583 research outputs found

    Assessing spring phenology of a temperate woodland : a multiscale comparison of ground, unmanned aerial vehicle and Landsat satellite observations

    Get PDF
    PhD ThesisVegetation phenology is the study of plant natural life cycle stages. Plant phenological events are related to carbon, energy and water cycles within terrestrial ecosystems, operating from local to global scales. As plant phenology events are highly sensitive to climate fluctuations, the timing of these events has been used as an independent indicator of climate change. The monitoring of forest phenology in a cost-effective manner, at a fine spatial scale and over relatively large areas remains a significant challenge. To address this issue, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) appear to be a potential new platform for forest phenology monitoring. The aim of this research is to assess the potential of UAV data to track the temporal dynamics of spring phenology, from the individual tree to woodland scale, and to cross-compare UAV results against ground and satellite observations, in order to better understand characteristics of UAV data and assess potential for use in validation of satellite-derived phenology. A time series of UAV data were acquired in tandem with an intensive ground campaign during the spring season of 2015, over Hanging Leaves Wood, Northumberland, UK. The radiometric quality of the UAV imagery acquired by two consumer-grade cameras was assessed, in terms of the ability to retrieve reflectance and Normalised Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), and successfully validated against ground (0.84โ‰คR2โ‰ฅ0.96) and Landsat (0.73โ‰คR2โ‰ฅ0.89) measurements, but only NDVI resulted in stable time series. The start (SOS), middle (MOS) and end (EOS) of spring season dates were estimated at an individual tree-level using UAV time series of NDVI and Green Chromatic Coordinate (GCC), with GCC resulting in a clearer and stronger seasonal signal at a tree crown scale. UAV-derived SOS could be predicted more accurately than MOS and EOS, with an accuracy of less than 1 week for deciduous woodland and within 2 weeks for evergreen. The UAV data were used to map phenological events for individual trees across the whole woodland, demonstrating that contrasting canopy phenological events can occur within the extent of a single Landsat pixel. This accounted for the poor relationships found between UAV- and Landsat-derived phenometrics (R2<0.45) in this study. An opportunity is now available to track very fine scale land surface changes over contiguous vegetation communities, information which could improve characterization of vegetation phenology at multiple scales.The Science without Borders program, managed by CAPES-Brazil (Coordenaรงรฃo de Aperfeiรงoamento de Pessoal de Nรญvel Superior)

    Afromontane forest ecosystem studies with multi-source satellite data

    Get PDF
    The Afromontane Forest of north Eastern Nigeria is an important ecological ecosystem endowed with flora and fauna species. The main goals of this thesis were to explore the potential of multi-source satellite remote sensing for the assessment of the biodiversity-rich Afromontane Forest ecosystem using different methods and algorithms to retrieve two major remote sensing -essential biodiversity variables (RS-EBV) which are related and are also the major determinants of biological and ecosystem stability

    Using eddy covariance, remote sensing, and in situ observations to improve models of springtime phenology in temperate deciduous forests

    Full text link
    Phenological events in temperate forests, such as bud burst and senescence, exert strong control over seasonal fluxes of water, energy and carbon. The timing of these transitions is influenced primarily by air temperature and photoperiod, although the exact nature and magnitude of these controls is poorly understood. In this dissertation, I use in situ and remotely sensed observations of phenology in combination with surface meteorological data and measurements of biosphere-atmosphere carbon exchanges to improve understanding and develop models of canopy phenology in temperate forest ecosystems. In the first element of this research I use surface air temperatures and eddy covariance measurements of carbon dioxide fluxes to evaluate and refine widely used approaches for predicting the onset of photosynthesis in spring that account for geographic variation in thermal and photoperiod constraints on phenology. Results from this analysis show that the refined models predict the onset of spring photosynthetic activity with significantly higher accuracy than existing models. A key challenge in developing and testing these models, however, is lack of adequate data sets that characterize phenology over large areas at multi-decadal time scales. To address this need, I develop a new method for estimating long-term average and interannual dynamics in the phenology of temperate forests using time series of Landsat TM/ETM+ images. Results show that estimated spring and autumn transition dates agree closely with in-situ measurements and that Landsat-derived estimates for the start and end of the growing season in Southern New England varied by as much as 4 weeks over the 30-year record of Landsat images. In the final element of this dissertation, I use meteorological data, species composition maps, satellite remote sensing, and ground observations to develop models of springtime leaf onset in temperate deciduous forests that account for geographic differences in how forest communities respond to springtime climate forcing. Results demonstrate important differences in cumulative heating requirements and photoperiod cues among forest types and that regional differences in species composition explain substantial geographic variation in springtime phenology of temperate forests. Together, the results from this dissertation provide an improved basis for observing and modeling springtime phenology in temperate forests

    A novel approach to modelling mangrove phenology from satellite images: a case study from Northern Australia

    Get PDF
    Around the world, the effects of changing plant phenology are evident in many ways: from earlier and longer growing seasons to altering the relationships between plants and their natural pollinators. Plant phenology is often monitored using satellite images and parametric methods. Parametric methods assume that ecosystems have unimodal phenologies and that the phenology model is invariant through space and time. In evergreen ecosystems such as mangrove forests, these assumptions may not hold true. Here we present a novel, data-driven approach to extract plant phenology from Landsat imagery using Generalized Additive Models (GAMs). Using GAMs, we created models for six different mangrove forests across Australia. In contrast to parametric methods, GAMs let the data define the shape of the phenological curve, hence showing the unique characteristics of each study site. We found that the Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) model is related to leaf production rate (from in situ data), leaf gain and net leaf production (from the published literature). We also found that EVI does not respond immediately to leaf gain in most cases, but has a two- to three-month lag. We also identified the start of season and peak growing season dates at our field site. The former occurs between September and October and the latter May and July. The GAMs allowed us to identify dual phenology events in our study sites, indicated by two instances of high EVI and two instances of low EVI values throughout the year. We contribute to a better understanding of mangrove phenology by presenting a data-driven method that allows us to link physical changes of mangrove forests with satellite imagery. In the future, we will use GAMs to (1) relate phenology to environmental variables (e.g., temperature and rainfall) and (2) predict phenological changes

    Remote Sensing of Savannas and Woodlands

    Get PDF
    Savannas and woodlands are one of the most challenging targets for remote sensing. This book provides a current snapshot of the geographical focus and application of the latest sensors and sensor combinations in savannas and woodlands. It includes feature articles on terrestrial laser scanning and on the application of remote sensing to characterization of vegetation dynamics in the Mato Grosso, Cerrado and Caatinga of Brazil. It also contains studies focussed on savannas in Europe, North America, Africa and Australia. It should be important reading for environmental practitioners and scientists globally who are concerned with the sustainability of the global savanna and woodland biome

    SATELLITE-BASED CHARACTERIZATION OF CROP TYPE AND PRODUCTIVITY OF AGROECOSYSTEMS: CASE STUDIES IN NORTHEAST CHINA, SOUTHERN AFRICA, AND CONTERMINOUS USA

    Get PDF
    Agroecosystem, or agricultural ecosystems, is the important anthropogenic ecosystem to meet the human demand for food, fiber, and feed, and it covers approximately 40-50% of the earthโ€™s land surface. Accurate estimates of agricultural land use and land cover and Gross Primary Production (GPP) are indispensable for global food security and understanding variations in the terrestrial carbon budgets. This dissertation aimed to strengthen the capacities of remote sensing to produce the high-quality products of crop type maps and primary productivity on large regional scales. In chapter 2, we designed simple algorithms to identify paddy rice of two different phenological phases (flooding/transplanting and ripening) at regional scales using 30-m multi-temporal Landsat images. Sixteen Landsat images from 2010 - 2012 were used to generate the paddy rice map in the Sanjiang Plain, northeast China - one of the intensive paddy rice cultivation regions in Northern Asia. The user and producer accuracies of paddy rice on the resultant Landsat-based paddy rice map were 90% and 94%, respectively, and was an improvement over the paddy rice dataset derived through visual interpretation and digitalization on the fine-resolution satellite images and traditional agricultural census data. Chapter 3 evaluated the capacities of the temporal MODIS vegetation indices and the satellite-based Vegetation Photosynthesis Model (VPM) to describe phenology and model the seasonal dynamics of GPP for savanna woodlands in Southern Africa on the site level. The results showed that the VPM-based GPP estimates tracked the seasonal dynamics and interannual variation of GPP estimated from eddy covariance measurements at flux tower sites. This study suggests that the VPM is a valuable tool for estimating GPP of semi-arid and semi-humid savanna woodland ecosystems in Southern Africa. Chapter 4 assessed the accuracies of air temperature and downward shortwave radiation of the North America Regional Reanalysis (NARR) by the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP), and evaluated impacts of the accuracies of regional climate inputs on the VPM-based GPP estimates for U.S. Midwest cropland. The results implied that the bias of NARR downward shortwave radiation introduced significant uncertainties into the VPM-based GPP estimates, suggesting that more accurate surface radiation datasets are needed to estimate primary production of terrestrial ecosystems at regional and global scales. Chapter 5 presented independent and complementary analyses of the impact of 2012 flash drought on productivity in the U.S. Midwest using multiple sources of evidences, i.e., in-situ AmeriFlux CO2 data, satellite observations of vegetation indices and solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF), and scaled ecosystem modeling. The results showed that phenological activities of all biomes advanced 1-2 weeks earlier in 2012 compared to other years of 2010-2014, and the drought threatened the U.S. Midwest agroecosystems. The growth of grassland/prairie and cropland was suppressed from June and it didnโ€™t recover until the end of the growing season. As the frequency and severity of droughts have been predicted to increase in future, this study provides better insights into the impacts of flash droughts on vegetation productivity and carbon cycling of major biomes in the U.S. Midwest

    Integrating Remote Sensing and Ecosystem Models for Terrestrial Vegetation Analysis: Phenology, Biomass, and Stand Age

    Get PDF
    Terrestrial vegetation plays an important role in global carbon cycling and climate change by assimilating carbon into biomass during the growing season and releasing it due to natural or anthropogenic disturbances. Remote sensing and ecosystem models can help us extend our studies of vegetation phenology, aboveground biomass, and disturbances from field sites to regional or global scales. Nonetheless, remote sensing-derived variables may differ in fundamental and important ways from ground measurements. With the growth of remote sensing as a key tool in geoscience research, comparisons to ground data and intercomparisons among satellite products are needed. Here I conduct three separate but related analyses and show promising comparisons of key ecosystem states and processes derived from remote sensing and theoretical modeling to those observed on the ground. First, I show that the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) greenup product is significantly correlated with the earliest ground phenology event for North America. Spring greenup indices from different satellites demonstrate similar variability along latitudes, but the number of ground phenology observations in summer, fall, and winter is too limited to interpret the remote sensing-derived phenology products. Second, I estimate aboveground biomass (AGB) for California and show that it agrees with inventory-based regional biomass assessments. In this approach, I present a new remote sensing-based approach for mapping live forest AGB based on a simple parametric model that combines high-resolution estimates of Leaf Area Index derived from Landsat and canopy maximum height from the space-borne Geoscience Laser Altimeter System (GLAS) sensor. Third, I built a theoretical model to estimate stand age in primary forests by coupling a carbon accumulation function to the probability density of disturbance occurrences, and then ran the model with satellite-derived AGB and net primary production. The validated remote sensing data, integrated with ecosystem models, are particularly useful for large-region vegetation research in areas with sparse field measurements, and will help us to explore the long-term vegetation dynamics

    ๊ทผ์ ‘ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์›๊ฒฉ ์„ผ์‹ฑ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ๋“ค์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ์ง€์†์  ์‹๋ฌผ ๊ณ„์ ˆ ๋ฐ ํƒœ์–‘ ์œ ๋„ ์—ฝ๋ก์†Œ ํ˜•๊ด‘๋ฌผ์งˆ ๊ด€์ธก

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ํ™˜๊ฒฝ๋Œ€ํ•™์› ํ˜‘๋™๊ณผ์ • ์กฐ๊ฒฝํ•™, 2022.2. ๋ฅ˜์˜๋ ฌ.Monitoring phenology, physiological and structural changes in vegetation is essential to understand feedbacks of vegetation between terrestrial ecosystems and the atmosphere by influencing the albedo, carbon flux, water flux and energy. To this end, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) from satellite remote sensing have been widely used. However, there are still limitations in satellite remote sensing as 1) satellite imagery could not capture fine-scale spatial resolution of SIF signals, 2) satellite products are strongly influenced by condition of the atmosphere (e.g. clouds), thus it is challenging to know physiological and structural changes in vegetation on cloudy days and 3) satellite imagery captured a mixed signal from over- and understory, thus it is difficult to study the difference between overstory and understory phenology separately. Therefore, in order to more accurately understand the signals observed from the satellite, further studies using near-surface remote sensing system to collect ground-based observed data are needed. The main purpose of this dissertation is continuous observation of vegetation phenology and SIF using near-surface remote sensing system. To achieve the main goal, I set three chapters as 1) developing low-cost filter-based near-surface remote sensing system to monitor SIF continuously, 2) monitoring SIF in a temperate evergreen needleleaf forest continuously, and 3) understanding the relationships between phenology from in-situ multi-layer canopies and satellite products. In Chapter 2, I developed the filter-based smart surface sensing system (4S-SIF) to overcome the technical challenges of monitoring SIF in the field as well as to decrease sensor cost for more comprehensive spatial sampling. I verified the satisfactory spectral performance of the bandpass filters and confirmed that digital numbers (DN) from 4S-SIF exhibited linear relationships with the DN from the hyperspectral spectroradiometer in each band (R2 > 0.99). In addition, we confirmed that 4S-SIF shows relatively low variation of dark current value at various temperatures. Furthermore, the SIF signal from 4S-SIF represents a strong linear relationship with QEpro-SIF either changing the physiological mechanisms of the plant using DCMU (3-(3, 4-dichlorophenyl)-1, 1-dimethyurea) treatment. I believe that 4S-SIF will be a useful tool for collecting in-situ data across multiple spatial and temporal scales. Satellite-based SIF provides us with new opportunities to understand the physiological and structural dynamics of vegetation from canopy to global scales. However, the relationships between SIF and gross primary productivity (GPP) are not fully understood, which is mainly due to the challenges of decoupling structural and physiological factors that control the relationships. In Chapter 3, I reported the results of continuous observations of canopy-level SIF, GPP, absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (APAR), and chlorophyll: carotenoid index (CCI) in a temperate evergreen needleleaf forest. To understand the mechanisms underlying the relationship between GPP and SIF, I investigated the relationships of light use efficiency (LUE_p), chlorophyll fluorescence yield (ฮฆ_F), and the fraction of emitted SIF photons escaping from the canopy (f_esc) separately. I found a strongly non-linear relationship between GPP and SIF at diurnal and seasonal time scales (R2 = 0.91 with a hyperbolic regression function, daily). GPP saturated with APAR, while SIF did not. In addition, there were differential responses of LUE_p and ฮฆ_F to air temperature. While LUE_p reached saturation at high air temperatures, ฮฆ_F did not saturate. I also found that the canopy-level chlorophyll: carotenoid index was strongly correlated to canopy-level ฮฆ_F (R2 = 0.84) implying that ฮฆ_F could be more closely related to pigment pool changes rather than LUE_p. In addition, I found that the f_esc contributed to a stronger SIF-GPP relationship by partially capturing the response of LUE_p to diffuse light. These findings can help refine physiological and structural links between canopy-level SIF and GPP in evergreen needleleaf forests. We do not fully understand what satellite NDVI derived leaf-out and full leaf dates actually observe because deciduous broadleaf forest consists of multi-layer canopies typically and mixed-signal from multi-layer canopies could affect satellite observation. Ultimately, we have the following question: What phenology do we actually see from space compared to ground observations on multi-layer canopy phenology? In Chapter 4, I reported the results of 8 years of continuous observations of multi-layer phenology and climate variables in a deciduous broadleaf forest, South Korea. Multi-channel spectrometers installed above and below overstory canopy allowed us to monitor over- and understory canopy phenology separately, continuously. I evaluated the widely used phenology detection methods, curvature change rate and threshold with NDVI observed above top of the canopy and compared leaf-out and full leaf dates from both methods to in-situ observed multi-layer phenology. First, I found that NDVI from the above canopy had a strong linear relationship with satellites NDVI (R2=0.95 for MODIS products and R2= 0.85 for Landsat8). Second, leaf-out dates extracted by the curvature change rate method and 10% threshold were well matched with understory leaf-out dates. Third, the full-leaf dates extracted by the curvature change rate method and 90% threshold were similar to overstory full-leaf dates. Furthermore, I found that overstory leaf-out dates were closely correlated to accumulated growing degree days (AGDD) while understory leaf-out dates were related to AGDD and also sensitive to the number of chill days (NCD). These results suggest that satellite-based leaf-out and full leaf dates represent understory and overstory signals in the deciduous forest site, which requires caution when using satellite-based phenology data into future prediction as overstory and understory canopy show different sensitivities to AGDD and NCD.์‹๋ฌผ ๊ณ„์ ˆ ๋ฐ ์‹์ƒ์˜ ์ƒ๋ฆฌํ•™์ , ๊ตฌ์กฐ์ ์ธ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ์ง€์†์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ชจ๋‹ˆํ„ฐ๋ง ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ์œก์ƒ์ƒํƒœ๊ณ„์™€ ๋Œ€๊ธฐ๊ถŒ ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€, ํƒ„์†Œ ์ˆœํ™˜ ๋“ฑ์˜ ํ”ผ๋“œ๋ฐฑ์„ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ํ•„์ˆ˜์ ์ด๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ๊ด€์ธกํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์œ„์„ฑ์—์„œ ๊ด€์ธก๋œ ์ •๊ทœํ™” ์‹์ƒ ์ง€์ˆ˜ (NDVI) ํƒœ์–‘ ์œ ๋„ ์—ฝ๋ก์†Œ ํ˜•๊ด‘๋ฌผ์งˆ (SIF)๋Š” ๋Œ€์ค‘์ ์œผ๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜, ์šฐ์ฃผ ์œ„์„ฑ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ์ž๋ฃŒ๋Š” ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ํ•œ๊ณ„์ ๋“ค์ด ์กด์žฌํ•œ๋‹ค. 1) ์•„์ง๊นŒ์ง€ ๊ณ ํ•ด์ƒ๋„์˜ ์œ„์„ฑ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ SIF ์ž๋ฃŒ๋Š” ์—†๊ณ , 2) ์œ„์„ฑ ์ž๋ฃŒ๋“ค์€ ๋Œ€๊ธฐ์˜ ์งˆ (์˜ˆ, ๊ตฌ๋ฆ„)์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฐ›์•„, ํ๋ฆฐ ๋‚ ์˜ ์‹์ƒ์˜ ์ƒ๋ฆฌํ•™์ , ๊ตฌ์กฐ์  ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ํƒ์ง€ํ•˜๊ธฐ ํž˜๋“ค๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, 3) ์œ„์„ฑ ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€๋Š” ์ƒ๋ถ€ ์‹์ƒ๊ณผ ํ•˜๋ถ€ ์‹์ƒ์ด ํ˜ผํ•ฉ๋˜์–ด ์„ž์ธ ์‹ ํ˜ธ๋ฅผ ํƒ์ง€ํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์—, ๊ฐ ์ธต์˜ ์‹๋ฌผ ๊ณ„์ ˆ์„ ๊ฐ๊ฐ ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ธฐ์— ์–ด๋ ค์›€์ด ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋ฏ€๋กœ, ์œ„์„ฑ์—์„œ ํƒ์ง€ํ•œ ์‹ ํ˜ธ๋ฅผ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ณ , ์‹์ƒ์˜ ์ƒ๋ฆฌํ•™์ , ๊ตฌ์กฐ์  ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ๋ณด๋‹ค ์ •ํ™•ํžˆ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ๊ทผ์ ‘ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์›๊ฒฉ ์„ผ์‹ฑ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ์‹ค์ธก ์ž๋ฃŒ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋“ค์ด ์š”๊ตฌ๋œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ์˜ ์ฃผ ๋ชฉ์ ์€ ๊ทผ์ ‘ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์›๊ฒฉ ์„ผ์‹ฑ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์‹๋ฌผ ๊ณ„์ ˆ ๋ฐ SIF๋ฅผ ํ˜„์žฅ์—์„œ ์ง€์†์ ์œผ๋กœ ์‹ค์ธกํ•˜๊ณ , ์œ„์„ฑ ์˜์ƒ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ–๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ํ•œ๊ณ„์  ๋ฐ ๊ถ๊ธˆ์ฆ๋“ค์„ ํ•ด๊ฒฐ ๋ฐ ๋ณด์™„ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ์ด ๋ชฉ์ ์„ ๋‹ฌ์„ฑํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ, ์•„๋ž˜์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ์„ธ๊ฐ€์ง€ Chapter: 1) SIF๋ฅผ ๊ด€์ธกํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ํ•„ํ„ฐ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ์ €๋ ดํ•œ ๊ทผ์ ‘ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์„ผ์‹ฑ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ, 2)์˜จ๋Œ€ ์นจ์—ฝ์ˆ˜๋ฆผ์—์„œ์˜ ์—ฐ์†์ ์ธ SIF ๊ด€์ธก, 3)์œ„์„ฑ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ์‹๋ฌผ ๊ณ„์ ˆ๊ณผ ์‹ค์ธกํ•œ ๋‹ค์ธต ์‹์ƒ์˜ ์‹๋ฌผ ๊ณ„์ ˆ ๋น„๊ต๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜๊ณ , ์ด๋ฅผ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. SIF๋Š” ์‹์ƒ์˜ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์ , ์ƒ๋ฆฌํ•™์  ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๊ณ , ์ถ”์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ์ธ์ž๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์–ด, SIF๋ฅผ ํ˜„์žฅ์—์„œ ๊ด€์ธกํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๊ทผ์ ‘ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์›๊ฒฉ ์„ผ์‹ฑ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ๋“ค์ด ์ตœ๊ทผ ์ œ์‹œ๋˜์–ด ์˜ค๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜, ์•„์ง๊นŒ์ง€ SIF๋ฅผ ๊ด€์ธกํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ƒ์—…์ ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ํ†ต๋˜๋Š” ๊ด€์ธก ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์€ ํ˜„์ €ํžˆ ๋ถ€์กฑํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ๋ถ„๊ด‘๊ณ„์˜ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์  ํŠน์„ฑ์ƒ ํ˜„์žฅ์—์„œ ๊ด€์ธก ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ๋ณด์ • ๋ฐ ๊ด€๋ฆฌํ•˜๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ์–ด๋ ค์›Œ ๋†’์€ ์งˆ์˜ SIF๋ฅผ ์ทจ๋“ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ๋งค์šฐ ๋„์ „ ์ ์ธ ๋ถ„์•ผ์ด๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ํ•™์œ„ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์˜ Chapter 2์—์„œ๋Š” SIF๋ฅผ ํ˜„์žฅ์—์„œ ๋ณด๋‹ค ์†์‰ฝ๊ฒŒ ๊ด€์ธกํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ํ•„ํ„ฐ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ๊ทผ์ ‘ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์„ผ์‹ฑ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ(Smart Surface Sensing System, 4S-SIF)์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์„ผ์„œ๋Š” ๋Œ€์—ญ ํ•„ํ„ฐ๋“ค๊ณผ ํฌํ† ๋‹ค์ด์˜ค๋“œ๊ฐ€ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์„œ๋ณด ๋ชจํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋Œ€์—ญ ํ•„ํ„ฐ ๋ฐ ๊ด€์ธก ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์„ ์ž๋™์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณ€๊ฒฝํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ, ํ•œ ๊ฐœ์˜ ํฌํ† ๋‹ค์ด์˜ค๋“œ๊ฐ€ 3๊ฐœ์˜ ํŒŒ์žฅ ๋ฒ”์œ„(757, 760, 770 nm)์˜ ๋น› ๋ฐ ํƒœ์–‘์œผ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์ž…์‚ฌ๋˜๋Š” ๊ด‘๋Ÿ‰๊ณผ ์‹์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐ˜์‚ฌ/๋ฐฉ์ถœ๋œ ๊ด‘๋Ÿ‰์„ ๊ด€์ธกํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ๊ณ ์•ˆ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ํฌํ† ๋‹ค์ด์˜ค๋“œ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์ธ์‹๋œ ๋””์ง€ํ„ธ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๊ฐ’์€ ์ƒ์—…์ ์œผ๋กœ ํŒ๋งค๋˜๋Š” ์ดˆ๊ณ ํ•ด์ƒ๋„ ๋ถ„๊ด‘๊ณ„(QE Pro, Ocean Insight)์™€ ๋šœ๋ ทํ•œ ์„ ํ˜• ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ด๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค (R2 > 0.99). ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์œผ๋กœ, 4S-SIF์—์„œ ๊ด€์ธก๋œ SIF์™€ ์ดˆ๊ณ ํ•ด์ƒ๋„ ๋ถ„๊ด‘๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ถ”์ถœํ•œ SIF๊ฐ€ ์„ ํ˜•์ ์ธ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์ด๋ฃจ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์‹์ƒ์˜ ์ƒ๋ฆฌํ•™์  ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ์ผ์œผํ‚ค๋Š” ํ™”ํ•™ ๋ฌผ์งˆ์ธ DCMU(3-(3, 4-dichlorophenyl)-1, 1-dimethyurea)์„ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌํ–ˆ์Œ์—๋„ ๋ถˆ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ , ์‚ฐ์ถœ๋œ SIF๋“ค์€ ์„ ํ˜• ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์„ผ์„œ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ๋“ค์— ๋น„ํ•ด ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๊ธฐ ์‰ฝ๊ณ  ๊ฐ„๋‹จํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ์ €๋ ดํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์‹œ๊ณต๊ฐ„์  ์Šค์ผ€์ผ์˜ SIF๋ฅผ ๊ด€์ธกํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ์žฅ์ ์ด ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์œ„์„ฑ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ SIF๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ด์ผ์ฐจ์ƒ์‚ฐ์„ฑ(gross primary productivity, GPP)์„ ์ถ”์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ตœ๊ทผ ํƒ„์†Œ ์ˆœํ™˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ถ„์•ผ์—์„œ ๊ฐ๊ด‘๋ฐ›๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ์ฃผ์ œ์ด๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜, SIF์™€ GPP์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋Š” ์—ฌ์ „ํžˆ ๋งŽ์€ ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ์„ ์ง€๋‹ˆ๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š”๋ฐ, ์ด๋Š” SIF-GPP ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์กฐ์ ˆํ•˜๋Š” ์‹์ƒ์˜ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์  ๋ฐ ์ƒ๋ฆฌํ•™์  ์š”์ธ์„ ๋”ฐ๋กœ ๋ถ„๋ฆฌํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ณ ์ฐฐํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋“ค์ด ๋ถ€์กฑํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ด๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ํ•™์œ„ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์˜ Chapter 3์—์„œ๋Š” ์ง€์†์ ์œผ๋กœ SIF, GPP, ํก์ˆ˜๋œ ๊ด‘ํ•ฉ์„ฑ์œ ํšจ๋ณต์‚ฌ๋Ÿ‰ (absorbed photosynthetically active radiation, APAR), ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ํด๋กœ๋กœํ•„๊ณผ ์นด๋กœํ‹ฐ๋…ธ์ด๋“œ์˜ ๋น„์œจ ์ธ์ž (chlorophyll: carotenoid index, CCI)๋ฅผ ์˜จ๋Œ€์นจ์—ฝ์ˆ˜๋ฆผ์—์„œ ์—ฐ์†์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ด€์ธกํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. SIF-GPP ๊ด€๊ณ„์˜ ๊ตฌ์ฒด์ ์ธ ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋ฐํžˆ๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ, ๊ด‘ ์ด์šฉํšจ์œจ (light use efficiency, LUE_p), ์—ฝ๋ก์†Œ ํ˜•๊ด‘ ์ˆ˜๋“๋ฅ  (chlorophyll fluorescence yield, ฮฆ_F) ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  SIF ๊ด‘์ž๊ฐ€ ๊ตฐ๋ฝ์œผ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๋ฐฉ์ถœ๋˜๋Š” ๋น„์œจ (escape fraction, f_esc)์„ ๊ฐ๊ฐ ๋„์ถœํ•˜๊ณ  ํƒ๊ตฌํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. SIF์™€ GPP์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋Š” ๋šœ๋ ทํ•œ ๋น„ ์„ ํ˜•์ ์ธ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ด๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ–ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ(R2 = 0.91 with a hyperbolic regression function, daily), ์ผ์ฃผ๊ธฐ ๋‹จ์œ„์—์„œ SIF๋Š” APAR์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์„ ํ˜•์ ์ด์—ˆ์ง€๋งŒ GPP๋Š” APAR์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๋šœ๋ ทํ•œ ํฌํ™” ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ด๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์œผ๋กœ LUE_p ์™€ ฮฆ_F ๊ฐ€ ๋Œ€๊ธฐ ์˜จ๋„์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋ฐ˜์‘ํ•˜๋Š” ์ •๋„๊ฐ€ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. LUE_p๋Š” ๋†’์€ ์˜จ๋„์—์„œ ํฌํ™” ๋˜์—ˆ์ง€๋งŒ, ฮฆ_F๋Š” ํฌํ™” ํŒจํ„ด์„ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์—†์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ๊ตฐ๋ฝ ์ˆ˜์ค€์—์„œ์˜ CCI์™€ ฮฆ_F๊ฐ€ ๋šœ๋ ทํ•œ ์ƒ๊ด€ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค(R2 = 0.84). ์ด๋Š” ฮฆ_F๊ฐ€ ์—ฝ๋ก์†Œ ์ƒ‰์†Œ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ LUE_p์— ๋น„ํ•ด ๋” ๊ฐ•ํ•œ ๊ด€๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ์‹œ์‚ฌํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰์œผ๋กœ, f_esc๊ฐ€ ํƒœ์–‘๊ด‘์˜ ์‚ฐ๋ž€๋œ ์ •๋„์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋ฐ˜์‘์„ ํ•˜์—ฌ, ฮฆ_F์™€ LUE_p์˜ ๊ฐ•ํ•œ ์ƒ๊ด€ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ํ˜•์„ฑํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ๊ธฐ์—ฌํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ์€ ์˜จ๋Œ€ ์นจ์—ฝ์ˆ˜๋ฆผ์—์„œ ๊ตฐ๋ฝ ์ˆ˜์ค€์˜ SIF-GPP๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์ƒ๋ฆฌํ•™์  ๋ฐ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์  ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ทœ๋ช…ํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ํฐ ๋„์›€์ด ๋  ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ์‹๋ฌผ ๊ณ„์ ˆ์€ ์‹์ƒ์ด ์ฒ ์„ ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ฃผ๊ธฐ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด๋Š” ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ๊ด€์ธกํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ˜์‘์ด๋‹ค. ์‹๋ฌผ ๊ณ„์ ˆ์€ ์œก์ƒ์ƒํƒœ๊ณ„์™€ ๋Œ€๊ธฐ๊ถŒ ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ๋ฌผ์งˆ ์ˆœํ™˜์„ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ๋งค์šฐ ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ์œ„์„ฑ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ NDVI๋Š” ์‹๋ฌผ ๊ณ„์ ˆ์„ ํƒ์ง€ํ•˜๊ณ  ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋Œ€์ค‘์ ์œผ๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋œ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜, ํ™œ์—ฝ์ˆ˜๋ฆผ์—์„œ์˜ ์œ„์„ฑ NDVI ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ๊ฐœ์—ฝ ์‹œ๊ธฐ ๋ฐ ์„ฑ์ˆ™ ์‹œ๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ์‹ค์ œ ์–ด๋Š ์‹œ์ ์„ ํƒ์ง€ํ•˜๋Š”์ง€๋Š” ๋ถˆ๋ถ„๋ช…ํ•˜๋‹ค. ์‹ค์ œ ํ™œ์—ฝ์ˆ˜๋ฆผ์€ ๋‹ค์ธต ์‹์ƒ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์˜ ์‚ผ์ฐจ์›์œผ๋กœ ์ด๋ฃจ์–ด์ ธ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด, ์œ„์„ฑ ์˜์ƒ์€ ๋‹ค์ธต ์‹์ƒ์˜ ์‹ ํ˜ธ๊ฐ€ ์„ž์—ฌ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ด์ฐจ์›์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฌผ์ด๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ด๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ, ์œ„์„ฑ NDVI ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ์‹๋ฌผ ๊ณ„์ ˆ์ด ๋‹ค์ธต ์‹์ƒ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ์ด๋ฃจ๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ํ™œ์—ฝ์ˆ˜๋ฆผ์—์„œ ์‹ค์ œ ํ˜„์žฅ ๊ด€์ธก๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์˜€์„ ๋•Œ ์–ด๋Š ์‹œ์ ์„ ํƒ์ง€ํ•˜๋Š”์ง€์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ถ๊ธˆ์ฆ์ด ๋‚จ๋Š”๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ํ•™์œ„ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์˜ Chapter 4์—์„œ๋Š” ์ง€์†์ ์œผ๋กœ 8๋…„ ๋™์•ˆ ํ™œ์—ฝ์ˆ˜๋ฆผ๋‚ด์˜ ๋‹ค์ธต ์‹์ƒ์˜ ์‹๋ฌผ ๊ณ„์ ˆ์„ ๊ทผ์ ‘ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์›๊ฒฉ ์„ผ์‹ฑ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ด€์ธกํ•˜๊ณ , ์œ„์„ฑ NDVI ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ์‹๋ฌผ ๊ณ„์ ˆ๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋‹ค์ฑ„๋„ ๋ถ„๊ด‘๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์ƒ๋ถ€ ์‹์ƒ์˜ ์œ„์™€ ์•„๋ž˜์— ์„ค์น˜ํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ, ์ƒ๋ถ€ ์‹์ƒ๊ณผ ํ•˜๋ถ€ ์‹์ƒ์˜ ์‹๋ฌผ ๊ณ„์ ˆ์„ ๊ฐ๊ฐ ์—ฐ์†์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ด€์ธกํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์‹๋ฌผ ๊ณ„์ ˆ์„ ํƒ์ง€ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋งŽ์ด ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ธ 1) ์—ญ์น˜๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๊ณผ 2) ์ด๊ณ„๋„ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฐœ์—ฝ ์‹œ๊ธฐ ๋ฐ ์„ฑ์ˆ™ ์‹œ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•˜๊ณ  ์ด๋ฅผ ๋‹ค์ธต ์‹์ƒ์˜ ์‹๋ฌผ ๊ณ„์ ˆ๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์ฒซ๋ฒˆ์งธ๋กœ, ๊ตฐ๋ฝ์˜ ์ƒ์ธต๋ถ€์—์„œ ์‹ค์ธกํ•œ NDVI์™€ ์œ„์„ฑ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ NDVI๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ•ํ•œ ์„ ํ˜• ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ด๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ–ˆ๋‹ค (R2=0.95 ๋Š” MODIS ์˜์ƒ๋“ค ๋ฐ R2= 0.85 ๋Š” Landsat8). ๋‘๋ฒˆ์งธ๋กœ, ์ด๊ณ„๋„ํ•จ์ˆ˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๊ณผ 10%์˜ ์—ญ์น˜ ๊ฐ’์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด ๋น„์Šทํ•œ ๊ฐœ์—ฝ ์‹œ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ์ถ”์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ํ•˜๋ถ€ ์‹์ƒ์˜ ๊ฐœ์—ฝ ์‹œ๊ธฐ์™€ ๋น„์Šทํ•œ ์‹œ๊ธฐ์ž„์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์„ธ๋ฒˆ์งธ๋กœ, ์ด๊ณ„๋„ํ•จ์ˆ˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๊ณผ 90%์˜ ์—ญ์น˜ ๊ฐ’์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด ๋น„์Šทํ•œ ์„ฑ์ˆ™ ์‹œ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ์‚ฐ์ถœํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ์ƒ๋ถ€ ์‹์ƒ์˜ ์„ฑ์ˆ™ ์‹œ๊ธฐ์™€ ๋น„์Šทํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ƒ๋ถ€ ์‹์ƒ์˜ ๊ฐœ์—ฝ ์‹œ๊ธฐ์™€ ํ•˜๋ถ€ ์‹์ƒ์˜ ๊ฐœ์—ฝ ์‹œ๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ์˜จ๋„์™€ ๋ฐ˜์‘ํ•˜๋Š” ์ •๋„๊ฐ€ ๋šœ๋ ทํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ๋‚˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ƒ๋ถ€ ์‹์ƒ์˜ ๊ฐœ์—ฝ ์‹œ๊ธฐ๋Š” ์ ์‚ฐ ์ƒ์žฅ ์˜จ๋„ ์ผ์ˆ˜ (AGDD)์™€ ๊ฐ•ํ•œ ์ƒ๊ด€์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์˜€๊ณ , ํ•˜๋ถ€ ์‹์ƒ์˜ ๊ฐœ์—ฝ ์‹œ๊ธฐ๋Š” AGDD์™€ ์—ฐ๊ด€์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ–๊ณ  ์žˆ์„ ๋ฟ๋งŒ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ ์ถ”์œ„ ์ผ์ˆ˜(NCD)์—๋„ ๋ฏผ๊ฐํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋ฐ˜์‘ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์œ„์„ฑ NDVI ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ๊ฐœ์—ฝ ์‹œ๊ธฐ๋Š” ํ•˜๋ถ€ ์‹์ƒ์˜ ๊ฐœ์—ฝ ์‹œ๊ธฐ์™€ ์—ฐ๊ด€์„ฑ์ด ๋†’๊ณ , ์„ฑ์ˆ™ ์‹œ๊ธฐ๋Š” ์ƒ๋ถ€ ์‹์ƒ์˜ ์„ฑ์ˆ™ ์‹œ๊ธฐ์™€ ๋น„์Šทํ•˜๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ์ƒ๋ถ€ ์‹์ƒ๊ณผ ํ•˜๋ถ€ ์‹์ƒ์ด ์˜จ๋„์— ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๋ฏผ๊ฐ์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ–๊ณ  ์žˆ์–ด, ์œ„์„ฑ์—์„œ ์‚ฐ์ถœ๋œ ์‹๋ฌผ ๊ณ„์ ˆ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ธฐํ›„๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•  ๋•Œ, ์–ด๋–ค ์ธต์˜ ์‹์ƒ์ด ์œ„์„ฑ ์˜์ƒ์— ์ฃผ๋œ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š”์ง€ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ์‹œ์‚ฌํ•œ๋‹ค. ์œ„์„ฑ์€ ๋„“์€ ์ง€์—ญ์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ์†์‰ฝ๊ฒŒ ๋ชจ๋‹ˆํ„ฐ๋งํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์–ด ๋งŽ์€ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ–๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ๋„๊ตฌ์ด์ง€๋งŒ, ๋ณด๋‹ค ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ์œ„์„ฑ ๊ด€์ธก ๊ฐ’์„ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ํ˜„์žฅ์—์„œ ๊ด€์ธก๋œ ์ž๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ํ•œ ๊ฒ€์ฆ์ด ์š”๊ตฌ๋œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ํ•™์œ„ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” 1) ๊ทผ์ ‘ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์„ผ์‹ฑ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ, 2) ๊ทผ์ ‘ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์„ผ์‹ฑ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•œ ์‹์ƒ์˜ ์ƒ๋ฆฌํ•™์  ๊ตฌ์กฐ์  ๋ณ€ํ™”์˜ ์ง€์†์ ์ธ ๊ด€์ธก, 3) ๋‹ค์ธต ์‹์ƒ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์—์„œ ๊ด€์ธก๋˜๋Š” ์‹๋ฌผ ๊ณ„์ ˆ ๋ฐ ์œ„์„ฑ์—์„œ ์ถ”์ •๋œ ์‹๋ฌผ ๊ณ„์ ˆ์˜ ์—ฐ๊ด€์„ฑ ํ‰๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•œ ๊ทผ์ ‘ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์„ผ์„œ๋Š” ์ƒ์—… ์„ผ์„œ๋“ค๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ–ˆ์„ ๋•Œ, ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ €๋ ดํ•˜๊ณ  ์† ์‰ฝ๊ฒŒ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์ ์œผ๋กœ๋„ ๋ถ€์กฑํ•จ์ด ์—†์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทผ์ ‘ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์„ผ์‹ฑ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ SIF๋ฅผ ์˜จ๋Œ€ ์นจ์—ฝ์ˆ˜๋ฆผ์—์„œ ์ง€์†์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ด€์ธกํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์ด์ผ์ฐจ์ƒ์‚ฐ์„ฑ๊ณผ SIF๋Š” ๋น„์„ ํ˜• ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๊ฐ–๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ๋งŽ์€ ์„ ํ–‰ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋“ค์—์„œ ๋ฐœํ‘œํ•œ ์œ„์„ฑ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ SIF์™€ GPP๊ฐ€ ์„ ํ˜•์ ์ธ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ธ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ๊ณผ๋Š” ๋‹ค์†Œ ์ƒ๋ฐ˜๋œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์ด๋‹ค. ๋‹ค์ธก ์‹์ƒ์˜ ๋ด„์ฒ  ์‹๋ฌผ ๊ณ„์ ˆ์„ ์—ฐ์†์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ด€์ธกํ•˜๊ณ , ์œ„์„ฑ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ์‹๋ฌผ ๊ณ„์ ˆ๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์œ„์„ฑ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ๊ฐœ์—ฝ ์‹œ๊ธฐ๋Š” ํ•˜๋ถ€ ์‹์ƒ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ฃผ๋กœ ๋ฐ›๊ณ , ์„ฑ์ˆ™ ์‹œ๊ธฐ๋Š” ์ƒ๋ถ€ ์‹์ƒ์˜ ์‹œ๊ธฐ์™€ ๋น„์Šทํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ฆ‰, ๊ทผ์ ‘ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์„ผ์‹ฑ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ํ˜„์žฅ์—์„œ ์‹ค์ธกํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์œ„์„ฑ ์˜์ƒ์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋“ค๊ณผ๋Š” ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ผ ์ˆ˜๋„ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์œ„์„ฑ ์˜์ƒ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ ๋ฐ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ, ๋ณด๋‹ค ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ์‹์ƒ์˜ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์ , ์ƒ๋ฆฌํ•™์  ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜์„ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ๊ทผ์ ‘ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์„ผ์‹ฑ์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•œ ํ˜„์žฅ์—์„œ ๊ตฌ์ถ•ํ•œ ์ž๋ฃŒ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ๋” ๋งŽ์€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋“ค์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ์‹œ์‚ฌํ•œ๋‹ค.Abstract i Chapter 1. Introduction 2 1. Background 2 2. Purpose 5 Chapter 2. Monitoring SIF using a filter-based near surface remote sensing system 9 1. Introduction 9 2. Instrument desing and technical spefications of the filter-based smart surface sensing system (4S-SIF) 12 2.1. Ultra-narrow band pass filter 14 2.2. Calibration of 4S-SIF 15 2.3. Temperature and humidity response 16 2.4. Evaluate SIF quality from 4S-SIF in the field 17 3. Results 20 4. Discussion 23 Chapter 3. SIF is non-linearly related to canopy photosynthesis in a temperate evergreen needleleaf forest during fall transition 27 1. Introduction 27 2. Methods and Materials 31 2.1. Study site 31 2.2. Leaf-level fluorescence measurement 32 2.3. Canopy-level SIF and spectral reflectance measurement 34 2.4. SIF retrieval 37 2.5. Canopy-level photosynthesis estimates 38 2.6. Meteorological variables and APAR 39 2.7. Statistical analysis 40 3. Results 41 4. Discussion 48 4.1. Non-linear relationships between SIF and GPP 49 4.2. Role of f_esc in SIF-GPP relationship 53 4.3. Implications of non-linear SIF-GPP relationship in temperate ENF 54 5. Conclusion 57 6. Appendix 59 Chapter 4. Monitoring spring phenology of multi-layer canopy in a deciduous broadleaf forest: What signal do satellites actually see in space 65 1. Introduction 65 2. Materials and Methods 69 2.1. Study site 69 2.2. Multi-layer spectral reflectance and transmittance measurement 70 2.3. Phenometrics detection 72 2.4. In-situ multi-layer phenology 74 2.5. Satellite remote sensing data 75 2.6. Meteorological variables 75 3. Results 76 3.1. Seasonal to interannual variations of NDVI, 1-transmittance, and air temperature 76 3.2. Inter-annual variation of leaf-out and full-leaf dates 78 3.3. The relationships between dates calculated according tothreshold and in-situ multi-layer phenology 80 3.4. The relationship between multi-layer phenology, AGDD and NCD 81 4. Discussion 82 4.1. How do satellite-based leaf-out and full-leaf dates differ from in-situ multi-layer phenology 83 4.2. Are the 10 % and 90 % thresholds from satellite-basedNDVI always well matched with the leaf-out and full-leaf dates calculated by the curvature change rate 86 4.3. What are the implications of the difference between satellite-based and multi-layer phenology 87 4.4. Limitations and implications for future studies 89 5. Conclusion 91 6. Appendix 92 Chapter 5. Conclusion 114 Abstract in Korean 115๋ฐ•
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore