Comparative evaluation of approaches in T.4.1-4.3 and working definition of adaptive module

The goal of this deliverable is two-fold: (1) to present and compare different approaches towards learning and encoding movements us- ing dynamical systems that have been developed by the AMARSi partners (in the past during the first 6 months of the project), and (2) to analyze their suitability to be used as adaptive modules, i.e. as building blocks for the complete architecture that will be devel- oped in the project. The document presents a total of eight approaches, in two groups: modules for discrete movements (i.e. with a clear goal where the movement stops) and for rhythmic movements (i.e. which exhibit periodicity). The basic formulation of each approach is presented together with some illustrative simulation results. Key character- istics such as the type of dynamical behavior, learning algorithm, generalization properties, stability analysis are then discussed for each approach. We then make a comparative analysis of the different approaches by comparing these characteristics and discussing their suitability for the AMARSi project

GenNet: A Platform for Hybrid Network Experiments

We describe General Network (GenNet), a software plugin for the real time experimental interface (RTXI) dynamic clamp system that allows for straightforward and flexible implementation of hybrid network experiments. This extension to RTXI allows for hybrid networks that contain an arbitrary number of simulated and real neurons, significantly improving upon previous solutions that were limited, particularly by the number of cells supported. The benefits of this system include the ability to rapidly and easily set up and perform scalable experiments with hybrid networks and the ability to scan through ranges of parameters. We present instructions for installing, running and using GenNet for hybrid network experiments and provide several example uses of the system

Integration and validation of embedded flight software on space-qualified multicore architectures

In the recent decades, the importance of software on space missions has notably increased, reflecting the need to integrate advanced on-board functionalities. With multicore processors being lately introduced to host critical high-performance applications, the complexity to validate software has significantly raised with respect to single core architectures. While there has been a big step forward in avionics after the publication of the CAST-32A paper, the ECSS-E-ST-40C software engineering standard used by the European Space Agency (ESA) is still not providing validation support for multicore processors. Hence, it is expected that standardising guidelines to develop software on such platforms will become a recurring topic in the industry to match the demands of future space exploration missions

Evolutionary robotics and neuroscience

No description supplie