9,548 research outputs found
Formalising Confluence in PVS
Confluence is a critical property of computational systems which is related
with determinism and non ambiguity and thus with other relevant computational
attributes of functional specifications and rewriting system as termination and
completion. Several criteria have been explored that guarantee confluence and
their formalisations provide further interesting information. This work
discusses topics and presents personal positions and views related with the
formalisation of confluence properties in the Prototype Verification System PVS
developed at our research group.Comment: In Proceedings DCM 2015, arXiv:1603.0053
Closed nominal rewriting and efficiently computable nominal algebra equality
We analyse the relationship between nominal algebra and nominal rewriting,
giving a new and concise presentation of equational deduction in nominal
theories. With some new results, we characterise a subclass of equational
theories for which nominal rewriting provides a complete procedure to check
nominal algebra equality. This subclass includes specifications of the
lambda-calculus and first-order logic.Comment: In Proceedings LFMTP 2010, arXiv:1009.218
Constraint Handling Rules with Binders, Patterns and Generic Quantification
Constraint Handling Rules provide descriptions for constraint solvers.
However, they fall short when those constraints specify some binding structure,
like higher-rank types in a constraint-based type inference algorithm. In this
paper, the term syntax of constraints is replaced by -tree syntax, in
which binding is explicit; and a new generic quantifier is introduced,
which is used to create new fresh constants.Comment: Paper presented at the 33nd International Conference on Logic
Programming (ICLP 2017), Melbourne, Australia, August 28 to September 1, 2017
16 pages, LaTeX, no PDF figure
Confluence of Orthogonal Nominal Rewriting Systems Revisited
Nominal rewriting systems (Fernandez, Gabbay, Mackie, 2004;
Fernandez, Gabbay, 2007) have been introduced as a new framework
of higher-order rewriting systems based on the nominal approach
(Gabbay, Pitts, 2002; Pitts, 2003), which deals with variable
binding via permutations and freshness conditions on atoms.
Confluence of orthogonal nominal rewriting systems has been shown in
(Fernandez, Gabbay, 2007). However, their definition of
(non-trivial) critical pairs has a serious weakness so that the
orthogonality does not actually hold for most of standard nominal
rewriting systems in the presence of binders. To overcome this
weakness, we divide the notion of overlaps into the self-rooted and
proper ones, and introduce a notion of alpha-stability which
guarantees alpha-equivalence of peaks from the self-rooted
overlaps. Moreover, we give a sufficient criterion for uniformity and alpha-stability. The new definition of orthogonality and the
criterion offer a novel confluence condition effectively applicable to many standard nominal rewriting systems. We also report on an
implementation of a confluence prover for orthogonal nominal rewriting systems based on our framework
De Morgan Dual Nominal Quantifiers Modelling Private Names in Non-Commutative Logic
This paper explores the proof theory necessary for recommending an expressive
but decidable first-order system, named MAV1, featuring a de Morgan dual pair
of nominal quantifiers. These nominal quantifiers called `new' and `wen' are
distinct from the self-dual Gabbay-Pitts and Miller-Tiu nominal quantifiers.
The novelty of these nominal quantifiers is they are polarised in the sense
that `new' distributes over positive operators while `wen' distributes over
negative operators. This greater control of bookkeeping enables private names
to be modelled in processes embedded as formulae in MAV1. The technical
challenge is to establish a cut elimination result, from which essential
properties including the transitivity of implication follow. Since the system
is defined using the calculus of structures, a generalisation of the sequent
calculus, novel techniques are employed. The proof relies on an intricately
designed multiset-based measure of the size of a proof, which is used to guide
a normalisation technique called splitting. The presence of equivariance, which
swaps successive quantifiers, induces complex inter-dependencies between
nominal quantifiers, additive conjunction and multiplicative operators in the
proof of splitting. Every rule is justified by an example demonstrating why the
rule is necessary for soundly embedding processes and ensuring that cut
elimination holds.Comment: Submitted for review 18/2/2016; accepted CONCUR 2016; extended
version submitted to journal 27/11/201
Nominal Narrowing
Nominal unification is a generalisation of first-order unification
that takes alpha-equivalence into account. In this paper, we study
nominal unification in the context of equational theories. We
introduce nominal narrowing and design a general nominal E-unification
procedure, which is sound and complete for a wide class of equational
theories. We give examples of application
A Theory of Explicit Substitutions with Safe and Full Composition
Many different systems with explicit substitutions have been proposed to
implement a large class of higher-order languages. Motivations and challenges
that guided the development of such calculi in functional frameworks are
surveyed in the first part of this paper. Then, very simple technology in named
variable-style notation is used to establish a theory of explicit substitutions
for the lambda-calculus which enjoys a whole set of useful properties such as
full composition, simulation of one-step beta-reduction, preservation of
beta-strong normalisation, strong normalisation of typed terms and confluence
on metaterms. Normalisation of related calculi is also discussed.Comment: 29 pages Special Issue: Selected Papers of the Conference
"International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming 2008" edited
by Giuseppe Castagna and Igor Walukiewic
Graphical Encoding of a Spatial Logic for the pi-Calculus
This paper extends our graph-based approach to the verification of spatial properties of π-calculus specifications. The mechanism is based on an encoding for mobile calculi where each process is mapped into a graph (with interfaces) such that the denotation is fully abstract with respect to the usual structural congruence, i.e., two processes are equivalent exactly when the corresponding encodings yield isomorphic graphs. Behavioral and structural properties of π-calculus processes expressed in a spatial logic can then be verified on the graphical encoding of a process rather than on its textual representation. In this paper we introduce a modal logic for graphs and define a translation of spatial formulae such that a process verifies a spatial formula exactly when its graphical representation verifies the translated modal graph formula
- …