Cross-intersecting families and primitivity of symmetric systems

Let $X$ be a finite set and $\mathfrak p\subseteq 2^X$, the power set of $X$, satisfying three conditions: (a) $\mathfrak p$ is an ideal in $2^X$, that is, if $A\in \mathfrak p$ and $B\subset A$, then $B\in \mathfrak p$; (b) For $A\in 2^X$ with $|A|\geq 2$, $A\in \mathfrak p$ if $\{x,y\}\in \mathfrak p$ for any $x,y\in A$ with $x\neq y$; (c) $\{x\}\in \mathfrak p$ for every $x\in X$. The pair $(X,\mathfrak p)$ is called a symmetric system if there is a group $\Gamma$ transitively acting on $X$ and preserving the ideal $\mathfrak p$. A family $\{A_1,A_2,\ldots,A_m\}\subseteq 2^X$ is said to be a cross-$\mathfrak{p}$-family of $X$ if $\{a, b\}\in \mathfrak{p}$ for any $a\in A_i$ and $b\in A_j$ with $i\neq j$. We prove that if $(X,\mathfrak p)$ is a symmetric system and $\{A_1,A_2,\ldots,A_m\}\subseteq 2^X$ is a cross-$\mathfrak{p}$-family of $X$, then $$\sum_{i=1}^m|{A}_i|\leq\left\{ \begin{array}{cl} |X| & \hbox{if $m\leq \frac{|X|}{\alpha(X,\, \mathfrak p)}$,} \\ m\, \alpha(X,\, \mathfrak p) & \hbox{if $m\geq \frac{|X|}{\alpha{(X,\, \mathfrak p)}}$,} \end{array}\right.$$ where $\alpha(X,\, \mathfrak p)=\max\{|A|:A\in\mathfrak p\}$. This generalizes Hilton's theorem on cross-intersecting families of finite sets, and provides analogs for cross-$t$-intersecting families of finite sets, finite vector spaces and permutations, etc. Moreover, the primitivity of symmetric systems is introduced to characterize the optimal families.Comment: 15 page

Erdos-Ko-Rado from intersecting shadows

A set system is called t-intersecting if every two members meet each other in at least t elements. Katona determined the minimum ratio of the shadow and the size of such families and showed that the Erdos-Ko-Rado theorem immediately follows from this result. The aim of this note is to reproduce the proof to obtain a slight improvement in the Kneser graph. We also give a brief overview of corresponding results

Strongly intersecting integer partitions

We call a sum a1+a2+• • •+ak a partition of n of length k if a1, a2, . . . , ak and n are positive integers such that a1 ≤ a2 ≤ • • • ≤ ak and n = a1 + a2 + • • • + ak. For i = 1, 2, . . . , k, we call ai the ith part of the sum a1 + a2 + • • • + ak. Let Pn,k be the set of all partitions of n of length k. We say that two partitions a1+a2+• • •+ak and b1+b2+• • •+bk strongly intersect if ai = bi for some i. We call a subset A of Pn,k strongly intersecting if every two partitions in A strongly intersect. Let Pn,k(1) be the set of all partitions in Pn,k whose first part is 1. We prove that if 2 ≤ k ≤ n, then Pn,k(1) is a largest strongly intersecting subset of Pn,k, and uniquely so if and only if k ≥ 4 or k = 3 ≤ n ̸∈ {6, 7, 8} or k = 2 ≤ n ≤ 3.peer-reviewe

A cross-intersection theorem for subsets of a set

Two families $\mathcal{A}$ and $\mathcal{B}$ of sets are said to be cross-intersecting if each member of $\mathcal{A}$ intersects each member of $\mathcal{B}$. For any two integers $n$ and $k$ with $0 \leq k \leq n$, let ${[n] \choose \leq k}$ denote the family of all subsets of $\{1, \dots, n\}$ of size at most $k$. We show that if $\mathcal{A} \subseteq {[m] \choose \leq r}$, $\mathcal{B} \subseteq {[n] \choose \leq s}$, and $\mathcal{A}$ and $\mathcal{B}$ are cross-intersecting, then $$|\mathcal{A}||\mathcal{B}| \leq \sum_{i=0}^r {m-1 \choose i-1} \sum_{j=0}^s {n-1 \choose j-1},$$ and equality holds if $\mathcal{A} = \{A \in {[m] \choose \leq r} \colon 1 \in A\}$ and $\mathcal{B} = \{B \in {[n] \choose \leq s} \colon 1 \in B\}$. Also, we generalise this to any number of such cross-intersecting families.Comment: 12 pages, submitted. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1212.695