-time adaptive windowing for velocity estimation. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 8(6), 1003-1009. doi:10.1109/87.880606Janot, A., Gautier, M., Jubien, A., & Vandanjon, P. O. (2014). Comparison Between the CLOE Method and the DIDIM Method for Robots Identification. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 22(5), 1935-1941. doi:10.1109/tcst.2014.2299544Janot, A., Vandanjon, P.-O., & Gautier, M. (2016). A revised Durbin-Wu-Hausman test for industrial robot identification. Control Engineering Practice, 48, 52-62. doi:10.1016/j.conengprac.2015.12.017Jiménez-Fabián, R., & Verlinden, O. (2012). Review of control algorithms for robotic ankle systems in lower-limb orthoses, prostheses, and exoskeletons. Medical Engineering & Physics, 34(4), 397-408. doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2011.11.018Khalil, W., Vijayalingam, A., Khomutenko, B., Mukhanov, I., Lemoine, P., & Ecorchard, G. (2014). OpenSYMORO: An open-source software package for symbolic modelling of robots. 2014 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics. doi:10.1109/aim.2014.6878246Marchal-Crespo, L., & Reinkensmeyer, D. J. (2009). Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 6(1). doi:10.1186/1743-0003-6-20Meng, W., Liu, Q., Zhou, Z., Ai, Q., Sheng, B., & Xie, S. (Shane). (2015). Recent development of mechanisms and control strategies for robot-assisted lower limb rehabilitation. Mechatronics, 31, 132-145. doi:10.1016/j.mechatronics.2015.04.005Page, A., Candelas, P., & Belmar, F. (2006). On the use of local fitting techniques for the analysis of physical dynamic systems. European Journal of Physics, 27(2), 273-279. doi:10.1088/0143-0807/27/2/010Raibert, M. H., & Craig, J. J. (1981). Hybrid Position/Force Control of Manipulators. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 103(2), 126-133. doi:10.1115/1.3139652Ramsay, J. O., & Silverman, B. W. (2005). Functional Data Analysis. Springer Series in Statistics. doi:10.1007/b98888Saglia, J. A., Tsagarakis, N. G., Dai, J. S., & Caldwell, D. G. (2013). Control Strategies for Patient-Assisted Training Using the Ankle Rehabilitation Robot (ARBOT). IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 18(6), 1799-1808. doi:10.1109/tmech.2012.2214228Vallés, M., Cazalilla, J., Valera, Á., Mata, V., Page, Á., & Díaz-Rodríguez, M. (2015). A 3-PRS parallel manipulator for ankle rehabilitation: towards a low-cost robotic rehabilitation. Robotica, 35(10), 1939-1957. doi:10.1017/s0263574715000120Vallés, M., Cazalilla, J. I., Valera, Á., Mata, V., & Page, Á. (2013). Implementación basada en el middleware OROCOS de controladores dinámicos pasivos para un robot paralelo. Revista Iberoamericana de Automática e Informática Industrial RIAI, 10(1), 96-103. doi:10.1016/j.riai.2012.11.009Vallés, M., Díaz-Rodríguez, M., Valera, Á., Mata, V., & Page, Á. (2012). Mechatronic Development and Dynamic Control of a 3-DOF Parallel Manipulator. Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines, 40(4), 434-452. doi:10.1080/15397734.2012.687292Wu, F. X., Zhang, W. J., Li, Q., & Ouyang, P. R. (2002). Integrated Design and PD Control of High-Speed Closed-loop Mechanisms. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 124(4), 522-528. doi:10.1115/1.1513179Yang, C., Huang, Q., & Han, J. (2012). Decoupling control for spatial six-degree-of-freedom electro-hydraulic parallel robot. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 28(1), 14-23. doi:10.1016/j.rcim.2011.06.002Yoon, J., Ryu, J., & Lim, K.-B. (2006). Reconfigurable ankle rehabilitation robot for various exercises. Journal of Robotic Systems, 22(S1), S15-S33. doi:10.1002/rob.2015

Mechatronic design, experimental setup, and control architecture design of a novel 4 DoF parallel manipulator

"This is an Author's Accepted Manuscript of an article published in [include the complete citation information for the final versíon of the article as published in the Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines 2018 [copyright Taylor & Francis], available online at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/15397734.2017.1355249."[EN] Although parallel manipulators started with the introduction of architectures with six degrees of freedom, a vast number of applications require less than six degrees of freedom. Consequently, scholars have proposed architectures with three and four degrees of freedom, but relatively few four degrees of freedom parallel manipulators have become prototypes, especially of the two rotation and two translation motion types. In this article, we explain the mechatronics design, prototype, and control architecture design of a four degrees of freedom parallel manipulators with two rotation and two translation motions. We chose to design a four degrees of freedom manipulator based on the motion needed to complete the tasks of lower limb rehabilitation. To the author's best knowledge, parallel manipulators between three and six degrees of freedom for rehabilitation of lower limb have not been proposed to date. The developed architecture enhances the three minimum degrees of freedom required by adding a four degrees of freedom, which allows combinations of normal or tangential efforts in the joints, or torque acting on the knee. We put forward the inverse and forward displacement equations, describe the prototype, perform the experimental setup, and develop the hardware and control architecture. The tracking accuracy experiments from the proposed controller show that the manipulator can accomplish the required application.The authors wish to thank the Plan Nacional de I + D, Comision Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnologia (FEDER-CICYT) for the partial funding of this study under project DPI2013-44227-R. We also want to thank the Fondo Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnologia e Innovacion (FONACIT-Venezuela) for its financial support under the project No. 2013002165.Vallés Miquel, M.; Araujo-Gómez, P.; Mata Amela, V.; Valera Fernández, Á.; Díaz-Rodríguez, M.; Page Del Pozo, AF.; Farhat, N. (2018). Mechatronic design, experimental setup, and control architecture design of a novel 4 DoF parallel manipulator. Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines. 46(4):425-439. https://doi.org/10.1080/15397734.2017.1355249S425439464Araujo-Gómez, P., Díaz-Rodriguez, M., Mata, V., Valera, A., & Page, A. (2016). Design of a 3-UPS-RPU Parallel Robot for Knee Diagnosis and Rehabilitation. CISM International Centre for Mechanical Sciences, 303-310. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-33714-2_34Bruyninckx, H., Soetens, P., Issaris, P., Leuven, K. (2002). The Orocos Project. http://www.orocos.org.Cao, R., Gao, F., Zhang, Y., Pan, D., & Chen, W. (2014). A New Parameter Design Method of a 6-DOF Parallel Motion Simulator for a Given Workspace. Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines, 43(1), 1-18. doi:10.1080/15397734.2014.904234Carretero, J. A., Podhorodeski, R. P., Nahon, M. A., & Gosselin, C. M. (1999). Kinematic Analysis and Optimization of a New Three Degree-of-Freedom Spatial Parallel Manipulator. Journal of Mechanical Design, 122(1), 17-24. doi:10.1115/1.533542Cazalilla, J., Vallés, M., Valera, Á., Mata, V., & Díaz-Rodríguez, M. (2016). Hybrid force/position control for a 3-DOF 1T2R parallel robot: Implementation, simulations and experiments. Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines, 44(1-2), 16-31. doi:10.1080/15397734.2015.1030679Chablat, D., & Wenger, P. (2003). Architecture optimization of a 3-DOF translational parallel mechanism for machining applications, the orthoglide. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 19(3), 403-410. doi:10.1109/tra.2003.810242Clavel, R. (1988). A Fast Robot with Parallel Geometry. Proc. Int. Symposium on Industrial Robots, Lausanne, Switzerland, 91–100.Díaz, I., Gil, J. J., & Sánchez, E. (2011). Lower-Limb Robotic Rehabilitation: Literature Review and Challenges. Journal of Robotics, 2011, 1-11. doi:10.1155/2011/759764Díaz-Rodríguez, M., Mata, V., Valera, Á., & Page, Á. (2010). A methodology for dynamic parameters identification of 3-DOF parallel robots in terms of relevant parameters. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 45(9), 1337-1356. doi:10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2010.04.007Escamilla, R. F., MacLeod, T. D., Wilk, K. E., Paulos, L., & Andrews, J. R. (2012). Cruciate ligament loading during common knee rehabilitation exercises. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 226(9), 670-680. doi:10.1177/0954411912451839Gan, D., Dai, J. S., Dias, J., Umer, R., & Seneviratne, L. (2015). Singularity-Free Workspace Aimed Optimal Design of a 2T2R Parallel Mechanism for Automated Fiber Placement. Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics, 7(4). doi:10.1115/1.4029957Garage, W. (2009). Robot Operating System. www.ros.org. Accessed date: August 2nd, 2017.Girone, M., Burdea, G., Bouzit, M., Popescu, V., & Deutsch, J. E. (2001). Autonomous Robots, 10(2), 203-212. doi:10.1023/a:1008938121020Gough, V., Whitehall, S. (1962). Universal Tyre Test Machine. Proceedings 9th Int. Technical Congress FISITA, London, vol. 117, 117–135.Jamwal, P. K., Hussain, S., & Xie, S. Q. (2013). Review on design and control aspects of ankle rehabilitation robots. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 10(2), 93-101. doi:10.3109/17483107.2013.866986Lee, K.-M., & Arjunan, S. (1992). A Three Degrees of Freedom Micro-Motion In-Parallel Actuated Manipulator. Precision Sensors, Actuators and Systems, 345-374. doi:10.1007/978-94-011-1818-7_9Li, Y., & Xu, Q. (2007). Design and Development of a Medical Parallel Robot for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 12(3), 265-273. doi:10.1109/tmech.2007.897257Mohan, S., Mohanta, J. K., Kurtenbach, S., Paris, J., Corves, B., & Huesing, M. (2017). Design, development and control of a 2PRP-2PPR planar parallel manipulator for lower limb rehabilitation therapies. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 112, 272-294. doi:10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2017.03.001Ortega, R., & Spong, M. W. (1989). Adaptive motion control of rigid robots: A tutorial. Automatica, 25(6), 877-888. doi:10.1016/0005-1098(89)90054-xPierrot, F., Company, O. (1999). H4: A New Family of 4 DoF Parallel Robots. Proceedings of 1999 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, Georgia, USA, 508–513.Ramsay, J. O., & Silverman, B. W. (1997). Functional Data Analysis. Springer Series in Statistics. doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-7107-7Rastegarpanah, A., Saadat, M., & Borboni, A. (2016). Parallel Robot for Lower Limb Rehabilitation Exercises. Applied Bionics and Biomechanics, 2016, 1-10. doi:10.1155/2016/8584735Stewart, D. (1965). A Platform with Six Degrees of Freedom. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 180(1), 371-386. doi:10.1243/pime_proc_1965_180_029_02Vallés, M., Cazalilla, J., Valera, Á., Mata, V., Page, Á., & Díaz-Rodríguez, M. (2015). A 3-PRS parallel manipulator for ankle rehabilitation: towards a low-cost robotic rehabilitation. Robotica, 35(10), 1939-1957. doi:10.1017/s0263574715000120Vallés, M., Díaz-Rodríguez, M., Valera, Á., Mata, V., & Page, Á. (2012). Mechatronic Development and Dynamic Control of a 3-DOF Parallel Manipulator. Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines, 40(4), 434-452. doi:10.1080/15397734.2012.687292Xu, W. L., Pap, J.-S., & Bronlund, J. (2008). Design of a Biologically Inspired Parallel Robot for Foods Chewing. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 55(2), 832-841. doi:10.1109/tie.2007.909067Yoon, J., Ryu, J., & Lim, K.-B. (2006). Reconfigurable ankle rehabilitation robot for various exercises. Journal of Robotic Systems, 22(S1), S15-S33. doi:10.1002/rob.20150Zarkandi, S. (2011). Kinematics and Singularity Analysis of a Parallel Manipulator with Three Rotational and One Translational DOFs. Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines, 39(3), 392-407. doi:10.1080/15397734.2011.55914

Design and Evaluation of the LOPES Exoskeleton Robot for Interactive Gait Rehabilitation

This paper introduces a newly developed gait rehabilitation device. The device, called LOPES, combines a freely translatable and 2-D-actuated pelvis segment with a leg exoskeleton containing three actuated rotational joints: two at the hip and one at the knee. The joints are impedance controlled to allow bidirectional mechanical interaction between the robot and the training subject. Evaluation measurements show that the device allows both a "pa- tient-in-charge" and "robot-in-charge" mode, in which the robot is controlled either to follow or to guide a patient, respectively. Electromyography (EMG) measurements (one subject) on eight important leg muscles, show that free walking in the device strongly resembles free treadmill walking; an indication that the device can offer task-specific gait training. The possibilities and limitations to using the device as gait measurement tool are also shown at the moment position measurements are not accurate enough for inverse-dynamical gait analysis

Design, control and evaluation of a low-cost active orthosis for the gait of spinal cord injured subjects

Robotic gait training after spinal cord injury is of high priority to maximize independence and improve the living conditions of the patients. Current rehabilitation robots are expensive and heavy, and are generally found only in the clinical environment. To overcome these issues, we present the design of a low-cost, low-weight and personalized robotic orthosis for incomplete spinal cord injured subjects. The paper also presents a preliminary experimental evaluation of the assistive device on one subject with spinal cord injury that can control hip flexion to a certain extent, but lacks control of knee and ankle muscles. Results show that gait velocity, stride length and cadence of walking increased (24,11%, 7,41% and 15,56%, respectively) when wearing active orthoses compared to the case when the subject used the usual passive orthoses.Postprint (published version