10,415 research outputs found
Software defect prediction: do different classifiers find the same defects?
Open Access: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.During the last 10 years, hundreds of different defect prediction models have been published. The performance of the classifiers used in these models is reported to be similar with models rarely performing above the predictive performance ceiling of about 80% recall. We investigate the individual defects that four classifiers predict and analyse the level of prediction uncertainty produced by these classifiers. We perform a sensitivity analysis to compare the performance of Random Forest, Naïve Bayes, RPart and SVM classifiers when predicting defects in NASA, open source and commercial datasets. The defect predictions that each classifier makes is captured in a confusion matrix and the prediction uncertainty of each classifier is compared. Despite similar predictive performance values for these four classifiers, each detects different sets of defects. Some classifiers are more consistent in predicting defects than others. Our results confirm that a unique subset of defects can be detected by specific classifiers. However, while some classifiers are consistent in the predictions they make, other classifiers vary in their predictions. Given our results, we conclude that classifier ensembles with decision-making strategies not based on majority voting are likely to perform best in defect prediction.Peer reviewedFinal Published versio
Is One Hyperparameter Optimizer Enough?
Hyperparameter tuning is the black art of automatically finding a good
combination of control parameters for a data miner. While widely applied in
empirical Software Engineering, there has not been much discussion on which
hyperparameter tuner is best for software analytics. To address this gap in the
literature, this paper applied a range of hyperparameter optimizers (grid
search, random search, differential evolution, and Bayesian optimization) to
defect prediction problem. Surprisingly, no hyperparameter optimizer was
observed to be `best' and, for one of the two evaluation measures studied here
(F-measure), hyperparameter optimization, in 50\% cases, was no better than
using default configurations.
We conclude that hyperparameter optimization is more nuanced than previously
believed. While such optimization can certainly lead to large improvements in
the performance of classifiers used in software analytics, it remains to be
seen which specific optimizers should be applied to a new dataset.Comment: 7 pages, 2 columns, accepted for SWAN1
Towards Automated Performance Bug Identification in Python
Context: Software performance is a critical non-functional requirement,
appearing in many fields such as mission critical applications, financial, and
real time systems. In this work we focused on early detection of performance
bugs; our software under study was a real time system used in the
advertisement/marketing domain.
Goal: Find a simple and easy to implement solution, predicting performance
bugs.
Method: We built several models using four machine learning methods, commonly
used for defect prediction: C4.5 Decision Trees, Na\"{\i}ve Bayes, Bayesian
Networks, and Logistic Regression.
Results: Our empirical results show that a C4.5 model, using lines of code
changed, file's age and size as explanatory variables, can be used to predict
performance bugs (recall=0.73, accuracy=0.85, and precision=0.96). We show that
reducing the number of changes delivered on a commit, can decrease the chance
of performance bug injection.
Conclusions: We believe that our approach can help practitioners to eliminate
performance bugs early in the development cycle. Our results are also of
interest to theoreticians, establishing a link between functional bugs and
(non-functional) performance bugs, and explicitly showing that attributes used
for prediction of functional bugs can be used for prediction of performance
bugs
Recommended from our members
A general software defect-proneness prediction framework
This is the author's accepted manuscript. The final published article is available from the link below. Copyright @ 2011 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other users, including reprinting/ republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted components of this work in other works.BACKGROUND - Predicting defect-prone software components is an economically important activity and so has received a good deal of attention. However, making sense of the many, and sometimes seemingly inconsistent, results is difficult. OBJECTIVE - We propose and evaluate a general framework for software defect prediction that supports 1) unbiased and 2) comprehensive comparison between competing prediction systems. METHOD - The framework is comprised of 1) scheme evaluation and 2) defect prediction components. The scheme evaluation analyzes the prediction performance of competing learning schemes for given historical data sets. The defect predictor builds models according to the evaluated learning scheme and predicts software defects with new data according to the constructed model. In order to demonstrate the performance of the proposed framework, we use both simulation and publicly available software defect data sets. RESULTS - The results show that we should choose different learning schemes for different data sets (i.e., no scheme dominates), that small details in conducting how evaluations are conducted can completely reverse findings, and last, that our proposed framework is more effective and less prone to bias than previous approaches. CONCLUSIONS - Failure to properly or fully evaluate a learning scheme can be misleading; however, these problems may be overcome by our proposed framework.National Natural Science Foundation of
Chin
Connecting Software Metrics across Versions to Predict Defects
Accurate software defect prediction could help software practitioners
allocate test resources to defect-prone modules effectively and efficiently. In
the last decades, much effort has been devoted to build accurate defect
prediction models, including developing quality defect predictors and modeling
techniques. However, current widely used defect predictors such as code metrics
and process metrics could not well describe how software modules change over
the project evolution, which we believe is important for defect prediction. In
order to deal with this problem, in this paper, we propose to use the
Historical Version Sequence of Metrics (HVSM) in continuous software versions
as defect predictors. Furthermore, we leverage Recurrent Neural Network (RNN),
a popular modeling technique, to take HVSM as the input to build software
prediction models. The experimental results show that, in most cases, the
proposed HVSM-based RNN model has a significantly better effort-aware ranking
effectiveness than the commonly used baseline models
- …