621 research outputs found

    Brain Rhythms: Towards a Coherent Picture of Ensemble Development inย Learning

    Get PDF
    SummaryA recent study suggests that coherence of 20โ€“40ย Hz brain oscillations in the hippocampus and upstream lateral entorhinal cortex may support encoding ofย task-relevant information during associative learning. Coordination of local hippocampal circuits in this frequency range could be important for encoding new information

    Temporal Encoding of Place Sequences by Hippocampal Cell Assemblies

    Get PDF
    SummaryBoth episodic memory and spatial navigation require temporal encoding of the relationships between events or locations. In a linear maze, ordered spatial distances between sequential locations were represented by the temporal relations of hippocampal place cell pairs within cycles of theta oscillation in a compressed manner. Such correlations could arise due to spike โ€œphase precessionโ€ of independent neurons driven by common theta pacemaker or as a result of temporal coordination among specific hippocampal cell assemblies. We found that temporal correlation between place cell pairs was stronger than predicted by a pacemaker drive of independent neurons, indicating a critical role for synaptic interactions and precise timing within and across cell assemblies in place sequence representation. CA1 and CA3 ensembles, identifying spatial locations, were active preferentially on opposite phases of theta cycles. These observations suggest that interleaving CA3 neuronal sequences bind CA1 assemblies representing overlapping past, present, and future locations into single episodes

    The role of medial entorhinal cortex activity in hippocampal CA1 spatiotemporally correlated sequence generation and object selectivity for memory function

    Full text link
    The hippocampus is crucial for episodic memory and certain forms of spatial navigation. Firing activity of hippocampal principal neurons contains environmental information, including the presence of specific objects, as well as the animalโ€™s spatial and temporal position relative to environmental and behavioral cues. The organization of these firing correlates may allow the formation of memory traces through the integration of object and event information onto a spatiotemporal framework of cell assemblies. Characterizing how external inputs guide internal dynamics in the hippocampus to enable this process across different experiences is crucial to understanding hippocampal function. A body of literature implicates the medial entorhinal cortex (MEC) in supplying spatial and temporal information to the hippocampus. Here we develop a protocol utilizing bilaterally implanted custom designed triple fiber optic arrays and the red-shifted inhibitory opsin JAWS to transiently inactivate large volumes of MEC in freely behaving rats. This was coupled with extracellular tetrode recording of ensembles in CA1 of the hippocampus during a novel memory task involving temporal, spatial and object related epochs, in order to assess the importance of MEC activity for hippocampal feature selectivity during a rich and familiar experience. We report that inactivation of MEC during a mnemonic temporal delay disrupts the existing temporal firing field sequence in CA1 both during and following the inactivation period. Neurons with firing fields prior to the inactivation on each trial remained relatively stable. The disruption of CA1 temporal firing field sequences was accompanied by a behavioral deficit implicating MEC activity and hippocampal temporal field sequences in effective memory across time. Inactivating MEC during the object or spatial epochs of the task did not significantly alter CA1 object selective or spatial firing fields and behavioral performance remained stable. Our findings suggest that MEC is crucial specifically for temporal field organization and expression during a familiar and rich experience. These results support a role for MEC in guiding hippocampal cell assembly sequences in the absence of salient changing stimuli, which may extend to the navigation of cognitive organization in humans and support memory formation and retrieval

    The Cognitive Architecture of Spatial Navigation: Hippocampal and Striatal Contributions

    Get PDF
    Spatial navigation can serve as a model system in cognitive neuroscience, in which specific neural representations, learning rules, and control strategies can be inferred from the vast experimental literature that exists across many species, including humans. Here, we review this literature, focusing on the contributions of hippocampal and striatal systems, and attempt to outline a minimal cognitive architecture that is consistent with the experimental literature and that synthesizes previous related computational modeling. The resulting architecture includes striatal reinforcement learning based on egocentric representations of sensory states and actions, incidental Hebbian association of sensory information with allocentric state representations in the hippocampus, and arbitration of the outputs of both systems based on confidence/uncertainty in medial prefrontal cortex. We discuss the relationship between this architecture and learning in model-free and model-based systems, episodic memory, imagery, and planning, including some open questions and directions for further experiments

    The Ontogeny of Hippocampus-Dependent Memories

    Get PDF
    The formation of memories that contain information about the specific time and place of acquisition, which are commonly referred to as "autobiographical" or "episodic" memories, critically relies on the hippocampus and on a series of interconnected structures located in the medial temporal lobe of the mammalian brain. The observation that adults retain very few of these memories from the first years of their life has fueled a long-standing debate on whether infants can make the types of memories that in adults are processed by the hippocampus-dependent memory system, and whether the hippocampus is involved in learning and memory processes early in life. Recent evidence shows that, even at a time when its circuitry is not yet mature, the infant hippocampus is able to produce long-lasting memories. However, the ability to acquire and store such memories relies on molecular pathways and network-based activity dynamics different from the adult system, which mature with age. The mechanisms underlying the formation of hippocampus-dependent memories during infancy, and the role that experience exerts in promoting the maturation of the hippocampus-dependent memory system, remain to be understood. In this review, we discuss recent advances in our understanding of the ontogeny and the biological correlates of hippocampus-dependent memories

    Cortical-hippocampal processing: prefrontal-hippocampal contributions to the spatiotemporal relationship of events

    Full text link
    The hippocampus and prefrontal cortex play distinct roles in the generation and retrieval of episodic memory. The hippocampus is crucial for binding inputs across behavioral timescales, whereas the prefrontal cortex is found to influence retrieval. Spiking of hippocampal principal neurons contains environmental information, including information about the presence of specific objects and their spatial or temporal position relative to environmental and behavioral cues. Neural activity in the prefrontal cortex is found to map behavioral sequences that share commonalities in sensory input, movement, and reward valence. Here I conducted a series of four experiments to test the hypothesis that external inputs from cortex update cell assemblies that are organized within the hippocampus. I propose that cortical inputs coordinate with CA3 to rapidly integrate information at fine timescales. Extracellular tetrode recordings of neurons in the orbitofrontal cortex were performed in rats during a task where object valences were dictated by the spatial context in which they were located. Orbitofrontal ensembles, during object sampling, were found to organize all measured task elements in inverse rank relative to the rank previously observed in the hippocampus, whereby orbitofrontal ensembles displayed greater differentiation for object valence and its contextual identity than spatial position. Using the same task, a follow-up experiment assessed coordination between prefrontal and hippocampal networks by simultaneously recording medial prefrontal and hippocampal activity. The circuit was found to coordinate at theta frequencies, whereby hippocampal theta engaged prefrontal signals during contextual sampling, and the order of engagement reversed during object sampling. Two additional experiments investigated hippocampal temporal representations. First, hippocampal patterns were found to represent conjunctions of time and odor during a head-fixed delayed match-to-sample task. Lastly, I assessed the dependence of hippocampal firing patterns on intrinsic connectivity during the delay period versus active navigation of spatial routes, as rats performed a delayed-alternation T-maze. Stimulation of the ventral hippocampal commissure induced remapping of hippocampal activity during the delay period selectively. Despite temporal reorganization, different hippocampal populations emerged to predict temporal position. These results show hippocampal representations are guided by stable cortical signals, but also, coordination between cortical and intrinsic circuitry stabilizes flexible CA1 temporal representations

    Synaptic integrative mechanisms for spatial cognition

    Get PDF

    Novel Space Alters Theta and Gamma Synchrony Across the Longitudinal Axis of the Hippocampus.

    Get PDF
    Hippocampal theta (6โ€“10 Hz) and gamma (25โ€“50 Hz and 65โ€“100 Hz) local field potentials (LFPs) reflect the dynamic synchronization evoked by inputs impinging upon hippocampal neurons. Novel experience is known to engage hippocampal physiology and promote successful encoding. Does novelty synchronize or desynchronize theta and/or gamma frequency inputs across the septotemporal (long) axis of the hippocampus (HPC)? The present study tested the hypothesis that a novel spatial environment would alter theta power and coherence across the long axis. We compared theta and gamma LFP signals at individual (power) and millimeter distant electrode pairs (coherence) within the dentate gyrus (DG) and CA1 region while rats navigated a runway (1) in a familiar environment, (2) with a modified path in the same environment and (3) in a novel space. Locomotion in novel space was related to increases in theta and gamma power at most CA1 and DG sites. The increase in theta and gamma power was concurrent with an increase in theta and gamma coherence across the long axis of CA1; however, there was a significant decrease in theta coherence across the long axis of the DG. These findings illustrate significant shifts in the synchrony of entorhinal, CA3 and/or neuromodulatory afferents conveying novel spatial information to the dendritic fields of CA1 and DG targets across the long axis of the HPC. This shift suggests that the entire theta/gamma-related input to the CA1 network, and likely output, receives and conveys a more coherent message in response to novel sensory experience. Such may contribute to the successful encoding of novel sensory experience

    ์„ฑ๊ณต๊ธฐ์–ต์—์„œ์˜ ํ•ด๋งˆ์˜ ํŠน์ง•์  ๋‡Œ ๊ธฐ์ „

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ์ž์—ฐ๊ณผํ•™๋Œ€ํ•™ ๋‡Œ์ธ์ง€๊ณผํ•™๊ณผ, 2020. 8. ์ •์ฒœ๊ธฐ.One of the most intriguing of the human brain's complex functions is the ability to store information provided by experience and to retrieve much of it at will. This capability of memory processing is critical to humans survival โ€“ that is, humans guide their actions based on a given stimulus (e.g., item) in an environment, and can do so even when the stimulus is no longer present owing to the memory of the stimulus. A fundamental question of memory is why some experiences are remembered whereas others are forgotten. Since Scoville and Milners characterization of patient H.M., who demonstrated severe recognition memory deficits following damage to the medial temporal lobe (MTL), the hippocampus has been extensively studied as one of the key neural substrates for memory. In line with this, several experiments have been conducted on exploring the roles of the hippocampus in various ways. One is confirming the causality of the hippocampus in the memory process using direct electrical stimulation to the hippocampal region. The other is investigating the neural correlates of hippocampus using intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) field potential and single neurons action potential known as spike recorded directly from the hippocampus. The present thesis is focused on providing direct electrophysiological evidence of human hippocampus in episodic memory that may help fill the gap that remained in the field for several years. Here, I will show how direct hippocampal stimulation affect human behavior and present characterized neural correlates of successful memory in the hippocampus. In the first study, building on the previous findings on the hippocampus, I sought to address whether the hippocampus would show functional causality with memory tasks and elicit different neural characteristics depending on memory tasks applied. I found hippocampal stimulation modulated memory performance in a task-dependent manner, improving associative memory performance, while impairing item memory performance. These results of the task-specific memory modulation suggest that the associative task elicited stronger theta oscillations than the single-item task. In the second study, I tested whether successful memory formation relies on the hippocampal neuronal activity that engaged preceding an event. I found that hippocampal pre-stimulus spiking activity (elicited by a cue presented just before a word) predicted subsequent memory. Stimulus activity during encoding (during-stimulus) also showed a trend of predicting subsequent memory but was simply a continuation of pre-stimulus activity. These findings indicate that successful memory formation in human is predicted by a pre-stimulus activity and suggests that the preparatory mobilization of neural processes before encoding benefits episodic memory performance. Throughout the study, the current finding suggests the possibility that the intervals of poor memory encoding can be identified even before the stimulus presented and may be rescued with targeted stimulation to the hippocampus even before the stimulus presented.์ธ๊ฐ„์˜ ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ๋‡Œ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ ์ค‘ ํฅ๋ฏธ๋กœ์šด ํ•˜๋‚˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝํ—˜์— ์˜๊ฑฐํ•˜์—ฌ ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ์ €์žฅํ•˜๊ณ  ์˜์ง€์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ €์žฅ๋œ ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ์žฌ์ธํ•˜๋Š” ๊ธฐ์–ต ๋Šฅ๋ ฅ ์ด๋‹ค. ์ธ๊ฐ„์€ ์ฃผ์–ด์ง„ ์ž๊ทน์— ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ–‰๋™์„ ์ •ํ•˜๋ฉฐ ์‹ฌ์ง€์–ด ์ž๊ทน์ด ์—†๋Š” ์ƒํ™ฉ์—์„œ๋„ ์ž๊ทน์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ธฐ์–ต์„ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ ํ–‰๋™์„ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๊ธฐ์–ต ๋Šฅ๋ ฅ์€ ์ƒ์กด์— ์žˆ์–ด ๋งค์šฐ ๊ฒฐ์ •์ ์ด๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ธฐ์–ต๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ์ ์ธ ์งˆ๋ฌธ์€ ๊ธฐ์–ต์˜ ์ €์žฅ ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜, ์ฆ‰, ์–ด๋–ค ๊ธฐ์–ต์€ ์ €์žฅ์ด ๋˜๊ณ  ์–ด๋–ค ๊ธฐ์–ต์€ ์žŠํ˜€์ง€๋Š” ๊ฐ€์ผ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ์Šค์ฝ”๋นŒ๊ณผ ๋ฐ€๋„ˆ๊ฐ€ ์ฒ˜์Œ ๋ณด๊ณ ํ•œ ๊ธฐ์–ต์ƒ์‹ค์ฆ ํ™˜์ž H.M.์€ ์ธก๋‘์˜์—ญ์˜ ์†์ƒ์„ ์ž…์€ ํ›„ ์‹ฌ๊ฐํ•œ ์ธ์ง€ ๊ธฐ์–ต ๋Šฅ๋ ฅ์˜ ์žฅ์• ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€๊ณ , ์ดํ›„ ์‚ฌ๋žŒ ๋‡Œ์˜ ํ•ด๋งˆ ์˜์—ญ์€ ๊ธฐ์–ต์„ ๊ด€์žฅํ•˜๋Š” ๋‡Œ์˜ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์˜์—ญ ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜๋กœ ๋„๋ฆฌ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ํ•ด๋งˆ๊ฐ€ ๊ธฐ์–ต์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ๊ณผ ์—ญํ• ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์œผ๋กœ ์‹คํ—˜์ด ์ง„ํ–‰๋˜์–ด ์™”๋‹ค. ๊ทธ ์ค‘์˜ ํ•˜๋‚˜๋Š” ๋‡Œ์— ์ง์ ‘์ ์ธ ์ „๊ธฐ์ž๊ทน์„ ๊ฐ€ํ•ด ๊ธฐ์–ต ๊ณผ์ • ์ค‘ ํ•ด๋งˆ์˜ ์—ญํ• ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ธ๋ฐ, ์ด๋Š” ๋‡Œ์ „์ฆ ํ™˜์ž์˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์‚ฌ๋žŒ์˜ ๋‡Œ์— ์ ‘๊ทผ์ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•ด์ง€๋ฉด์„œ ์ด๋ฃจ์–ด์ ธ ์™”๋‹ค. ๋‘ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ ์ „๊ธฐ์ƒ๋ฆฌํ•™์  ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ํ†ตํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ธ๋ฐ ์„ธํฌ ์™ธ ํ™œ๋™ ์ „์œ„์ธ ์ŠคํŒŒ์ดํฌ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์„ฑ๊ณต๊ธฐ์–ต์—์„œ์˜ ๋‰ด๋Ÿฐ์˜ ํ™œ๋™์„ฑ์„ ๋ฐํžˆ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ์ด ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ์ด ๋ถ„์•ผ์—์„œ ์˜ค๋žซ๋™์•ˆ ๋…ผ๋ž€์ด ๋˜์—ˆ๊ณ  ๋ถ€์กฑํ–ˆ๋˜ ์„ฑ๊ณต ๊ธฐ์–ต์— ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ํ•ด๋งˆ์˜ ์—ญํ• ๊ณผ ๊ธฐ์ „์„ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ์ž๊ทน ๋ฐ ์‹ ๊ฒฝ์„ธํฌ์˜ ์‹ ํ˜ธ๋ฅผ ์ธก์ •ํ•ด์„œ ์ „๊ธฐ์ƒ๋ฆฌํ•™์  ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ์ดˆ์ ์„ ๋งž์ถ”๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ ๋ณธ ์ €์ž๋Š” ์‚ฌ๋žŒ์˜ ์„ฑ๊ณต๊ธฐ์–ตํ˜•์„ฑ๊ณผ ์žฌ์ธ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๋‡Œ ์ž๊ทน๊ณผ ๋‹จ์œ„์„ธํฌํ™œ๋™์„ ๋ณด๊ณ ํ•  ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ํ•ด๋งˆ์™€ ๊ธฐ์–ต์˜ ์ธ๊ณผ๊ด€๊ณ„ ๋ฐ ๊ธฐ์–ต ๊ณผ์ • ์ค‘์˜ ํ•ด๋งˆ์˜ ๋‡Œ ๊ธฐ์ „๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ์‹คํ—˜์ , ํ–‰๋™์  ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ๋“ค์— ๊ทผ๊ฑฐํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณธ ์ €์ž๋Š” (ใ„ฑ) ํ•ด๋งˆ์— ์ง์ ‘์ ์ธ ์ „๊ธฐ ์ž๊ทน์„ ์ฃผ๊ณ  ๊ธฐ์–ต ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋Šฅ๋ ฅ์˜ ์ฐจ์ด ๋ฐ ๊ธฐ์–ต ๊ณผ์ œ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•ด๋งˆ์˜ ์‹ ๊ฒฝ ๊ธฐ์ „์„ ๋ฐํžˆ๊ณ , (ใ„ด) ์„ฑ๊ณต ๊ธฐ์–ต์ด ํ˜•์„ฑ๋˜๋Š” ๊ณผ์ •์—์„œ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚˜๋Š” ์‹ ๊ฒฝ์„ธํฌ์˜ ๋ฐœํ™” ํŒจํ„ด์˜ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ์‚ดํŽด๋ณด์•˜๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ €์ž๋Š” ํ–ฅํ›„ ๊ธฐ์–ต์˜ ํ˜•์„ฑ ๊ณผ์ •์—์„œ, ์ž๊ทน์ด ์ œ์‹œ๋˜๋Š” ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„๋ฟ ๋งŒ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ ์ž๊ทน์ด ์ฃผ์–ด์ง€๊ธฐ ์ „ ๋‹จ๊ณ„์—์„œ๋„ ํ•ด๋งˆ๋ฅผ ํƒ€๊นƒ ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ „๊ธฐ ์ž๊ทน์„ ์คŒ์œผ๋กœ์จ ๊ธฐ์–ต ์‹คํŒจ๋กœ ์ด์–ด์งˆ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ž๊ทน์„ ์„ฑ๊ณต ๊ธฐ์–ต์œผ๋กœ ์ €์žฅํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ์œ ๋„ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋ผ ๊ธฐ๋Œ€ํ•œ๋‹ค.SECTION 1. INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER 1: Human Memory System 1 1.1. The hippocampus and memory 2 1.2. The structure of the hippocampus 3 CHAPTER 2: Human Memory Research: how to see a memory 4 2.1 Clinical rationale for invasive recordings with intracranial electrodes 4 2.2. Human intracranial EEG 6 2.3. Single unit activity recording and spike sorting in human 7 2.4. Direct brain stimulation study 9 CHAPTER 3: Human Memory Research: hippocampal activity for understanding successful memory formation 11 3.1. Functional role of human intracranial oscillatory activity in successful memory mechanism 11 3.1.1. Theta Oscillations 11 3.1.2. Gamma oscillations 13 3.2. Brain stimulation for memory enhancement 14 3.3. Single unit activity study in memory 15 CHAPTER 4: Purpose of the Present Study 17 SECTION 2. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY 19 CHAPTER 5: The importance of the hippocampal oscillatory activity for successful memory: direct brain stimulation study 19 5.1. Abstract 20 5.2. Introduction 22 5.3. Materials and Methods 25 5.3.1. Patients 25 5.3.2. Electrode localization 25 5.3.3. Memory task 29 5.3.4. Brain stimulation 30 5.3.5. Neuropsychological memory test 31 5.3.6. Analysis of memory performance and electrophysiological data 32 5.4. Results 37 5.4.1. Hippocampal stimulation improves associative memory but impairs item memory 37 5.4.2. Stimulation-induced memory enhancement is reflected in increased theta power during retrieval 38 5.4.3. Associative memory elicits higher theta power than item memory during encoding 42 5.4.4. Successful memory encoding elicits higher theta power in both memory task 44 5.4.5. Stimulation-mediated memory effect is greater in subject with poorer baseline cognitive function 46 5.5. Discussion 48 5.5.1. Summary 48 5.5.2. Task-dependent effects of hippocampal stimulation on memory 49 5.5.3. Theta activity as a neural signature for memory enhancement 51 5.5.4. Clinical implications 52 5.5.5. Limitations 54 5.5.6. Conclusion 55 CHAPTER 6: Hippocampal pre-stimulus activity predicts later memory success 57 6.1. Abstract 58 6.2. Introduction 59 6.3. Materials and Methods 62 6.3.1. Patients 62 6.3.2. Electrodes 63 6.3.3. Task and Stimuli 64 6.3.4. Electrophysiological recordings and Spike sorting 65 6.3.5. Analysis of iEEG field potentials 66 6.4. Results 68 6.4.1. Behavioral results 68 6.4.2. Spiking properties of hippocampal neurons 68 6.4.3. Hippocampal pre-stimulus activity correlates with successful memory 70 6.4.4. Hippocampal pre-stimulus spiking activity correlates with high gamma field potentials 74 6.5. Discussion 78 6.5.1. Summary 78 6.5.2. Comparison with previous findings 78 6.5.3. Possible mechanism underlying pre-stimulus activity 79 6.5.4. Conclusion 82 SECTION 3. GENERAL CONCLUSION 83 CHAPTER 7: General Conclusion and Perspective 83 Bibliography 84 Abstract in Korean (๊ตญ๋ฌธ์ดˆ๋ก) 93Docto
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore