Equity crowdfunding, shareholder structures, and firm performance

This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Wiley via the DOI in this record.Research question/issue: This paper provides a first-time glimpse into the postcampaign financial and innovative performance of equity-crowdfunded (ECF) and matched nonequity-crowdfunded (NECF) firms. We further investigate how direct and nominee shareholder structures in ECF firms are associated with firm performance. Research findings/insights: We find that ECF firms have 8.5 times higher failure rates than matched NECF firms. However, 3.4 times more ECF firms have patent applications than matched NECF firms. Within the group of ECF firms, we find that ECF firms financed through a nominee structure make smaller losses, whereas ECF firms financed through a direct shareholder structure have more new patent applications, including foreign patent applications. Theoretical/academic implications: Our findings suggest that there are important adverse selection issues on equity crowdfunding platforms, although these platforms also serve as a catalyst for innovative activities. Moreover, our findings suggest that there is a more complex relationship between dispersed versus concentrated crowd shareholders and firm performance than currently assumed in the literature. Practitioner/policy implications: For policy makers and crowdfunding platforms, investor protection against adverse selection will be important to ensure the sustainability of equity crowdfunding markets. For entrepreneurs and crowd investors, our study highlights how equity crowdfunding and the adopted shareholder structure relate to short-term firm performance.Research Foundation—Flander

Competition in financial services

In the financial services sector, the failure of a single institution can have a compounding effect on the sector, and on national and global economies. In particular, there is systemic risk from inter-institution lending, and this effect is more complex in Australia due to the small number of major players. In retail banking in Australia, following a similar practice in most developed countries, if an unsecured creditor is a retail depositor, their deposit is insured by the government. That is, if a retail bank fails, the Federal Government will make the depositors whole. The regulatory system, particularly the prudential regulatory system, is designed to protect depositors’ and borrowers’ interests, and this protects the interest of the government. The effect is that regulatory policy on banking has prioritised stability in consideration of the sovereign risk associated with the risk of retail bank failure. However, this approach also creates a policy dilemma. The dilemma concerns the extent to which the retail banking sector can attain the benefits of the vigorous rivalry from effective and efficient competition, without unduly risking stability and the potential of a devastating call on the public purse. Specifically, in the context of effective and efficient competition, there is limited competitiveness in retail banking in Australia. This is reflected in the static state of market share between the four major banks, and very slow and marginal improvements gains even by strong second tier competitors. Furthermore, the retail banking sector’s capacity for product and service innovation is limited. Although the absence of vigorous rivalry is conducive to stability within the retail banking sector, it is likely to detract from the welfare of retail banking consumers. Furthermore, the level of innovation may not be as high as is feasible and barriers, including prudential regulatory barriers to entry or expansion, mean that the extent of rivalry is unlikely to change without some form of promotion of competition. The paper consequently makes a four-point recommendation for the removal of the ‘four pillars’ policy:  The four major banks are protected by an implicit government guarantee that impacts market operation with little observable benefit to consumers, and may be a source of consumer disutility.  The four pillars policy has prompted increased vertical integration within the sector, particularly in the area of mortgage products.  There are sufficient merger protections provided by Part IV of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth).  Competition and contestability arise when there are reasonably low barriers to entry and exit from the sector. It is not clear that low barriers to entry exist in Australia, and evidence to support this view comes from the failure of international banks to gain a significant toehold in the retail banking sector in Australia. One deterrent to entry is the regulatory focus on the four pillars. The authors recognise that this position is at odds with the view of the Financial System Inquiry. However, the rationale in the report of the Inquiry was to prevent mergers, and the current competition law achieves this objective. The paper recommends two specific policies to promote competition in retail banking without the structural intervention that would otherwise be required to improve the intensity of competition in the retail banking sector:  Introduce bank account number portability. This would use ‘know your customer’ and central database systems in a similar form to those that have been used for mobile number portability in Australia for the last decade and a half.  Introduce customer access to data held by banks to allow third parties to compare bank offerings across all banks.  Significantly, these two recommendations are consistent with the productivity proposals issued by the UK Government in July 2015. The research paper also examines crowd equity funding as a disruptive force in the banking sector, and recommends that crowd equity funding be permitted with the following safeguards:  ASIC should take an active role in monitoring crowd equity funding and be willing to sue in case of fraudulent action.  Any intermediary online platform should have a financial services licence with limited duty of care.  There should be a cap for business raisings through crowd equity funding of $2 million in a 12-month period.  Crowd equity funding is a social phenomenon. Through its use of social media, it has attracted people who have previously never been interested in investing in companies. Instead of being feared, this interest should be nurtured through the promotion of investors’ financial education

Co-operative and Alternative Finance for Agricultural/Food Communities : European Developments

Publisher PD

An Annotated Bibliography of Recent Literature on Current Developments in Philanthropy

As philanthropic organizations play an increasingly important role in societies around the world, the research on philanthropy – from giving and volunteering practices to regulatory frameworks to digital innovations – has also evolved in recent decades. It is important to develop a thorough overview of the relevant scientific discourses and literature on current developments in philanthropy. This will allow researchers and practitioners to enhance the understanding of philanthropy and to improve its practice worldwide. This report provides new insights on current developments and important changes in the global philanthropic landscape, including trends in global philanthropy and its interaction with other sectors of society

참신성에 따른 스타트업 크라우드펀딩 창업 자금 조달 전략

학위논문(박사) -- 서울대학교대학원 : 공과대학 협동과정 기술경영·경제·정책전공, 2023. 2. 황준석.This thesis explores startups' fundraising and development strategies that started from novel ideas to sustainable companies through crowdfunding. From the stage of persuasion by presenting novel ideas to subsequent business development, the study analyzes the factors that enable startups to grow successfully through crowdfunding and accordingly reveals what an effective action strategy from the entrepreneur's point of view is. The purpose of the thesis is to understand the cycle of the campaign, value delivery, and subsequent development while focusing on the strategic perspective of entrepreneurs using crowdfunding as an entrepreneurial fundraising tool. First, at the fundraising point, which is the beginning of crowdfunding startups, the study focuses on indicators that can measure an idea's novelty and explore the behavioral strategies of founders during crowdfunding campaigns according to the degree of novelty. This study proposes a machine learning-based methodological measurement to understand the novelty and presents a behavioral strategy using the method. The study demonstrates that the novelty of an idea is a crucial element in changing the direction project founders must act for successful fundraising in reward-based crowdfunding. The second study proposes a framework for a satisfactory crowdfunding experience for reward-based crowdfunding participants. Through the framework of utilitarian-hedonic value delivery borrowed from consumer research, the study finds the determinants of how founders deliver value to crowdfunding participants after realizing business ideas. This study explores the post-campaign idea implementation and satisfaction delivery process, taking preliminary steps to broadly understand the subsequent business processes after fundraising. The third study examines the differences in characteristics of crowdfunding startups that have attracted follow-up venture funds. In particular, the study analyzes how the timing and valuation of follow-up venture financing are affected by the characteristics of the crowdfunding campaign process. This study in-depth finds the relationship between the process of crowdfunding and long-term sustainable startups.Chapter 1. Introduction 1 1.1. Research Background 1 1.2 Research Objectives 4 1.3 Research Outline 5 Chapter 2. Literature Review 8 2.1 Entrepreneurial Financing 8 2.1.1 Venture Capital 8 2.1.2 Crowdfunding 11 2.1.2.1 Crowdfunding in entrepreneur perspectives 12 2.1.2.2 Crowdfunding in investor perspectives 14 2.2 Idea Realization 16 2.2.1 Signaling theory 18 2.3 Contribution of the study 19 Chapter 3. Effective Strategies to Attract Crowdfunding Investment Based on the Novelty of Business Ideas 23 3.1 Introduction 24 3.2 Literature Review 27 3.2.1 Crowdfunding as entrepreneurial financing and signaling theory 27 3.2.2 Novelty of an idea and crowdfunding success 29 3.2.3 Measuring novelty and innovation performance 31 3.3 Theoretical framework and hypotheses development 33 3.3.1 Ideas novelty 34 3.3.2 Target diversification and an ideas novelty 36 3.3.3 Information updates and two-sided communication 39 3.3.4 Method 45 3.3.4.1 Data sources 45 3.3.4.2 Descriptive statistics 46 3.3.4.3 Dependent and explanatory variables 47 3.3.4.4 Control variables 49 3.3.4.5 Empirical model 51 3.3.5 Results 54 3.3.6 Discussion 66 Chapter 4. Delivering Satisfaction after Crowdfunding through Utilitarian and Hedonic Value Structure 74 4.1 Introduction 75 4.2 Theoretical Background 77 4.2.1 Idea realization in crowdfunding 77 4.2.2 Market feedback from funder satisfaction after fundraising 78 4.2.3 Idea implementing capacity: delivering the utilitarian value 81 4.2.4 Emotional satisfaction of participating innovation: improving the hedonic value 84 4.3 Research objective, Methodology, and Data 88 4.3.1 Research objective and data source 88 4.3.2 Dependent variable 89 4.3.3 Explanatory variables 90 4.3.4 Control variables 91 4.3.5 Descriptive statistics 92 4.3.6 Empirical model 93 4.4 Results and Discussion 96 4.4.1 Empirical results 96 4.4.2 Discussion 99 4.5 Conclusion 102 4.5.1 Limitations and further studies 103 Chapter 5. Subsequent funding of crowdfunded startups: Focusing on factors affecting follow-up funding amount and timing 105 5.1 Introduction 106 5.2 Theoretical framework and hypotheses 109 5.2.1 Crowdfunding as entrepreneurial financing 109 5.2.2 Venture financing performance: amount and timing 112 5.2.3 Research framework 113 5.2.4 Feedback aspect and follow-up financing 114 5.2.4.1 Securing market expectation 114 5.2.4.2 Securing market satisfaction/dissatisfaction 117 5.2.5 Relationships with investors and follow-up funding 119 5.3 Data and method 122 5.3.1 Data sources 122 5.3.2 Descriptive statistics 123 5.3.3 Dependent and explanatory variables 124 5.3.4 Control variables 127 5.3.5 Empirical model 128 5.4 Results 130 5.5 Discussion with case studies 135 5.6. Limitations and further research 141 Chapter 6. Conclusion 144 6.1 Overall Summary 144 6.2 Implications and Contributions 148박

Crowdfunding In France: A New Revolution?

In the last few years, small firms have had difficulties to finance their projects via the traditional bank system. A new type of financing has recently appeared in Europe and in particular in France: the crowdfunding. It is a method for funding a variety of new ventures, allowing individual founders of for-profit, cultural, or social projects to request funding from many individuals via Internet. Our paper contributes to the literature by introducing this financial innovation and building a theoretical framework to explain its success. We also discuss some more practical issues to enhance crowdfunding in France

Start-Up Financing in the Digital Age – A Systematic Review and Comparison of New Forms of Financing

Start-ups are seen as the leading force in dynamically growing economies. Limited financing opportunities often prevent entrepreneurs from realizing their innovative business ideas or taking growth opportunities. However, in the context of the technological revolution, a fundamental change in the entrepreneurial finance landscape is observed. Innovative, digital financial instruments such as Business Angel Networks, Crowdfunding, or Initial Coin Offerings provide young companies with attractive financing opportunities. Although a large number of studies focus on start-up financing in the digital age, the literature is still fragmented. By providing a systemic literature review of 85 high-quality peer-reviewed journal articles published between 1990 and 2019, we address the following purposes: First, we outline a holistic picture on the financing spectrum of start-ups in the digital age. Therefore, we classify the articles into two categories as traditional or novel financing instruments. Subsequently, we associate the different financing instruments into the various growth stages of start-ups and define them as equity or debt. Second, we evaluate the suitability of novel financing instruments based on the trade-off and pecking order theory. Third, we investigate whether new forms of financing are substitutes or complements to traditional financing forms. Furthermore, ideas for further research are suggested

Communicating values: essays on trust and legitimacy as dynamic drivers of decision-making in crowdfunding

There is great consensus among scholars and practitioners alike that entrepreneurs and young ventures play an important role in tackling societal issues. Despite this, such ventures with their overarching social or environmental mission face grave difficulties when it comes to accessing external finance. This may be due to their complex value-propositions that bring with a narrative outside the traditional lines of investor/investee communication, and of course their increased liability of newness (Stinchcombe, 1965) because of novel forms of organisations with strong stakeholder participation in their governance. Crowdfunding (CF) can be seen as a fairly young financing option that aims to bridge this financing gap. It does so by focusing investors on the value-propositions of the ventures such that it connects the fund-seeking venture to the community. Because of these peculiarities it is crucial to understand how decision-making and underlying communication processes work as they are more strongly underpinned by collective and individual values. And while research has shed light on the factors that influence decision-making processes, much less attention has been paid to the communication and negotiation of the underlying values of the various actors in these processes. This thesis, in the form of a PhD by Public Works, fills this gap and provides insights into how the communication and negotiation of values between the actors influences decision-making in CF throughout the various stages of a funding campaign. It summarises and outlines five scholarly papers which address CF as an institutional space with interlinked actors and looks at decision-making processes from sociological and socio-cognitive perspectives, applying legitimacy and trust lenses. Given the nascent status of CF theory the research positions itself in an interpretative paradigm and follows an abductive methodology with qualitative methods. Based on the combined insights from the five papers the thesis ultimately provides insights into the processes of embedding and re-embedding of values in CF and by that how these values drive decision-making

Crowdfunding and Sustainable Development: a good match?

This dissertation sets out to explore the role of crowdfunding in promoting sustainable development. It explores the role of specialized crowdfunding platforms in contributing to SD and under which conditions they can contribute to SD by considering both platform-related and founder/product-related factors. The dissertation employs two articles in order to explore this. The first is a conceptual paper based on a deductive reasoning approach which investigates a specific type of crowdfunding platforms (i.e. Islamic crowdfunding platforms) and their potential contribution to sustainable development through a conceptual typology. The second is an empirical paper exploring how crowdfunding could benefit developing countries in moving toward sustainable development. It investigates whether and how geographical factors (specifically the distinction between developed and developing countries) may have an impact also in a crowdfunding context, i.e., on the success of prosocial crowdfunding campaigns. The dissertation finds that crowdfunding contribution to sustainable development is not granted, and it is context-specific. Crowdfunding platforms play a critical role in contributing to sustainable development through the several actions and strategies they adopt. How the crowdfunding platform promotes itself and the type of crowd it targets could impact its sustainable development contribution and the sustainable development goals to which it contributes. Moreover, founder/product-related factors have an impact on the success of crowdfunding campaigns aiming to contribute to sustainable development. Donors’ decision-making behaviours could be influenced by home bias and the perceived credibility of the project initiator, as signalled by the country of origin. Thus, donors prefer allocating their donation budget to developed countries and, when allocating their budgets to developing countries, support project initiators from developed countries rather than from developing countries. Therefore, although crowdfunding possesses considerable potential to contribute to sustainable development, it must overcome numerous obstacles in order to become a genuine driving force for sustainability. The dissertation contributes to the literature in various capacities. Firstly, it contributes to the literature which investigates the innovation potential of CF in contributing to SD, to the literature on CF literature and geography, as well as to charitable-giving literature in the online context. Second, it provides a typology for Islamic crowdfunding platforms to understand the role of these platforms in contributing to sustainable development, which could help policymakers and international development actors to make more informed decisions about which type of Islamic crowdfunding platforms they should regulate and/or support. Finally, it shows the challenges of specialised crowdfunding platforms in contributing to sustainable development in developing countries and the role of geography in the success of prosocial crowdfunding campaigns