Cryptanalysis of the Randomized Version of a Lattice-Based Signature Scheme from PKC'08

International audienceIn PKC'08, Plantard, Susilo and Win proposed a lattice-based signature scheme, whose security is based on the hardness of the closest vector problem with the infinity norm (CVP∞). This signature scheme was proposed as a countermeasure against the Nguyen-Regev attack, which improves the security and the efficiency of the Goldreich, Goldwasser and Halevi scheme (GGH). Furthermore, to resist potential side channel attacks, the authors suggested modifying the determinis-tic signing algorithm to be randomized. In this paper, we propose a chosen message attack against the randomized version. Note that the randomized signing algorithm will generate different signature vectors in a relatively small cube for the same message, so the difference of any two signature vectors will be relatively short lattice vector. Once collecting enough such short difference vectors, we can recover the whole or the partial secret key by lattice reduction algorithms, which implies that the randomized version is insecure under the chosen message attack

LLL for ideal lattices re-evaluation of the security of Gentry-Halevi\u27s FHE scheme

The LLL algorithm, named after its inventors, Lenstra, Lenstra and Lovász, is one of themost popular lattice reduction algorithms in the literature. In this paper, we propose the first variant of LLL algorithm that is dedicated for ideal lattices, namely, the iLLL algorithm. Our iLLL algorithm takes advantage of the fact that within LLL procedures, previously reduced vectors can be re-used for further reductions. Using this method, we prove that the iLLL is at least as fast as the LLL algorithm, and it outputs a basis with the same quality. We also provide a heuristic approach that accelerates the re-use method. As a result, in practice, our algorithm can be approximately eight times faster than LLL algorithm for typical scenarios where lattice dimension is between 100 and 150. When applying our algorithm to the Gentry–Halevi’s fully homomorphic challenges, we are able to solve the toy challenge within 24 days using a 2.66GHz CPU, while with the classical LLL algorithm, it takes 32 days. Further, assuming a 4.0GHz CPU, we predict to reduce the basis in 15.7 years for the small challenges, while previous best prediction was 45 years

Comparison between Subfield and Straightforward Attacks on NTRU

Recently in two independent papers, Albrecht, Bai and Ducas and Cheon, Jeong and Lee presented two very similar attacks, that allow to break NTRU with larger parameters and GGH Multinear Map without zero encodings. They proposed an algorithm for recovering the NTRU secret key given the public key which apply for large NTRU modulus, in particular to Fully Homomorphic Encryption schemes based on NTRU. Hopefully, these attacks do not endanger the security of the NTRUE NCRYPT scheme, but shed new light on the hardness of this problem. The basic idea of both attacks relies on decreasing the dimension of the NTRU lattice using the multiplication matrix by the norm (resp. trace) of the public key in some subfield instead of the public key itself. Since the dimension of the subfield is smaller, the dimension of the lattice decreases, and lattice reduction algorithm will perform better. Here, we revisit the attacks on NTRU and propose another variant that is simpler and outperforms both of these attacks in practice. It allows to break several concrete instances of YASHE, a NTRU-based FHE scheme, but it is not as efficient as the hybrid method of Howgrave-Graham on concrete parameters of NTRU. Instead of using the norm and trace, we propose to use the multiplication by the public key in some subring and show that this choice leads to better attacks. We √ can then show that for power of two cyclotomic fields, the time complexity is polynomialFinally, we show that, under heuristics, straightforward lattice reduction is even more efficient, allowing to extend this result to fields without non-trivial subfields, such as NTRU Prime. We insist that the improvement on the analysis applies even for relatively small modulus ; though if the secret is sparse, it may not be the fastest attack. We also derive a tight estimation of security for (Ring-)LWE and NTRU assumptions. when $q=2^{\Omega(\sqrt{n \log \log n})}$

Encriptação parcialmente homomórfica CCA1-segura

Orientadores: Ricardo Dahab, Diego de Freitas AranhaTese (doutorado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de ComputaçãoResumo: Nesta tese nosso tema de pesquisa é a encriptação homomórfica, com foco em uma solução prática e segura para encriptação parcialmente homomórfica (somewhat homomorphic encryption - SHE), considerando o modelo de segurança conhecido como ataque de texto encriptado escolhido (chosen ciphertext attack - CCA). Este modelo pode ser subdividido em duas categorias, a saber, CCA1 e CCA2, sendo CCA2 o mais forte. Sabe-se que é impossível construir métodos de encriptação homomórfica que sejam CCA2-seguros. Por outro lado, é possível obter segurança CCA1, mas apenas um esquema foi proposto até hoje na literatura; assim, seria interessante haver outras construções oferecendo este tipo de segurança. Resumimos os principais resultados desta tese de doutorado em duas contribuições. A primeira é mostrar que a família NTRU de esquemas SHE é vulnerável a ataques de recuperação de chave privada, e portanto não são CCA1-seguros. A segunda é a utilização de computação verificável para obter esquemas SHE que são CCA1-seguros e que podem ser usados para avaliar polinômios multivariáveis quadráticos. Atualmente, métodos de encriptação homomórfica são construídos usando como substrato dois problemas de difícil solução: o MDC aproximado (approximate GCD problem - AGCD) e o problema de aprendizado com erros (learning with errors - LWE). O problema AGCD leva, em geral, a construções mais simples mas com desempenho inferior, enquanto que os esquemas baseados no problema LWE correspondem ao estado da arte nesta área de pesquisa. Recentemente, Cheon e Stehlé demonstraram que ambos problemas estão relacionados, e é uma questão interessante investigar se esquemas baseados no problema AGCD podem ser tão eficientes quanto esquemas baseados no problema LWE. Nós respondemos afirmativamente a esta questão para um cenário específico: estendemos o esquema de computação verificável proposto por Fiore, Gennaro e Pastro, de forma que use a suposição de que o problema AGCD é difícil, juntamente com o esquema DGHV adaptado para uso do Teorema Chinês dos Restos (Chinese remainder theorem - CRT) de forma a evitar ataques de recuperação de chave privadaAbstract: In this thesis we study homomorphic encryption with focus on practical and secure somewhat homomorphic encryption (SHE), under the chosen ciphertext attack (CCA) security model. This model is classified into two different main categories: CCA1 and CCA2, with CCA2 being the strongest. It is known that it is impossible to construct CCA2-secure homomorphic encryption schemes. On the other hand, CCA1-security is possible, but only one scheme is known to achieve it. It would thus be interesting to have other CCA1-secure constructions. The main results of this thesis are summarized in two contributions. The first is to show that the NTRU-family of SHE schemes is vulnerable to key recovery attacks, hence not CCA1-secure. The second is the utilization of verifiable computation to obtain a CCA1-secure SHE scheme that can be used to evaluate quadratic multivariate polynomials. Homomorphic encryption schemes are usually constructed under the assumption that two distinct problems are hard, namely the Approximate GCD (AGCD) Problem and the Learning with Errors (LWE) Problem. The AGCD problem leads, in general, to simpler constructions, but with worse performance, wheras LWE-based schemes correspond to the state-of-the-art in this research area. Recently, Cheon and Stehlé proved that both problems are related, and thus it is an interesting problem to investigate if AGCD-based SHE schemes can be made as efficient as their LWE counterparts. We answer this question positively for a specific scenario, extending the verifiable computation scheme proposed by Fiore, Gennaro and Pastro to work under the AGCD assumption, and using it together with the Chinese Remainder Theorem (CRT)-version of the DGHV scheme, in order to avoid key recovery attacksDoutoradoCiência da ComputaçãoDoutor em Ciência da Computação143484/2011-7CNPQCAPE

Homomorphic Encryption for Finite Automata

We describe a somewhat homomorphic GSW-like encryption scheme, natively encrypting matrices rather than just single elements. This scheme offers much better performance than existing homomorphic encryption schemes for evaluating encrypted (nondeterministic) finite automata (NFAs). Differently from GSW, we do not know how to reduce the security of this scheme to LWE, instead we reduce it to a stronger assumption, that can be thought of as an inhomogeneous variant of the NTRU assumption. This assumption (that we term iNTRU) may be useful and interesting in its own right, and we examine a few of its properties. We also examine methods to encode regular expressions as NFAs, and in particular explore a new optimization problem, motivated by our application to encrypted NFA evaluation. In this problem, we seek to minimize the number of states in an NFA for a given expression, subject to the constraint on the ambiguity of the NFA

Key-Recovery Attacks Against Somewhat Homomorphic Encryption Schemes

In 1978, Rivest, Adleman and Dertouzos introduced the concept of privacy homomorphism and asked whether it is possible to perform arbitrary operations on encrypted ciphertexts. Thirty years later, Gentry gave a positive answer in his seminal paper at STOC 2009, by proposing an ingenious approach to construct fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) schemes. With this approach, one starts with a somewhat homomorphic encryption (SHE) scheme that can perform only limited number of operations on ciphertexts (i.e. it can evaluate only low-degree polynomials). Then, through the so-called bootstrapping step, it is possible to turn this SHE scheme into an FHE scheme. After Gentry's work, many SHE and FHE schemes have been proposed; in total, they can be divided into four categories, according to the hardness assumptions underlying each SHE (and hence, FHE) scheme: hard problems on lattices, the approximate common divisor problem, the (ring) learning with errors problem, and the NTRU encryption scheme. Even though SHE schemes are less powerful than FHE schemes, they can already be used in many useful real-world applications, such as medical and financial applications. It is therefore of primary concern to understand what level of security these SHE schemes provide. By default, all the SHE schemes developed so far offer IND-CPA security - i.e. resistant against a chosen-plaintext attack - but nothing is said about their IND-CCA1 security - i.e. secure against an adversary who is able to perform a non-adaptive chosen-ciphertext attack. Considering such an adversary is in fact a more realistic scenario. Gentry emphasized it as a future work to investigate SHE schemes with IND-CCA1 security, and the task to make some clarity about it was initiated by Loftus, May, Smart and Vercauteren: at SAC 2011 they showed how one family of SHE schemes is not IND-CCA1 secure, opening the doors to an interesting investigation on the IND-CCA1 security of the existing schemes in the other three families of schemes. In this work we therefore continue this line of research and show that most existing somewhat homomorphic encryption schemes are not IND-CCA1 secure. In fact, we show that these schemes suffer from key recovery attacks (stronger than a typical IND-CCA1 attack), which allow an adversary to completely recover the private keys through a number of decryption oracle queries. As a result, this dissertation shows that all known SHE schemes fail to provide IND-CCA1 security. While it is true that IND-CPA security may be enough to construct cryptographic protocols in presence of semi-honest attackers, key recovery attacks will pose serious threats for practical usage of SHE and FHE schemes: if a malicious attacker (or a compromised honest party) submits manipulated ciphertexts and observes the behavior (side channel leakage) of the decryptor, then it may be able to recover all plaintexts in the system. Therefore, it is very desirable to design SHE and FHE with IND-CCA1 security, or at least design them to prevent key recovery attacks. This raises the interesting question whether it is possible or not to develop such IND-CCA1 secure SHE scheme. Up to date, the only positive result in this direction is a SHE scheme proposed by Loftus et al. at SAC 2011 (in fact, a modification of an existing SHE scheme and IND-CCA1 insecure). However, this IND-CCA1 secure SHE scheme makes use of a non standard knowledge assumption, while it would be more interesting to only rely on standard assumptions. We propose then a variant of the SHE scheme proposed by Lopez-Alt, Tromer, and Vaikuntanathan at STOC 2012, which offers good indicators about its possible IND-CCA1 security

An Approach to Reduce Storage for Homomorphic Computations

We introduce a hybrid homomorphic encryption by combining public key encryption (PKE) and somewhat homomorphic encryption (SHE) to reduce storage for most applications of somewhat or fully homomorphic encryption (FHE). In this model, one encrypts messages with a PKE and computes on encrypted data using a SHE or a FHE after homomorphic decryption. To obtain efficient homomorphic decryption, our hybrid schemes is constructed by combining IND-CPA PKE schemes without complicated message paddings with SHE schemes with large integer message space. Furthermore, we remark that if the underlying PKE is multiplicative on a domain closed under addition and multiplication, this scheme has an important advantage that one can evaluate a polynomial of arbitrary degree without recryption. We propose such a scheme by concatenating ElGamal and Goldwasser-Micali scheme over a ring $\Z_N$ for a composite integer $N$ whose message space is $\Z_N^\times$. To be used in practical applications, homomorphic decryption of the base PKE is too expensive. We accelerate the homomorphic evaluation of the decryption by introducing a method to reduce the degree of exponentiation circuit at the cost of additional public keys. Using same technique, we give an efficient solution to the open problem~\cite{KLYC13} partially. As an independent interest, we obtain another generic conversion method from private key SHE to public key SHE. Differently from Rothblum~\cite{RothTCC11}, it is free to choose the message space of SHE

On the Security of Lattice-Based Cryptography Against Lattice Reduction and Hybrid Attacks

Over the past decade, lattice-based cryptography has emerged as one of the most promising candidates for post-quantum public-key cryptography. For most current lattice-based schemes, one can recover the secret key by solving a corresponding instance of the unique Shortest Vector Problem (uSVP), the problem of finding a shortest non-zero vector in a lattice which is unusually short. This work is concerned with the concrete hardness of the uSVP. In particular, we study the uSVP in general as well as instances of the problem with particularly small or sparse short vectors, which are used in cryptographic constructions to increase their efficiency. We study solving the uSVP in general via lattice reduction, more precisely, the Block-wise Korkine-Zolotarev (BKZ) algorithm. In order to solve an instance of the uSVP via BKZ, the applied block size, which specifies the BKZ algorithm, needs to be sufficiently large. However, a larger block size results in higher runtimes of the algorithm. It is therefore of utmost interest to determine the minimal block size that guarantees the success of solving the uSVP via BKZ. In this thesis, we provide a theoretical and experimental validation of a success condition for BKZ when solving the uSVP which can be used to determine the minimal required block size. We further study the practical implications of using so-called sparsification techniques in combination with the above approach. With respect to uSVP instances with particularly small or sparse short vectors, we investigate so-called hybrid attacks. We first adapt the “hybrid lattice reduction and meet-in-the-middle attack” (or short: the hybrid attack) by Howgrave-Graham on the NTRU encryption scheme to the uSVP. Due to this adaption, the attack can be applied to a larger class of lattice-based cryptosystems. In addition, we enhance the runtime analysis of the attack, e.g., by an explicit calculation of the involved success probabilities. As a next step, we improve the hybrid attack in two directions as described in the following. To reflect the potential of a modern attacker on classical computers, we show how to parallelize the attack. We show that our parallel version of the hybrid attack scales well within realistic parameter ranges. Our theoretical analysis is supported by practical experiments, using our implementation of the parallel hybrid attack which employs Open Multi-Processing and the Message Passing Interface. To reflect the power of a potential future attacker who has access to a large-scale quantum computer, we develop a quantum version of the hybrid attack which replaces the classical meet-in-the-middle search by a quantum search. Not only is the quantum hybrid attack faster than its classical counterpart, but also applicable to a wider range of uSVP instances (and hence to a larger number of lattice-based schemes) as it uses a quantum search which is sensitive to the distribution on the search space. Finally, we demonstrate the practical relevance of our results by using the techniques developed in this thesis to evaluate the concrete security levels of the lattice-based schemes submitted to the US National Institute of Standards and Technology’s process of standardizing post-quantum public-key cryptography