1,599 research outputs found
Crowdsourcing Paper Screening in Systematic Literature Reviews
Literature reviews allow scientists to stand on the shoulders of giants,
showing promising directions, summarizing progress, and pointing out existing
challenges in research. At the same time conducting a systematic literature
review is a laborious and consequently expensive process. In the last decade,
there have a few studies on crowdsourcing in literature reviews. This paper
explores the feasibility of crowdsourcing for facilitating the literature
review process in terms of results, time and effort, as well as to identify
which crowdsourcing strategies provide the best results based on the budget
available. In particular we focus on the screening phase of the literature
review process and we contribute and assess methods for identifying the size of
tests, labels required per paper, and classification functions as well as
methods to split the crowdsourcing process in phases to improve results.
Finally, we present our findings based on experiments run on Crowdflower
Leveraging Crowdsourcing Data For Deep Active Learning - An Application: Learning Intents in Alexa
This paper presents a generic Bayesian framework that enables any deep
learning model to actively learn from targeted crowds. Our framework inherits
from recent advances in Bayesian deep learning, and extends existing work by
considering the targeted crowdsourcing approach, where multiple annotators with
unknown expertise contribute an uncontrolled amount (often limited) of
annotations. Our framework leverages the low-rank structure in annotations to
learn individual annotator expertise, which then helps to infer the true labels
from noisy and sparse annotations. It provides a unified Bayesian model to
simultaneously infer the true labels and train the deep learning model in order
to reach an optimal learning efficacy. Finally, our framework exploits the
uncertainty of the deep learning model during prediction as well as the
annotators' estimated expertise to minimize the number of required annotations
and annotators for optimally training the deep learning model.
We evaluate the effectiveness of our framework for intent classification in
Alexa (Amazon's personal assistant), using both synthetic and real-world
datasets. Experiments show that our framework can accurately learn annotator
expertise, infer true labels, and effectively reduce the amount of annotations
in model training as compared to state-of-the-art approaches. We further
discuss the potential of our proposed framework in bridging machine learning
and crowdsourcing towards improved human-in-the-loop systems
Engineering Crowdsourced Stream Processing Systems
A crowdsourced stream processing system (CSP) is a system that incorporates
crowdsourced tasks in the processing of a data stream. This can be seen as
enabling crowdsourcing work to be applied on a sample of large-scale data at
high speed, or equivalently, enabling stream processing to employ human
intelligence. It also leads to a substantial expansion of the capabilities of
data processing systems. Engineering a CSP system requires the combination of
human and machine computation elements. From a general systems theory
perspective, this means taking into account inherited as well as emerging
properties from both these elements. In this paper, we position CSP systems
within a broader taxonomy, outline a series of design principles and evaluation
metrics, present an extensible framework for their design, and describe several
design patterns. We showcase the capabilities of CSP systems by performing a
case study that applies our proposed framework to the design and analysis of a
real system (AIDR) that classifies social media messages during time-critical
crisis events. Results show that compared to a pure stream processing system,
AIDR can achieve a higher data classification accuracy, while compared to a
pure crowdsourcing solution, the system makes better use of human workers by
requiring much less manual work effort
Creation of Reliable Relevance Judgments in Information Retrieval Systems Evaluation Experimentation through Crowdsourcing: A Review
Test collection is used to evaluate the information retrieval systems in laboratory-based evaluation experimentation. In a classic setting, generating relevance judgments involves human assessors and is a costly and time consuming task. Researchers and practitioners are still being challenged in performing reliable and low-cost evaluation of retrieval systems. Crowdsourcing as a novel method of data acquisition is broadly used in many research fields. It has been proven that crowdsourcing is an inexpensive and quick solution as well as a reliable alternative for creating relevance judgments. One of the crowdsourcing applications in IR is to judge relevancy of query document pair. In order to have a successful crowdsourcing experiment, the relevance judgment tasks should be designed precisely to emphasize quality control. This paper is intended to explore different factors that have an influence on the accuracy of relevance judgments accomplished by workers and how to intensify the reliability of judgments in crowdsourcing experiment
- …