Equivalence of infinite-state systems with silent steps

This dissertation contributes to analysis methods for infinite-state systems. The dissertation focuses on equivalence testing for two relevant classes of infinite-state systems: commutative context-free processes, and one-counter automata. As for equivalence notions, we investigate the classical bisimulation and simulation equivalences. The important point is that we allow for silent steps in the model, abstracting away from internal, unobservable actions. Very few decidability results have been known so far for bisimulation or simulation equivalence for infinite-state systems with silent steps, as presence of silent steps makes the equivalence problem arguably harder to solve. A standard technique for bisimulation or simulation equivalence testing is to use the hierarchy of approximants. For an effective decision procedure the hierarchy must stabilize (converge) at level omega, the first limit ordinal, which is not the case for the models investigated in this thesis. However, according to a long-standing conjecture, the community believed that the convergence actually takes place at level omega+ omega in the class of commutative context free processes. We disprove the conjecture and provide a lower bound of omega * omega for the convergence level. We also show that all previously known positive decidability results for BPPs can be re-proven uniformly using the improved approximants techniques. Moreover dissertation contains an unsuccesfull attack on one of the main open problems in the area: decidability of weak bisimulation equivalence for commutative context-free processes. Our technical development of this section is not sufficient to solve the problem, but we believe it is a serious step towards a solution. Furtermore, we are able to show decidability of branching (stuttering) bisimulation equivalence, a slightly more discriminating variant of bisimulation equivalence. It is worth emphesizing that, until today, our result is the only known decidability result for bisimulation equivalence in a class of inifinite-state systems with silent steps that is not known to admit convergence of (some variant of) standard approximants at level omega. Finally we consider weak simulation equivalence over one-counter automata without zero tests (allowing zero tests implies undecidability). While weak bisimulation equivalence is known to be undecidable in this class, we prove a surprising result that weak simulation equivalence is actually decidable. Thus we provide a first example going against a trend, widely-believed by the community, that simulation equivalence tends to be computationally harder than bisimulation equivalence. In short words, the dissertation contains three new results, each of them solving a non-trivial open problem about equivalence testing of infinite-state systems with silent steps

Decidability and coincidence of equivalences for concurrency

There are two fundamental problems concerning equivalence relations in con-currency. One is: for which system classes is a given equivalence decidable? The second is: when do two equivalences coincide? Two well-known equivalences are history preserving bisimilarity (hpb) and hereditary history preserving bisimi-larity (hhpb). These are both ‘independence ’ equivalences: they reflect causal dependencies between events. Hhpb is obtained from hpb by adding a ‘back-tracking ’ requirement. This seemingly small change makes hhpb computationally far harder: hpb is well-known to be decidable for finite-state systems, whereas the decidability of hhpb has been a renowned open problem for several years; only recently it has been shown undecidable. The main aim of this thesis is to gain insights into the decidability problem for hhpb, and to analyse when it coincides with hpb; less technically, we might say, to analyse the power of the interplay between concurrency, causality, and conflict. We first examine the backtracking condition, and see that it has two dimen

Foundations of Software Science and Computation Structures

This open access book constitutes the proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Foundations of Software Science and Computational Structures, FOSSACS 2019, which took place in Prague, Czech Republic, in April 2019, held as part of the European Joint Conference on Theory and Practice of Software, ETAPS 2019. The 29 papers presented in this volume were carefully reviewed and selected from 85 submissions. They deal with foundational research with a clear significance for software science

Modeling and checking Real-Time system designs

Real-time systems are found in an increasing variety of application fields. Usually, they are embedded systems controlling devices that may risk lives or damage properties: they are safety critical systems. Hard Real-Time requirements (late means wrong) make the development of such kind of systems a formidable and daunting task. The need to predict temporal behavior of critical real-time systems has encouraged the development of an useful collection of models, results and tools for analyzing schedulability of applications (e.g., [log]). However, there is no general analytical support for verifying other kind of high level timing requirements on complex software architectures. On the other hand, the verification of specifications and designs of real-time systems has been considered an interesting application field for automatic analysis techniques such as model-checking. Unfortunately, there is a natural trade-off between sophistication of supported features and the practicality of formal analysis. To cope with the challenges of formal analysis real-time system designs we focus on three aspects that, we believe, are fundamental to get practical tools: model-generation, modelreduction and model-checking. Then, firstly, we extend our ideas presented in [30] and develop an automatic approach to model and verify designs of real-time systems for complex timing requirements based on scheduling theory and timed automata theory [7] (a wellknown and studied formalism to model and verify timed systems). That is, to enhance practicality of formal analysis, we focus our analysis on designs adhering to Fixed-Priority scheduling. In essence, we exploit known scheduling theory to automatically derive simple and compositional formal models. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first proposal to integrate scheduling theory into the framework of automatic formal verification. To model such systems, we present I/O Timed Components, a notion and discipline to build non-blocking live timed systems. I/O Timed Components, which are build on top of Timed Automata, provide other important methodological advantages like influence detection or compositional reasoning. Secondly, we provide a battery of automatic and rather generic abstraction techniques that, given a requirement to be analyzed, reduces the model while preserving the relevant behaviors to check it. Thus, we do not feed the verification tools with the whole model as previous formal approaches. To provide arguments about the correctness of those abstractions, we present a notion of Continuous Observational Bismulation that is weaker than strong timed bisimulation yet preserving many well-known logics for timed systems like TCTL [3]. Finally, since we choose timed automata as formal kernel, we adapt and apply their deeply studied and developed analysis theory, as well as their practical tools. Moreover, we also describe from scratch an algorithm to model-check duration properties, a feature that is not addressed by available tools. That algorithm extends the one presented in [28].Fil:Braberman, Víctor Adrián. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina