92 research outputs found
From average case complexity to improper learning complexity
The basic problem in the PAC model of computational learning theory is to
determine which hypothesis classes are efficiently learnable. There is
presently a dearth of results showing hardness of learning problems. Moreover,
the existing lower bounds fall short of the best known algorithms.
The biggest challenge in proving complexity results is to establish hardness
of {\em improper learning} (a.k.a. representation independent learning).The
difficulty in proving lower bounds for improper learning is that the standard
reductions from -hard problems do not seem to apply in this
context. There is essentially only one known approach to proving lower bounds
on improper learning. It was initiated in (Kearns and Valiant 89) and relies on
cryptographic assumptions.
We introduce a new technique for proving hardness of improper learning, based
on reductions from problems that are hard on average. We put forward a (fairly
strong) generalization of Feige's assumption (Feige 02) about the complexity of
refuting random constraint satisfaction problems. Combining this assumption
with our new technique yields far reaching implications. In particular,
1. Learning 's is hard.
2. Agnostically learning halfspaces with a constant approximation ratio is
hard.
3. Learning an intersection of halfspaces is hard.Comment: 34 page
Moment-Matching Polynomials
We give a new framework for proving the existence of low-degree, polynomial
approximators for Boolean functions with respect to broad classes of
non-product distributions. Our proofs use techniques related to the classical
moment problem and deviate significantly from known Fourier-based methods,
which require the underlying distribution to have some product structure.
Our main application is the first polynomial-time algorithm for agnostically
learning any function of a constant number of halfspaces with respect to any
log-concave distribution (for any constant accuracy parameter). This result was
not known even for the case of learning the intersection of two halfspaces
without noise. Additionally, we show that in the "smoothed-analysis" setting,
the above results hold with respect to distributions that have sub-exponential
tails, a property satisfied by many natural and well-studied distributions in
machine learning.
Given that our algorithms can be implemented using Support Vector Machines
(SVMs) with a polynomial kernel, these results give a rigorous theoretical
explanation as to why many kernel methods work so well in practice
Learning Kernel-Based Halfspaces with the Zero-One Loss
We describe and analyze a new algorithm for agnostically learning
kernel-based halfspaces with respect to the \emph{zero-one} loss function.
Unlike most previous formulations which rely on surrogate convex loss functions
(e.g. hinge-loss in SVM and log-loss in logistic regression), we provide finite
time/sample guarantees with respect to the more natural zero-one loss function.
The proposed algorithm can learn kernel-based halfspaces in worst-case time
\poly(\exp(L\log(L/\epsilon))), for \emph{any} distribution, where is a
Lipschitz constant (which can be thought of as the reciprocal of the margin),
and the learned classifier is worse than the optimal halfspace by at most
. We also prove a hardness result, showing that under a certain
cryptographic assumption, no algorithm can learn kernel-based halfspaces in
time polynomial in .Comment: This is a full version of the paper appearing in the 23rd
International Conference on Learning Theory (COLT 2010). Compared to the
previous arXiv version, this version contains some small corrections in the
proof of Lemma 3 and in appendix
Weighted Polynomial Approximations: Limits for Learning and Pseudorandomness
Polynomial approximations to boolean functions have led to many positive
results in computer science. In particular, polynomial approximations to the
sign function underly algorithms for agnostically learning halfspaces, as well
as pseudorandom generators for halfspaces. In this work, we investigate the
limits of these techniques by proving inapproximability results for the sign
function.
Firstly, the polynomial regression algorithm of Kalai et al. (SIAM J. Comput.
2008) shows that halfspaces can be learned with respect to log-concave
distributions on in the challenging agnostic learning model. The
power of this algorithm relies on the fact that under log-concave
distributions, halfspaces can be approximated arbitrarily well by low-degree
polynomials. We ask whether this technique can be extended beyond log-concave
distributions, and establish a negative result. We show that polynomials of any
degree cannot approximate the sign function to within arbitrarily low error for
a large class of non-log-concave distributions on the real line, including
those with densities proportional to .
Secondly, we investigate the derandomization of Chernoff-type concentration
inequalities. Chernoff-type tail bounds on sums of independent random variables
have pervasive applications in theoretical computer science. Schmidt et al.
(SIAM J. Discrete Math. 1995) showed that these inequalities can be established
for sums of random variables with only -wise independence,
for a tail probability of . We show that their results are tight up to
constant factors.
These results rely on techniques from weighted approximation theory, which
studies how well functions on the real line can be approximated by polynomials
under various distributions. We believe that these techniques will have further
applications in other areas of computer science.Comment: 22 page
- …