Symbolic Algorithms for Language Equivalence and Kleene Algebra with Tests

We first propose algorithms for checking language equivalence of finite automata over a large alphabet. We use symbolic automata, where the transition function is compactly represented using a (multi-terminal) binary decision diagrams (BDD). The key idea consists in computing a bisimulation by exploring reachable pairs symbolically, so as to avoid redundancies. This idea can be combined with already existing optimisations, and we show in particular a nice integration with the disjoint sets forest data-structure from Hopcroft and Karp's standard algorithm. Then we consider Kleene algebra with tests (KAT), an algebraic theory that can be used for verification in various domains ranging from compiler optimisation to network programming analysis. This theory is decidable by reduction to language equivalence of automata on guarded strings, a particular kind of automata that have exponentially large alphabets. We propose several methods allowing to construct symbolic automata out of KAT expressions, based either on Brzozowski's derivatives or standard automata constructions. All in all, this results in efficient algorithms for deciding equivalence of KAT expressions

Automatically proving equivalence by type-safe reflection

We are also grateful for the support of the Scottish Informatics and Computer Science Alliance (SICSA) and EPSRC grant EP/N024222/1.One difficulty with reasoning and programming with dependent types is that proof obligations arise naturally once programs become even moderately sized. For example, implementing an adder for binary numbers indexed over their natural number equivalents naturally leads to proof obligations for equalities of expressions over natural numbers. The need for these equality proofs comes, in intensional type theories, from the fact that the propositional equality enables us to prove as equal terms that are not judgementally equal, which means that the typechecker can’t always obtain equalities by reduction. As far as possible, we would like to solve such proof obligations automatically. In this paper, we show one way to automate these proofs by reflection in the dependently typed programming language Idris. We show how defining reflected terms indexed by the original Idris expression allows us to construct and manipulate proofs. We build a hierarchy of tactics for proving equivalences in semi-groups, monoids, commutative monoids, groups, commutative groups, semi-rings and rings. We also show how each tactic reuses those from simpler structures, thus avoiding duplication of code and proofs.Postprin

Type Classes for Mathematics in Type Theory

The introduction of first-class type classes in the Coq system calls for re-examination of the basic interfaces used for mathematical formalization in type theory. We present a new set of type classes for mathematics and take full advantage of their unique features to make practical a particularly flexible approach formerly thought infeasible. Thus, we address both traditional proof engineering challenges as well as new ones resulting from our ambition to build upon this development a library of constructive analysis in which abstraction penalties inhibiting efficient computation are reduced to a minimum. The base of our development consists of type classes representing a standard algebraic hierarchy, as well as portions of category theory and universal algebra. On this foundation we build a set of mathematically sound abstract interfaces for different kinds of numbers, succinctly expressed using categorical language and universal algebra constructions. Strategic use of type classes lets us support these high-level theory-friendly definitions while still enabling efficient implementations unhindered by gratuitous indirection, conversion or projection. Algebra thrives on the interplay between syntax and semantics. The Prolog-like abilities of type class instance resolution allow us to conveniently define a quote function, thus facilitating the use of reflective techniques

Tableaux Modulo Theories Using Superdeduction

We propose a method that allows us to develop tableaux modulo theories using the principles of superdeduction, among which the theory is used to enrich the deduction system with new deduction rules. This method is presented in the framework of the Zenon automated theorem prover, and is applied to the set theory of the B method. This allows us to provide another prover to Atelier B, which can be used to verify B proof rules in particular. We also propose some benchmarks, in which this prover is able to automatically verify a part of the rules coming from the database maintained by Siemens IC-MOL. Finally, we describe another extension of Zenon with superdeduction, which is able to deal with any first order theory, and provide a benchmark coming from the TPTP library, which contains a large set of first order problems.Comment: arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1501.0117

Deciding synchronous Kleene algebra with derivatives

Synchronous Kleene algebra (SKA) is a decidable framework that combines Kleene algebra (KA) with a synchrony model of concurrency. Elements of SKA can be seen as processes taking place within a fixed discrete time frame and that, at each time step, may execute one or more basic actions or then come to a halt. The synchronous Kleene algebra with tests (SKAT) combines SKA with a Boolean algebra. Both algebras were introduced by Prisacariu, who proved the decidability of the equational theory, through a Kleene theorem based on the classical Thompson -NFA construction. Using the notion of partial derivatives, we present a new decision procedure for equivalence between SKA terms. The results are extended for SKAT considering automata with transitions labeled by Boolean expressions instead of atoms. This work continous previous research done for KA and KAT, where derivative based methods were used in feasible algorithms for testing terms equivalence. (c) Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Formal Analysis of Concurrent Programs

In this thesis, extensions of Kleene algebras are used to develop algebras for rely-guarantee style reasoning about concurrent programs. In addition to these algebras, detailed denotational models are implemented in the interactive theorem prover Isabelle/HOL. Formal soundness proofs link the algebras to their models. This follows a general algebraic approach for developing correct by construction verification tools within Isabelle. In this approach, algebras provide inference rules and abstract principles for reasoning about the control flow of programs, while the concrete models provide laws for reasoning about data flow. This yields a rapid, lightweight approach for the construction of verification and refinement tools. These tools are used to construct a popular example from the literature, via refinement, within the context of a general-purpose interactive theorem proving environment

Fifty years of Hoare's Logic

We present a history of Hoare's logic.Comment: 79 pages. To appear in Formal Aspects of Computin