1,270 research outputs found
Detecting and classifying lesions in mammograms with Deep Learning
In the last two decades Computer Aided Diagnostics (CAD) systems were
developed to help radiologists analyze screening mammograms. The benefits of
current CAD technologies appear to be contradictory and they should be improved
to be ultimately considered useful. Since 2012 deep convolutional neural
networks (CNN) have been a tremendous success in image recognition, reaching
human performance. These methods have greatly surpassed the traditional
approaches, which are similar to currently used CAD solutions. Deep CNN-s have
the potential to revolutionize medical image analysis. We propose a CAD system
based on one of the most successful object detection frameworks, Faster R-CNN.
The system detects and classifies malignant or benign lesions on a mammogram
without any human intervention. The proposed method sets the state of the art
classification performance on the public INbreast database, AUC = 0.95 . The
approach described here has achieved the 2nd place in the Digital Mammography
DREAM Challenge with AUC = 0.85 . When used as a detector, the system reaches
high sensitivity with very few false positive marks per image on the INbreast
dataset. Source code, the trained model and an OsiriX plugin are availaible
online at https://github.com/riblidezso/frcnn_cad
Recommended from our members
Deep learning networks find unique mammographic differences in previous negative mammograms between interval and screen-detected cancers: a case-case study.
BackgroundTo determine if mammographic features from deep learning networks can be applied in breast cancer to identify groups at interval invasive cancer risk due to masking beyond using traditional breast density measures.MethodsFull-field digital screening mammograms acquired in our clinics between 2006 and 2015 were reviewed. Transfer learning of a deep learning network with weights initialized from ImageNet was performed to classify mammograms that were followed by an invasive interval or screen-detected cancer within 12 months of the mammogram. Hyperparameter optimization was performed and the network was visualized through saliency maps. Prediction loss and accuracy were calculated using this deep learning network. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC) values were generated with the outcome of interval cancer using the deep learning network and compared to predictions from conditional logistic regression with errors quantified through contingency tables.ResultsPre-cancer mammograms of 182 interval and 173 screen-detected cancers were split into training/test cases at an 80/20 ratio. Using Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) density alone, the ability to correctly classify interval cancers was moderate (AUC = 0.65). The optimized deep learning model achieved an AUC of 0.82. Contingency table analysis showed the network was correctly classifying 75.2% of the mammograms and that incorrect classifications were slightly more common for the interval cancer mammograms. Saliency maps of each cancer case found that local information could highly drive classification of cases more than global image information.ConclusionsPre-cancerous mammograms contain imaging information beyond breast density that can be identified with deep learning networks to predict the probability of breast cancer detection
Cancer diagnosis using deep learning: A bibliographic review
In this paper, we first describe the basics of the field of cancer diagnosis, which includes steps of cancer diagnosis followed by the typical classification methods used by doctors, providing a historical idea of cancer classification techniques to the readers. These methods include Asymmetry, Border, Color and Diameter (ABCD) method, seven-point detection method, Menzies method, and pattern analysis. They are used regularly by doctors for cancer diagnosis, although they are not considered very efficient for obtaining better performance. Moreover, considering all types of audience, the basic evaluation criteria are also discussed. The criteria include the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve), Area under the ROC curve (AUC), F1 score, accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, precision, dice-coefficient, average accuracy, and Jaccard index. Previously used methods are considered inefficient, asking for better and smarter methods for cancer diagnosis. Artificial intelligence and cancer diagnosis are gaining attention as a way to define better diagnostic tools. In particular, deep neural networks can be successfully used for intelligent image analysis. The basic framework of how this machine learning works on medical imaging is provided in this study, i.e., pre-processing, image segmentation and post-processing. The second part of this manuscript describes the different deep learning techniques, such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs), generative adversarial models (GANs), deep autoencoders (DANs), restricted Boltzmann’s machine (RBM), stacked autoencoders (SAE), convolutional autoencoders (CAE), recurrent neural networks (RNNs), long short-term memory (LTSM), multi-scale convolutional neural network (M-CNN), multi-instance learning convolutional neural network (MIL-CNN). For each technique, we provide Python codes, to allow interested readers to experiment with the cited algorithms on their own diagnostic problems. The third part of this manuscript compiles the successfully applied deep learning models for different types of cancers. Considering the length of the manuscript, we restrict ourselves to the discussion of breast cancer, lung cancer, brain cancer, and skin cancer. The purpose of this bibliographic review is to provide researchers opting to work in implementing deep learning and artificial neural networks for cancer diagnosis a knowledge from scratch of the state-of-the-art achievements
Convolutional Neural Networks for the segmentation of microcalcification in Mammography Imaging
Cluster of microcalcifications can be an early sign of breast cancer. In this
paper we propose a novel approach based on convolutional neural networks for
the detection and segmentation of microcalcification clusters. In this work we
used 283 mammograms to train and validate our model, obtaining an accuracy of
98.22% in the detection of preliminary suspect regions and of 97.47% in the
segmentation task. Our results show how deep learning could be an effective
tool to effectively support radiologists during mammograms examination.Comment: 13 pages, 7 figure
- …