3,437 research outputs found

    Vulnerable road users and connected autonomous vehicles interaction: a survey

    Get PDF
    There is a group of users within the vehicular traffic ecosystem known as Vulnerable Road Users (VRUs). VRUs include pedestrians, cyclists, motorcyclists, among others. On the other hand, connected autonomous vehicles (CAVs) are a set of technologies that combines, on the one hand, communication technologies to stay always ubiquitous connected, and on the other hand, automated technologies to assist or replace the human driver during the driving process. Autonomous vehicles are being visualized as a viable alternative to solve road accidents providing a general safe environment for all the users on the road specifically to the most vulnerable. One of the problems facing autonomous vehicles is to generate mechanisms that facilitate their integration not only within the mobility environment, but also into the road society in a safe and efficient way. In this paper, we analyze and discuss how this integration can take place, reviewing the work that has been developed in recent years in each of the stages of the vehicle-human interaction, analyzing the challenges of vulnerable users and proposing solutions that contribute to solving these challenges.This work was partially funded by the Ministry of Economy, Industry, and Competitiveness of Spain under Grant: Supervision of drone fleet and optimization of commercial operations flight plans, PID2020-116377RB-C21.Peer ReviewedPostprint (published version

    Fast, Accurate Thin-Structure Obstacle Detection for Autonomous Mobile Robots

    Full text link
    Safety is paramount for mobile robotic platforms such as self-driving cars and unmanned aerial vehicles. This work is devoted to a task that is indispensable for safety yet was largely overlooked in the past -- detecting obstacles that are of very thin structures, such as wires, cables and tree branches. This is a challenging problem, as thin objects can be problematic for active sensors such as lidar and sonar and even for stereo cameras. In this work, we propose to use video sequences for thin obstacle detection. We represent obstacles with edges in the video frames, and reconstruct them in 3D using efficient edge-based visual odometry techniques. We provide both a monocular camera solution and a stereo camera solution. The former incorporates Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) data to solve scale ambiguity, while the latter enjoys a novel, purely vision-based solution. Experiments demonstrated that the proposed methods are fast and able to detect thin obstacles robustly and accurately under various conditions.Comment: Appeared at IEEE CVPR 2017 Workshop on Embedded Visio

    Safety Evaluation Using Counterfactual Simulations: The use of computational driver behavior models in crash avoidance systems and virtual simulations with optimal subsampling

    Get PDF
    Traffic safety is a problem worldwide. In-vehicle conflict and crash avoidance systems have been under development and assessment for some time, as integral parts of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) and Automated Driving Systems (ADS). Among the methods used to assess conflict and crash avoidance systems developed by the automotive industry, virtual safety assessment methods have been shown to have great potential and efficiency. In fact, scenario generation-based virtual safety assessments playโ€”and are likely to continue to playโ€”a very important role in the assessments of vehicles of all levels of automation. The ultimate aim of this thesis is to improve the safety performance of conflict and crash avoidance systems. This aim is addressed through the use of computational driver models in two different ways. First, by using comfort-zone boundaries in system design, and second, by using a behavior-based crash-causation model together with a novel optimized scenario generation method for virtual safety assessment.The first objective of this thesis is to investigate how a driver model which includes road usersโ€™ comfortable behaviors in crash avoidance algorithms impacts the systemsโ€™ safety performance and the residual crash characteristics. Chinese car-to-two-wheeler crashes were targeted; Automated Emergency Braking (AEB) algorithms, which comprised the proposed crash avoidance systems, were compared to a traditional AEB algorithm. The proposed algorithms showed larger safety performance benefits. In addition, the similarities in residual crash characteristics regarding impact speed and location after different AEB implementations can potentially simplify the designs of in-crash protection system in future.The second objective is to develop and apply a method for efficient subsampling in crash-causation-model-based scenario generation for virtual safety assessment. The method, which is machine-learning-assisted, actively and iteratively updates the sampling probability based on new simulation results. The crash-causation model is based on off-road glances and a distribution of driver maximum decelerations in critical situations. A simple time-to-collision-based AEB algorithm was used to demonstrate the assessment process as well as the benefits of combining crash-causation-model-based scenario generation and optimal subsampling. The sampling methods are designed to target specific safety benefit indicators, such as impact speed reduction and crash avoidance rate. The results of the study show that the proposed sampling method requires almost 50% fewer simulations than traditional importance sampling.Future work aims to focus on applying the active sampling method to driver-model-based car-to-vulnerable road user (VRU) scenario generation. In addition to assessing conflict and crash avoidance system performance, a novel stopping criterion based on Bayesian future prediction will be further developed and demonstrated for use in experiments (e.g., as part of developing driver models) and virtual simulations (e.g., using driver-behavior-based crash-causation models). This criterion will be able to indicate when studies are unlikely to yield actionable results within the budget available, facilitating the decision to discontinue them while they are being run

    A systematic literature review on the relationship between autonomous vehicle technology and traffic-related mortality.

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(์„์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ํ–‰์ •๋Œ€ํ•™์› ๊ธ€๋กœ๋ฒŒํ–‰์ •์ „๊ณต, 2023. 2. ์ตœํƒœํ˜„.The society is anticipated to gain a lot from Autonomous Vehicles (AV), such as improved traffic flow and a decrease in accidents. They heavily rely on improvements in various Artificial Intelligence (AI) processes and strategies. Though some researchers in this field believe AV is the key to enhancing safety, others believe AV creates new challenges when it comes to ensuring the security of these new technology/systems and applications. The article conducts a systematic literature review on the relationship between autonomous vehicle technology and traffic-related mortality. According to inclusion and exclusion criteria, articles from EBSCO, ProQuest, IEEE Explorer, Web of Science were chosen, and they were then sorted. The findings reveal that the most of these publications have been published in advanced transport-related journals. Future improvements in the automobile industry and the development of intelligent transportation systems could help reduce the number of fatal traffic accidents. Technologies for autonomous cars provide effective ways to enhance the driving experience and reduce the number of traffic accidents. A multitude of driving-related problems, such as crashes, traffic, energy usage, and environmental pollution, will be helped by autonomous driving technology. More research is needed for the significant majority of the studies that were assessed. They need to be expanded so that they can be tested in real-world or computer-simulated scenarios, in better and more realistic scenarios, with better and more data, and in experimental designs where the results of the proposed strategy are compared to those of industry standards and competing strategies. Therefore, additional study with improved methods is needed. Another major area that requires additional research is the moral and ethical choices made by AVs. Government, policy makers, manufacturers, and designers all need to do many actions in order to deploy autonomous vehicles on the road effectively. The government should develop laws, rules, and an action plan in particular. It is important to create more effective programs that might encourage the adoption of emerging technology in transportation systems, such as driverless vehicles. In this regard, user perception becomes essential since it may inform designers about current issues and observations made by people. The perceptions of autonomous car users in developing countries like Azerbaijan haven't been thoroughly studied up to this point. The manufacturer has to fix the system flaw and needs a good data set for efficient operation. In the not-too-distant future, the widespread use of highly automated vehicles (AVs) may open up intriguing new possibilities for resolving persistent issues in current safety-related research. Further research is required to better understand and quantify the significant policy implications of Avs, taking into consideration factors like penetration rate, public adoption, technological advancements, traffic patterns, and business models. It only needs to take into account peer-reviewed, full-text journal papers for the investigation, but it's clear that a larger database and more documents would provide more results and a more thorough analysis.์ž์œจ์ฃผํ–‰์ฐจ(AV)๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ตํ†ต ํ๋ฆ„์ด ๊ฐœ์„ ๋˜๊ณ  ์‚ฌ๊ณ ๊ฐ€ ์ค„์–ด๋“œ๋Š” ๋“ฑ ์‚ฌํšŒ๊ฐ€ ์–ป๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ๋งŽ์„ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์˜ˆ์ƒ๋œ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋“ค์€ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ(AI) ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค์™€ ์ „๋žต์˜ ๊ฐœ์„ ์— ํฌ๊ฒŒ ์˜์กดํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋ถ„์•ผ์˜ ์ผ๋ถ€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์ž๋“ค์€ AV๊ฐ€ ์•ˆ์ „์„ฑ์„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ์—ด์‡ ๋ผ๊ณ  ๋ฏฟ์ง€๋งŒ, ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์ž๋“ค์€ AV๊ฐ€ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๊ธฐ์ˆ /์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ๋ฐ ์• ํ”Œ๋ฆฌ์ผ€์ด์…˜์˜ ๋ณด์•ˆ์„ ๋ณด์žฅํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จํ•˜์—ฌ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ์•ผ๊ธฐํ•œ๋‹ค๊ณ  ๋ฏฟ๋Š”๋‹ค. ์ด ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ์ž์œจ์ฃผํ–‰์ฐจ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ๊ณผ ๊ตํ†ต ๊ด€๋ จ ์‚ฌ๋ง๋ฅ  ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ฒด๊ณ„์ ์ธ ๋ฌธํ—Œ ๊ฒ€ํ† ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•œ๋‹ค. ํฌํ•จ ๋ฐ ์ œ์™ธ ๊ธฐ์ค€์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ EBSCO, ProQuest, IEEE Explorer ๋ฐ Web of Science์˜ ๊ธฐ์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ์„ ํƒํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜ํ–ˆ๋‹ค.์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์ถœํŒ๋ฌผ์˜ ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์ด ๊ณ ๊ธ‰ ์šด์†ก ๊ด€๋ จ ์ €๋„์— ๊ฒŒ์žฌ๋˜์—ˆ์Œ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค€๋‹ค. ๋ฏธ๋ž˜์˜ ์ž๋™์ฐจ ์‚ฐ์—…์˜ ๊ฐœ์„ ๊ณผ ์ง€๋Šฅํ˜• ๊ตํ†ต ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์€ ์น˜๋ช…์ ์ธ ๊ตํ†ต ์‚ฌ๊ณ ์˜ ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ค„์ด๋Š” ๋ฐ ๋„์›€์ด ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ž์œจ์ฃผํ–‰ ์ž๋™์ฐจ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์€ ์šด์ „ ๊ฒฝํ—˜์„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ค๊ณ  ๊ตํ†ต ์‚ฌ๊ณ ์˜ ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ค„์ผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ธ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ถฉ๋Œ, ๊ตํ†ต, ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์‚ฌ์šฉ, ํ™˜๊ฒฝ ์˜ค์—ผ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ์ˆ˜๋งŽ์€ ์šด์ „ ๊ด€๋ จ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋“ค์€ ์ž์œจ ์ฃผํ–‰ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์— ์˜ํ•ด ๋„์›€์„ ๋ฐ›์„ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ํ‰๊ฐ€๋œ ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๋” ๋งŽ์€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ์‹ค์ œ ๋˜๋Š” ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค, ๋” ์ข‹๊ณ  ํ˜„์‹ค์ ์ธ ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค, ๋” ์ข‹๊ณ  ๋” ๋งŽ์€ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ์ „๋žต ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ์‚ฐ์—… ํ‘œ์ค€ ๋ฐ ๊ฒฝ์Ÿ ์ „๋žต์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์™€ ๋น„๊ต๋˜๋Š” ์‹คํ—˜ ์„ค๊ณ„์—์„œ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ํ™•์žฅ๋˜์–ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๊ฐœ์„ ๋œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ถ”๊ฐ€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ์ถ”๊ฐ€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ๋˜ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์ฃผ์š” ๋ถ„์•ผ๋Š” AV์˜ ๋„๋•์ , ์œค๋ฆฌ์  ์„ ํƒ์ด๋‹ค. ์ •๋ถ€, ์ •์ฑ… ์ž…์•ˆ์ž, ์ œ์กฐ์—…์ฒด ๋ฐ ์„ค๊ณ„์ž๋Š” ๋ชจ๋‘ ์ž์œจ ์ฃผํ–‰ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰์„ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋„๋กœ์— ๋ฐฐ์น˜ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋งŽ์€ ์กฐ์น˜๋ฅผ ์ทจํ•ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ •๋ถ€๋Š” ํŠนํžˆ ๋ฒ•, ๊ทœ์น™, ์‹คํ–‰ ๊ณ„ํš์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์šด์ „์ž ์—†๋Š” ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ์šด์†ก ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์—์„œ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์˜ ์ฑ„ํƒ์„ ์žฅ๋ คํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ณด๋‹ค ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ธ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์„ ๋งŒ๋“œ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ์ด์™€ ๊ด€๋ จํ•˜์—ฌ, ์„ค๊ณ„์ž์—๊ฒŒ ํ˜„์žฌ ์ด์Šˆ์™€ ์‚ฌ๋žŒ์— ์˜ํ•œ ๊ด€์ฐฐ์„ ์•Œ๋ ค์ค„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž ์ธ์‹์ด ํ•„์ˆ˜์ ์ด ๋œ๋‹ค.์ œ์กฐ์—…์ฒด๋Š” ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ๊ฒฐํ•จ์„ ์ˆ˜์ •ํ•ด์•ผ ํ•˜๋ฉฐ ํšจ์œจ์ ์ธ ์ž‘๋™์„ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ข‹์€ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์„ธํŠธ๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ๋ฉ€์ง€ ์•Š์€ ๋ฏธ๋ž˜์—, ๊ณ ๋„๋กœ ์ž๋™ํ™”๋œ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰(AV)์˜ ๊ด‘๋ฒ”์œ„ํ•œ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์€ ํ˜„์žฌ์˜ ์•ˆ์ „ ๊ด€๋ จ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ์ง€์†์ ์ธ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ํฅ๋ฏธ๋กœ์šด ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์„ ์—ด์–ด์ค„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณด๊ธ‰๋ฅ , ๊ณต๊ณต ์ฑ„ํƒ, ๊ธฐ์ˆ  ๋ฐœ์ „, ๊ตํ†ต ํŒจํ„ด ๋ฐ ๋น„์ฆˆ๋‹ˆ์Šค ๋ชจ๋ธ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ์š”์†Œ๋ฅผ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์—ฌ Avs์˜ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์ •์ฑ… ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋” ์ž˜ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๊ณ  ์ •๋Ÿ‰ํ™”ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ถ”๊ฐ€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ์กฐ์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋™๋ฃŒ ๊ฒ€ํ† ๋ฅผ ๊ฑฐ์นœ ์ „๋ฌธ ์ €๋„ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ๋งŒ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜๋ฉด ๋˜์ง€๋งŒ, ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฒ ์ด์Šค๊ฐ€ ์ปค์ง€๊ณ  ๋ฌธ์„œ๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ์•„์ง€๋ฉด ๋” ๋งŽ์€ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์™€ ๋” ์ฒ ์ €ํ•œ ๋ถ„์„์ด ์ œ๊ณต๋  ๊ฒƒ์ด ๋ถ„๋ช…ํ•˜๋‹ค.Abstract 3 Table of Contents 6 List of Tables 7 List of Figures 7 List of Appendix 7 CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 8 1.1. Background 8 1.2. Purpose of Research 13 CHAPTER 2: AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES 21 2.1. Intelligent Traffic Systems 21 2.2. System Architecture for Autonomous Vehicles 22 2.3. Key components in AV classification 27 CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY AND DATA COLLECTION PROCEDURE 35 CHAPTER 4: FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION 39 4.1. RQ1: Do autonomous vehicles reduce traffic-related deaths 40 4.2. RQ2: Are there any challenges to using autonomous vehicles 63 4.3. RQ3: As a developing country, how effective is the use of autonomous vehicles for reducing traffic mortality 72 CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSION 76 5.1. Summary 76 5.2. Implications and Recommendations 80 5.3. Limitation of the study 91 Bibliography 93 List of Tables Table 1: The 6 Levels of Autonomous Vehicles Table 2: Search strings Table 3: Inclusion and exclusion criteria List of Figures Figure 1: Traffic Death Comparison with Europe Figure 2: Research strategy and study selection process List of Appendix Appendix 1: List of selected articles์„

    A comprehensive survey on cooperative intersection management for heterogeneous connected vehicles

    Get PDF
    Nowadays, with the advancement of technology, world is trending toward high mobility and dynamics. In this context, intersection management (IM) as one of the most crucial elements of the transportation sector demands high attention. Today, road entities including infrastructures, vulnerable road users (VRUs) such as motorcycles, moped, scooters, pedestrians, bicycles, and other types of vehicles such as trucks, buses, cars, emergency vehicles, and railway vehicles like trains or trams are able to communicate cooperatively using vehicle-to-everything (V2X) communications and provide traffic safety, efficiency, infotainment and ecological improvements. In this paper, we take into account different types of intersections in terms of signalized, semi-autonomous (hybrid) and autonomous intersections and conduct a comprehensive survey on various intersection management methods for heterogeneous connected vehicles (CVs). We consider heterogeneous classes of vehicles such as road and rail vehicles as well as VRUs including bicycles, scooters and motorcycles. All kinds of intersection goals, modeling, coordination architectures, scheduling policies are thoroughly discussed. Signalized and semi-autonomous intersections are assessed with respect to these parameters. We especially focus on autonomous intersection management (AIM) and categorize this section based on four major goals involving safety, efficiency, infotainment and environment. Each intersection goal provides an in-depth investigation on the corresponding literature from the aforementioned perspectives. Moreover, robustness and resiliency of IM are explored from diverse points of view encompassing sensors, information management and sharing, planning universal scheme, heterogeneous collaboration, vehicle classification, quality measurement, external factors, intersection types, localization faults, communication anomalies and channel optimization, synchronization, vehicle dynamics and model mismatch, model uncertainties, recovery, security and privacy
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore