476 research outputs found
Practical Reasoning for Very Expressive Description Logics
Description Logics (DLs) are a family of knowledge representation formalisms
mainly characterised by constructors to build complex concepts and roles from
atomic ones. Expressive role constructors are important in many applications,
but can be computationally problematical. We present an algorithm that decides
satisfiability of the DL ALC extended with transitive and inverse roles and
functional restrictions with respect to general concept inclusion axioms and
role hierarchies; early experiments indicate that this algorithm is well-suited
for implementation. Additionally, we show that ALC extended with just
transitive and inverse roles is still in PSPACE. We investigate the limits of
decidability for this family of DLs, showing that relaxing the constraints
placed on the kinds of roles used in number restrictions leads to the
undecidability of all inference problems. Finally, we describe a number of
optimisation techniques that are crucial in obtaining implementations of the
decision procedures, which, despite the worst-case complexity of the problem,
exhibit good performance with real-life problems
Reasoning with Individuals for the Description Logic SHIQ
While there has been a great deal of work on the development of reasoning
algorithms for expressive description logics, in most cases only Tbox reasoning
is considered. In this paper we present an algorithm for combined Tbox and Abox
reasoning in the SHIQ description logic. This algorithm is of particular
interest as it can be used to decide the problem of (database) conjunctive
query containment w.r.t. a schema. Moreover, the realisation of an efficient
implementation should be relatively straightforward as it can be based on an
existing highly optimised implementation of the Tbox algorithm in the FaCT
system.Comment: To appear at CADE-1
An ontology for software component matching
The Web is likely to be a central platform for software development in the future. We investigate how Semantic Web technologies, in particular ontologies, can be utilised to support software component development in a Web environment. We use description logics, which underlie Semantic Web ontology languages such as DAML+OIL, to develop
an ontology for matching requested and provided components. A link between modal logic and description logics will prove invaluable for the provision of reasoning support for component and service behaviour
Description Logics as Ontology Languages for the Semantic Web
The vision of a Semantic Web has recently drawn considerable attention, both from academia and industry. Description logics are often named as one of the tools that can support the Semantic Web and thus help to make this vision reality. In this paper, we describe what description logics are and what they can do for the Semantic Web. Descriptions logics are very useful for defining, integrating, and maintaining ontologies, which provide the Semantic Web with a common understanding of the basic semantic concepts used to annotate Web pages. We also argue that, without the last decade of basic research in this area, description logics could not play such an important rˆole in this domain
Deciding regular grammar logics with converse through first-order logic
We provide a simple translation of the satisfiability problem for regular
grammar logics with converse into GF2, which is the intersection of the guarded
fragment and the 2-variable fragment of first-order logic. This translation is
theoretically interesting because it translates modal logics with certain frame
conditions into first-order logic, without explicitly expressing the frame
conditions.
A consequence of the translation is that the general satisfiability problem
for regular grammar logics with converse is in EXPTIME. This extends a previous
result of the first author for grammar logics without converse. Using the same
method, we show how some other modal logics can be naturally translated into
GF2, including nominal tense logics and intuitionistic logic.
In our view, the results in this paper show that the natural first-order
fragment corresponding to regular grammar logics is simply GF2 without extra
machinery such as fixed point-operators.Comment: 34 page
Reasoning with Very Expressive Fuzzy Description Logics
It is widely recognized today that the management of imprecision and
vagueness will yield more intelligent and realistic knowledge-based
applications. Description Logics (DLs) are a family of knowledge representation
languages that have gained considerable attention the last decade, mainly due
to their decidability and the existence of empirically high performance of
reasoning algorithms. In this paper, we extend the well known fuzzy ALC DL to
the fuzzy SHIN DL, which extends the fuzzy ALC DL with transitive role axioms
(S), inverse roles (I), role hierarchies (H) and number restrictions (N). We
illustrate why transitive role axioms are difficult to handle in the presence
of fuzzy interpretations and how to handle them properly. Then we extend these
results by adding role hierarchies and finally number restrictions. The main
contributions of the paper are the decidability proof of the fuzzy DL languages
fuzzy-SI and fuzzy-SHIN, as well as decision procedures for the knowledge base
satisfiability problem of the fuzzy-SI and fuzzy-SHIN
Fuzzy Description Logics with General Concept Inclusions
Description logics (DLs) are used to represent knowledge of an application domain and provide standard reasoning services to infer consequences of this knowledge. However, classical DLs are not suited to represent vagueness in the description of the knowledge. We consider a combination of DLs and Fuzzy Logics to address this task. In particular, we consider the t-norm-based semantics for fuzzy DLs introduced by Hájek in 2005. Since then, many tableau algorithms have been developed for reasoning in fuzzy DLs. Another popular approach is to reduce fuzzy ontologies to classical ones and use existing highly optimized classical reasoners to deal with them. However, a systematic study of the computational complexity of the different reasoning problems is so far missing from the literature on fuzzy DLs. Recently, some of the developed tableau algorithms have been shown to be incorrect in the presence of general concept inclusion axioms (GCIs). In some fuzzy DLs, reasoning with GCIs has even turned out to be undecidable. This work provides a rigorous analysis of the boundary between decidable and undecidable reasoning problems in t-norm-based fuzzy DLs, in particular for GCIs. Existing undecidability proofs are extended to cover large classes of fuzzy DLs, and decidability is shown for most of the remaining logics considered here. Additionally, the computational complexity of reasoning in fuzzy DLs with semantics based on finite lattices is analyzed. For most decidability results, tight complexity bounds can be derived
- …