Degrees of Freedom of Wireless X Networks

We explore the degrees of freedom of $M\times N$ user wireless $X$ networks, i.e. networks of $M$ transmitters and $N$ receivers where every transmitter has an independent message for every receiver. We derive a general outerbound on the degrees of freedom \emph{region} of these networks. When all nodes have a single antenna and all channel coefficients vary in time or frequency, we show that the \emph{total} number of degrees of freedom of the $X$ network is equal to $\frac{MN}{M+N-1}$ per orthogonal time and frequency dimension. Achievability is proved by constructing interference alignment schemes for $X$ networks that can come arbitrarily close to the outerbound on degrees of freedom. For the case where either M=2 or N=2 we find that the outerbound is exactly achievable. While $X$ networks have significant degrees of freedom benefits over interference networks when the number of users is small, our results show that as the number of users increases, this advantage disappears. Thus, for large $K$, the $K\times K$ user wireless $X$ network loses half the degrees of freedom relative to the $K\times K$ MIMO outerbound achievable through full cooperation. Interestingly, when there are few transmitters sending to many receivers ($N\gg M$) or many transmitters sending to few receivers ($M\gg N$), $X$ networks are able to approach the $\min(M,N)$ degrees of freedom possible with full cooperation on the $M\times N$ MIMO channel. Similar to the interference channel, we also construct an example of a 2 user $X$ channel with propagation delays where the outerbound on degrees of freedom is achieved through interference alignment based on a simple TDMA strategy.Comment: 26 page

On the Capacity of the Finite Field Counterparts of Wireless Interference Networks

This work explores how degrees of freedom (DoF) results from wireless networks can be translated into capacity results for their finite field counterparts that arise in network coding applications. The main insight is that scalar (SISO) finite field channels over $\mathbb{F}_{p^n}$ are analogous to n x n vector (MIMO) channels in the wireless setting, but with an important distinction -- there is additional structure due to finite field arithmetic which enforces commutativity of matrix multiplication and limits the channel diversity to n, making these channels similar to diagonal channels in the wireless setting. Within the limits imposed by the channel structure, the DoF optimal precoding solutions for wireless networks can be translated into capacity optimal solutions for their finite field counterparts. This is shown through the study of the 2-user X channel and the 3-user interference channel. Besides bringing the insights from wireless networks into network coding applications, the study of finite field networks over $\mathbb{F}_{p^n}$ also touches upon important open problems in wireless networks (finite SNR, finite diversity scenarios) through interesting parallels between p and SNR, and n and diversity.Comment: Full version of paper accepted for presentation at ISIT 201

Multiple Unicast Capacity of 2-Source 2-Sink Networks

We study the sum capacity of multiple unicasts in wired and wireless multihop networks. With 2 source nodes and 2 sink nodes, there are a total of 4 independent unicast sessions (messages), one from each source to each sink node (this setting is also known as an X network). For wired networks with arbitrary connectivity, the sum capacity is achieved simply by routing. For wireless networks, we explore the degrees of freedom (DoF) of multihop X networks with a layered structure, allowing arbitrary number of hops, and arbitrary connectivity within each hop. For the case when there are no more than two relay nodes in each layer, the DoF can only take values 1, 4/3, 3/2 or 2, based on the connectivity of the network, for almost all values of channel coefficients. When there are arbitrary number of relays in each layer, the DoF can also take the value 5/3 . Achievability schemes incorporate linear forwarding, interference alignment and aligned interference neutralization principles. Information theoretic converse arguments specialized for the connectivity of the network are constructed based on the intuition from linear dimension counting arguments.Comment: 6 pages, 7 figures, submitted to IEEE Globecom 201

Real Interference Alignment and Degrees of Freedom Region of Wireless X Networks

Abstract-We consider a single hop wireless X network with K transmitters and J receivers, all with single antenna. Each transmitter conveys for each receiver an independent message. The channel is assumed to have constant coefficients. We develop interference alignment scheme for this setup and derived several achievable degrees of freedom regions. We show that in some cases, the derived region meets a previous outer bound and are hence the DoF region. For our achievability schemes, we divide each message into streams and use real interference alignment on the streams. Several previous results on the DoF region and total DoF for various special cases can be recovered from our result. Index Terms-real interference alignment, degrees of freedom region, wireless X network, stream alignmen

Degrees of Freedom of Two-Hop Wireless Networks: "Everyone Gets the Entire Cake"

We show that fully connected two-hop wireless networks with K sources, K relays and K destinations have K degrees of freedom both in the case of time-varying channel coefficients and in the case of constant channel coefficients (in which case the result holds for almost all values of constant channel coefficients). Our main contribution is a new achievability scheme which we call Aligned Network Diagonalization. This scheme allows the data streams transmitted by the sources to undergo a diagonal linear transformation from the sources to the destinations, thus being received free of interference by their intended destination. In addition, we extend our scheme to multi-hop networks with fully connected hops, and multi-hop networks with MIMO nodes, for which the degrees of freedom are also fully characterized.Comment: Presented at the 2012 Allerton Conference. Submitted to IEEE Transactions on Information Theor