122,200 research outputs found
Counting Independent Sets of a Fixed Size in Graphs with Given Minimum Degree
Galvin showed that for all fixed Ī“ and sufficiently large n, the n-vertex graph with minimum degree Ī“ that admits the most independent sets is the complete bipartite graph . He conjectured that except perhaps for some small values of t, the same graph yields the maximum count of independent sets of size t for each possible t. Evidence for this conjecture was recently provided by Alexander, Cutler, and Mink, who showed that for all triples with , no n-vertex bipartite graph with minimum degree Ī“ admits more independent sets of size t than . Here, we make further progress. We show that for all triples with and , no n-vertex graph with minimum degree Ī“ admits more independent sets of size t than , and we obtain the same conclusion for and . Our proofs lead us naturally to the study of an interesting family of critical graphs, namely those of minimum degree Ī“ whose minimum degree drops on deletion of an edge or a vertex
Preferential survival in models of complex ad hoc networks
There has been a rich interplay in recent years between (i) empirical
investigations of real world dynamic networks, (ii) analytical modeling of the
microscopic mechanisms that drive the emergence of such networks, and (iii)
harnessing of these mechanisms to either manipulate existing networks, or
engineer new networks for specific tasks. We continue in this vein, and study
the deletion phenomenon in the web by following two different sets of web-sites
(each comprising more than 150,000 pages) over a one-year period. Empirical
data show that there is a significant deletion component in the underlying web
networks, but the deletion process is not uniform. This motivates us to
introduce a new mechanism of preferential survival (PS), where nodes are
removed according to a degree-dependent deletion kernel. We use the mean-field
rate equation approach to study a general dynamic model driven by Preferential
Attachment (PA), Double PA (DPA), and a tunable PS, where c nodes (c<1) are
deleted per node added to the network, and verify our predictions via
large-scale simulations. One of our results shows that, unlike in the case of
uniform deletion, the PS kernel when coupled with the standard PA mechanism,
can lead to heavy-tailed power law networks even in the presence of extreme
turnover in the network. Moreover, a weak DPA mechanism, coupled with PS, can
help make the network even more heavy-tailed, especially in the limit when
deletion and insertion rates are almost equal, and the overall network growth
is minimal. The dynamics reported in this work can be used to design and
engineer stable ad hoc networks and explain the stability of the power law
exponents observed in real-world networks.Comment: 9 pages, 6 figure
Counterpart semantics for a second-order mu-calculus
We propose a novel approach to the semantics of quantified Ī¼-calculi, considering models where states are algebras; the evolution relation is given by a counterpart relation (a family of partial homomorphisms), allowing for the creation, deletion, and merging of components; and formulas are interpreted over sets of state assignments (families of substitutions, associating formula variables to state components). Our proposal avoids the limitations of existing approaches, usually enforcing restrictions of the evolution relation: the resulting semantics is a streamlined and intuitively appealing one, yet it is general enough to cover most of the alternative proposals we are aware of
Tree-edges deletion problems with bounded diameter obstruction sets
AbstractWe study the following problem: given a tree G and a finite set of trees H, find a subset O of the edges of G such that G-O does not contain a subtree isomorphic to a tree from H, and O has minimum cardinality. We give sharp boundaries on the tractability of this problem: the problem is polynomial when all the trees in H have diameter at most 5, while it is NP-hard when all the trees in H have diameter at most 6. We also show that the problem is polynomial when every tree in H has at most one vertex with degree more than 2, while it is NP-hard when the trees in H can have two such vertices.The polynomial-time algorithms use a variation of a known technique for solving graph problems. While the standard technique is based on defining an equivalence relation on graphs, we define a quasiorder. This new variation might be useful for giving more efficient algorithm for other graph problems
- ā¦