33,237 research outputs found

    Three Puzzles on Mathematics, Computation, and Games

    Full text link
    In this lecture I will talk about three mathematical puzzles involving mathematics and computation that have preoccupied me over the years. The first puzzle is to understand the amazing success of the simplex algorithm for linear programming. The second puzzle is about errors made when votes are counted during elections. The third puzzle is: are quantum computers possible?Comment: ICM 2018 plenary lecture, Rio de Janeiro, 36 pages, 7 Figure

    Discriminating different classes of biological networks by analyzing the graphs spectra distribution

    Get PDF
    The brain's structural and functional systems, protein-protein interaction, and gene networks are examples of biological systems that share some features of complex networks, such as highly connected nodes, modularity, and small-world topology. Recent studies indicate that some pathologies present topological network alterations relative to norms seen in the general population. Therefore, methods to discriminate the processes that generate the different classes of networks (e.g., normal and disease) might be crucial for the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of the disease. It is known that several topological properties of a network (graph) can be described by the distribution of the spectrum of its adjacency matrix. Moreover, large networks generated by the same random process have the same spectrum distribution, allowing us to use it as a "fingerprint". Based on this relationship, we introduce and propose the entropy of a graph spectrum to measure the "uncertainty" of a random graph and the Kullback-Leibler and Jensen-Shannon divergences between graph spectra to compare networks. We also introduce general methods for model selection and network model parameter estimation, as well as a statistical procedure to test the nullity of divergence between two classes of complex networks. Finally, we demonstrate the usefulness of the proposed methods by applying them on (1) protein-protein interaction networks of different species and (2) on networks derived from children diagnosed with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and typically developing children. We conclude that scale-free networks best describe all the protein-protein interactions. Also, we show that our proposed measures succeeded in the identification of topological changes in the network while other commonly used measures (number of edges, clustering coefficient, average path length) failed

    Quantum Graphical Models and Belief Propagation

    Get PDF
    Belief Propagation algorithms acting on Graphical Models of classical probability distributions, such as Markov Networks, Factor Graphs and Bayesian Networks, are amongst the most powerful known methods for deriving probabilistic inferences amongst large numbers of random variables. This paper presents a generalization of these concepts and methods to the quantum case, based on the idea that quantum theory can be thought of as a noncommutative, operator-valued, generalization of classical probability theory. Some novel characterizations of quantum conditional independence are derived, and definitions of Quantum n-Bifactor Networks, Markov Networks, Factor Graphs and Bayesian Networks are proposed. The structure of Quantum Markov Networks is investigated and some partial characterization results are obtained, along the lines of the Hammersely-Clifford theorem. A Quantum Belief Propagation algorithm is presented and is shown to converge on 1-Bifactor Networks and Markov Networks when the underlying graph is a tree. The use of Quantum Belief Propagation as a heuristic algorithm in cases where it is not known to converge is discussed. Applications to decoding quantum error correcting codes and to the simulation of many-body quantum systems are described.Comment: 58 pages, 9 figure

    Properties of dense partially random graphs

    Full text link
    We study the properties of random graphs where for each vertex a {\it neighbourhood} has been previously defined. The probability of an edge joining two vertices depends on whether the vertices are neighbours or not, as happens in Small World Graphs (SWGs). But we consider the case where the average degree of each node is of order of the size of the graph (unlike SWGs, which are sparse). This allows us to calculate the mean distance and clustering, that are qualitatively similar (although not in such a dramatic scale range) to the case of SWGs. We also obtain analytically the distribution of eigenvalues of the corresponding adjacency matrices. This distribution is discrete for large eigenvalues and continuous for small eigenvalues. The continuous part of the distribution follows a semicircle law, whose width is proportional to the "disorder" of the graph, whereas the discrete part is simply a rescaling of the spectrum of the substrate. We apply our results to the calculation of the mixing rate and the synchronizability threshold.Comment: 14 pages. To be published in Physical Review

    (Quantum) Space-Time as a Statistical Geometry of Lumps in Random Networks

    Full text link
    In the following we undertake to describe how macroscopic space-time (or rather, a microscopic protoform of it) is supposed to emerge as a superstructure of a web of lumps in a stochastic discrete network structure. As in preceding work (mentioned below), our analysis is based on the working philosophy that both physics and the corresponding mathematics have to be genuinely discrete on the primordial (Planck scale) level. This strategy is concretely implemented in the form of \tit{cellular networks} and \tit{random graphs}. One of our main themes is the development of the concept of \tit{physical (proto)points} or \tit{lumps} as densely entangled subcomplexes of the network and their respective web, establishing something like \tit{(proto)causality}. It may perhaps be said that certain parts of our programme are realisations of some early ideas of Menger and more recent ones sketched by Smolin a couple of years ago. We briefly indicate how this \tit{two-story-concept} of \tit{quantum} space-time can be used to encode the (at least in our view) existing non-local aspects of quantum theory without violating macroscopic space-time causality.Comment: 35 pages, Latex, under consideration by CQ

    Faster and Simpler Distributed Algorithms for Testing and Correcting Graph Properties in the CONGEST-Model

    Full text link
    In this paper we present distributed testing algorithms of graph properties in the CONGEST-model [Censor-Hillel et al. 2016]. We present one-sided error testing algorithms in the general graph model. We first describe a general procedure for converting Ï”\epsilon-testers with a number of rounds f(D)f(D), where DD denotes the diameter of the graph, to O((log⁥n)/Ï”)+f((log⁥n)/Ï”)O((\log n)/\epsilon)+f((\log n)/\epsilon) rounds, where nn is the number of processors of the network. We then apply this procedure to obtain an optimal tester, in terms of nn, for testing bipartiteness, whose round complexity is O(ϔ−1log⁥n)O(\epsilon^{-1}\log n), which improves over the poly(ϔ−1log⁥n)poly(\epsilon^{-1} \log n)-round algorithm by Censor-Hillel et al. (DISC 2016). Moreover, for cycle-freeness, we obtain a \emph{corrector} of the graph that locally corrects the graph so that the corrected graph is acyclic. Note that, unlike a tester, a corrector needs to mend the graph in many places in the case that the graph is far from having the property. In the second part of the paper we design algorithms for testing whether the network is HH-free for any connected HH of size up to four with round complexity of O(ϔ−1)O(\epsilon^{-1}). This improves over the O(ϔ−2)O(\epsilon^{-2})-round algorithms for testing triangle freeness by Censor-Hillel et al. (DISC 2016) and for testing excluded graphs of size 44 by Fraigniaud et al. (DISC 2016). In the last part we generalize the global tester by Iwama and Yoshida (ITCS 2014) of testing kk-path freeness to testing the exclusion of any tree of order kk. We then show how to simulate this algorithm in the CONGEST-model in O(kk2+1⋅ϔ−k)O(k^{k^2+1}\cdot\epsilon^{-k}) rounds
    • 

    corecore