15,424 research outputs found
Finding Inductive Loop Invariants using Large Language Models
Loop invariants are fundamental to reasoning about programs with loops. They
establish properties about a given loop's behavior. When they additionally are
inductive, they become useful for the task of formal verification that seeks to
establish strong mathematical guarantees about program's runtime behavior. The
inductiveness ensures that the invariants can be checked locally without
consulting the entire program, thus are indispensable artifacts in a formal
proof of correctness. Finding inductive loop invariants is an undecidable
problem, and despite a long history of research towards practical solutions, it
remains far from a solved problem. This paper investigates the capabilities of
the Large Language Models (LLMs) in offering a new solution towards this old,
yet important problem. To that end, we first curate a dataset of verification
problems on programs with loops. Next, we design a prompt for exploiting LLMs,
obtaining inductive loop invariants, that are checked for correctness using
sound symbolic tools. Finally, we explore the effectiveness of using an
efficient combination of a symbolic tool and an LLM on our dataset and compare
it against a purely symbolic baseline. Our results demonstrate that LLMs can
help improve the state-of-the-art in automated program verification
Strengthening Model Checking Techniques with Inductive Invariants
This paper describes optimized techniques to efficiently compute and reap benefits from inductive invariants within SAT-based model checking. We address sequential circuit verification, and we consider both equivalences and implications between pairs of nodes in the logic networks. First, we present a very efficient dynamic procedure, based on equivalence classes and incremental SAT, specifically oriented to reduce the set of checked invariants. Then, we show how to effectively integrate the computation of inductive invariants within state-of-the-art SAT-based model checking procedures. Experiments (on more than 600 designs) show the robustness of our approach on verification instances on which stand-alone techniques fai
Using Flow Specifications of Parameterized Cache Coherence Protocols for Verifying Deadlock Freedom
We consider the problem of verifying deadlock freedom for symmetric cache
coherence protocols. In particular, we focus on a specific form of deadlock
which is useful for the cache coherence protocol domain and consistent with the
internal definition of deadlock in the Murphi model checker: we refer to this
deadlock as a system- wide deadlock (s-deadlock). In s-deadlock, the entire
system gets blocked and is unable to make any transition. Cache coherence
protocols consist of N symmetric cache agents, where N is an unbounded
parameter; thus the verification of s-deadlock freedom is naturally a
parameterized verification problem. Parametrized verification techniques work
by using sound abstractions to reduce the unbounded model to a bounded model.
Efficient abstractions which work well for industrial scale protocols typically
bound the model by replacing the state of most of the agents by an abstract
environment, while keeping just one or two agents as is. However, leveraging
such efficient abstractions becomes a challenge for s-deadlock: a violation of
s-deadlock is a state in which the transitions of all of the unbounded number
of agents cannot occur and so a simple abstraction like the one above will not
preserve this violation. In this work we address this challenge by presenting a
technique which leverages high-level information about the protocols, in the
form of message sequence dia- grams referred to as flows, for constructing
invariants that are collectively stronger than s-deadlock. Efficient
abstractions can be constructed to verify these invariants. We successfully
verify the German and Flash protocols using our technique
The AutoProof Verifier: Usability by Non-Experts and on Standard Code
Formal verification tools are often developed by experts for experts; as a
result, their usability by programmers with little formal methods experience
may be severely limited. In this paper, we discuss this general phenomenon with
reference to AutoProof: a tool that can verify the full functional correctness
of object-oriented software. In particular, we present our experiences of using
AutoProof in two contrasting contexts representative of non-expert usage.
First, we discuss its usability by students in a graduate course on software
verification, who were tasked with verifying implementations of various sorting
algorithms. Second, we evaluate its usability in verifying code developed for
programming assignments of an undergraduate course. The first scenario
represents usability by serious non-experts; the second represents usability on
"standard code", developed without full functional verification in mind. We
report our experiences and lessons learnt, from which we derive some general
suggestions for furthering the development of verification tools with respect
to improving their usability.Comment: In Proceedings F-IDE 2015, arXiv:1508.0338
BeSpaceD: Towards a Tool Framework and Methodology for the Specification and Verification of Spatial Behavior of Distributed Software Component Systems
In this report, we present work towards a framework for modeling and checking
behavior of spatially distributed component systems. Design goals of our
framework are the ability to model spatial behavior in a component oriented,
simple and intuitive way, the possibility to automatically analyse and verify
systems and integration possibilities with other modeling and verification
tools. We present examples and the verification steps necessary to prove
properties such as range coverage or the absence of collisions between
components and technical details
SPEEDY: An Eclipse-based IDE for invariant inference
SPEEDY is an Eclipse-based IDE for exploring techniques that assist users in
generating correct specifications, particularly including invariant inference
algorithms and tools. It integrates with several back-end tools that propose
invariants and will incorporate published algorithms for inferring object and
loop invariants. Though the architecture is language-neutral, current SPEEDY
targets C programs. Building and using SPEEDY has confirmed earlier experience
demonstrating the importance of showing and editing specifications in the IDEs
that developers customarily use, automating as much of the production and
checking of specifications as possible, and showing counterexample information
directly in the source code editing environment. As in previous work,
automation of specification checking is provided by back-end SMT solvers.
However, reducing the effort demanded of software developers using formal
methods also requires a GUI design that guides users in writing, reviewing, and
correcting specifications and automates specification inference.Comment: In Proceedings F-IDE 2014, arXiv:1404.578
- …