A doubly exponential upper bound on noisy EPR states for binary games

This paper initiates the study of a class of entangled games, mono-state games, denoted by $(G,\psi)$, where $G$ is a two-player one-round game and $\psi$ is a bipartite state independent of the game $G$. In the mono-state game $(G,\psi)$, the players are only allowed to share arbitrary copies of $\psi$. This paper provides a doubly exponential upper bound on the copies of $\psi$ for the players to approximate the value of the game to an arbitrarily small constant precision for any mono-state binary game $(G,\psi)$, if $\psi$ is a noisy EPR state, which is a two-qubit state with completely mixed states as marginals and maximal correlation less than $1$. In particular, it includes $(1-\epsilon)|\Psi\rangle\langle\Psi|+\epsilon\frac{I_2}{2}\otimes\frac{I_2}{2}$, an EPR state with an arbitrary depolarizing noise $\epsilon>0$.The structure of the proofs is built the recent framework about the decidability of the non-interactive simulation of joint distributions, which is completely different from all previous optimization-based approaches or "Tsirelson's problem"-based approaches. This paper develops a series of new techniques about the Fourier analysis on matrix spaces and proves a quantum invariance principle and a hypercontractive inequality of random operators. This novel approach provides a new angle to study the decidability of the complexity class MIP$^*$, a longstanding open problem in quantum complexity theory.Comment: The proof of Lemma C.9 is corrected. The presentation is improved. Some typos are correcte

Decidability of Secure Non-interactive Simulation of Doubly Symmetric Binary Source

Noise, which cannot be eliminated or controlled by parties, is an incredible facilitator of cryptography. For example, highly efficient secure computation protocols based on independent samples from the doubly symmetric binary source (BSS) are known. A modular technique of extending these protocols to diverse forms of other noise without any loss of round and communication complexity is the following strategy. Parties, beginning with multiple samples from an arbitrary noise source, non-interactively, albeit securely, simulate the BSS samples. After that, they can use custom-designed efficient multi-party solutions using these BSS samples. Khorasgani, Maji, and Nguyen (EPRINT--2020) introduce the notion of secure non-interactive simulation (SNIS) as a natural cryptographic extension of concepts like non-interactive simulation and non-interactive correlation distillation in theoretical computer science and information theory. In SNIS, the parties apply local reduction functions to their samples to produce samples of another distribution. This work studies the decidability problem of whether samples from the noise $(X,Y)$ can securely and non-interactively simulate BSS samples. As is standard in analyzing non-interactive simulations, our work relies on Fourier-analytic techniques to approach this decidability problem. Our work begins by algebraizing the simulation-based security definition of SNIS. Using this algebraized definition of security, we analyze the properties of the Fourier spectrum of the reduction functions. Given $(X,Y)$ and BSS with noise parameter $\epsilon$, the objective is to distinguish between the following two cases. (A) Does there exist a SNIS from $BSS(\epsilon)$ to $(X,Y)$ with $\delta$-insecurity? (B) Do all SNIS from $BSS(\epsilon)$ to $(X,Y)$ incur $\delta\u27$-insecurity, where $\delta\u27>\delta$? We prove that there is a bounded computable time algorithm achieving this objective for the following cases. (1) $\delta=O{1/n}$ and $\delta\u27=$ positive constant, and (2) $\delta=$ positive constant, and $\delta\u27=$ another (larger) positive constant. We also prove that $\delta=0$ is achievable only when $(X,Y)$ is another BSS, where $(X,Y)$ is an arbitrary distribution over $\{-1,1\}\times\{-1,1\}$. Furthermore, given $(X,Y)$, we provide a sufficient test determining if simulating BSS samples incurs a constant-insecurity, irrespective of the number of samples of $(X,Y)$. Handling the security of the reductions in Fourier analysis presents unique challenges because the interaction of these analytical techniques with security is unexplored. Our technical approach diverges significantly from existing approaches to the decidability problem of (insecure) non-interactive reductions to develop analysis pathways that preserve security. Consequently, our work shows a new concentration of the Fourier spectrum of secure reduction functions, unlike their insecure counterparts. We show that nearly the entire weight of secure reduction functions\u27 spectrum is concentrated on the lower-degree components. The authors believe that examining existing analytical techniques through the facet of security and developing new analysis methodologies respecting security is of independent and broader interest

Decidability of fully quantum nonlocal games with noisy maximally entangled states

This paper considers the decidability of fully quantum nonlocal games with noisy maximally entangled states. Fully quantum nonlocal games are a generalization of nonlocal games, where both questions and answers are quantum and the referee performs a binary POVM measurement to decide whether they win the game after receiving the quantum answers from the players. The quantum value of a fully quantum nonlocal game is the supremum of the probability that they win the game, where the supremum is taken over all the possible entangled states shared between the players and all the valid quantum operations performed by the players. The seminal work $\mathrm{MIP}^*=\mathrm{RE}$ implies that it is undecidable to approximate the quantum value of a fully nonlocal game. This still holds even if the players are only allowed to share (arbitrarily many copies of) maximally entangled states. This paper investigates the case that the shared maximally entangled states are noisy. We prove that there is a computable upper bound on the copies of noisy maximally entangled states for the players to win a fully quantum nonlocal game with a probability arbitrarily close to the quantum value. This implies that it is decidable to approximate the quantum values of these games. Hence, the hardness of approximating the quantum value of a fully quantum nonlocal game is not robust against the noise in the shared states. This paper is built on the framework for the decidability of non-interactive simulations of joint distributions and generalizes the analogous result for nonlocal games. We extend the theory of Fourier analysis to the space of super-operators and prove several key results including an invariance principle and a dimension reduction for super-operators. These results are interesting in their own right and are believed to have further applications.Comment: Reference is update

Non interactive simulation of correlated distributions is decidable

A basic problem in information theory is the following: Let $\mathbf{P} = (\mathbf{X}, \mathbf{Y})$ be an arbitrary distribution where the marginals $\mathbf{X}$ and $\mathbf{Y}$ are (potentially) correlated. Let Alice and Bob be two players where Alice gets samples $\{x_i\}_{i \ge 1}$ and Bob gets samples $\{y_i\}_{i \ge 1}$ and for all $i$, $(x_i, y_i) \sim \mathbf{P}$. What joint distributions $\mathbf{Q}$ can be simulated by Alice and Bob without any interaction? Classical works in information theory by G{\'a}cs-K{\"o}rner and Wyner answer this question when at least one of $\mathbf{P}$ or $\mathbf{Q}$ is the distribution on $\{0,1\} \times \{0,1\}$ where each marginal is unbiased and identical. However, other than this special case, the answer to this question is understood in very few cases. Recently, Ghazi, Kamath and Sudan showed that this problem is decidable for $\mathbf{Q}$ supported on $\{0,1\} \times \{0,1\}$. We extend their result to $\mathbf{Q}$ supported on any finite alphabet. We rely on recent results in Gaussian geometry (by the authors) as well as a new \emph{smoothing argument} inspired by the method of \emph{boosting} from learning theory and potential function arguments from complexity theory and additive combinatorics.Comment: The reduction for non-interactive simulation for general source distribution to the Gaussian case was incorrect in the previous version. It has been rectified no

Behavioural Preorders on Stochastic Systems - Logical, Topological, and Computational Aspects

Computer systems can be found everywhere: in space, in our homes, in our cars, in our pockets, and sometimes even in our own bodies. For concerns of safety, economy, and convenience, it is important that such systems work correctly. However, it is a notoriously difficult task to ensure that the software running on computers behaves correctly. One approach to ease this task is that of model checking, where a model of the system is made using some mathematical formalism. Requirements expressed in a formal language can then be verified against the model in order to give guarantees that the model satisfies the requirements. For many computer systems, time is an important factor. As such, we need our formalisms and requirement languages to be able to incorporate real time. We therefore develop formalisms and algorithms that allow us to compare and express properties about real-time systems. We first introduce a logical formalism for reasoning about upper and lower bounds on time, and study the properties of this formalism, including axiomatisation and algorithms for checking when a formula is satisfied. We then consider the question of when a system is faster than another system. We show that this is a difficult question which can not be answered in general, but we identify special cases where this question can be answered. We also show that under this notion of faster-than, a local increase in speed may lead to a global decrease in speed, and we take step towards avoiding this. Finally, we consider how to compare the real-time behaviour of systems not just qualitatively, but also quantitatively. Thus, we are interested in knowing how much one system is faster or slower than another system. This is done by introducing a distance between systems. We show how to compute this distance and that it behaves well with respect to certain properties.Comment: PhD dissertation from Aalborg Universit

Secure Non-Interactive Reducibility is Decidable

Secure Non-Interactive Reductions (SNIR) is a recently introduced, but fundamental cryptographic primitive. The basic question about SNIRs is how to determine if there is an SNIR from one 2-party correlation to another. While prior work provided answers for several pairs of correlations, the possibility that this is an undecidable problem in general was left open. In this work we show that the existence of an SNIR between any pair of correlations can be determined by an algorithm. At a high-level, our proof follows the blueprint of a similar (but restricted) result by Khorasgani et al. But combining the spectral analysis of SNIRs by Agrawal et al. (Eurocrypt 2022) with a new variant of a junta theorem by Kindler and Safra, we obtain a complete resolution of the decidability question for SNIRs. The new junta theorem that we identify and prove may be of independent interest

10252 Abstracts Collection -- Game Semantics and Program Verification

From 20th to 25th June 2010, the Dagstuhl Seminar "Game Semantics and Program Verification\u27\u27 was held in Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz Center for Informatics. During the seminar, several participants presented their current research, and ongoing work and open problems were discussed. Abstracts of the presentations given during the seminar as well as abstracts of seminar results and ideas are put together in this paper. The first section describes the seminar topics and goals in general. Links to extended abstracts or full papers are provided, if available