872 research outputs found

    ์„œ์šธ ์ธ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋ฏธ์„ธ๋จผ์ง€ ๋…ธ์ถœ ์˜ˆ์ธก์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๋ณด๊ฑด๋Œ€ํ•™์› ํ™˜๊ฒฝ๋ณด๊ฑดํ•™๊ณผ, 2021.8. ๊ณฝ์ˆ˜์˜.Outdoor concentrations of particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of < 2.5 ยตm (PM2.5) often used as a surrogate for population exposure to PM2.5 in epidemiological studies. However, people spend the majority of their time indoors; therefore, the relationship between indoor and outdoor PM2.5 concentrations should be considered in the estimation of population exposure to PM2.5. The overall objective of this study was to estimate population exposure to PM2.5 using time-location patterns and outdoor PM2.5 concentrations which was applied by the relationship between indoor and outdoor PM2.5 concentration. Additionally, direction of refining estimation of population exposure to PM2.5 was explored to provide useful insights for further study for the estimates of population exposure to particulate matter. Study 1 (chapter 2) aimed to develop a population exposure model to PM2.5 and identify the determinants associated with the high-exposure group. The input data for the population exposure model were 3984 time-location patterns from Korea Time Use Survey data, outdoor PM2.5 concentrations from ambient air quality monitoring station (AQMS), and the microenvironment-to-outdoor concentration (M/O ratio) of PM2.5 at seven microenvironments in Seoul, Korea. A probabilistic approach was used to develop the Korea simulation exposure model (KoSEM). The determinants for the population exposure group were identified using a multinomial logistic regression analysis. Population exposure to PM2.5 varied significantly among the three seasons. The mean ยฑ standard deviation of population exposures to PM2.5 was 21.3 ยฑ 4.0 ฮผg/m3 in summer, 9.8 ยฑ 2.7 ฮผg/m3 in autumn, and 29.9 ยฑ 10.6 ฮผg/m3 in winter. Exposure to PM2.5 higher than 35 ฮผg/m3 mainly occurred in winter. Gender, age, working hours, and health condition were identified as significant determinants in the exposure groups. The high PM2.5 exposure group was characterized as a higher proportion of males of a lower age with fewer working hours. Study 2 (chapter 3) aimed to predict real-time indoor PM10 concentration in the daycare centers, kindergartens, and elementary schools using outdoor environmental data. Indoor PM10 concentrations were measured in 54 daycare centers, 12 kindergartens, and 21 elementary schools in Seoul, Korea, using a real-time monitor (AirGuard K) over a period of one year. Multiple linear regression models were used to predict real-time indoor PM10 concentration in these educational facilities using outdoor PM10 and meteorological data as inputs. Four formations (original, ratio of indoor-to-outdoor, root-transformation, and log-transformation) for dependent variable were compared to determine the best performance of the model. A 10-fold cross-validation method was used to evaluate the accuracy of the prediction models. Daycare centers showed the highest indoor PM10 concentration. Root-transformed models with high accuracy were developed to predict the real-time indoor PM10 concentration in educational facilities every 10 min. The R2 of the prediction models were 0.64 in the daycare centers, 0.45 in the kindergartens, and 0.43 in the elementary schools. The 24 h profile of the predicted indoor PM10 was similar to the measured PM10 concentration. Study 3 (chapter 4) aimed to determine the spatial variations of five air pollutants (PM2.5, PM10, NO2, CO, and O3) at city-scale and small-scale areas in Seoul, Korea in four seasons. Hourly concentrations of the five air pollutants at 25 AQMSs in Seoul from December 2017โ€’December 2018 were obtained from a Korean government website (AirKorea). In-situ measurements in small-scale (1 km2) areas were conducted to obtain the hourly concentrations of five air pollutants at eight monitoring sites surrounding the AQMS in Guro-gu, Seoul. Spatial autocorrelations were determined using Morans index analyses. High PM2.5 and PM10 concentrations were observed in winter, whereas high O3 concentrations occurred in spring and summer. The hourly mean concentrations of air pollutants at in-situ monitoring sites (IMSs) were generally higher than those at the nearby AQMS, whereas the O3 concentrations at IMSs were lower in spring and summer. Seasonal spatial autocorrelation patterns of air pollutants in the city-scale area did not reflect the variation in the small-scale area. Through these studies, population exposure to PM2.5 in Seoul was predicted by season using a population exposure model. The methodology could provide useful insights to conduct more accurate PM exposure assessment with less resources rather than without direct measurements. The population exposure model for PM2.5 could be used to implement effective interventions and evaluate the effectiveness of control policies to reduce exposure.๋ฏธ์„ธ๋จผ์ง€ (Particulate matter, PM)์˜ ๋…ธ์ถœ์€ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์—ญํ•™ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ํ˜ธํก๊ธฐ๊ณ„ ๋ฐ ์‹ฌํ˜ˆ๊ด€๊ณ„ ์งˆ๋ณ‘์˜ ์œ ๋ณ‘๋ฅ ๊ณผ ์กฐ๊ธฐ์‚ฌ๋ง๋ฅ ์„ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์‹œํ‚จ๋‹ค๊ณ  ๋ฐํ˜€์ง„ ๋ฐ” ์žˆ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ ์ดˆ๋ฏธ์„ธ๋จผ์ง€ (PM2.5) ๋Š” ๊ณต๊ธฐ์—ญํ•™์  ์ง๊ฒฝ์ด 2.5 ฮผm ์ธ ์ž…์ž์ƒ ๋ฌผ์งˆ๋กœ ์ž…์ž ํฌ๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ๋ฏธ์„ธํ•˜์—ฌ ํก์ž…์‹œ ์ฝ” ์ ๋ง‰์—์„œ ๊ฑธ๋Ÿฌ์ง€์ง€ ์•Š๊ณ  ํํฌ๊นŒ์ง€ ๋„๋‹ฌํ•˜์—ฌ ๋งŽ์€ ๊ฑด๊ฐ•์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์œ ๋ฐœํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ดˆ๋ฏธ์„ธ๋จผ์ง€ ๋…ธ์ถœ ๊ด€๋ฆฌ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ค‘์š”์„ฑ๊ณผ ํ•„์š”์„ฑ์€ ์ปค์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ๊ตญ๋ฏผ์˜ ๊ฑด๊ฐ•์„ ๋ณดํ˜ธํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ๊ตญ๋ฏผ์ด ๋ฏธ์„ธ๋จผ์ง€์— ์–ผ๋งˆ๋‚˜, ์–ด๋””์„œ, ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ๋…ธ์ถœ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š”์ง€๋ฅผ ํŒŒ์•…ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฐœ์ธ๋…ธ์ถœ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ํ•„์ˆ˜์ ์ด๋‹ค. ๋ฏธ์„ธ๋จผ์ง€์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฐœ์ธ์ด ๋…ธ์ถœ๋˜๋Š” ์ •๋„๋ฅผ ์ •ํ™•ํžˆ ํŒŒ์•…ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ๊ฐœ์ธ์˜ ์‹œ๊ฐ„ํ™œ๋™ํŒจํ„ด์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์–ธ์ œ (time), ์–ด๋””์„œ (microenvironment), ์–ด๋–ค ํ™œ๋™ (activity)์„ ํ–ˆ๋Š”์ง€์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์‹ค์ œ ํ™œ๋™๊ณต๊ฐ„์—์„œ์˜ ๋…ธ์ถœ ๋†๋„์™€ ๋จธ๋ฌด๋ฅธ ์‹œ๊ฐ„ํ™œ๋™ ์–‘์ƒ์„ ํŒŒ์•…ํ•˜์—ฌ์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ์ด๋Š” ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ , ๊ฒฝ์ œ์  ์ œ์•ฝ์ด ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ๋‹ค๋Š” ํ•œ๊ณ„์ ์ด ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋งŽ์€ ์—ญํ•™์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ตญ๊ฐ€ ๋Œ€๊ธฐ์ธก์ •๋ง์—์„œ ์ธก์ •๋œ ์‹ค์™ธ ๋Œ€๊ธฐ์˜ค์—ผ๋ฌผ์งˆ ๋†๋„๋ฅผ ๊ฐœ์ธ๋…ธ์ถœ ๋†๋„์™€ ๊ฐ™๋‹ค๊ณ  ๊ฐ„์ฃผํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฐœ์ธ๋…ธ์ถœ์„ ๊ฐ„์ ‘์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ถ”์ •ํ•˜๋ ค๋Š” ์‹œ๋„๋“ค์ด ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ๋งŽ์€ ์„ ํ–‰์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ์‹ค์™ธ ๋ฏธ์„ธ๋จผ์ง€ ๋†๋„๋งŒ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐœ์ธ๋…ธ์ถœ ๋†๋„๋ฅผ ์ถ”์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ๊ทธ ์˜ค์ฐจ๊ฐ€ ํฌ๋‹ค๊ณ  ๊ทœ๋ช… ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ๋ฏธ์„ธ๋จผ์ง€ ๊ฐœ์ธ๋…ธ์ถœ ํ‰๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ์‹ค๋‚ด์™€ ์‹ค์™ธ ๋ชจ๋‘์—์„œ์˜ ๋…ธ์ถœ ์ˆ˜์ค€์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์—ฌ์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋Š” ์ดˆ๋ฏธ์„ธ๋จผ์ง€ ์‹ค์™ธ๋†๋„์™€ ์‹ค๋‚ด์™ธ ๋†๋„๋น„๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•œ ์ธ๊ตฌ์ง‘๋‹จ ์ดˆ๋ฏธ์„ธ๋จผ์ง€ ๋…ธ์ถœ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜์—ฌ ์„œ์šธ ์‹œ๋ฏผ์˜ ๊ณ„์ ˆ๋ณ„ ์ดˆ๋ฏธ์„ธ๋จผ์ง€ ๋…ธ์ถœ ๋ถ„ํฌ๋ฅผ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ณ ๋…ธ์ถœ ์ธ๊ตฌ์ง‘๋‹จ์˜ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ํŒŒ์•…ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋ฉฐ, ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•œ ๋ชจ๋ธ์—์„œ ๋‚˜์•„๊ฐ€ ์ถ”ํ›„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ์ธ๊ตฌ์ง‘๋‹จ ๋…ธ์ถœ ์˜ˆ์ธก์„ ๊ณ ๋„ํ™” ์‹œํ‚ฌ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๊ณ ์ฐฐํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ฒซ๋ฒˆ์งธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ(chapter 2)๋Š” ์ธ๊ตฌ์ง‘๋‹จ ์ดˆ๋ฏธ์„ธ๋จผ์ง€ ๋…ธ์ถœ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜์—ฌ ์„œ์šธ ์‹œ๋ฏผ์˜ ๊ณ„์ ˆ๋ณ„ ์ดˆ๋ฏธ์„ธ๋จผ์ง€ ๋…ธ์ถœ๋ถ„ํฌ๋ฅผ ๋„์ถœํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ณ ๋…ธ์ถœ ์ธ๊ตฌ์ง‘๋‹จ์˜ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ํŒŒ์•…ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ์ž…๋ ฅ๊ฐ’์€ ํ†ต๊ณ„์ฒญ 2014๋…„ ์ƒํ™œ์‹œ๊ฐ„์กฐ์‚ฌ์˜ ๊ณ„์ ˆ๋ณ„ ํ‰์ผ์˜ ์„œ์šธ ์‹œ๋ฏผ ์‹œ๊ฐ„ํ™œ๋™ํŒจํ„ด 3984๊ฐœ (์—ฌ๋ฆ„: 960, ๊ฐ€์„: 1898, ๊ฒจ์šธ: 1126)์™€ 7๊ฐœ์˜ ๋ฏธ์„ธํ™˜๊ฒฝ (์ง‘, ์ง์žฅ/ํ•™๊ต, ๊ธฐํƒ€์žฅ์†Œ, ์‹๋‹น, ๋„๋ณด, ์ž๋™์ฐจ, ๋Œ€์ค‘๊ตํ†ต)์—์„œ์˜ ๊ณ„์ ˆ๋ณ„ ์ดˆ๋ฏธ์„ธ๋จผ์ง€ ๋†๋„์ด๋‹ค. ๋ฏธ์„ธํ™˜๊ฒฝ์—์„œ์˜ ์ดˆ๋ฏธ์„ธ๋จผ์ง€ ๋†๋„๋Š” ์„œ์šธ์‹œ 25๊ฐœ๊ตฌ ๋„์‹œ๋Œ€๊ธฐ์ธก์ •๋ง์—์„œ์˜ 5๊ฐœ๋…„ (2015-2019๋…„) ์‹ค์™ธ ์ดˆ๋ฏธ์„ธ๋จผ์ง€ ๋†๋„ dataset๊ณผ ๋ฏธ์„ธํ™˜๊ฒฝ ์‹ค์ธก์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์‚ฐ์ถœํ•œ ๋ฏธ์„ธํ™˜๊ฒฝ ๋ฐ ์‹ค์™ธ ๋†๋„๋น„ (M/O ratio) ๊ฐ ๋ถ„ํฌ๋ฅผ ๊ณฑํ•˜์—ฌ ์‚ฐ์ถœํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์‚ฐ์ถœํ•œ ๋ฏธ์„ธํ™˜๊ฒฝ๋ณ„ ์ดˆ๋ฏธ์„ธ๋จผ์ง€ ๋†๋„๋Š” 10๋ถ„ ๋‹จ์œ„์˜ ๊ณ„์ ˆ๋ณ„ ์‹œ๊ฐ„ํ™œ๋™ ํŒจํ„ด์— ๊ฐ๊ฐ ์ ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ํ™•๋ฅ ๋ก ์  ์˜ˆ์ธก ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ• (๋ชฌํ…Œ์นด๋ฅผ๋กœ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜)์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์„œ์šธ์‹œ๋ฏผ์˜ ๊ณ„์ ˆ๋ณ„ ์ดˆ๋ฏธ์„ธ๋จผ์ง€ ๊ฐœ์ธ๋…ธ์ถœ ๋ถ„ํฌ๋ฅผ ๋„์ถœํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. PM2.5 ๊ฐœ์ธ๋…ธ์ถœ ํ‰๊ท ์€ ์—ฌ๋ฆ„์ฒ ์— 21.3 ยฑ 4.0 ฮผg/m3 ์ด์—ˆ๊ณ , ๊ฐ€์„์ฒ ์— 9.8 ยฑ 2.7 ฮผg/m3 ์ด์—ˆ๊ณ , ๊ฒจ์šธ์ฒ ์— 29.9 ยฑ 10.6 ฮผg/m3 ์ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋…ธ์ถœ๊ตฐ์€ ๋„์ถœํ•œ ๋…ธ์ถœ ๋ถ„ํฌ์—์„œ ์ƒ์œ„ 20%์— ํ•ด๋‹นํ•˜๋Š” ์‚ฌ๋žŒ๋“ค์„ ๊ณ ๋…ธ์ถœ๊ตฐ, ํ•˜์œ„ 20%๋ฅผ ์ €๋…ธ์ถœ๊ตฐ, ๋‚˜๋จธ์ง€ 60%๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ์ค€ ๋…ธ์ถœ๊ตฐ์œผ๋กœ ์ •์˜ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ณ ๋…ธ์ถœ๊ตฐ์˜ PM2.5 ๊ฐœ์ธ๋…ธ์ถœ ํ‰๊ท ์€ 45.4 ยฑ 13.1 ฮผg/m3 ์ด์—ˆ๊ณ , ์ €๋…ธ์ถœ๊ตฐ ํ‰๊ท ์€ 20.4 ยฑ 2.1 ฮผg/m3, ๊ธฐ์ค€ ๋…ธ์ถœ๊ตฐ ํ‰๊ท ์€ 27.9 ยฑ 3.4 ฮผg/m3 ์ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ณ ๋…ธ์ถœ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ค€ ์ธ์ž๋Š” ์„ฑ๋ณ„, ๋‚˜์ด, ์ผํ•œ์‹œ๊ฐ„, ๊ฑด๊ฐ•์ƒํƒœ์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ณ ๋…ธ์ถœ๊ตฐ์€ ๋‚จ์ž์ผ์ˆ˜๋ก, ๋‚˜์ด๊ฐ€ ์–ด๋ฆด์ˆ˜๋ก, ์›”์ˆ˜์ž…์ด ๋†’๊ณ  ์ผํ•œ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ด ๊ธด ์‚ฌ๋žŒ์œผ๋กœ ํŠน์„ฑ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‘๋ฒˆ์งธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ(chapter 3)๋Š” ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์‹ค์™ธ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋“ค์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ต์œก ๊ธฐ๊ด€์—์„œ์˜ ์‹ค์‹œ๊ฐ„ ์‹ค๋‚ด ๋ฏธ์„ธ๋จผ์ง€ ๋†๋„๋ฅผ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๋Š” ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์˜ˆ์ธก ๋ชจ๋ธ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์—๋Š” ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๋ฐ˜์˜ํ•œ 4๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋ชจ๋ธ ํ˜•ํƒœ (Original, I/O ratio, Root, Log)๋ฅผ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , 9๊ฐ€์ง€ ์‹ค์™ธ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‹ค์ค‘ํšŒ๊ท€๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์‹ค์™ธ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋Š” ์‹ค์™ธ๊ณต๊ธฐ์งˆ ์ž๋ฃŒ, ์‹ค์™ธ ๊ธฐํ›„๊ด€์ธก ์ž๋ฃŒ (์˜จ๋„, ์Šต๋„, ๊ฐ•์ˆ˜๋Ÿ‰, ํ’ํ–ฅ, ํ’์†, ๊ธฐ์••, ์ผ์‚ฌ๋Ÿ‰, ์ผ์กฐ๋Ÿ‰) ์ด์—ˆ๊ณ , ๋ฐ˜์‘๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋Š” ์„œ์šธ์ด 87๊ณณ์—์„œ์˜ ๊ต์œก๊ธฐ๊ด€ (์–ด๋ฆฐ์ด์ง‘ 54๊ณณ, ์œ ์น˜์› 12๊ณณ, ์ดˆ๋“ฑํ•™๊ต 21๊ณณ) ๊ต์‹ค์—์„œ์˜ 1๋…„ ๋™์•ˆ 10๋ถ„ ๋‹จ์œ„์˜ ์‹ค์‹œ๊ฐ„ ์‹ค๋‚ด ๋ฏธ์„ธ๋จผ์ง€ ๋†๋„๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ตœ์ข… ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋œ ์˜ˆ์ธก ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๋ฃจํŠธ๋ณ€ํ˜•ํ•˜๊ณ  ์š”์ผ-์‹œ๊ฐ„ ์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ํฌํ•จํ•˜์˜€๊ณ  ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ฃผ์š”ํ•œ ์„ค๋ช…๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋Š” ์‹ค์™ธ ๋ฏธ์„ธ๋จผ์ง€ ๋†๋„์˜€๋‹ค. ์˜ˆ์ธก ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ R2๋Š” ์–ด๋ฆฐ์ด์ง‘์€ 0.64, ์œ ์น˜์›์€ 0.45, ์ดˆ๋“ฑํ•™๊ต๋Š” 0.43์ด์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ์‹ค์ธก๋œ ์‹ค๋‚ด ๋ฏธ์„ธ๋จผ์ง€ ๋†๋„์˜ ์‹œ๊ฐ„๋Œ€๋ณ„ ์ถ”์ด๋ฅผ ์ž˜ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜์—ฌ ์ข‹์€ ์˜ˆ์ธก๋ ฅ์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋ƒˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์‹ค๋‚ด ์˜ˆ์ธก ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ์ง์ ‘ ์ธก์ •์„ ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋”๋ผ๋„ ๊ณต๊ฐœ๋œ ๊ตญ๊ฐ€์ž๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์‹ค๋‚ด ๋ฏธ์„ธ๋จผ์ง€ ๋†๋„ ์˜ˆ์ธก ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์คฌ์œผ๋ฉฐ ๋ณธ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋…ธ์ถœ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ค‘์žฌ (Intervention)๋ฅผ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์„ธ๋ฒˆ์งธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ(chapter 4)๋Š” ์„œ์šธ์‹œ ๋‚ด ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ํฌ๊ธฐ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ city-scale๊ณผ ๋ณด๋‹ค ๋” ์ž‘์€ 1 km2์˜ ์ž‘์€ ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ๋‹จ์œ„ (small-scale)๋กœ ๋‚˜๋ˆ„์–ด 5๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋Œ€๊ธฐ์˜ค์—ผ๋ฌผ์งˆ (PM10, PM2.5, NO2, CO, O3) ๋†๋„์˜ ๊ณ„์ ˆ๋ณ„ ๊ณต๊ฐ„์  ํŒจํ„ด์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ํŒŒ์•…ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋Œ€๊ธฐ์˜ค์—ผ๋ฌผ์งˆ์˜ ์‹œ๊ณต๊ฐ„์  ๋†๋„ ๋ณ€์ด์˜ ์ดํ•ด์™€ ๊ณ ์ฐฐ์„ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ ์‹ค์™ธ๋†๋„๋ฅผ ๊ฐœ์ธ๋…ธ์ถœ ํ‰๊ฐ€์— ์ ์šฉํ•œ๋‹ค๋ฉด ๋ณด๋‹ค ๋” ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ๊ฐœ์ธ๋…ธ์ถœ ํ‰๊ฐ€๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๋‹ค. 2017๋…„ 12์›”๋ถ€ํ„ฐ 2018๋…„ 12์›”๊นŒ์ง€์˜ ์„œ์šธ์‹œ 25๊ฐœ๊ตฌ ๋„์‹œ๋Œ€๊ธฐ์ธก์ •๋ง์—์„œ์˜ ๋Œ€๊ธฐ์˜ค์—ผ๋ฌผ์งˆ ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ๋†๋„๋Š” ์—์–ด์ฝ”๋ฆฌ์•„ ํ™ˆํŽ˜์ด์ง€ (http://www.airkorea.or.kr)์—์„œ ๋‹ค์šด๋กœ๋“œ ๋ฐ›์•˜๋‹ค. ๊ตฌ๋กœ๊ตฌ ๋‚ด ์ž‘์€ ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ๋‹จ์œ„ (1 km2)์—์„œ ๋Œ€๊ธฐ์˜ค์—ผ๋ฌผ์งˆ ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ๋†๋„๋Š” ๋„์‹œ๋Œ€๊ธฐ์ธก์ •๋ง์˜ ์ธก์ •๋ฒ•๊ณผ ๋™์ผํ•œ ๊ณต์ •์‹œํ—˜๊ธฐ์ค€์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ธก์ • ์ง€์ ์€ ์„œ์šธ์‹œ ๊ตฌ๋กœ๊ตฌ ๋„์‹œ๋Œ€๊ธฐ์ธก์ •๋ง 1๊ณณ์„ ๊ธฐ์ค€์œผ๋กœ 5 km x 5 km test-bed๋ฅผ ์„ค์ •ํ•˜์—ฌ 1 km2 ํฌ๊ธฐ์˜ ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ๋‹จ์œ„๋กœ 8๊ณณ์„ ์„ ์ •ํ•˜๊ณ , ํ•œ ๊ณ„์ ˆ๋‹น ๊ฐ ์ง€์ ์—์„œ ์•ฝ 10์ผ ๋™์•ˆ ๋†๋„๋ฅผ 4๊ณ„์ ˆ ๋ฐ˜๋ณต ์ธก์ •ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ถ„์„ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ Morans ์ง€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋Œ€๊ธฐ์˜ค์—ผ๋ฌผ์งˆ ๋†๋„์˜ ์ „์—ญ์ , ๊ตญ์ง€์  ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ์ž๊ธฐ์ƒ๊ด€์„ฑ์„ ํŒŒ์•…ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. 25๊ฐœ๊ตฌ ๋„์‹œ ๋Œ€๊ธฐ์ธก์ •๋ง์—์„œ์˜ ๋Œ€๊ธฐ ์˜ค์—ผ๋ฌผ์งˆ ๋†๋„์™€ ๋ณด๋‹ค ๋” 8๊ณณ์˜ ์ž‘์€ ๊ณต๊ฐ„๋‹จ์œ„์—์„œ์˜ ์˜ค์—ผ๋ฌผ์งˆ ๋†๋„๋Š” ๊ณ„์ ˆ๋ณ„๋กœ ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ์ฐจ์ด๋ฅผ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋ƒˆ๋‹ค. ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋„์‹œ๋Œ€๊ธฐ์ธก์ •๋ง์—์„œ์˜ ์˜ค์—ผ๋ฌผ์งˆ ๋†๋„๊ฐ€ ๋†’์•˜์ง€๋งŒ ์˜ค์กด์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๋ด„๊ณผ ์—ฌ๋ฆ„์— ๋” ์ž‘์€ ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ๋‹จ์œ„์—์„œ์˜ ๋†๋„๊ฐ€ ๋” ๋†’์•˜๋‹ค. 25๊ฐœ๊ตฌ ๋„์‹œ ๋Œ€๊ธฐ์ธก์ •๋ง์˜ ๋†๋„๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•œ ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ์ž๊ธฐ์ƒ๊ด€์„ฑ์€ ๊ตฌ๋กœ๊ตฌ ๋‚ด 8๊ณณ์˜ ์ž‘์€ ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ๋‹จ์œ„์˜ ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ์ž๊ธฐ์ƒ๊ด€์„ฑ๊ณผ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ํŒจํ„ด์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด์–ด ์ž‘์€ ๊ณต๊ฐ„๊นŒ์ง€ ๋Œ€๋ณ€ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์—†์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณด๋‹ค ๋” ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ๋Œ€๊ธฐ์˜ค์—ผ๋ฌผ์งˆ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฐœ์ธ๋…ธ์ถœ์„ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” city-scale๋ณด๋‹ค ๋” ์ž‘์€ ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ๋‹จ์œ„์˜ ๋Œ€๊ธฐ์˜ค์—ผ๋ฌผ์งˆ ๋†๋„ ๋ณ€์ด๊ฐ€ ๊ณ ๋ ค ๋˜์–ด์•ผ ํ•˜๊ฒ ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ธ๊ตฌ์ง‘๋‹จ ๋…ธ์ถœ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜์—ฌ ์„œ์šธ ์‹œ๋ฏผ์˜ ์ดˆ๋ฏธ์„ธ๋จผ์ง€ ๋…ธ์ถœ ๋ถ„ํฌ๋ฅผ ๋„์ถœํ•˜์˜€๊ณ  ๊ณ ๋…ธ์ถœ์˜ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ํŒŒ์•…ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋…ธ์ถœ ์ค‘์žฌ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ณผํ•™์ ์ธ ๊ทผ๊ฑฐ๋ฅผ ๋งˆ๋ จํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•œ ์ดˆ๋ฏธ์„ธ๋จผ์ง€ ์ธ๊ตฌ์ง‘๋‹จ ๋…ธ์ถœ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ฐœ์ธ๋…ธ์ถœ์„ ์ง์ ‘ ์ธก์ •์„ ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์•„๋„ ๊ฐœ์ธ์˜ ๋…ธ์ถœ ์ˆ˜์ค€์„ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์–ด ๊ฒฝ์ œ์ ์ธ ๋…ธ์ถœํ‰๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ๊ถ๊ทน์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ดˆ๋ฏธ์„ธ๋จผ์ง€ ๊ณ ๋…ธ์ถœ ์ธ๊ตฌ์ง‘๋‹จ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ตญ๊ฐ€ ์ •์ฑ… ์ˆ˜๋ฆฝ์˜ ๊ธฐ์ดˆ์ž๋ฃŒ๋กœ ํ™œ์šฉ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๋ณด๋‹ค ๋” ์‹ค์ œ ๋…ธ์ถœ์„ ๋ฐ˜์˜ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋…ธ์ถœํ‰๊ฐ€ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ๋ณด์™„, ๋ฐœ์ „์‹œํ‚ฌ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ถ”ํ›„ ์ธ๊ตฌ์ง‘๋‹จ ๋…ธ์ถœํ‰๊ฐ€์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ •ํ™•๋„์™€ ํ™œ์šฉ๋„๋ฅผ ๋†’์ผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ํ†ต์ฐฐ๋ ฅ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์‹ค๋‚ด ๋ฏธ์„ธํ™˜๊ฒฝ์˜ ๋ฏธ์„ธ๋จผ์ง€ ๋†๋„๋ฅผ ์‹ค์™ธ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋งŒ์œผ๋กœ๋„ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๊ณ  ์‹ค์™ธ ๋ฏธ์„ธ๋จผ์ง€ ๋†๋„๋ฅผ ์ธ๊ตฌ์ง‘๋‹จ ๋…ธ์ถœ๋ชจ๋ธ์— ์ ์šฉ์‹œ ์˜ˆ์ธก ๊ณต๊ฐ„์˜ ๋‹จ์œ„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‹ ์ค‘ํ•œ ์ ‘๊ทผ ๊ด€์ ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํ–ฅํ›„ ์ถ”๊ฐ€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ดˆ๋ฏธ์„ธ๋จผ์ง€ ์ธ๊ตฌ์ง‘๋‹จ ๋…ธ์ถœ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ๊ตญ๋‚ด ๋‹ค๋ฅธ์ง€์—ญ, ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๋Œ€๊ธฐ์˜ค์—ผ๋ฌผ์งˆ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ํ™•๋Œ€, ์ ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•œ ๋…ธ์ถœํ‰๊ฐ€ ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ๋ฒ”์šฉ์„ฑ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค.Chapter I. Introduction 1 1.1. Background 2 1.2. Objectives 24 References 27 Chapter II. A model for population exposure to PM2.5: Identification of determinants for high population exposure in Seoul 34 2.1. Introduction 35 2.2. Methods 39 2.3. Results 47 2.4. Discussion 60 2.5. Conclusions 65 References 66 Chapter III. Prediction models using outdoor environmental data for real-time PM10 concentrations in daycare centers, kindergartens, and elementary schools 72 3.1. Introduction 73 3.2. Methods 76 3.3. Results 80 3.4. Discussion 92 3.5. Conclusions 97 References 98 Chapter IV. Seasonal spatial variation of five air pollutants (PM2.5, PM10, NO2, CO, and O3) at city-scale and small-scale areas in Seoul 104 4.1. Introduction 105 4.2. Methods 108 4.3. Results 116 4.4. Discussion 128 4.5. Conclusions 133 References 134 Chapter V. Summary and Conclusions 142 Supplements 146 ๊ตญ๋ฌธ์ดˆ๋ก 178 List of Tables . Table 1-1. KAAQSs by criteria air pollutants 4 Table 1-2. IAQ standards and guideline (PM2.5, PM10, CO2, CO, and NO2) in indoor multi-use facilities managed by the Korea Ministry of Environment 6 Table 1-3. Seasonal times spent for Seoul population in 2014 11 Table 1-4. Summary of population exposure models to air pollutants in previous studies 20 Table 1-5. A summary of refinement of KoSEM in this study 23 Table 2-1. Times spent in different microenvironments by season. 48 Table 2-2. Descriptive statistics of the PM2.5 M/O ratio in various microen vironments by season 52 Table 2-3. Demographic and socio-economic characteristics of the exposure groups for PM2.5 56 Table 2-4. Determinants associated with the PM2.5 exposure group by a multinomial logistic regression model 59 Table 3-1. Descriptive statistics of the average indoor and outdoor variables during one year 81 Table 3-2. Spearman correlation coefficients among indoor PM10 concen tration, outdoor PM10 concentration, and meteorological variables 83 Table 3-3. The comparison of the RMSE (ฮผg/m3) among the four types of transformed models with day-time predictor 85 Table 3-4. The rate of exceeding the KAAQS of PM10 (75 ฮผg/m3) 90 Table 3-5. Agreement of measured PM10 (Standard of > 75 ฮผg/m3) and diff erent levels of predicted 10 min PM10 91 Table 4-1. The noncompliance rates (%) of the KAAQSs of air pollutants by season 119 Table 4-2. Pearson correlation coefficients among five air pollutants in 25 AQMSs in Seoul (gray) and IMSs in Guro-gu, Seoul (white) by season 121 Table 4-3. Pearson correlation coefficients of five air pollutants between IMSs and AQMS by season 122 Table 4-4. Global spatial autocorrelation analysis of air pollutants at 25 AQ MSs in Seoul over four seasons 123 Table 4-5. Global spatial autocorrelation analysis of air pollutants at 8 IMSs in Guro-gu over four seasons 124 List of Figures . Figure 1-1. The overall outline of the study 26 Figure 2-1. Structure of the KoSEM II-PM2.5 44 Figure 2-2. Daily average of outdoor PM2.5 concentrations by season from 2015โ€’2019 50 Figure 2-3. Cumulative frequency of population exposures to PM2.5 by season using a probabilistic simulation 54 Figure 3-1. Comparison between the measured and predicted indoor PM10 concentration every 10 min during 24 h 88 Figure 4-1. Locations of monitoring sites in Seoul. Yellow star represents AQMSs and blue squares represents IMSs 109 Figure 4-2. Hourly concentrations of air pollutants at 25 AQMSs (blue), 1 AQMS in Guro-gu (pink), and 8 IMSs in Guro-gu (white) 118 Figure 4-3. LMIs of air pollutants in eight IMSs by season 127 List of Supplements . Table S-1. IAQ standards and guidelines in indoor multi-use facilities 147 Table S-2. IAQ guidelines in public transportations managed by the Korea Ministry of Environment 148 Table S-3. IAQ standards and guidelines in kindergartens, schools, and university managed by the Korea Ministry of Education 149 Table S-4. IAQ standards in workplace managed by Korea Ministry of Employment and Labor 150 Table S-5. Descriptive statistics of socio-demographic characteristics of population by seasons 151 Table S-6. Specifications of the MicroPEM 153 Table S-7. Sample size of microenvironment measurement 154 Table S-8. Means of PM2.5 concentrations in the seven microenvironments by season 155 Table S-9. Specifications of the AirGuard K 156 Table S-10. Outdoor environmental parameters as input variable for multiple linear regression models 157 Table S-11. Time Tables at educational facilities 159 Table S-12. KAAQSs of air pollutants 160 Table S-13. Latitude and longitude of monitoring sites in Seoul 161 Table S-14. Measurement schedules in eight IMSs over one year 162 Table S-15. Means of PM2.5 concentrations (ฮผg/m3) both IMSs and AQMS in Guro-gu 163 Table S-16. Means of PM10 concentrations (ฮผg/m3) both IMSs and AQMS in Guro-gu 164 Table S-17. Means of NO2 concentrations (ppm) both IMSs and AQMS in Guro-gu 165 Table S-18. Means of CO concentrations (ppm) both IMSs and AQMS in Guro-gu 166 Table S-19. Means of O3 concentrations (ppm) both IMSs and AQMS in Guro-gu 167 Table S-20. LMIs of PM2.5 at 25 AQMSs in Seoul by season 168 Table S-21. LMIs of PM10 at 25 AQMSs in Seoul by season 169 Table S-22. LMIs of NO2 at 25 AQMSs in Seoul by season 170 Table S-23. LMIs of CO at 25 AQMSs in Seoul by season 171 Table S-24. LMIs of O3 at 25 AQMSs in Seoul by season 172โ€ƒ Figure S-1. 24-h profiles of hourly average of outdoor PM2.5 concentrations over 5 year 173 Figure S-2. Scatter plots in educational facilities 174 Figure S-3. Relationship between gravimetric measurement and AirGuard K concentration using 2-day average of PM10 176 Figure S-4. Location of AQMSs and educational facilities in Seoul 177๋ฐ•

    Estimation of ground-level particulate matter concentrations through the synergistic use of satellite observations and process-based models over South Korea

    Get PDF
    Long-term exposure to particulate matter (PM) with aerodynamic diameters &lt; 10 (PM10) and 2.5 mu m (PM2.5) has negative effects on human health. Although station-based PM monitoring has been conducted around the world, it is still challenging to provide spatially continuous PM information for vast areas at high spatial resolution. Satellite-derived aerosol information such as aerosol optical depth (AOD) has been frequently used to investigate ground-level PM concentrations. In this study, we combined multiple satellite-derived products including AOD with model-based meteorological parameters (i. e., dew-point temperature, wind speed, surface pressure, planetary boundary layer height, and relative humidity) and emission parameters (i. e., NO, NH3, SO2, primary organic aerosol (POA), and HCHO) to estimate surface PM concentrations over South Korea. Random forest (RF) machine learning was used to estimate both PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations with a total of 32 parameters for 2015-2016. The results show that the RF-based models produced good performance resulting in R-2 values of 0.78 and 0.73 and root mean square errors (RMSEs) of 17.08 and 8.25 mu gm(-3) for PM10 and PM2.5, respectively. In particular, the proposed models successfully estimated high PM concentrations. AOD was identified as the most significant for esti-mating ground-level PM concentrations, followed by wind speed, solar radiation, and dew-point temperature. The use of aerosol information derived from a geostationary satellite sensor (i. e., Geostationary Ocean Color Imager, GOCI) resulted in slightly higher accuracy for estimating PM concentrations than that from a polar-orbiting sensor system (i. e., the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer, MODIS). The proposed RF models yielded better performance than the process-based approaches, particularly in improving on the underestimation of the process-based models (i. e., GEOS-Chem and the Community Multiscale Air Quality Modeling System, CMAQ)

    Ambient particulate matter (PM10) concentrations in major urban areas of Korea during 1996โ€“2010

    Get PDF
    AbstractIn this study, ambient particulate matter pollution was investigated using monthly PM10 concentration data collected from seven major cities in Korea from 1996 to 2010. The highest mean value for the whole study period is seen from the capital city, Seoul (63.2ยฑ17.9ฮผg mโ€“3), while the lowest is from Ulsan (46.7ยฑ14.8ฮผg mโ€“3). The concentrations of PM10 in all cities exhibited seasonal variations with the peak values occurring consistently in spring (March or April). The PM10 data in each city consistently exhibited strong correlations (p<0.01) with gaseous pollutants (SO2, NO2, and CO), except for O3 (p>0.05). The analysis of long term trends of PM10 levels indicates a weak but consistent decline in concentrations in most cities with the relative average annual reductions of between 0.4 and 2.8% yโ€“1

    Spatiotemporal variations of air pollutants (O-3, NO2, SO2, CO, PM10, and VOCs) with land-use types

    Get PDF
    The spatiotemporal variations of surface air pollutants (O-3, NO2, SO2, CO, and PM10) with four land-use types, residence (R), commerce (C), industry (I) and greenbelt (G), have been investigated at 283 stations in South Korea during 2002-2013, using routinely observed data. The volatile organic compound (VOC) data at nine photochemical pollutant monitoring stations available since 2007 were utilized in order to examine their effect on the ozone chemistry. The land-use types, set by the Korean government, were generally consistent with the satellite-derived land covers and with the previous result showing anti-correlation between O-3 and NO2 in diverse urban areas. The relationship between the two pollutants in the Seoul Metropolitan Area (SMA) residence land-use areas was substantially different from that outside of the SMA, probably due to the local differences in vehicle emissions. The highest concentrations of air pollutants in the diurnal, weekly, and annual cycles were found in industry for SO2 and PMPM10, in commerce for NO2 and CO, and in greenbelt for O-3. The concentrations of air pollutants, except for O-3, were generally higher in big cities during weekdays, while O-3 showed its peak in suburban areas or small cities during weekends. The weekly cycle and trends of O-3 were significantly out of phase with those of NO2, particularly in the residential and commercial areas, suggesting that vehicle emission was a major source in those areas. The ratios of VOCs to NO2 for each of the land-use types were in the order of I (10.2) &gt; C (8.7) &gt; G (3.9) &gt; R (3.6), suggesting that most areas in South Korea were likely to be VOC-limited for ozone chemistry. The pollutants (NO2, SO2, CO, and PMPM10 except for O-3 have decreased, most likely due to the effective government control. The total oxidant values (OX = O-3 + NO2) with the land-use types were analyzed for the local and regional (or background) contributions of O-3, respectively, and the order of OX (ppb) was C (57.4) &gt; R (53.6) &gt; I (50.7) &gt; G (45.4), indicating the greenbelt observation was close to the backgroundopen

    SOURCE IDENTIFICATION OF PM10 AND SO2 IN A MULTI-INDUSTRIAL CITY OF KOREA

    Get PDF
    Department of Urban and Environmental Engineering (Environmental Science and Engineering)Ulsan is the largest industrial city of South Korea. A large area of the city is covered by automobile, shipbuilding, petrochemical, and non-ferrous industrial complexes. Among criteria air pollutants (CAPs), particulate matters (PM) and sulfur dioxide (SO2) directly related to the main industries are major environmental concerns in Ulsan. Basically, the effect of local sources is crucial for these pollutants. Also, long-range atmospheric transport (LRAT) from China is an important source of CAPs, especially for PM10. However, there has been no studies dealing with LRAT and local pollution of CAPs together in Ulsan. In this study, we collected and interpreted hourly data on CAPs measured at 14 automatic monitoring stations. The conditional bivariate probability function (CBPF), a receptor model, was used in order to identify local pollution sources of PM10 and SO2. An air dispersion model, California puff (CALPUFF), was also used to evaluate the influence of the industrial emissions by using 2012 Clean Air Policy Support System (CAPSS) data. The correlation analysis between the concentrations derived by CALPUFF and the monitoring data was conducted to identify the influence of local industrial sources. For LRAT of PM10, the potential source contribution function (PSCF) and cluster analysis of back-trajectories were performed. Totally, the monitoring data, modelling results, and back-trajectory data were derived at the hourly data set. These parameters were processed using statistical analysis, such as c-tree and random forest to assess the major sources between local and LRAT effects for each month. The hourly data of PM10 showed the highest level in April and May and the lowest in August and December. Besides, the highest and the lowest concentrations of SO2 were observed in July and December, respectively. CBPF results indicated that the petrochemical industry and road traffic were the main local sources of PM10, whereas SO2 concentration was greatly influenced by the petrochemical industry. From CALPUFF results, both PM10 and SO2 were dispersed from the industrial areas to the residential areas in summer. The PSCF and cluster analysis results showed the potential LRAT sources of PM10 was china in spring. Lastly, the importance between the local and LRAT impacts in each month was identified by the statistical analysis. The local impacts of PM10 and SO2 were the largest in summer and decreased in winter. The LRAT of PM10 was observed when high levels of PM coming from China occurred in spring. This study can be a basis to identify the local and long-distance sources of CAPs in other cities.clos

    Possible link between Arctic Sea ice and January PM10 concentrations in South Korea

    Get PDF
    In this study, we investigated the possible teleconnection between PM10 concentrations in South Korea and Arctic Sea ice concentrations at inter-annual time scales using observed PM10 data from South Korea, NCEP R2 data, and NOAA Sea Ice Concentration (SIC) data from 2001 to 2018. From the empirical orthogonal function (EOF) analysis, we found that the first mode (TC1) was a large-scale mode for PM10 in South Korea and explained about 27.4% of the total variability. Interestingly, the TC1 is more dominantly influenced by the horizontal ventilation effect than the vertical atmospheric stability effect. The pollution potential index (PPI), which is defined by the weighted average of the two ventilation effects, is highly correlated with the TC1 of PM10 at a correlation coefficient of 0.75, indicating that the PPI is a good measure for PM10 in South Korea at inter-annual time scales. Regression maps show that the decrease of SIC over the Barents Sea is significantly correlated with weakening of high pressure over the Ural mountain range region, the anomalous high pressure at 500 hPa over the Korean peninsula, and the weakening of the Siberian High and Aleutian low. Moreover, these patterns are similar to the correlation pattern with the PPI, suggesting that the variability of SIC over the Barents Sea may play an important role in modulating the variability of PM10 in South Korea through teleconnection from the Barents Sea to the Korean peninsula via Eurasia

    2012-2018๋…„ ํ•œ๋ฐ˜๋„ ์‹œ์ • ๋ณ€ํ™”์™€ ๊ธฐ์—ฌ์š”์ธ ๋ถ„์„

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (์„์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ์ž์—ฐ๊ณผํ•™๋Œ€ํ•™ ์ง€๊ตฌํ™˜๊ฒฝ๊ณผํ•™๋ถ€, 2020. 8. ๋ฐ•๋ก์ง„.Visibility is determined by light extinctions due to gases and particles in the atmosphere as well as meteorological conditions. In particular, fine particular matters (PM) are one of important factors for affecting visibility, which is thus known to be a representative indicator of sensible air pollution. Despite of continued decreases of PM concentrations in South Korea, the public, however, perceive that PM air pollution in South Korea has worsened over the past. To understand and explain this disparity, we here use long-term hourly visibility observations at six sites in South Korea for 2012-2018 and analyze contributing factors to their variations including PM concentrations, and its chemical compositions along with meteorological conditions. We find that annual mean visibility in Seoul and Daejeon has improved by 0.7 km and 0.4 km, respectively, for the past 7 years, while Gwangju, Ulsan, Jeju, and Baengnyeong have shown its degradations by 0.7 km, 2.9 km, 0.6 km, 1.4 km for the same period. For high PM seasons, the frequency of hourly poor visibility (< 6.7 km) in Seoul, however, has increased by 11% in winter and Daejeon has also shown an increase of poor visibility frequency by 13% in spring. The frequencies of hourly poor visibility in Gwangju, Ulsan, and Baengnyeong have increased by 9%, 15%, 13%, respectively, regardless of seasons. Our analysis reveals that PM composition changes from sulfate to nitrate aerosols are a major factor for increasing hourly poor visibility frequencies in Seoul, Daejeon, and Baengnyeong, whereas meteorological conditions including relative humidity and windspeed changes are important factors for visibility degradations in Gwangju, Ulsan, and Jeju. We find that nitrate aerosols account for about 53% of visibility degradations in all regions. Increases of nitrate aerosol concentrations are driven by NOx emission changes and the reduction of sulfate aerosol concentrations, which makes additional NH3 available for ammonium nitrate production in the atmosphere.์‹œ์ •์€ ๋Œ€๊ธฐ์˜ ํ˜ผํƒ๋„๋ฅผ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด๋Š” ์ฒ™๋„๋กœ์จ ๊ณต๊ธฐ ์ค‘์˜ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๊ฐ€์Šค์ƒ ๋ฌผ์งˆ๊ณผ ์ž…์ž์ƒ ๋ฌผ์งˆ๋“ค์˜ ๋น› ์‚ฐ๋ž€๊ณผ ๊ธฐ์ƒ ์กฐ๊ฑด์— ์˜ํ•ด ๊ฒฐ์ •๋œ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ ์ฒด๊ฐ ๋Œ€๊ธฐ์˜ค์—ผ์˜ ๋Œ€ํ‘œ์ ์ธ ์ง€ํ‘œ๋กœ ์•Œ๋ ค์ง„ ๋ฏธ์„ธ๋จผ์ง€๋Š” ์‹œ์ •์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ผ์น˜๋Š” ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ๋ฌผ์งˆ ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜์ด๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ํ•œ๊ตญ์˜ ๋ฏธ์„ธ๋จผ์ง€ ๋†๋„๊ฐ€ ์ง€์†ํ•ด์„œ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๋Š” ์ถ”์„ธ์ž„์—๋„ ๋ถˆ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ , ๊ตญ๋ฏผ๋“ค์€ ๊ณผ๊ฑฐ๋ณด๋‹ค ํ•œ๊ตญ์˜ ๋Œ€๊ธฐ์˜ค์—ผ์ด ๋” ์•…ํ™”๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค๊ณ  ์ธ์‹ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์ธ์‹์˜ ์ฐจ์ด๋ฅผ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๊ณ  ์„ค๋ช…ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด 2012๋…„๋ถ€ํ„ฐ 2018๋…„ ๋™์•ˆ ํ•œ๊ตญ์˜ 6๊ฐœ ์ง€์—ญ์—์„œ ๊ด€์ธก๋œ ์‹œ์ • ์ž๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ, ๋ฏธ์„ธ๋จผ์ง€๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜๋Š” ์„ฑ๋ถ„ ๋†๋„(์งˆ์‚ฐ์—ผ, ํ™ฉ์‚ฐ์—ผ, ์œ ๊ธฐ ํƒ„์†Œ, ์›์†Œ ํƒ„์†Œ)์™€ ๊ธฐ์ƒ ์กฐ๊ฑด(์ƒ๋Œ€์Šต๋„, ํ’์† ๋“ฑ)์ด ์‹œ์ •๊ณผ ์ €์‹œ์ •์˜ ๋นˆ๋„์œจ ๋ณ€ํ™”์— ์–ผ๋งˆ๋‚˜ ๊ธฐ์—ฌํ•˜๋Š”์ง€๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์„œ์šธ๊ณผ ๋Œ€์ „์˜ ์—ฐํ‰๊ท  ์‹œ์ •์€ ์ง€๋‚œ 7๋…„ ๋™์•ˆ ๊ฐ๊ฐ 0.7 km, 0.4 km์”ฉ ๊ฐœ์„ ๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ด‘์ฃผ, ์šธ์‚ฐ, ์ œ์ฃผ, ๋ฐฑ๋ น๋„๋Š” ๊ฐ๊ฐ 0.7 km, 2.9 km, 0.6 km, 1.4 km์”ฉ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ด‘์ฃผ์™€ ์šธ์‚ฐ, ๋ฐฑ๋ น๋„๋Š” ๊ณ„์ ˆ๊ณผ ๊ด€๊ณ„์—†์ด ์ €์‹œ์ • ๋นˆ๋„์œจ์ด ๊ฐ๊ฐ 9%, 15%, 13%์”ฉ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•œ ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด, ์„œ์šธ์€ ๊ฒจ์šธ์—, ๋Œ€์ „์€ ๋ด„์— ํ•œ์ •ํ•˜์—ฌ11%, 13%์”ฉ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์„œ์šธ๊ณผ ๋Œ€์ „, ๋ฐฑ๋ น๋„์˜ ์ €์‹œ์ • ๋นˆ๋„์œจ์˜ ์ฆ๊ฐ€๋Š” ๋ฏธ์„ธ๋จผ์ง€๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜๋Š” ์ฃผ์š” ์„ฑ๋ถ„์ด ํ™ฉ์‚ฐ์—ผ์—์„œ ์งˆ์‚ฐ์—ผ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณ€ํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š”๋ฐ, ์ด์— ๋ฐ˜ํ•ด ๊ด‘์ฃผ, ์šธ์‚ฐ, ์ œ์ฃผ๋„์˜ ์‹œ์ • ์ €ํ•˜์—๋Š” ์ƒ๋Œ€์Šต๋„์™€ ํ’์†์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”๊ฐ€ ๋” ํฌ๊ฒŒ ๊ธฐ์—ฌํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์Œ์„ ์•Œ์•„๋‚ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ๋ชจ๋“  ์ง€์—ญ์—์„œ ๋ฏธ์„ธ๋จผ์ง€ ์„ฑ๋ถ„๋“ค ์ค‘ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ์‹œ์ • ์ €ํ•˜์— ๊ธฐ์—ฌํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฌผ์งˆ์€ ์งˆ์‚ฐ์—ผ์œผ๋กœ 53% ๊ธฐ์—ฌํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์งˆ์‚ฐ์—ผ์˜ ๋†๋„ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋Š” ์งˆ์†Œ์‚ฐํ™”๋ฌผ์˜ ๋ฐฐ์ถœ๋Ÿ‰ ๋ณ€ํ™”์™€ ํ™ฉ์‚ฐ์—ผ ๋†๋„์˜ ๊ฐ์†Œ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ๋Œ€๊ธฐ ์ค‘์˜ ์•”๋ชจ๋‹ˆ์•„ ์ƒ์„ฑ์œผ๋กœ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค.1. Introduction 8 2. Methods 12 2.1 Observations 12 2.2 Data reconstruction 15 2.3 Poor visibility frequency 18 3. Results and Discussion 19 3.1 Annual visibility trend 19 3.2 Poor visibility analysis 23 3.3 Conditions affecting poor visibility 29 3.4 Variations of nitrate and sulfate 33 4. Summary and Conclusions 38 BIBLIOGRAPY 40 ๊ตญ๋ฌธ ์ดˆ๋ก 44Maste

    Meteorological characteristics and assessment of the effect of local emissions during high PM10 concentration in the Seoul Metropolitan Area

    Get PDF
    In this study, we investigate the meteorological characteristics and the effect of local emissions during high PM10 concentrations in the Seoul Metropolitan Area (SMA) by utilizing data from a high-resolution urban meteorological observation system network (UMS-Seoul) and The Air Pollution Model (TAPM). For a detailed analysis, days with PM10 concentrations higher than 80 ??g m-3 for daily average PM10 concentration (classified as unhealthy by the Korean Ministry of Environment) in the Seoul Metropolitan Area (SMA) were classified into 3 Cases. Case I was defined as when the prevailing effect was from outside the SMA. Case II was defined as when the prevailing effect was a local effect with outside. Case III was defined as when the prevailing effect was local. Overall, high PM10 concentrations in the SMA mostly occurred under weak migratory anticyclone systems over the Korean Peninsula during warm temperatures. Prior to the PM10 concentration reaching the peak concentration, the pattern in each case was distinctive. After peak concentrations, however, the pattern for the 3 cases became less distinct. This study showed that nearly 50% of the high PM10 concentrations in the SMA occurred in spring and were governed by the conditions for Case II more than these for Cases I and III. In spring, the main sources of the high PM10 concentrations in the SMA were local emissions due to the predominance of weak winds and local circulation. The simulation showed that the non-SMA emissions were about 63 to 73% contribution to the spring high PM10 concentrations in the SMA. Specifically, local point sources including industrial combustion, electric utility, incineration and cement production facilities scattered around the SMA and could account for PM10 concentrations more than 10 ??g m-3 in the SMA
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore