1,585 research outputs found
Correcting for ascertainment bias in the inference of population structure
Background: The ascertainment process of molecular markers amounts to disregard loci carrying alleles with low frequencies. This can result in strong biases in inferences under population genetics models if not properly taken into account by the inference algorithm. Attempting to model this censoring process in view of making inference of population structure (i.e.identifying clusters of individuals) brings up challenging numerical difficulties. Method: These difficulties are related to the presence of intractable normalizing constants in Metropolis-Hastings acceptance ratios. This can be solved via an Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm known as single variable exchange algorithm (SVEA). Result: We show how this general solution can be implemented for a class of clustering models of broad interest in population genetics that includes the models underlying the computer programs STRUCTURE, GENELAND and GESTE. We also implement the method proposed for a simple example and show that it allows us to reduce the bias substantially. Availability: Further details and a computer program implementing the method are available from http://folk.uio.no/gillesg/AscB/ Contact: [email protected]
Population Structure and Cryptic Relatedness in Genetic Association Studies
We review the problem of confounding in genetic association studies, which
arises principally because of population structure and cryptic relatedness.
Many treatments of the problem consider only a simple ``island'' model of
population structure. We take a broader approach, which views population
structure and cryptic relatedness as different aspects of a single confounder:
the unobserved pedigree defining the (often distant) relationships among the
study subjects. Kinship is therefore a central concept, and we review methods
of defining and estimating kinship coefficients, both pedigree-based and
marker-based. In this unified framework we review solutions to the problem of
population structure, including family-based study designs, genomic control,
structured association, regression control, principal components adjustment and
linear mixed models. The last solution makes the most explicit use of the
kinships among the study subjects, and has an established role in the analysis
of animal and plant breeding studies. Recent computational developments mean
that analyses of human genetic association data are beginning to benefit from
its powerful tests for association, which protect against population structure
and cryptic kinship, as well as intermediate levels of confounding by the
pedigree.Comment: Published in at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/09-STS307 the Statistical
Science (http://www.imstat.org/sts/) by the Institute of Mathematical
Statistics (http://www.imstat.org
The date of interbreeding between Neandertals and modern humans
Comparisons of DNA sequences between Neandertals and present-day humans have
shown that Neandertals share more genetic variants with non-Africans than with
Africans. This could be due to interbreeding between Neandertals and modern
humans when the two groups met subsequent to the emergence of modern humans
outside Africa. However, it could also be due to population structure that
antedates the origin of Neandertal ancestors in Africa. We measure the extent
of linkage disequilibrium (LD) in the genomes of present-day Europeans and find
that the last gene flow from Neandertals (or their relatives) into Europeans
likely occurred 37,000-86,000 years before the present (BP), and most likely
47,000-65,000 years ago. This supports the recent interbreeding hypothesis, and
suggests that interbreeding may have occurred when modern humans carrying Upper
Paleolithic technologies encountered Neandertals as they expanded out of
Africa
On the informativeness of dominant and co-dominant genetic markers for Bayesian supervised clustering
We study the accuracy of Bayesian supervised method used to cluster
individuals into genetically homogeneous groups on the basis of dominant or
codominant molecular markers. We provide a formula relating an error criterion
the number of loci used and the number of clusters. This formula is exact and
holds for arbitrary number of clusters and markers. Our work suggests that
dominant markers studies can achieve an accuracy similar to that of codominant
markers studies if the number of markers used in the former is about 1.7 times
larger than in the latter
Inference of population splits and mixtures from genome-wide allele frequency data
Many aspects of the historical relationships between populations in a species
are reflected in genetic data. Inferring these relationships from genetic data,
however, remains a challenging task. In this paper, we present a statistical
model for inferring the patterns of population splits and mixtures in multiple
populations. In this model, the sampled populations in a species are related to
their common ancestor through a graph of ancestral populations. Using
genome-wide allele frequency data and a Gaussian approximation to genetic
drift, we infer the structure of this graph. We applied this method to a set of
55 human populations and a set of 82 dog breeds and wild canids. In both
species, we show that a simple bifurcating tree does not fully describe the
data; in contrast, we infer many migration events. While some of the migration
events that we find have been detected previously, many have not. For example,
in the human data we infer that Cambodians trace approximately 16% of their
ancestry to a population ancestral to other extant East Asian populations. In
the dog data, we infer that both the boxer and basenji trace a considerable
fraction of their ancestry (9% and 25%, respectively) to wolves subsequent to
domestication, and that East Asian toy breeds (the Shih Tzu and the Pekingese)
result from admixture between modern toy breeds and "ancient" Asian breeds.
Software implementing the model described here, called TreeMix, is available at
http://treemix.googlecode.comComment: 28 pages, 6 figures in main text. Attached supplement is 22 pages, 15
figures. This is an updated version of the preprint available at
http://precedings.nature.com/documents/6956/version/
Correcting the Site Frequency Spectrum for Divergence-Based Ascertainment
Comparative genomics based on sequenced referenced genomes is essential to hypothesis generation and testing within population genetics. However, selection of candidate regions for further study on the basis of elevated or depressed divergence between species leads to a divergence-based ascertainment bias in the site frequency spectrum within selected candidate loci. Here, a method to correct this problem is developed that obtains maximum-likelihood estimates of the unascertained allele frequency distribution using numerical optimization. I show how divergence-based ascertainment may mimic the effects of natural selection and offer correction formulae for performing proper estimation into the strength of selection in candidate regions in a maximum-likelihood setting
Correcting the Site Frequency Spectrum for Divergence-Based Ascertainment
Comparative genomics based on sequenced referenced genomes is essential to hypothesis generation and testing within population genetics. However, selection of candidate regions for further study on the basis of elevated or depressed divergence between species leads to a divergence-based ascertainment bias in the site frequency spectrum within selected candidate loci. Here, a method to correct this problem is developed that obtains maximum-likelihood estimates of the unascertained allele frequency distribution using numerical optimization. I show how divergence-based ascertainment may mimic the effects of natural selection and offer correction formulae for performing proper estimation into the strength of selection in candidate regions in a maximum-likelihood setting
- …