146 research outputs found

    Gauss decomposition for Chevalley groups, revisited

    Full text link
    In the 1960's Noboru Iwahori and Hideya Matsumoto, Eiichi Abe and Kazuo Suzuki, and Michael Stein discovered that Chevalley groups G=G(Φ,R)G=G(\Phi,R) over a semilocal ring admit remarkable Gauss decomposition G=TUU−UG=TUU^-U, where T=T(Φ,R)T=T(\Phi,R) is a split maximal torus, whereas U=U(Φ,R)U=U(\Phi,R) and U−=U−(Φ,R)U^-=U^-(\Phi,R) are unipotent radicals of two opposite Borel subgroups B=B(Φ,R)B=B(\Phi,R) and B−=B−(Φ,R)B^-=B^-(\Phi,R) containing TT. It follows from the classical work of Hyman Bass and Michael Stein that for classical groups Gauss decomposition holds under weaker assumptions such as \sr(R)=1 or \asr(R)=1. Later the second author noticed that condition \sr(R)=1 is necessary for Gauss decomposition. Here, we show that a slight variation of Tavgen's rank reduction theorem implies that for the elementary group E(Φ,R)E(\Phi,R) condition \sr(R)=1 is also sufficient for Gauss decomposition. In other words, E=HUU−UE=HUU^-U, where H=H(Φ,R)=T∩EH=H(\Phi,R)=T\cap E. This surprising result shows that stronger conditions on the ground ring, such as being semi-local, \asr(R)=1, \sr(R,\Lambda)=1, etc., were only needed to guarantee that for simply connected groups G=EG=E, rather than to verify the Gauss decomposition itself

    Algebraic properties of profinite groups

    Full text link
    Recently there has been a lot of research and progress in profinite groups. We survey some of the new results and discuss open problems. A central theme is decompositions of finite groups into bounded products of subsets of various kinds which give rise to algebraic properties of topological groups.Comment: This version has some references update
    • …
    corecore