5,990 research outputs found
Correlation between centrality metrics and their application to the opinion model
In recent decades, a number of centrality metrics describing network
properties of nodes have been proposed to rank the importance of nodes. In
order to understand the correlations between centrality metrics and to
approximate a high-complexity centrality metric by a strongly correlated
low-complexity metric, we first study the correlation between centrality
metrics in terms of their Pearson correlation coefficient and their similarity
in ranking of nodes. In addition to considering the widely used centrality
metrics, we introduce a new centrality measure, the degree mass. The m order
degree mass of a node is the sum of the weighted degree of the node and its
neighbors no further than m hops away. We find that the B_{n}, the closeness,
and the components of x_{1} are strongly correlated with the degree, the
1st-order degree mass and the 2nd-order degree mass, respectively, in both
network models and real-world networks. We then theoretically prove that the
Pearson correlation coefficient between x_{1} and the 2nd-order degree mass is
larger than that between x_{1} and a lower order degree mass. Finally, we
investigate the effect of the inflexible antagonists selected based on
different centrality metrics in helping one opinion to compete with another in
the inflexible antagonists opinion model. Interestingly, we find that selecting
the inflexible antagonists based on the leverage, the B_{n}, or the degree is
more effective in opinion-competition than using other centrality metrics in
all types of networks. This observation is supported by our previous
observations, i.e., that there is a strong linear correlation between the
degree and the B_{n}, as well as a high centrality similarity between the
leverage and the degree.Comment: 20 page
Computing Vertex Centrality Measures in Massive Real Networks with a Neural Learning Model
Vertex centrality measures are a multi-purpose analysis tool, commonly used
in many application environments to retrieve information and unveil knowledge
from the graphs and network structural properties. However, the algorithms of
such metrics are expensive in terms of computational resources when running
real-time applications or massive real world networks. Thus, approximation
techniques have been developed and used to compute the measures in such
scenarios. In this paper, we demonstrate and analyze the use of neural network
learning algorithms to tackle such task and compare their performance in terms
of solution quality and computation time with other techniques from the
literature. Our work offers several contributions. We highlight both the pros
and cons of approximating centralities though neural learning. By empirical
means and statistics, we then show that the regression model generated with a
feedforward neural networks trained by the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm is not
only the best option considering computational resources, but also achieves the
best solution quality for relevant applications and large-scale networks.
Keywords: Vertex Centrality Measures, Neural Networks, Complex Network Models,
Machine Learning, Regression ModelComment: 8 pages, 5 tables, 2 figures, version accepted at IJCNN 2018. arXiv
admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1810.1176
Graph Metrics for Temporal Networks
Temporal networks, i.e., networks in which the interactions among a set of
elementary units change over time, can be modelled in terms of time-varying
graphs, which are time-ordered sequences of graphs over a set of nodes. In such
graphs, the concepts of node adjacency and reachability crucially depend on the
exact temporal ordering of the links. Consequently, all the concepts and
metrics proposed and used for the characterisation of static complex networks
have to be redefined or appropriately extended to time-varying graphs, in order
to take into account the effects of time ordering on causality. In this chapter
we discuss how to represent temporal networks and we review the definitions of
walks, paths, connectedness and connected components valid for graphs in which
the links fluctuate over time. We then focus on temporal node-node distance,
and we discuss how to characterise link persistence and the temporal
small-world behaviour in this class of networks. Finally, we discuss the
extension of classic centrality measures, including closeness, betweenness and
spectral centrality, to the case of time-varying graphs, and we review the work
on temporal motifs analysis and the definition of modularity for temporal
graphs.Comment: 26 pages, 5 figures, Chapter in Temporal Networks (Petter Holme and
Jari Saram\"aki editors). Springer. Berlin, Heidelberg 201
- …