594 research outputs found

    Deep Neural Networks Rival the Representation of Primate IT Cortex for Core Visual Object Recognition

    Get PDF
    The primate visual system achieves remarkable visual object recognition performance even in brief presentations and under changes to object exemplar, geometric transformations, and background variation (a.k.a. core visual object recognition). This remarkable performance is mediated by the representation formed in inferior temporal (IT) cortex. In parallel, recent advances in machine learning have led to ever higher performing models of object recognition using artificial deep neural networks (DNNs). It remains unclear, however, whether the representational performance of DNNs rivals that of the brain. To accurately produce such a comparison, a major difficulty has been a unifying metric that accounts for experimental limitations such as the amount of noise, the number of neural recording sites, and the number trials, and computational limitations such as the complexity of the decoding classifier and the number of classifier training examples. In this work we perform a direct comparison that corrects for these experimental limitations and computational considerations. As part of our methodology, we propose an extension of "kernel analysis" that measures the generalization accuracy as a function of representational complexity. Our evaluations show that, unlike previous bio-inspired models, the latest DNNs rival the representational performance of IT cortex on this visual object recognition task. Furthermore, we show that models that perform well on measures of representational performance also perform well on measures of representational similarity to IT and on measures of predicting individual IT multi-unit responses. Whether these DNNs rely on computational mechanisms similar to the primate visual system is yet to be determined, but, unlike all previous bio-inspired models, that possibility cannot be ruled out merely on representational performance grounds.Comment: 35 pages, 12 figures, extends and expands upon arXiv:1301.353

    Comparing primate’s ventral visual stream and the state-of-the-art deep convolutional neural networks for core object recognition

    Get PDF
    Our ability to recognize and categorize objects in our surroundings is a critical component of our cognitive processes. Despite the enormous variations in each object's appearance (Due to variations in object position, pose, scale, illumination, and the presence of visual clutter), primates are thought to be able to quickly and easily distinguish objects from among tens of thousands of possibilities. The primate's ventral visual stream is believed to support this view-invariant visual object recognition ability by untangling object identity manifolds. Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), inspired by the primate's visual system, have also shown remarkable performance in object recognition tasks. This review aims to explore and compare the mechanisms of object recognition in the primate's ventral visual stream and state-of-the-art deep CNNs. The research questions address the extent to which CNNs have approached human-level object recognition and how their performance compares to the primate ventral visual stream. The objectives include providing an overview of the literature on the ventral visual stream and CNNs, comparing their mechanisms, and identifying strengths and limitations for core object recognition. The review is structured to present the ventral visual stream's structure, visual representations, and the process of untangling object manifolds. It also covers the architecture of CNNs. The review also compared the two visual systems and the results showed that deep CNNs have shown remarkable performance and capability in certain aspects of object recognition, but there are still limitations in replicating the complexities of the primate visual system. Further research is needed to bridge the gap between computational models and the intricate neural mechanisms underlying human object recognition.Our ability to recognize and categorize objects in our surroundings is a critical component of our cognitive processes. Despite the enormous variations in each object's appearance (Due to variations in object position, pose, scale, illumination, and the presence of visual clutter), primates are thought to be able to quickly and easily distinguish objects from among tens of thousands of possibilities. The primate's ventral visual stream is believed to support this view-invariant visual object recognition ability by untangling object identity manifolds. Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), inspired by the primate's visual system, have also shown remarkable performance in object recognition tasks. This review aims to explore and compare the mechanisms of object recognition in the primate's ventral visual stream and state-of-the-art deep CNNs. The research questions address the extent to which CNNs have approached human-level object recognition and how their performance compares to the primate ventral visual stream. The objectives include providing an overview of the literature on the ventral visual stream and CNNs, comparing their mechanisms, and identifying strengths and limitations for core object recognition. The review is structured to present the ventral visual stream's structure, visual representations, and the process of untangling object manifolds. It also covers the architecture of CNNs. The review also compared the two visual systems and the results showed that deep CNNs have shown remarkable performance and capability in certain aspects of object recognition, but there are still limitations in replicating the complexities of the primate visual system. Further research is needed to bridge the gap between computational models and the intricate neural mechanisms underlying human object recognition

    Performance-optimized deep neural networks are evolving into worse models of inferotemporal visual cortex

    Full text link
    One of the most impactful findings in computational neuroscience over the past decade is that the object recognition accuracy of deep neural networks (DNNs) correlates with their ability to predict neural responses to natural images in the inferotemporal (IT) cortex. This discovery supported the long-held theory that object recognition is a core objective of the visual cortex, and suggested that more accurate DNNs would serve as better models of IT neuron responses to images. Since then, deep learning has undergone a revolution of scale: billion parameter-scale DNNs trained on billions of images are rivaling or outperforming humans at visual tasks including object recognition. Have today's DNNs become more accurate at predicting IT neuron responses to images as they have grown more accurate at object recognition? Surprisingly, across three independent experiments, we find this is not the case. DNNs have become progressively worse models of IT as their accuracy has increased on ImageNet. To understand why DNNs experience this trade-off and evaluate if they are still an appropriate paradigm for modeling the visual system, we turn to recordings of IT that capture spatially resolved maps of neuronal activity elicited by natural images. These neuronal activity maps reveal that DNNs trained on ImageNet learn to rely on different visual features than those encoded by IT and that this problem worsens as their accuracy increases. We successfully resolved this issue with the neural harmonizer, a plug-and-play training routine for DNNs that aligns their learned representations with humans. Our results suggest that harmonized DNNs break the trade-off between ImageNet accuracy and neural prediction accuracy that assails current DNNs and offer a path to more accurate models of biological vision

    A Neural Algorithm of Artistic Style

    Full text link
    In fine art, especially painting, humans have mastered the skill to create unique visual experiences through composing a complex interplay between the content and style of an image. Thus far the algorithmic basis of this process is unknown and there exists no artificial system with similar capabilities. However, in other key areas of visual perception such as object and face recognition near-human performance was recently demonstrated by a class of biologically inspired vision models called Deep Neural Networks. Here we introduce an artificial system based on a Deep Neural Network that creates artistic images of high perceptual quality. The system uses neural representations to separate and recombine content and style of arbitrary images, providing a neural algorithm for the creation of artistic images. Moreover, in light of the striking similarities between performance-optimised artificial neural networks and biological vision, our work offers a path forward to an algorithmic understanding of how humans create and perceive artistic imagery
    • …
    corecore